|
1
|
Xiang F, Zhang Y, Tan X, Yan Y, Liu H, Ma W, Chen Y. Prospective comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-ibandronate and bone scans for detecting bone metastases in breast cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1428498. [PMID: 39144828 PMCID: PMC11323743 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1428498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction 68Ga labeled DOTA-Ibandronate (68Ga-DOTA-IBA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), is a novel bone-targeting imaging tracer and promising diagnostic method for bone metastases detection. Therefore, this study aimed to compare 68Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT to the 99mTc-MDP whole-body bone scan (WBBS) for detecting bone metastases in breast cancer (BC). Materials and methods In this prospective study, 45 women with BC underwent imaging via 68Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP WBBS. Clinical and demographic information as well as BC imaging features were recorded. The two methods were compared in terms of their detection rate for bone metastases and the number of lesions. Results The 45 women were aged 53.5 ± 11.0 years. The bone metastases detection rate with 68Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT was 100% (45/45) and with 99mTc-MDP WBBS was 95.6% (43/45). A total of 546 bone metastases lesions were detected. The lesion detection rate using 68Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT was 100% (546/546) and using 99mTc-MDP WBBS was 67.8% (370/546). More lesions were found at each site via 68Ga-DOTA-IBA than via 99mTc-MDP WBBS. Conclusions 68Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT is a more sensitive method than 99mTc-MDP WBBS for assessing bone metastases in BC and may therefore represent a useful imaging technique for bone metastases, while offering a visual basis for 177Lu-DOTA-IBA diagnosis and therapy response assessments for BC. Further validation using a broader study cohort is warranted to confirm these findings. Clinical trial registration https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=170163, identifier ChiCTR2200064487.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feifan Xiang
- The State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
- Department of Orthopedic, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Xiaoqi Tan
- Department of Dermatology, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Yuanzhuo Yan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, China
| | - Huipan Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, China
| | - Wenzhe Ma
- The State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China
| | - Yue Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Vaz SC, Woll JPP, Cardoso F, Groheux D, Cook GJR, Ulaner GA, Jacene H, Rubio IT, Schoones JW, Peeters MJV, Poortmans P, Mann RM, Graff SL, Dibble EH, de Geus-Oei LF. Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[ 18F]FDG PET/CT in no special type breast cancer : (endorsed by the ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2706-2732. [PMID: 38740576 PMCID: PMC11224102 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06696-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is much literature about the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with breast cancer (BC). However, there exists no international guideline with involvement of the nuclear medicine societies about this subject. PURPOSE To provide an organized, international, state-of-the-art, and multidisciplinary guideline, led by experts of two nuclear medicine societies (EANM and SNMMI) and representation of important societies in the field of BC (ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA). METHODS Literature review and expert discussion were performed with the aim of collecting updated information regarding the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with no special type (NST) BC and summarizing its indications according to scientific evidence. Recommendations were scored according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria. RESULTS Quantitative PET features (SUV, MTV, TLG) are valuable prognostic parameters. In baseline staging, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT plays a role from stage IIB through stage IV. When assessing response to therapy, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT should be performed on certified scanners, and reported either according to PERCIST, EORTC PET, or EANM immunotherapy response criteria, as appropriate. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT may be useful to assess early metabolic response, particularly in non-metastatic triple-negative and HER2+ tumours. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is useful to detect the site and extent of recurrence when conventional imaging methods are equivocal and when there is clinical and/or laboratorial suspicion of relapse. Recent developments are promising. CONCLUSION 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is extremely useful in BC management, as supported by extensive evidence of its utility compared to other imaging modalities in several clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia C Vaz
- Nuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - David Groheux
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
- University Paris-Diderot, INSERM U976, Paris, France
- Centre d'Imagerie Radio-Isotopique (CIRI), La Rochelle, France
| | - Gary J R Cook
- Department of Cancer Imaging, King's College London, London, UK
- King's College London and Guy's & St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gary A Ulaner
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA, USA
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Heather Jacene
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Radiology Department, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie L Graff
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Elizabeth H Dibble
