British Fertility Society: ‘Ovulation induction in WHO Type 1 anovulation: Guidelines for practice’ Produced on behalf of the BFS Policy and Practice Committee

Society for endocrinology guideline for understanding, diagnosing and treating female hypogonadism

Female hypogonadism (FH) is a relatively common endocrine disorder in women of premenopausal age, but there are significant uncertainties and wide variation in its management. Most current guidelines are monospecialty and only address premature ovarian insufficiency (POI); some allude to management in very brief and general terms, and most rely upon the extrapolation of evidence from the studies relating to physiological estrogen deficiency in postmenopausal women. The Society for Endocrinology commissioned new guidance to provide all care providers with a multidisciplinary perspective on managing patients with all forms of FH. It has been compiled using expertise from Endocrinology, Primary Care, Gynaecology and Reproductive Health practices, with contributions from expert patients and a patient support group, to help clinicians best manage FH resulting from both POI and hypothalamo-pituitary disorders, whether organic or functional.

Fertility issues in hypopituitarism

Women with hypopituitarism have lower fertility rates and worse pregnancy outcomes than women with normal pituitary function. These disparities exist despite the use of assisted reproductive technologies and hormone replacement. In women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, administration of exogenous gonadotropins can be used to successfully induce ovulation. Growth hormone replacement in the setting of growth hormone deficiency has been suggested to potentiate reproductive function, but its routine use in hypopituitary women remains unclear and warrants further study. In this review, we will discuss the clinical approach to fertility in a woman with hypopituitarism.

Guideline for the management of conception and pregnancy in thalassaemia syndromes: A British Society for Haematology Guideline

This comprehensive guideline, developed by a representative group of UK-based medical experts specialising in haemoglobinopathies, addresses the management of conception and pregnancy in patients with thalassaemia. A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE using specific keywords, formed the basis of the literature review. Key terms included "thalassaemia," "pregnancy," "Cooley's anaemia," "Mediterranean anaemia," and others, covering aspects such as fertility, iron burden and ultrasonography. The guideline underwent rigorous review by prominent organisations, including the Endocrine Society, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the United Kingdom Thalassaemia Society and the British Society of Haematology (BSH) guideline writing group. Additional feedback was solicited from a sounding board of UK haematologists, ensuring a thorough and collaborative approach. The objective of the guideline is to equip healthcare professionals with precise recommendations for managing conception and pregnancy in patients with thalassaemia.

A comprehensive review of the new FIGO classification of ovulatory disorders

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) system for the classification of disorders of ovulation was produced 50 years ago and, by international consensus, has been updated by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO).

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This review outlines in detail each component of the FIGO HyPO-P (hypothalamic, pituitary, ovarian, PCOS) classification with a concise description of each cause, and thereby provides a systematic method for diagnosis and management.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the published articles in the PubMed database in the English-language literature until October 2022, containing the keywords ovulatory disorders; ovulatory dysfunction; anovulation, and each subheading in the FIGO HyPO-P classification. We did not include abstracts or conference proceedings because the data are usually difficult to assess.

OUTCOMES

We present the most comprehensive review of all disorders of ovulation, published systematically according to the logical FIGO classification.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Improving the diagnosis of an individual's ovulatory dysfunction will significantly impact clinical practice by enabling healthcare practitioners to make a precise diagnosis and plan appropriate management.

Application of Human Menopausal Gonadotropins in the Treatment of Idiopathic Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism (IHH)-Based Infertility in Females: A Case Report

Rationale

Idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) is a prevalent congenital genetic disorder with multiple inheritance patterns. IHH can manifest as normal hypogonadotrophic sexual hypofunction (nIHH) or with an abnormal sense of smell, known as Kallmann. It primarily affects the production and effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing-hormone (GnRh), leading to reduced follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone levels. This results in infertility and underdeveloped secondary sexual characteristics.

Patient Concerns

A 29-year-old female presented with infertility.

Diagnosis

IHH diagnosis was confirmed through magnetic resonance (MR) scan, endocrine tests, physical examination, and B ultrasonic inspection. Additionally, genetic studies, including chromosome analysis, were conducted for the patient. The results confirmed no genetic abnormalities or concerns.

Interventions

The patient underwent multiple ovulation induction programs.

Outcome

After several ovulation induction cycles, the patient conceived and delivered a live baby.

