The use of buccal cells for rapid diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 1

Analysis of mutational dynamics at the DMPK (CTG)n locus identifies saliva as a suitable DNA sample source for genetic analysis in myotonic dystrophy type 1

Genotype-to-phenotype correlation studies in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) have been confounded by the age-dependent, tissue-specific and expansion-biased features of somatic mosaicism of the expanded CTG repeat. Previously, we showed that by controlling for the confounding effects of somatic instability to estimate the progenitor allele CTG length in blood DNA, age at onset correlations could be significantly improved. To determine the suitability of saliva DNA as a source for genotyping, we used small pool-PCR to perform a detailed quantitative study of the somatic mutational dynamics of the CTG repeat in saliva and blood DNA from 40 DM1 patients. Notably, the modal allele length in saliva was only moderately higher in saliva and not as large as previously observed in most other tissues. The lower boundary of the allele distribution was also slightly higher in saliva than it was in blood DNA. However, the progenitor allele length estimated in blood explained more of the variation in age at onset than that estimated from saliva. Interestingly, although the modal allele length was slightly higher in saliva, the overall degree of somatic variation was typically lower than in blood DNA, revealing new insights into the tissue-specific dynamics of somatic mosaicism. These data indicate that saliva constitutes an accessible, non-invasive and suitable DNA sample source for performing genetic studies in DM1.

A rapid immunohistochemical test to distinguish congenital myotonic dystrophy from X-linked myotubular myopathy

Severe forms of myotubular myopathy (MTM) and congenital myotonic dystrophy type 1 (CDM), both present as floppy infants with hypotonia, respiratory failure and bulbar insufficiency. Muscle biopsy is often performed as part of the diagnostic process, but these two disorders share very similar histopathological features. It is well documented that CDM muscle has nuclear foci that contain muscleblind-like 1 (MBNL1) protein. In muscle biopsies from eight neonates showing central nuclei, MBNL1 immunolocalisation identified discrete, intensely stained foci in three cases that were subsequently confirmed as CDM by DNA analysis. In the five remaining non-CDM patients and two controls, MBNL1 staining was heterogeneous in nuclei, not as foci. MBNL1 staining patterns in CDM were easily distinguishable from MTM. We suggest that in cases of hypotonia with suspected CDM or MTM, when biopsy has been taken, sections should additionally be stained for MBNL1 to provide a rapid indication of a CDM diagnosis.