Different diagnostic properties of C-reactive protein, real-time PCR, and histopathology of frozen and permanent sections in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Current Trends in Total Ankle Replacement

Ankle arthritis can result in significant pain and restriction in range of motion. Total ankle replacement (TAR) is a motion-preserving surgical option used as an alternative to total ankle arthrodesis to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. There are several generations of TAR techniques based on component design, implant material, and surgical technique. With more recent TAR implants, an attempt is made to minimize bone resection and mirror the native anatomy. There are more than 20 implant devices currently available. Implant survivorship varies among prosthesis types and generations, with improved outcomes reported with use of the more recent third- and fourth-generation ankle implants. Pre- and postoperative assessments of TAR are primarily performed by using weight-bearing radiography, with weight-bearing CT emerging as an additional imaging tool. Preoperative assessments include those of the tibiotalar angle, offset, and adjacent areas of arthritis requiring additional surgical procedures. US, nuclear medicine studies, and MRI can be used to troubleshoot complications. Effective radiologic assessment requires an understanding of the component design and corresponding normal perioperative imaging features of ankle implants, as well as recognition of common and device-specific complications. General complications seen at radiography include aseptic loosening, osteolysis, hardware subsidence, periprosthetic fracture, infection, gutter impingement, heterotopic ossification, and syndesmotic nonunion. The authors review several recent generations of TAR implants commonly used in the United States, normal pre- and postoperative imaging assessment, and imaging complications of TAR. Indications for advanced imaging of TAR are also reviewed. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Reliable Diagnostic Tests and Thresholds for Preoperative Diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Arthritis Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

The current diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are diverse and controversial, leading to delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate and unify their diagnostic accuracy and the threshold selection of serum and synovial routine tests for PJI at an early stage.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for retrospective or prospective studies which reported preoperative‐available assays (serum, synovial, or culture tests) for the diagnosis of chronic PJI among inflammatory arthritis (IA) or non‐IA populations from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2022. Threshold effective analysis was performed on synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN%), synovial white blood cell (WBC), serum C‐reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to find the relevant cut‐offs.

Results

Two hundred and sixteen studies and information from 45,316 individuals were included in the final analysis. Synovial laboratory‐based α‐defensin and calprotectin had the best comprehensive sensitivity (0.91 [0.86–0.94], 0.95 [0.88–0.98]) and specificity (0.96 [0.94‐0.97], 0.95 [0.89–0.98]) values. According to the threshold effect analysis, the recommended cut‐offs are 70% (sensitivity 0.89 [0.85–0.92], specificity 0.90 [0.87–0.93]), 4100/μL (sensitivity 0.90 [0.87–0.93], specificity 0.97 [0.93–0.98]), 13.5 mg/L (sensitivity 0.84 [0.78–0.89], specificity 0.83 [0.73–0.89]), and 30 mm/h (sensitivity 0.79 [0.74–0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.72–0.83]) for synovial PMN%, synovial WBC, serum CRP, and ESR, respectively, and tests seem to be more reliable among non‐IA patients.

Conclusions

The laboratory‐based synovial α‐defensin and synovial calprotectin are the two best independent preoperative diagnostic tests for PJI. A cut off of 70% for synovial PMN% and tighter cut‐offs for synovial WBC and serum CRP could have a better diagnostic accuracy for non‐IA patients with chronic PJI.

Intraoperative frozen section histopathology for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection in hip revision surgery: the influence of recent dislocation and/or periprosthetic fracture

AIMS

To evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section histopathology for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) during hip revision surgery, both for patients with and without recent trauma to the hip.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included all revision total hip replacement procedures where intraoperative frozen section histopathology had been used for the evaluation of infection in a single institution between 2008 and 2015. Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria were used to define infection. 210 hips were included for evaluation. Prior to revision surgery, 36 hips had a dislocation or a periprosthetic fracture (group A), and 174 did not (group B).

RESULTS

The prevalence of infection was 14.3% (5.6% in group A and 16.1% in group B). Using Feldman criteria, the sensitivity of histopathology was 50.0%, specificity 47.1%, positive predictive value 5.3% and negative predictive value 94.1% in group A. The sensitivity of frozen section histopathology was 75.0%, specificity 96.5%, positive predictive value 85% and negative predictive value 95.3% in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative frozen section histopathology is reliable for the diagnosis of PJI if no dislocation or periprosthetic fracture has occurred prior to hip revision surgery.