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiation Science & Technology, Technical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Boers J, Eisses B, Zwager MC, van Geel JJL, Bensch F, de Vries EFJ, Hospers GAP, Glaudemans AWJM, Brouwers AH, den Dekker MAM, Elias SG, Kuip EJM, van Herpen CML, Jager A, van der Veldt AAM, Oprea-Lager DE, de Vries EGE, van der Vegt B, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt WC, Schröder CP. Correlation between Histopathological Prognostic Tumor Characteristics and [ 18F]FDG Uptake in Corresponding Metastases in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:416. [PMID: 38396455 PMCID: PMC10887896 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) can be used for staging. We evaluated the correlation between BC histopathological characteristics and [18F]FDG uptake in corresponding metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with non-rapidly progressive MBC of all subtypes prospectively underwent a baseline histological metastasis biopsy and [18F]FDG-PET. Biopsies were assessed for estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ER, PR, HER2); Ki-67; and histological subtype. [18F]FDG uptake was expressed as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and results were expressed as geometric means. RESULTS Of 200 patients, 188 had evaluable metastasis biopsies, and 182 of these contained tumor. HER2 positivity and Ki-67 ≥ 20% were correlated with higher [18F]FDG uptake (estimated geometric mean SUVmax 10.0 and 8.8, respectively; p = 0.0064 and p = 0.014). [18F]FDG uptake was lowest in ER-positive/HER2-negative BC and highest in HER2-positive BC (geometric mean SUVmax 6.8 and 10.0, respectively; p = 0.0058). Although [18F]FDG uptake was lower in invasive lobular carcinoma (n = 31) than invasive carcinoma NST (n = 146) (estimated geometric mean SUVmax 5.8 versus 7.8; p = 0.014), the metastasis detection rate was similar. CONCLUSIONS [18F]FDG-PET is a powerful tool to detect metastases, including invasive lobular carcinoma. Although BC histopathological characteristics are related to [18F]FDG uptake, [18F]FDG-PET and biopsy remain complementary in MBC staging (NCT01957332).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorianne Boers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (B.E.); (J.J.L.v.G.); (F.B.); (G.A.P.H.); (E.G.E.d.V.)
| | - Bertha Eisses
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (B.E.); (J.J.L.v.G.); (F.B.); (G.A.P.H.); (E.G.E.d.V.)
| | - Mieke C. Zwager
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (M.C.Z.); (B.v.d.V.)
| | - Jasper J. L. van Geel
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (B.E.); (J.J.L.v.G.); (F.B.); (G.A.P.H.); (E.G.E.d.V.)
| | - Frederike Bensch
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (B.E.); (J.J.L.v.G.); (F.B.); (G.A.P.H.); (E.G.E.d.V.)
| | - Erik F. J. de Vries
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (E.F.J.d.V.); (A.W.J.M.G.); (A.H.B.)
| | - Geke A. P. Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (B.E.); (J.J.L.v.G.); (F.B.); (G.A.P.H.); (E.G.E.d.V.)
| | - Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (E.F.J.d.V.); (A.W.J.M.G.); (A.H.B.)
| | - Adrienne H. Brouwers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (E.F.J.d.V.); (A.W.J.M.G.); (A.H.B.)
| | - Martijn A. M. den Dekker
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Evelien J. M. Kuip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Medical Center, 6500 Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (E.J.M.K.); (C.M.L.v.H.)
| | - Carla M. L. van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Medical Center, 6500 Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (E.J.M.K.); (C.M.L.v.H.)
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (A.J.); (A.A.M.v.d.V.)
| | - Astrid A. M. van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (A.J.); (A.A.M.v.d.V.)
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VU University Medical Center, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Elisabeth G. E. de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (B.E.); (J.J.L.v.G.); (F.B.); (G.A.P.H.); (E.G.E.d.V.)
| | - Bert van der Vegt
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (M.C.Z.); (B.v.d.V.)
| | | | - Carolina P. Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (B.E.); (J.J.L.v.G.); (F.B.); (G.A.P.H.); (E.G.E.d.V.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dutch Cancer Institute, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Ouvrard E, Kaseb A, Poterszman N, Porot C, Somme F, Imperiale A. Nuclear medicine imaging for bone metastases assessment: what else besides bone scintigraphy in the era of personalized medicine? Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 10:1320574. [PMID: 38288299 PMCID: PMC10823373 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1320574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurate detection and reliable assessment of therapeutic responses in bone metastases are imperative for guiding treatment decisions, preserving quality of life, and ultimately enhancing overall survival. Nuclear imaging has historically played a pivotal role in this realm, offering a diverse range of radiotracers and imaging modalities. While the conventional bone scan using 99mTc marked bisphosphonates has remained widely utilized, its diagnostic performance is hindered by certain limitations. Positron emission tomography, particularly when coupled with computed tomography, provides improved spatial resolution and diagnostic performance with various pathology-specific radiotracers. This review aims to evaluate the performance of different nuclear imaging modalities in clinical practice for detecting and monitoring the therapeutic responses in bone metastases of diverse origins, addressing their limitations and implications for image interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Ouvrard
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ashjan Kaseb
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nathan Poterszman
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Clémence Porot
- Radiopharmacy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Francois Somme
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- IPHC, UMR 7178, CNRS/Unistra, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Groheux D. Breast Cancer Systemic Staging (Comparison of Computed Tomography, Bone Scan, and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography). PET Clin 2023; 18:503-515. [PMID: 37268506 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
After an overview of the principles of bone scintigraphy, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT, the advantages and limits of these modalities in the staging of breast cancer are discussed in this paper. CT and PET/CT are not optimal for delineating primary tumor volume, and PET is less efficient than the sentinel node biopsy to depict small axillary lymph node metastases. In large breast cancer tumor, FDG PET/CT is useful to show extra-axillary lymph nodes. FDG PET/CT is superior to bone scan and CE-CT in detecting distant metastases, and it results in a change of treatment plan in nearly 15% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Groheux
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France; University Paris-Diderot, INSERM U976, HIPI, Paris, France; Centre d'Imagerie Radio-isotopique, La Rochelle, France.