Lessons

For IHH patients, a tailored human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) dose is recommended. High-dose HMG can benefit those with poor follicular response. The addition of letrozole (5-7.5mg) may enhance follicular response during stimulation. Our approach, which emphasizes the combined use of high-dose HMG, letrozole, and the adjustment of FSH and LH ratios, offers a unique perspective compared to traditional treatments. If HMG treatment is ineffective, alternative ovulation induction methods, such as r-fsh combined with r-lh or HMG combined with rLH, can be considered. Adjusting the FSH and LH ratio and varying rFSH and rLH additions might help achieve dominant follicles and live birth in resistant cases. This case report underscores the potential benefits of our regimen, suggesting its consideration for future research and clinical applications.

Management of congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in females

This review explores the challenges in the diagnosis of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, the transition of care from paediatric to adult care and the considerable health implications of this condition. The role gynaecologists and general practitioners have in managing hormone replacement therapy and reproductive potential is also highlighted. The fertility treatment options, which include ovulation induction with gonadotrophins and in-vitro fertilisation, are discussed in detail along with highlighting the fact that anovulation and markers of low ovarian reserve prior to priming treatment may not be reflective of poor reproductive potential. The holistic management of women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is still not standardised and evidence for subfertility management is scarce. This review aims to highlight this concern and provide guidance by evaluating current evidence.

Current pharmacotherapy and future directions for neuroendocrine causes of female infertility

INTRODUCTION

Infertility is recognized as a major global health issue, often associated with significant psychological distress for affected couples. Causes of female infertility include endocrine conditions leading to oligo/anovulation, in addition to structural causes such as tubal, uterine, or peritoneal disorders. Pharmacological treatments, targeting pathways in the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, can improve rates of ovulation, conception, pregnancy, and birth. Some existing therapeutic options are hindered by limited efficacy or by a non-physiological mechanism, which can risk excessive stimulation and treatment-related adverse effects. Therefore, there is a continued need for novel therapies to improve care for patients suffering with infertility.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors focus on endocrine causes of oligo/anovulation in women and on advances in assisted reproductive technology. Current pharmacological treatments and putative future therapeutic avenues in development to aid fertility in women are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

A deeper understanding of the reproductive neuroendocrine network governing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone release can offer novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of female subfertility, leading to improved clinical outcomes, less invasive routes of administration, and decreased treatment-related side-effects. The ultimate aim of development in female subfertility is to offer therapeutic interventions that are effective, reproducible, associated with minimal risks, and have an acceptable route of administration.

Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation

Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.

New and Consolidated Therapeutic Options for Pubertal Induction in Hypogonadism: In-depth Review of the Literature

Delayed puberty (DP) defines a retardation of onset/progression of sexual maturation beyond the expected age from either a lack/delay of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis activation or a gonadal failure. DP usually gives rise to concern and uncertainty in patients and their families, potentially affecting their immediate psychosocial well-being and also creating longer term psychosexual sequelae. The most frequent form of DP in younger teenagers is self-limiting and may not need any intervention. Conversely, DP from hypogonadism requires prompt and specific treatment that we summarize in this review. Hormone therapy primarily targets genital maturation, development of secondary sexual characteristics, and the achievement of target height in line with genetic potential, but other key standards of care include body composition and bone mass. Finally, pubertal induction should promote psychosexual development and mitigate both short- and long-term impairments comprising low self-esteem, social withdrawal, depression, and psychosexual difficulties. Different therapeutic options for pubertal induction have been described for both males and females, but we lack the necessary larger randomized trials to define the best approaches for both sexes. We provide an in-depth and updated literature review regarding therapeutic options for inducing puberty in males and females, particularly focusing on recent therapeutic refinements that better encompass the heterogeneity of this population, and underlining key differences in therapeutic timing and goals. We also highlight persistent shortcomings in clinical practice, wherein strategies directed at "the child with delayed puberty of uncertain etiology" risk being misapplied to older adolescents likely to have permanent hypogonadism.