The Utility of Frozen Section Histology in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Surgeons utilize a combination of preoperative tests and intraoperative findings to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI); however, there is currently no reliable diagnostic marker that can be used in isolation. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the utility of frozen section histology in diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 614 patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty with frozen section histology from a single institution was performed. Discriminatory value of frozen section histology was assessed using univariate analysis and evaluation of area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve comparing frozen section histology results to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) PJI criteria modified to exclude the histology component.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the frozen section histology was 53.6% and the specificity was 95.2%. There was 99.2% concordance between the permanent section and frozen section results. The receiver operating characteristic curve for frozen section yielded an AUC of 0.744 (95% confidence interval 0.627-0.860) and the modified ICM score yielded an AUC of 0.912 (95% confidence interval 0.836-0.988) when compared to the full score. The addition of frozen section histology changed the decision to infected in 20% of "inconclusive" cases but less than 1% of total cases.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to the modified ICM criteria, intraoperative frozen section histology has poor sensitivity, strong specificity, and acceptable overall discrimination for diagnosing PJI. This test appears to be of particular value for patients deemed "inconclusive" for infection using the remaining ICM criteria.

An automated real-time PCR assay for synovial fluid improves the preoperative etiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection and septic arthritis

Synovial fluid is important for the preoperative etiological diagnosis of suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or septic arthritis (SA). GENECUBE, an automated real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, was used to detect bacterial mecA (methicillin resistance) and was compared with microbiological cultures for preoperatively diagnosing PJI and SA in 74 patients suspected of these infections and thus earmarked for surgery. PJI and SA were diagnosed in 21 and 6 cases, respectively, using modified ICM 2018 diagnostic criteria. Microbiological cultures determined methicillin-resistant staphylococcus (MRS) as the causative organism in six samples, which were all positive in the GENECUBE assay. Significantly also, the GENECUBE assay detected six MRS infections in culture-negative but infection-diagnosed patients, and in one inconclusive case, suggesting a higher sensitivity of this assay. Compared with microbiological culture, the sensitivity and specificity of the GENECUBE assay for mecAwas 100% and 92.2%, respectively. However, GENECUBE also produced invalid results in three cases, suggesting possible PCR inhibitors in the synovial fluid samples. We additionally validated the accuracy of pan-bacterial real-time PCR targeting 16S rRNA and other tests. Pan-bacterial real-time PCR was as effective as preoperative bacterial culture testing, although the α-defensin assay had the highest sensitivity at 100%. Hence, fully automated real-time PCR targeting of the bacterial mecA gene improves the etiological diagnosis of PJI and SA by reducing the testing time and lowering the false-positive detection rates. A screening approach for α-defensin followed by bacterial mecA gene testing in synovial fluids is therefore a more efficient method of preoperatively diagnosing PJI and SA.

The combinations of multiple factors to improve the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity after artificial joint infection

Objective

To discuss the sensitivity and specificity of the combinations of multiple factors that work on bone infection after artificial joint, and provide evidence-based medical basis for the early diagnosis of infection after artificial joint.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on 35 patients diagnosed with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) or aseptic loosening (AL) who both received revision operation from January 2011 to January 2015. Analyzing and comparing their epidemiology indexes and expounded a series of auxiliary examinations corresponding positive diagnosis ratio.

Results

Thirty-five patients were divided into two groups. One is called group PJI which includes 16 patients, and the other is called group AL which contains 19 patients. There was no statistical difference between in age (p = 0.536), gender ratio (p = 0.094), and the time of catching infection or getting loose (p = 0.055). Swelling was statistical significant (p = 0.0435 < 0.05). AUC of CRP = 0.947, ESR = 0.893, IL-6 = 0.893, PCT = 0.781, WBC = 0.839, and PMN = 0.755, respectively, CRP has a high diagnostic value to PJI, ESR, IL-6, PCT, WBC, and PMN% possess a moderate diagnostic value. There were 3 cases of PJI whose pathological paraffin section showed infectious inflammatory cells (100%). three PJI patients and one AL patient whose 99mTc-MDP examination presented 100% infection or looseness rate.

Conclusion

CRP has a high diagnostic value to PJI. Histopathology HE staining, Gram staining, and 99mTc-MDP provide a highly accurate diagnosis for PJI. Therefore, the results suggest combining the unique clinical symptoms of PJI patients with relevant laboratory indexes, histopathologic characteristics, and imageological examinations that can improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of PJI in its early stage.

Combined Measurement of D-Dimer and C-Reactive Protein Levels: Highly Accurate for Diagnosing Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging and elusive in the absence of a gold standard. D-dimer plays an important role in inflammation that occurs during infections and therefore could be a valuable biomarker for PJI. This study aims to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer in detecting chronic PJI and to improve the accuracy of chronic PJI diagnosis through combined measurement of serum D-dimer with C-reactive protein (CRP)/erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-two patients presenting with a painful knee or hip after total hip or total knee arthroplasty for surgical revision were included in this prospective trial. Our cohort consisted of 55 patients undergoing revision for chronic PJI and 67 patients undergoing revision for aseptic failure. PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve were analyzed for each biomarker.

