EFFECTS OF HIPPOCAMPAL, AMYGDALA, HYPOTHALAMIC AND PARIETAL LESIONS ON A CLASSICALLY CONDITIONED FEAR RESPONSE

The sex-dependent and enduring impact of pubertal stress on health and disease

Illness is often predicated long before the manifestation of its symptoms. Exposure to stressful experiences particularly during critical periods of development, such as puberty and adolescence, can induce various physical and mental illnesses. Puberty is a critical period of maturation for neuroendocrine systems, such as the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axes. Exposure to adverse experiences during puberty can impede normal brain reorganizing and remodelling and result in enduring consequences on brain functioning and behaviour. Stress responsivity differs between the sexes during the pubertal period. This sex difference is partly due to differences in circulating sex hormones between males and females, impacting stress and immune responses differently. The effects of stress during puberty on physical and mental health remains under-examined. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent findings pertaining to age and sex differences in HPA axis, HPG axis, and immune system development, and describe how disruption in the functioning of these systems can propagate disease. Lastly, we delve into the notable neuroimmune contributions, sex differences, and the mediating role of the gut microbiome on stress and health outcomes. Understanding the enduring consequences of adverse experiences during puberty on physical and mental health will allow a greater proficiency in treating and preventing stress-related diseases early in development.

A genetic link between discriminative fear coding by the lateral amygdala, dopamine, and fear generalization

The lateral amygdala (LA) acquires differential coding of predictive and non-predictive fear stimuli that is critical for proper fear memory assignment. The neurotransmitter dopamine is an important modulator of LA activity and facilitates fear memory formation, but whether dopamine neurons aid in the establishment of discriminative fear coding by the LA is unknown. NMDA-type glutamate receptors in dopamine neurons are critical for the prevention of generalized fear following an aversive experience, suggesting a potential link between a cell autonomous function of NMDAR in dopamine neurons and fear coding by the LA. Here, we utilized mice with a selective genetic inactivation functional NMDARs in dopamine neurons (DAT-NR1 KO mice) combined with behavior, in vivo electrophysiology, and ex vivo electrophysiology in LA neurons to demonstrate that plasticity underlying differential fear coding in the LA is regulated by NMDAR signaling in dopamine neurons and alterations in this plasticity is associated non-discriminative cued-fear responses.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08969.001

When we experience a situation that causes us to feel fearful, the brain processes information about the events that led up to it. This information is encoded by groups of nerve cells called neurons in a region of the brain called the lateral amygdala. The nerve cells communicate with each other through chemicals called neurotransmitters. At a junction between two neurons—called a synapse—neurotransmitters are released from one cell and influence the activity of the other cell.

Long-term changes in the strength of these communications in response to specific cues underlie the formation of memories about fearful events. When these changes occur incorrectly they can lead to memories about particular events becoming inaccurate, which can lead to fear being associated with related, but non-threatening, situations. This ‘generalization’ of fear can lead to generalized anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that plays an important role in forming memories of fearful events. However, it is not clear whether neurons that release dopamine are also involved in correctly discriminating fearful events from non-fearful ones.

‘Receptor’ proteins called NMDARs on the surface of neurons that release dopamine are critical for preventing generalized fear. These receptors detect another neurotransmitter called glutamate. Jones et al. used genetics and ‘electrophysiology’ techniques to study these receptors in mice. The experiments show that a gene that encodes part of an NMDAR in dopamine neurons plays a key role in how fear memories are formed. When this gene is selectively switched off in the dopamine neurons, mice are more likely to develop generalized fear and anxiety behaviors after a threatening experience.

The experiments also demonstrate that these generalized threat responses are associated with differences in the way the synaptic connections in the lateral amygdala are strengthened. The next major challenge will be to find out which specific synaptic connections are strengthened and to establish how dopamine neuron activity patterns influences this connectivity.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08969.002

A model of amygdala-hippocampal-prefrontal interaction in fear conditioning and extinction in animals

Empirical research has shown that the amygdala, hippocampus, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) are involved in fear conditioning. However, the functional contribution of each brain area and the nature of their interactions are not clearly understood. Here, we extend existing neural network models of the functional roles of the hippocampus in classical conditioning to include interactions with the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. We apply the model to fear conditioning, in which animals learn physiological (e.g. heart rate) and behavioral (e.g. freezing) responses to stimuli that have been paired with a highly aversive event (e.g. electrical shock). The key feature of our model is that learning of these conditioned responses in the central nucleus of the amygdala is modulated by two separate processes, one from basolateral amygdala and signaling a positive prediction error, and one from the vmPFC, via the intercalated cells of the amygdala, and signaling a negative prediction error. In addition, we propose that hippocampal input to both vmPFC and basolateral amygdala is essential for contextual modulation of fear acquisition and extinction. The model is sufficient to account for a body of data from various animal fear conditioning paradigms, including acquisition, extinction, reacquisition, and context specificity effects. Consistent with studies on lesioned animals, our model shows that damage to the vmPFC impairs extinction, while damage to the hippocampus impairs extinction in a different context (e.g., a different conditioning chamber from that used in initial training in animal experiments). We also discuss model limitations and predictions, including the effects of number of training trials on fear conditioning.

Neural and cellular mechanisms of fear and extinction memory formation

Over the course of natural history, countless animal species have evolved adaptive behavioral systems to cope with dangerous situations and promote survival. Emotional memories are central to these defense systems because they are rapidly acquired and prepare organisms for future threat. Unfortunately, the persistence and intrusion of memories of fearful experiences are quite common and can lead to pathogenic conditions, such as anxiety and phobias. Over the course of the last 30 years, neuroscientists and psychologists alike have attempted to understand the mechanisms by which the brain encodes and maintains these aversive memories. Of equal interest, though, is the neurobiology of extinction memory formation as this may shape current therapeutic techniques. Here we review the extant literature on the neurobiology of fear and extinction memory formation, with a strong focus on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these processes.

Indelibility of Subcortical Emotional Memories

Acquisition and extinction of fear responses conditioned to a visual stimulus were examined in rats with ablations of visual cortex. Visual cortex lesions did not interfere with acquisition, indicating that visual fear conditioning, like auditory fear conditioning, is mediated by sub-cortical, probably thalamo-amygdala, sensory pathways. In contrast to acquisition, extinction was greatly prolonged, if not prevented, by cortical ablation. This resistance to extinction of sub cortical emotional memories may explain certain aspects of emotional memory in man.

Acquired drive strength as a joint function of UCS intensity and number of CS-UCS pairings

The form of the empirical law relating acquired drive strength to UCS intensity and number of CS-UCS pairings was investigated in two experiments using 120 and 30 male albino rats, respectively. Strength of UCS was varied at a broad range of intensities. Controls were introduced to prevent the intrusion of competing crouching responses (R1) on the measurement of response strength (R2). Acquired drive strength was found to be curvilinearly related to UCS intensity and number of CS-UCS pairings during conditioning. The relationship was monotonic and negatively accelerated. Habit strength, or sHr, was found to be jointly determined by UCS intensity (D) and number of CS-UCS pairings during aversive conditioning. These results were contrasted with findings for the instrumental appetitive learning case of Hull's system, where it has been shown that sHr and D are independent and interact in a multiplicative fashion in their effect on performance. An historical review of acquired drive experiments was also presented.