1
|
Roohani S, Ehret F, Beck M, Veltsista DP, Nadobny J, Zschaeck S, Abdel-Rahman S, Eckert F, Flörcken A, Issels RD, Klöck S, Krempien R, Lindner LH, Notter M, Ott OJ, Pink D, Potkrajcic V, Reichardt P, Riesterer O, Spałek MJ, Stutz E, Wessalowski R, Zilli T, Zips D, Ghadjar P, Kaul D. Regional hyperthermia for soft tissue sarcoma - a survey on current practice, controversies and consensus among 12 European centers. Int J Hyperthermia 2024; 41:2342348. [PMID: 38653548 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2024.2342348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the current practice of regional hyperthermia (RHT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at 12 European centers to provide an overview, find consensuses and identify controversies necessary for future guidelines and clinical trials. METHODS In this cross-sectional survey study, a 27-item questionnaire assessing clinical subjects and procedural details on RHT for STS was distributed to 12 European cancer centers for RHT. RESULTS We have identified seven controversies and five consensus points. Of 12 centers, 6 offer both, RHT with chemotherapy (CTX) or with radiotherapy (RT). Two centers only offer RHT with CTX and four centers only offer RHT with RT. All 12 centers apply RHT for localized, high-risk STS of the extremities, trunk wall and retroperitoneum. However, eight centers also use RHT in metastatic STS, five in palliative STS, eight for superficial STS and six for low-grade STS. Pretherapeutic imaging for RHT treatment planning is used by 10 centers, 9 centers set 40-43 °C as the intratumoral target temperature, and all centers use skin detectors or probes in body orifices for thermometry. DISCUSSION There is disagreement regarding the integration of RHT in contemporary interdisciplinary care of STS patients. Many clinical controversies exist that require a standardized consensus guideline and innovative study ideas. At the same time, our data has shown that existing guidelines and decades of experience with the technique of RHT have mostly standardized procedural aspects. CONCLUSIONS The provided results may serve as a basis for future guidelines and inform future clinical trials for RHT in STS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Danai P Veltsista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jacek Nadobny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sultan Abdel-Rahman
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AKH, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anne Flörcken
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rolf D Issels
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Klöck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lindenhofspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Robert Krempien
- Clinic for Radiotherapy, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
- MSB Medical School Berlin, Fakultät für Medizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lars H Lindner
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Notter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lindenhofspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Oliver J Ott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Daniel Pink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
- Cinic for Internal Medicine C - Haematology and Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Palliative Care, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Vlatko Potkrajcic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter Reichardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, and Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Riesterer
- Center for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Mateusz Jacek Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Emanuel Stutz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rüdiger Wessalowski
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Facoltà di Scienze Biomediche, Università Della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Datta NR, Kok HP, Crezee H, Gaipl US, Bodis S. Integrating Loco-Regional Hyperthermia Into the Current Oncology Practice: SWOT and TOWS Analyses. Front Oncol 2020; 10:819. [PMID: 32596144 PMCID: PMC7303270 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Moderate hyperthermia at temperatures between 40 and 44°C is a multifaceted therapeutic modality. It is a potent radiosensitizer, interacts favorably with a host of chemotherapeutic agents, and, in combination with radiotherapy, enforces immunomodulation akin to “in situ tumor vaccination.” By sensitizing hypoxic tumor cells and inhibiting repair of radiotherapy-induced DNA damage, the properties of hyperthermia delivered together with photons might provide a tumor-selective therapeutic advantage analogous to high linear energy transfer (LET) neutrons, but with less normal tissue toxicity. Furthermore, the high LET attributes of hyperthermia thermoradiobiologically are likely to enhance low LET protons; thus, proton thermoradiotherapy would mimic 12C ion therapy. Hyperthermia with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy substantially improves therapeutic outcomes without enhancing normal tissue morbidities, yielding level I evidence reported in several randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various tumor sites. Technological advancements in hyperthermia delivery, advancements in hyperthermia treatment planning, online invasive and non-invasive MR-guided thermometry, and adherence to quality assurance guidelines have ensured safe and effective delivery of hyperthermia to the target region. Novel biological modeling permits integration of hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment plans. Further, hyperthermia along with immune checkpoint inhibitors and DNA damage repair inhibitors could further augment the therapeutic efficacy resulting in synthetic lethality. Additionally, hyperthermia induced by magnetic nanoparticles coupled to selective payloads, namely, tumor-specific radiotheranostics (for both tumor imaging and radionuclide therapy), chemotherapeutic drugs, immunotherapeutic agents, and gene silencing, could provide a comprehensive tumor-specific theranostic modality akin to “magic (nano)bullets.” To get a realistic overview of the strength (S), weakness (W), opportunities (O), and threats (T) of hyperthermia, a SWOT analysis has been undertaken. Additionally, a TOWS analysis categorizes future strategies to facilitate further integration of hyperthermia with the current treatment modalities. These could gainfully accomplish a safe, versatile, and cost-effective enhancement of the existing therapeutic armamentarium to improve outcomes in clinical oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niloy R Datta
- Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - H Petra Kok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hans Crezee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Udo S Gaipl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stephan Bodis
- Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|