Live birth and perinatal outcomes using cryopreserved oocytes: an analysis of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database from 2000 to 2016 using three clinical models

STUDY QUESTION

Are live birth (LB) and perinatal outcomes affected by the use of frozen own versus frozen donor oocytes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Treatment cycles using frozen own oocytes have a lower LB rate but a lower risk of low birth weight (LBW) as compared with frozen donor oocytes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A rising trend of oocyte cryopreservation has been noted internationally in the creation of donor oocyte banks and in freezing own oocytes for later use in settings of fertility preservation and social egg freezing. Published literature on birth outcomes with frozen oocytes has primarily utilised data from donor oocyte banks due to the relative paucity of outcome data from cycles using frozen own oocytes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a retrospective cohort study utilising the anonymised database of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, which is the statutory regulator of fertility treatment in the UK. We analysed 988 015 IVF cycles from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) register from 2000 to 2016. Perinatal outcomes were assessed from singleton births only.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Three clinical models were used to assess LB and perinatal outcomes: Model 1 compared frozen own oocytes (n = 632) with frozen donor oocytes (n = 922); Model 2 compared frozen donor oocytes (n = 922) with fresh donor oocytes (n = 24 706); Model 3 compared first cycle of fresh embryo transfer from frozen donor oocytes (n = 917) with first cycle of frozen embryo transfer created with own oocytes and no prior fresh transfer (n = 326). Preterm birth (PTB) was defined as LB before 37 weeks and LBW as birth weight <2500 g. Adjustment was performed for confounding variables such as maternal age, number of embryos transferred and decade of treatment.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The LB rate (18.0% versus 30.7%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.85) and the incidence of LBW (5.3% versus 14.0%; aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.90) was significantly lower with frozen own oocytes as compared with frozen donor oocytes with no significant difference in PTB (9.5% versus 15.7%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.21). A lower LB rate was noted in frozen donor oocyte cycles (30.7% versus 34.7%; aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.80) when compared with fresh donor oocyte cycles. First cycle frozen donor oocytes did not show any significant difference in LB rate (30.1% versus 19.3%; aOR 1.26, 95% CI 0.86-1.83) or PTB, but a higher incidence of LBW (17.7% versus 5.4%; aOR 3.77, 95% CI 1.51-9.43) as compared with first cycle frozen embryos using own oocytes.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The indication for oocyte freezing, method of freezing used (whether slow-freezing or vitrification) and age at which eggs where frozen were unavailable. We report a subgroup analysis of women using their own frozen oocytes prior to 37 years. Cumulative LB rate could not be assessed due to the anonymous nature of the dataset.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Women planning to freeze their own eggs for fertility preservation or social egg freezing need to be counselled that the results from frozen donor egg banks may not completely apply to them. However, they can be reassured that oocyte cryopreservation does not appear to have a deleterious effect on perinatal outcomes.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No specific funding was sought for the study. The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Reduced FSH and LH action: implications for medically assisted reproduction

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) play complementary roles in follicle development and ovulation via a complex interaction in the hypothalamus, anterior pituitary gland, reproductive organs, and oocytes. Impairment of the production or action of gonadotropins causes relative or absolute LH and FSH deficiency that compromises gametogenesis and gonadal steroid production, thereby reducing fertility. In women, LH and FSH deficiency is a spectrum of conditions with different functional or organic causes that are characterized by low or normal gonadotropin levels and low oestradiol levels. While the causes and effects of reduced LH and FSH production are very well known, the notion of reduced action has received less attention by researchers. Recent evidence shows that molecular characteristics, signalling as well as ageing, and some polymorphisms negatively affect gonadotropin action. These findings have important clinical implications, in particular for medically assisted reproduction in which diminished action determined by the afore-mentioned factors, combined with reduced endogenous gonadotropin production caused by GnRH analogue protocols, may lead to resistance to gonadotropins and, thus, to an unexpected hypo-response to ovarian stimulation. Indeed, the importance of LH and FSH action has been highlighted by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproduction Technologies (ICMART) in their definition of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism as gonadal failure associated with reduced gametogenesis and gonadal steroid production due to reduced gonadotropin production or action. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of determinants of reduced FSH and LH action that are associated with a reduced response to ovarian stimulation.

Fertility and Pregnancy in Women With Hypopituitarism: A Systematic Literature Review

CONTEXT

Human reproduction is mainly governed from the hypothalamic-adrenal-gonadal (HPG) axis, which controls both ovarian morphology and function. Disturbances in the secretion of other anterior pituitary hormones (and their respective endocrine axes) interfere with HPG activity and have been linked to fertility problems. In normal pregnancy, maintenance of homeostasis is associated with continuous changes in pituitary morphology and function, which need to be considered during hormone replacement in patients with hypopituitarism.