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Khojasteh E, Dehdashti F, Shokeen M. Molecular imaging of bone metastasis. J Bone Oncol 2023; 40:100477. [PMID: 37193117 PMCID: PMC10182320 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in molecularly targeted modular designs for in vivo imaging applications has thrusted open possibilities of investigating deep molecular interactions non-invasively and dynamically. The shifting landscape of biomarker concentration and cellular interactions throughout pathological progression requires quick adaptation of imaging agents and detection modalities for accurate readouts. The synergy of state of art instrumentation with molecularly targeted molecules is resulting in more precise, accurate and reproducible data sets, which is facilitating investigation of several novel questions. Small molecules, peptides, antibodies and nanoparticles are some of the commonly used molecular targeting vectors that can be applied for imaging as well as therapy. The field of theranostics, which encompasses joint application of therapy and imaging, is successfully leveraging the multifunctional use of these biomolecules [[1], [2]]. Sensitive detection of cancerous lesions and accurate assessment of treatment response has been transformative for patient management. Particularly, since bone metastasis is one of the dominant causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, imaging can be hugely impactful in this patient population. The intent of this review is to highlight the utility of molecular positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in the context of prostate and breast bone metastatic cancer, and multiple myeloma. Furthermore, comparisons are drawn with traditionally utilized bone scans (skeletal scintigraphy). Both these modalities can be synergistic or complementary for assessing lytic- and blastic- bone lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Khojasteh
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Farrokh Dehdashti
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Monica Shokeen
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Corresponding author at: Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, 510 South Kingshighway Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
van Geel JJL, de Vries EFJ, van Kruchten M, Hospers GAP, Glaudemans AWJM, Schröder CP. Molecular imaging as biomarker for treatment response and outcome in breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231170738. [PMID: 37223262 PMCID: PMC10201167 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231170738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging, such as positron emission tomography (PET), is increasingly used as biomarker to predict and assess treatment response in breast cancer. The number of biomarkers is expanding with specific tracers for tumour characteristics throughout the body and this information can be used to aid the decision-making process. These measurements include metabolic activity using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET ([18F]FDG-PET), oestrogen receptor (ER) expression using 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-oestradiol ([18F]FES)-PET and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression using PET with radiolabelled trastuzumab (HER2-PET). In early breast cancer, baseline [18F]FDG-PET is frequently used for staging, but limited subtype-specific data reduce its usefulness as biomarker for treatment response or outcome. Early metabolic change on serial [18F]FDG-PET is increasingly used in the neo-adjuvant setting as dynamic biomarker to predict pathological complete response to systemic therapy, potentially allowing de-intensification or step-up intensification of treatment. In the metastatic setting, baseline [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FES-PET can be used as biomarker to predict treatment response, in triple-negative and ER-positive breast cancer, respectively. Metabolic progression on repeated [18F]FDG-PET appears to precede progressive disease on standard evaluation imaging; however, subtype-specific studies are limited and more prospective data are needed before implementation in clinical practice. Even though (repeated) [18F]FDG-PET, [18F]FES-PET and HER2-PEt all show promising results as biomarkers to predict therapy response and outcome, for eventual integration into clinical practice, future studies will have to clarify at what timepoint this integration has to optimally take place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper J. L. van Geel
- Department of Medical Oncology, University
Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
| | - Erik F. J. de Vries
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular
Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen,
Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Michel van Kruchten
- Department of Medical Oncology, University
Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
| | - Geke A. P. Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University
Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
| | - Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular
Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen,
Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carolina P. Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, University
Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The
Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands
Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Hansen JA, Naghavi-Behzad M, Gerke O, Baun C, Falch K, Duvnjak S, Alavi A, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Hildebrandt MG. Diagnosis of bone metastases in breast cancer: Lesion-based sensitivity of dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT compared to low-dose CT and bone scintigraphy. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0260066. [PMID: 34793550 PMCID: PMC8601566 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared lesion-based sensitivity of dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT, bone scintigraphy (BS), and low-dose CT (LDCT) for detection of various types of bone metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Prospectively, we included 18 patients with recurrent breast cancer who underwent dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT with LDCT and BS within a median time interval of three days. A total of 488 bone lesions were detected on any of the modalities and were categorized by the LDCT into osteolytic, osteosclerotic, mixed morphologic, and CT-negative lesions. Lesion-based sensitivity was 98.2% (95.4-99.3) and 98.8% (96.8-99.5) for early and delayed FDG-PET/CT, respectively, compared with 79.9% (51.1-93.8) for LDCT, 76.0% (36.3-94.6) for BS, and 98.6% (95.4-99.6) for the combined BS+LDCT. BS detected only 51.2% of osteolytic lesions which was significantly lower than other metastatic types. SUVs were significantly higher for all lesion types on delayed scans than on early scans (P<0.0001). Osteolytic and mixed-type lesions had higher SUVs than osteosclerotic and CT-negative metastases at both time-points. FDG-PET/CT had significantly higher lesion-based sensitivity than LDCT and BS, while a combination of the two yielded sensitivity comparable to that of FDG-PET/CT. Therefore, FDG-PET/CT could be considered as a sensitive one-stop-shop in case of clinical suspicion of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Ansholm Hansen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- * E-mail:
| | - Oke Gerke
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christina Baun
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Falch
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sandra Duvnjak
- Radiology Department–Breast Imaging, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Mammography Screening Center in the Capital Region, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Abass Alavi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Personalized Response Monitoring in Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Boers J, Loudini N, de Haas RJ, Willemsen ATM, van der Vegt B, de Vries EGE, Hospers GAP, Schröder CP, Glaudemans AWJM, de Vries EFJ. Analyzing the Estrogen Receptor Status of Liver Metastases with [ 18F]-FES-PET in Patients with Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11112019. [PMID: 34829366 PMCID: PMC8617814 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16α-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol ([18F]-FES) can visualize estrogen receptor (ER) expression, but it is challenging to determine the ER status of liver metastases, due to high physiological [18F]-FES uptake. We evaluated whether [18F]-FES-PET can be used to determine the ER status of liver metastases, using corresponding liver biopsies as the gold standard. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 23) were included if they had undergone a [18F]-FES-PET, liver metastasis biopsy, CT-scan, and [18F]-FDG-PET. [18F]-FES-PET scans were assessed by visual and quantitative analysis, tracer uptake was correlated with ER expression measured by immunohistochemical staining and the effects of region-of-interest size and background correction were determined. Results: Visual analysis allowed ER assessment of liver metastases with 100% specificity and 18% sensitivity. Quantitative analysis improved the sensitivity. Reduction of the region-of-interest size did not further improve the results, but background correction improved ER assessment, resulting in 83% specificity and 77% sensitivity. Using separate thresholds for ER+ and ER− metastases, positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 75%, respectively, could be obtained, although 30% of metastases remained inconclusive. Conclusion: In the majority of liver metastases, ER status can be determined with [18F]-FES-PET if background correction and separate thresholds are applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorianne Boers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (E.G.E.d.V.); (G.A.P.H.); (C.P.S.)
| | - Naila Loudini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (N.L.); (A.T.M.W.); (A.W.J.M.G.)
| | - Robbert J. de Haas
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Antoon T. M. Willemsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (N.L.); (A.T.M.W.); (A.W.J.M.G.)
| | - Bert van der Vegt
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Elisabeth G. E. de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (E.G.E.d.V.); (G.A.P.H.); (C.P.S.)
| | - Geke A. P. Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (E.G.E.d.V.); (G.A.P.H.); (C.P.S.)
| | - Carolina P. Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (E.G.E.d.V.); (G.A.P.H.); (C.P.S.)
| | - Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (N.L.); (A.T.M.W.); (A.W.J.M.G.)
| | - Erik F. J. de Vries
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (N.L.); (A.T.M.W.); (A.W.J.M.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-50-36-13599
| |
Collapse
|