Improved tumour control probability with MRI-based prostate brachytherapy treatment planning

Magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy enables safe CTV-to-PTV margin reduction in prostate cancer: a cine MRI motion study

Introduction

We aimed to establish if stereotactic body radiotherapy to the prostate can be delivered safely using reduced clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins on the 1.5T MR-Linac (MRL) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden), in the absence of gating.

Methods

Cine images taken in 3 orthogonal planes during the delivery of prostate SBRT with 36.25 Gray (Gy) in 5 fractions on the MRL were analysed. Using the data from 20 patients, the percentage of radiotherapy (RT) delivery time where the prostate position moved beyond 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP) and any direction was calculated.

Results

The prostate moved less than 3 mm in any direction for 90% of the monitoring period in 95% of patients. On a per-fraction basis, 93% of fractions displayed motion in all directions within 3 mm for 90% of the fraction delivery time. Recurring motion patterns were observed showing that the prostate moved with shallow drift (most common), transient excursions and persistent excursions during treatment.

Conclusion

A 3 mm CTV-PTV margin is safe to use for the treatment of 5 fraction prostate SBRT on the MRL, without gating. In the context of gating this work suggests that treatment time will not be extensively lengthened when an appropriate gating window is applied.

HDR brachytherapy boost using MR-only workflow for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: 8-year results of a pilot study

PURPOSE

To report 8-year clinical outcome with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) boost using MRI-only workflow for intermediate (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PC) patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-two patients were treated with 46-60 Gy of 3D conformal radiotherapy preceded and/or followed by a single dose of 8-10 Gy MRI-guided HDRBT. Interventions were performed in a 0.35 T MRI scanner. Trajectory planning, navigation, contouring, catheter reconstruction, and dose calculation were exclusively based on MRI images. Biochemical relapse-free- (BRFS), local relapse-free- (LRFS), distant metastasis-free- (DMFS), cancer-specific-(CCS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Late morbidity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.0) combined with RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) scale for urinary toxicity and rectal urgency (RU) determined by Yeoh.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 107 (range: 19-143) months. The 8-year actuarial rates of BRFS, LRFS, DMFS, CSS and OS were 85.7%, 97%, 97.6%, and 77.6%, respectively. There were no Gr.3 GI side effects. The 8-year actuarial rate of Gr.2 proctitis was 4%. The 8-year cumulative incidence of Gr.3 GU side effects was 8%, including two urinary stenoses (5%) and one cystitis (3%). EPIC urinary and bowel scores did not change significantly over time.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-only HDR-BT boost with moderate dose escalation provides excellent 8-year disease control with a favorable toxicity profile for IRPC and HRPC patients. Our results support the clinical importance of MRI across the BT workflow.

Image Distortions on a Plastic Interstitial Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Brachytherapy Applicator at 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Their Dosimetric Impact

PURPOSE

To quantify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) distortions on a plastic intracavitary/interstitial applicator with plastic needles at a field strength of 3 T and to determine the dosimetric impact, using patient data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 11 cervical cancer patients, our clinical MRI protocol was extended with 3 scans. From the first scan, a multi-echo acquisition, a map of the magnetic field (B₀) was calculated and used to quantify the field inhomogeneity. The expected displacements of the applicator were quantified for the clinical sequence using the measured field inhomogeneity and the clinical sequence's bandwidth. The second and third scan were our routine clinical sequence (duration: <5 minutes each), acquired consecutively using opposing readout directions. The displacement of the applicator between these scans is approximately twice the displacement due to B₀ inhomogeneity. The impact of the displacement on the dose was determined by reconstructing the applicator on both scans. The applicator was then shifted and rotated the same distance as the observed displacement to create a worst-case scenario (ie, twice the actual displacement due to B₀ inhomogeneity). Next, the dose to 98%/90% (D₉₈/D₉₀) of the clinical target volume at high risk, as well as the dose to the most irradiated 2 cm³ for bladder and rectum, were calculated for the original plan as well as the shifted plan.