DESIGN

We conducted a systematic PubMed literature review from 1969 to 2019, with the following keywords: fertility and hypopituitarism, pregnancy and hypopituitarism, and ovulation induction and hypopituitarism. Case reports or single-case series of up to 2 patients/4 pregnancies were excluded.

RESULTS

Eleven publications described data on fertility (n = 6) and/or pregnancy (n = 7) in women with hypopituitarism. Women with hypopituitarism often need assisted reproductive treatment, with pregnancy rates ranging from 47% to 100%. In patients achieving pregnancy, live birth rate ranged from 61% to 100%. While glucocorticoids, levothyroxine, and desmopressin are safely prescribed during pregnancy, growth hormone treatment regimens vary significantly between countries, and several publications support a positive effect in women seeking fertility.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first systematic review on fertility, ovulation induction, and pregnancy in patients with hypopituitarism, we show that while literature is scarce, birth rates are high in patients achieving pregnancy. However, prospective studies are needed for evaluating outcomes in relationship to treatment patterns. Replacement therapy in hypopituitarism should always mimic normal physiology, and this becomes challenging with changing demands during pregnancy evolution.

Decision points for individualized hormonal stimulation with recombinant gonadotropins for treatment of women with infertility

It is essential that fertility treatment is individualized based on a thorough diagnostic work-up, with treatment tailored to the patients' requirements. This individualization should be kept in mind during the main decision points that occur before and during treatment. Treatment customization must include consideration of both the woman and her partner involved in the process together, including their collective treatment goals. Once treatment goals have been agreed and diagnostic evaluations performed, personalization based on patient characteristics, together with an understanding of treatment goals and patient preferences, enables the selection of appropriate treatments, protocols, products and their dosing. Following treatment initiation, monitoring and adaptation of product and dose can then ensure optimal outcomes. Currently, it is not possible to base treatment decisions on every characteristic of the patient and personalization is based on biomarkers that have been identified as the most relevant. However, in the future, the use of artificial intelligence coupled with continuous monitoring should enable greater individualization and improve outcomes. This review considers the current state-of-the-art related to decision points during individualized treatment of female infertility, before looking at future developments that might further assist in making individualized treatment decisions, including the use of computer-assisted decision making.

Management of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in infertile patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination (OI + IUI) in female patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH), and to compare the outcomes of different stimulation protocols and cycle characteristics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The outcomes of OI + IUI treatments in patients with HH diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Cycles using recombinant (rec) luteinizing hormone (LH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) as LH sources were compared with each other. The cycle characteristics and pregnancy rates of the first cycles were compared with those of the second cycles in patients who underwent 2 or more cycles.

RESULTS

Of 104 patients diagnosed with World Health Organization type 1 anovulation, 99 were treated with hMG or rec LH + rec follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in a total of 220 cycles. The mean age of the study patients was 27.8 ± 4.6 years (range, 19-39 years). Rec FSH + rec LH was given in 37 cycles, and hMG was used in 183 cycles. The hormone values were as follows: FSH, 1.4 ± 1.6 mIU/mL; LH, 0.7 ± 1.2 mIU/mL; oestradiol, 13 (15.8 ± 12.0) pg/mL; and anti-Müllerian hormone, 2.1 (2.6 ± 1.2) ng/mL. A dominant follicle was observed in 85.7% of the first cycles and in 86.2% of the second cycles. The treatment lasted 17.2 ± 5.0 and 15.5 ± 3.8 days until the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration day in the first and second cycles, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The cycle cancellation rate was 8.1% (n = 3) in cycles done using rec gonadotropins and 29% (n = 53) in patients stimulated with hMG, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The pregnancy rates were 12.7% and 28.3% per cycle and per patient, respectively. The pregnancy rate in hCG-triggered patients (successful stimulation) was 17.1% per cycle in all patients.

CONCLUSION

OI with gonadotropins and IUI is a safe, efficient, and relatively cost-effective treatment option in patients with HH, yielding reasonable pregnancy rates per cycle and per patient. The use of rec FSH + rec LH facilitates cycle management but does not positively contribute to pregnancy rates and is more expensive than some other feasible options.

