Tralokinumab in elderly atopic dermatitis

Tralokinumab for the Treatment of Adult Atopic Dermatitis in Special Populations

Introduction

Even if mild forms of atopic dermatitis (AD) are usually well controlled with topical prescription drugs and emollients, the management of severe forms of the disease may be challenging, especially in special populations (SPs). These patients include groups of disadvantaged people (elderly, patients with disabilities and serious medical conditions) who are usually excluded from clinical trials. As a consequence, most of the data about the efficacy and safety of a drug in these patients derives from post-marketing experiences. In this context, the aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab in the management of AD in SPs.

Methods

A 24-weeks retrospective, dual-center study was performed enrolling patients with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe AD undergoing treatment with tralokinumab at labelled dosage. Disease severity was assessed using Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score at baseline and after 4 weeks (W4), W16, and W24. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored at the same timepoints. Statistical significance of clinical improvement (EASI, P-NRS, DLQI) at week 4, week 16, and week 24 as compared with baseline was evaluated by using Student's t-test, considering significant a p-value <0.05.

Results

Our study enrolling 27 SPs patients showed a significant improvement in EASI and P-NRS since week 4, continuing to improve up to week 24. Similarly, DLQI significantly decreases at each timepoint as compared with baseline. Finally, no AEs were reported during the study period. Of interest, our cohort included oncologic patients, a patient with a history of severe infection, as well as subjects affected by severe neurological, psychiatric, pulmonary, and/or cardiovascular disease.

Discussion

Our experience showed that tralokinumab is effective and safe in elderly patients and subjects affected by severe comorbidities.

Considerations for managing elderly patients with atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) diagnosis in elderly is challenging, due to its clinical polymorphism and the lack of diagnostic biomarkers. Moreover, the chronicity of the disease and the complex pathogenetic mechanism, make elderly AD management challenging.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative review of the current literature was performed using the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Skin databases, by researching the following terms: 'atopic dermatitis,' 'clinical phenotypes,' 'eczema,' 'elderly patients,' 'elderly type atopic dermatitis,' 'eczema clinical presentation.' The aim was to report the current knowledge on pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and treatment options of elderly AD.

EXPERT OPINION

Elderly type AD has recently been identified as a separate entity, with an increasing prevalence. With aging, both immunosenescence and barrier alterations can cause or modify AD presentation. Moreover, a chronic proinflammatory state (so-called 'inflammaging') is often present in elderly subjects. Older patients with AD may present with peculiar immunophenotypic profile, making AD diagnosis challenging. Similarly, the chronicity of the disease and the complex pathogenetic mechanism, make AD management a challenge. Indeed, systemic therapies for AD are often contraindicated or not tolerated and the management of elderly type AD is often burdened with numerous difficulties, leading to undertreated disease. Even if dupilumab and tralokinumab represent a valuable therapeutic weapon, more data on safety of JAK inhibitors are required.

Efficacy and Safety of Tralokinumab in Real Life: Possible Predictive Rapid Response Factors

Background: Tralokinumab has been recently approved for the management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Despite its effectiveness and safety have been widely reported, there are no studies investigating factors that may affect clinical outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab, also to investigate possible predictive response factors that may affect the time of onset of treatment response. Methods: A monocentric retrospective real-life study was performed enrolling AD patients undergoing treatment with tralokinumab for at least 24 weeks. AD severity was assessed at baseline and at week (W)16, and W24. Similarly, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled. AD severity started to improve at W4, continued to improve at W16 and W24. In our cohort, we found out that gender, age, atopic comorbidities, and previous treatments did not affect treatment outcomes. However, we observed that patients with higher Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (≥8), relapsing form of AD, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≤24, and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) ≤3 achieved more frequently EASI75 response at W16. No significant AEs were collected. Conclusions: Our study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab. In particular, a higher pruritus, a relapsing course of the disease, a reduced EASI, a reduced IGA, and a brief duration of the disease seem to be associated with the fastest onset of treatment effectiveness.