RESULTS

For a volume of interest containing the intrauterine device and the ovoids the 95th percentile of the absolute displacement ranged between 0.2 and 0.75 mm, over all patients. For all patients, the difference in D₉₈/D₉₀ in the opposing readout scans with the original plan was at most 4.7%/4.3%. For the dose to the most irradiated 2 cm³ of bladder/rectum, the difference was at most 6.0%/6.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosimetric impact of distortions on this plastic applicator with plastic needles is limited. Applicator reconstruction for brachytherapy planning purposes is feasible at 3 T MRI.

Dosimetric impact of contouring and needle reconstruction uncertainties in US-, CT- and MRI-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment planning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of target contouring and needle reconstruction uncertainties in an US-, CT- and MRI-based HDR prostate BT treatment planning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

US, CT, and MR images were acquired post-needle insertion in 22 HDR-BT procedures for 11 consecutive patients. Dose plans were simulated for an US-, CT- and MRI-based HDR-BT treatment planning procedure. Planning uncertainties in US- and CT-based plans were evaluated using MRI-based planning as reference. Target (CTV_Prostate) was re-contoured on MRI. Dose results were expressed in total equivalent dose given in 2Gy fractionation dose for EBRT (46Gy) plus 2 HDR-BT fractions.

RESULTS

Uncertainties in US- and CT-based planning caused the planned CTV_Prostate-D_90% to decrease with a mean of 2.9±5.0Gy (p=0.03) and 2.9±2.9Gy (p=0.001), respectively. The intra-observer contouring variation on MRI resulted in a mean variation of 1.6±1.5Gy in CTV_Prostate-D_90%. Reconstruction uncertainties on US resulted in a dose variation of±3Gy to the urethra, whereas data for CT were not available for this.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncertainties related to contouring and reconstruction in US- and CT-based HDR-BT treatment plans resulted in a systematic overestimation of the prescribed target dose. Inter-modality uncertainties (US and CT versus MR) were larger than MR intra-observer uncertainties.

Quantification of image distortions on the Utrecht interstitial CT/MR brachytherapy applicator at 3T MRI

PURPOSE

To quantify distortions on MR images of the Utrecht interstitial CT/MR applicator at a field strength of 3T using an MRI-only method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An MR-compatible phantom suspending the applicator in water was built and imaged on a Philips Ingenia 3T MRI scanner. A map of the magnetic field (B0) was calculated from multiecho images and used to quantify the field inhomogeneity. The expected displacements of the applicator could be quantified using the measured field inhomogeneity and sequence bandwidth. Additionally, two scans were acquired using opposing readout gradients. These scans were rigidly matched and their displacement was compared with the expected displacements from the B0 map. These same methods were applied in 4 patients. By rigid matching of the scans acquired with opposing readout direction the applicator displacement due to image distortion from B0 inhomogeneity as well as patient movement and organ deformation was determined.

RESULTS

According to the B0 map, the displacement on the intrauterine device of the plastic brachytherapy applicator was <0.4 mm for both the phantom and patients. Displacements obtained by the opposing readout method were ≤0.8 mm for each patient with a mean ± SD over the patients of 0.3 ± 0.1 mm.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that the B0 method agrees with the opposing readout method. Displacements caused by magnetic field inhomogeneity on 3T MRI were small compared with displacements due to patient movement and organ deformation.

Diagnosis of Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer on Prostate MRI: Impact of Second-Opinion Readings by Subspecialized Genitourinary Oncologic Radiologists

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to investigate the added value of second-opinion evaluation of prostate MRI by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists for the assessment of extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective evaluation of initial and second-opinion radiology reports of 76 patients who underwent MRI of the prostate before prostatectomy for histologically proven prostate cancer. Initial outside reports and second-opinion reports were unpaired and reviewed in random order by a urologist who was blinded to patients' clinical details and histopathologic data. Histopathologic analysis of the prostatectomy specimen served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Among cases with diagnostic-quality images available (71/76; 93%), disagreement between the initial report and the second-opinion report was observed in 30% of cases (21/71; κ = 0.35); in 18 of these 21 cases (86%), histopathologic analysis proved that the second-opinion report was correct. The second-opinion interpretations had statistically significantly higher sensitivity (66% vs 24%; p < 0.0001) than did the initial reports, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in specificity (87% vs 93%; p = 0.317). On ROC curve analysis, the second-opinion reports yielded a statistically significantly higher AUC for the detection of ECE (0.80 vs 0.65; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The reinterpretation of prostate MRI examinations by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists improved the detection of ECE of prostate cancer.