Low-dose gonadotropin induction of ovulation in anovulatory women: still needed in the age of IVF

Low-dose, step-up gonadotropin is the treatment of choice for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who have not conceived after anti-oestrogen treatment and as an effective alternative to pulsatile GnRH in women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH). There has been, however, no large-scale, comparative study between the two groups using low-dose gonadotropins. Here, we performed a retrospective, comparative analysis, in a single clinic database, of efficacy and safety of induction of ovulation using low-dose gonadotropins in 364 women with PCOS and 80 women with HH. The rate of ovulation was high in both PCOS (83%) and HH (84%) but mono-follicular, ovulatory cycles were more prevalent in PCOS than in HH (77% vs 53%, P < 0.0001) and the proportion of cycles that were abandoned was higher in HH than in PCOS (25% vs 15%, P < 0.0001). The median threshold dose of gonadotropin required to induce ovulation was 75 IU/day in PCOS and 113 IU/day in HH (P < 0.001) and the range of doses was greater in HH women. Forty-nine percent of women with PCOS and 65% of those with HH conceived (more than 90% within 6 cycles of treatment) and had at least one pregnancy. Multiple pregnancies (all twins) occurred in only 4% of women with PCOS and 5% of those with HH. These findings emphasise the efficacy and safety of low-dose gonadotropin treatment for both clomiphene-resistant women with PCOS and those with HH. These results highlight the importance of choosing the more physiological approach of gonadotropin induction of ovulation in both groups as the most appropriate treatment, in preference to IVF.

The effects of low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin combined with human menopausal gonadotropin protocol on women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) combined with human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) protocol on cycle characteristics and outcomes of infertile women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care academic medical centre.

PATIENT(S)

Forty-six infertile patients with HH and seventy-one infertile patients with tubal factor (TF) infertility undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

In the study group, all 46 HH patients were given low-dose hCG (50-300IU/d) in combination with HMG daily from cycle day 3. Meanwhile, a control group consisting of 71 patients with tubal factor infertility was set up, where the infertile women were given triptorelin 3.75 mg on cycle day 3 for desensitization and started stimulation with HMG only 5 weeks later. Transvaginal ultrasound and serum sex steroids were used for monitoring the development of follicles. Ovulation was triggered by hCG 5000IU when dominant follicles matured. Viable embryos were transferred on the third day after ovum pickup or cryopreserved for later transfer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included hCG day P4, ratio of E2/follicle count, number of oocytes retrieved, number of viable embryos, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and cumulative pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S)

With lower basal FSH, LH and E2, HH patients showed longer HMG stimulation duration (13 (10-22) d vs 12 (8-18) d, P < .001) and higher HMG dose (2960 ± 560 IU vs 2663 ± 538 IU, P = .005). Whilst the antral follicle count (AFC), number of follicles with diameters greater than 10mm on trigger day and oocytes retrieved were less in the HH group, the number of follicles with diameters greater than 14 mm and viable embryos were comparable. The ratio of E2/follicle count (>10 mm) and E2/follicle count (>14 mm) were distinctively higher in the HH group (1056 ± 281 vs 830 ± 245, P < .001; 1545 ± 570 vs 1312 ± 594pmol/L, P = .037; respectively). The clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and cumulative pregnancy rate per woman were comparable between the two groups. Comparison among the subgroups with different hCG dosage showed that HMG duration shortened with the increase of daily hCG dose (14.84 ± 2.88 vs 13.96 ± 2.63 vs 12.96 ± 1.30 days, P = .037). No significant differences were detected in outcomes between fresh embryo transfer (ET) group and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Low-dose hCG combined with HMG is a feasible protocol for HH women undergoing ovarian stimulation in IVF, providing favourable cycle characteristics and pregnancy rates. Low-dose hCG reduces HMG duration, whilst the hCG dose and embryo quality are not positively correlated. The outcomes of FET are comparable to ET, which provides a greater chance of success from IVF in the low responders with HH.

Controlled ovarian stimulation and IVF pregnancy in a trisomy X carrier with associated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

We describe successful controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and the first known IVF pregnancy in a trisomy X carrier with associated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) linked to a chromosome 4 double mutation in the allele of the Gonadotropins Releasing Hormone receptor (GnRHr) gene. Previous administration of low dose of gonadotropins, as recommended in patients with HH, led to poor follicular recruitment. Since trisomy X is a risk factor for diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), higher doses of gonadotropins led to better ovarian response. The report readknowledges the importance of a correct genetic evaluation in a competent laboratory as a reliable base for treatment planning in this kind of patients.