Identifying and Monitoring Respiratory Compromise: Report from the Rules and Algorithms Working Group

Understanding the “alarm problem” associated with continuous physiologic monitoring of general care patients

Study Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Applying Human Factors Engineering to Address the Telemetry Alarm Problem in a Large Medical Center

OBJECTIVE

Address the alarm problem by redesigning, reorganizing, and reprioritizing to better discriminate alarm sounds and displays in a hospital.

BACKGROUND

Alarms in hospitals are frequently misunderstood, disregarded, and overridden.

METHOD

Discovery-oriented, intervention, and translational studies were conducted. Study objectives and measures varied, but had the shared goals of increasing positive predictive value (PPV) of critical alarms by reducing low-PPV alarms in the background, prioritizing alarms, redesigning alarm sounds to increase information content, and transparently conveying who initiated alarms. An alarm ontology was iteratively generated and refined until consensus was achieved.

RESULTS

The ontology distinguishes five levels of urgency that incorporate likely PPV, three categories for who initiates the alarm (hospital staff, patient, or machine), whether it is clinical or technical, and clinical functions.

CONCLUSION

This unique collaboration allowed us to make progress on the alarm problem by making unintuitive leaps, avoiding common missteps, and refuting conventional healthcare approaches.

APPLICATION

Hospitals can consistently redesign, reorganize, reprioritize, and better discriminate alarms by priority, PPV, and content to reduce nurse response times.