A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy is a treatment modality that combines physical advantages of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with the radiobiological advantages of low dose rate brachytherapy. The aim of this review was to describe the effective clinical use of PDR brachytherapy worldwide in different tumour locations. We found 66 articles reporting on clinical PDR brachytherapy including the treatment procedure and outcome. Moreover, PDR brachytherapy has been applied in almost all tumour sites for which brachytherapy is indicated and with good local control and low toxicity. The main advantage of PDR is, because of the small pulse sizes used, the ability to spare normal tissue. In certain cases, HDR resembles PDR brachytherapy by the use of multifractionated low-fraction dose.

Improved dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy using high resolution contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study

Purpose

To assess detailed dosimetry data for prostate and clinical relevant intra- and peri-prostatic structures including neurovascular bundles (NVB), urethra, and penile bulb (PB) from postbrachytherapy computed tomography (CT) versus high resolution contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (HR-CEMRI).

Material and methods

Eleven postbrachytherapy prostate cancer patients underwent HR-CEMRI and CT imaging. Computed tomography and HR-CEMRI images were randomized and 2 independent expert readers created contours of prostate, intra- and peri-prostatic structures on each CT and HR-CEMRI scan for all 11 patients. Dosimetry data including V₁₀₀, D₉₀, and D₁₀₀ was calculated from these contours.

Results

Mean V₁₀₀ values from CT and HR-CEMRI contours were as follows: prostate (98.5% and 96.2%, p = 0.003), urethra (81.0% and 88.7%, p = 0.027), anterior rectal wall (ARW) (8.9% and 2.8%, p < 0.001), left NVB (77.9% and 51.5%, p = 0.002), right NVB (69.2% and 43.1%, p = 0.001), and PB (0.09% and 11.4%, p = 0.005). Mean D₉₀ (Gy) derived from CT and HR-CEMRI contours were: prostate (167.6 and 150.3, p = 0.012), urethra (81.6 and 109.4, p = 0.041), ARW (2.5 and 0.11, p = 0.003), left NVB (98.2 and 58.6, p = 0.001), right NVB (87.5 and 55.5, p = 0.001), and PB (11.2 and 12.4, p = 0.554).

Conclusions

Findings of this study suggest that HR-CEMRI facilitates accurate and meaningful dosimetric assessment of prostate and clinically relevant structures, which is not possible with CT. Significant differences were seen between CT and HR-CEMRI, with volume overestimation of CT derived contours compared to HR-CEMRI.

Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema

BACKGROUND

In pulsed-dose rate prostate brachytherapy the dose is delivered during 48 hours after implantation, making the treatment sensitive to oedematic effects possibly affecting dose delivery. The aim was to study changes in prostate volume during treatment by analysing catheter configurations on three subsequent scans.

METHODS

Prostate expansion was determined for 19 patients from the change in spatial distribution of the implanted catheters, using three CT-scans: a planning CT (CT1) and two CTs after 24 and 48 hours (CT2, CT3). An additional 4 patients only received one repeat CT (after 24 hours). The mean radial distance (MRD) of all dwell positions to the geometric centre of all dwell positions used was calculated to evaluate volume changes. From three implanted markers changes in inter-marker distances were assessed. The relative shifts of all dwell positions were determined using catheter- and marker-based registrations. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to compare the results from the different time points.

RESULTS

The MRDs measured on the two repeat CTs were significantly different from CT1. The mean prostate volume change derived from the difference in MRD was +4.3% (range -9.3% to +15.6%) for CT1-CT2 (p < .05) and +4.4% (range -7.5% to +16.3%) for CT1-CT3 (p < .05). These values represented a mean increase of 1.2 cm(3) in the first 24 hours and 1.5 cm(3) in the subsequent 24 hours. There was no clear sign of prostate expansion from the change in inter-marker distance (CT1-CT2: 0.2 ± 1.8 mm; CT1-CT3: 0.6 ± 2.2 mm). Catheter configuration remained stable; shifts in catheter positions were largest in the C-C direction: 0 ± 1.8 mm for CT1-CT2 and 0 ± 1.4 mm for CT2-CT3.

CONCLUSIONS

The volume changes derived from catheter displacements were small and therefore considered clinically insignificant. Implant configuration remains stable during 2 days of treatment, confirming the safety of this technique.

Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy

Publications have reported the benefits of using high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDRB) for the treatment of prostate cancer, since it provides similar biochemical control as other treatments while showing lowest long‐term complications to the organs at risk (OAR). With the inclusion of anatomy‐based inverse planning optimizers, HDRB has the advantage of potentially allowing dose escalation. Among the algorithms used, the Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing (IPSA) optimizer is widely employed since it provides adequate dose coverage, minimizing dose to the OAR, but it is known to generate large dwell times in particular positions of the catheter. As an alternative, the Hybrid Inverse treatment Planning Optimization (HIPO) algorithm was recently implemented in Oncentra Brachytherapy V. 4.3. The aim of this work was to compare, with the aid of radiobiological models, plans obtained with IPSA and HIPO to assess their use in our clinical practice. Thirty patients were calculated with IPSA and HIPO to achieve our department's clinical constraints. To evaluate their performance, dosimetric data were collected: Prostate PTV D90(%),V100(%),V150(%), and V200(%), Urethra D10(%), Rectum D2cc(%), and conformity indices. Additionally tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were calculated with the BioSuite software. The HIPO optimization was performed firstly with Prostate PTV (HIPOPTV) and then with Urethra as priority 1 (HIPOurethra). Initial optimization constraints were then modified to see the effects on dosimetric parameters, TCPs, and NTCPs. HIPO optimizations could reduce TCPs up to 10%–20% for all PTVs lower than 74 cm³. For the urethra, IPSA and HIPOurethra provided similar NTCPs for the majority of volume sizes, whereas HIPOPTV resulted in large NTCP values. These findings were in agreement with dosimetric values. By increasing the PTV maximum dose constraints for HIPOurethra plans, TCPs were found to be in agreement with IPSA without affecting the urethral NTCPs.

PACS numbers: 87.55.‐x, 87.55.de, 87.55.dh, 87.53.Jw

MRI target delineation may reduce long-term toxicity after prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Aiming for minimal toxicity after radical prostate cancer (PC) radiotherapy (RT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) target delineation could be a possible benefit knowing that clinical target volumes (CTV) are up to 30% smaller, when CTV delineation on MRI is compared to standard computed tomography (CT). This study compares long-term toxicity using CT or MRI delineation before PC RT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Urinary and rectal toxicity assessments 36 months after image-guided RT (78 Gy) using CTC-AE scores in two groups of PC patients. Peak symptom score values were registered. One group of patients (n=72) had standard CT target delineation and gold markers as fiducials. Another group of patients (n=73) had MRI target delineation and a nickel-titanium stent as fiducial.

RESULTS

At 36 months no difference in overall survival (92% in both groups, p=0.29) or in PSA-relapse free survival was found between the groups (MRI=89% and CT=94%, p=0.67). A significantly smaller CTV was found in the MRI group (p=0.02). Urinary retention and frequency were significantly reduced in the MRI group (p=0.03 in the matter of both). The overall urinary and rectal toxicity did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

MRI delineation leads to a significantly reduced CTV. Significantly lower urinary frequency and urinary retention toxicity scores were observed following MRI delineation. The study did not find significant differences in overall urinary or rectal toxicity between the two groups. PSA-relapse survival did not differ between the two groups at 36 months.