RESULTS

The area under the curve for D-dimer was 0.915 and was more accurate than serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate 0.719 and CRP 0.761. 1170 ng/mL was determined to be the optimal threshold value of D-dimer for the diagnosis of chronic PJI, with a sensitivity of 92.73% and a specificity of 74.63% in the diagnosis of chronic PJI. The combination of D-dimer and CRP tests demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.11% and negative predictive value of 96.55% for the diagnosis of chronic PJI.

CONCLUSION

The present study identified the D-dimer is a valuable biomarker in detecting chronic PJI. The combinations of serum D-dimer and CRP led to the improvement of sensitivity compared with those of the single-index test.

Higher sensitivity of swab polymerase chain reaction compared with tissue cultures for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) compared with tissue culture as the current gold standard.

METHODS

Forty-one consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled undergoing revision arthroplasty due to septic and aseptic reasons. Infection classification was done according to the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Intraoperatively, tissue samples of the periprosthetic membrane were collected for culture analysis, and swabs were taken from the accessible implant surface to perform 16S ribosomal RNA PCR. The diagnostic performance of swab PCR and tissue cultures was determined.

RESULTS

Of the 41 patients, 53.7% ( n = 22) had a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and 46.3% ( n = 19) an aseptic loosening. Swab PCR showed a higher sensitivity than tissue cultures (86.4% vs. 68.2%), while the specificity was equal (89.5%). The area under the curve was 0.79 for tissue cultures and 0.88 for swab PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first investigation of swab PCR for diagnosing PJI, this procedure revealed a higher sensitivity for diagnosing PJI compared with tissue cultures. Because swab PCR is easily implementable and does not require special equipment, it can potentially improve the diagnosis of PJI.

Proceedings from the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections: evaluation of periprosthetic shoulder infection

The Second International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in July 2018. More than 800 experts from all 9 subspecialties of orthopedic surgery and allied fields of infectious disease, microbiology, and epidemiology were assembled to form the International Consensus Group. The shoulder workgroup reached consensus on 27 questions related to culture techniques, inflammatory markers, and diagnostic criteria used to evaluate patients for periprosthetic shoulder infection. This document contains the group's recommendations and rationale for each question related to evaluating periprosthetic shoulder infection.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum, Synovial, and Tissue Testing for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that can occur following total joint replacement. Patients with chronic PJI report a substantially lower quality of life and face a higher risk of short-term mortality. Establishing a diagnosis of chronic PJI is challenging because of conflicting guidelines, numerous tests, and limited evidence. Delays in diagnosing PJI are associated with poorer outcomes and morbid revision surgery. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of serum, synovial, and tissue-based tests for chronic PJI.

METHODS

This review adheres to the Cochrane Collaboration's diagnostic test accuracy methods for evidence searching and syntheses. A detailed search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the grey literature was performed to identify studies involving the diagnosis of chronic PJI in patients with hip or knee replacement. Eligible studies were assessed for quality and bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed on tests with sufficient data points. Summary estimates and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were obtained using a bivariate model.

RESULTS

A total of 12,616 citations were identified, and 203 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these 203 studies, 170 had a high risk of bias. Eighty-three unique PJI diagnostic tests were identified, and 17 underwent meta-analyses. Laboratory-based synovial alpha-defensin tests and leukocyte esterase reagent (LER) strips (2+) had the best performance, followed by white blood-cell (WBC) count, measurement of synovial C-reactive protein (CRP) level, measurement of the polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%), and the alpha-defensin lateral flow test kit (Youden index ranging from 0.78 to 0.94). Tissue-based tests and 3 serum tests (measurement of interleukin-6 [IL-6] level, CRP level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) had a Youden index between 0.61 to 0.75 but exhibited poorer performance compared with the synovial tests mentioned above.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the literature pertaining to chronic PJI diagnostic tests is heterogeneous, and the studies are at a high risk for bias. We believe that greater transparency and more complete reporting in studies of diagnostic test results should be mandated by peer-reviewed journals. The available literature suggests that several synovial fluid-based tests perform well for diagnosing chronic PJI and their use is recommended in the work-up of any suspected case of chronic PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifying Common Pathogens in Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Testing Drug-resistance Rate for Different Antibiotics: A Prospective, Single Center Study in Beijing

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to identify the common microorganisms causing PJI as well as the drug-resistant spectrum for each microorganism, to help orthopaedic surgeons to choose appropriate antibiotics.

METHOD

One hundred and sixty patients who suffered from failure of primary or revision total hip or knee arthroplasty for different reasons were prospectively recruited. These patients underwent revision or re-revision total hip or knee arthroplasty in our institution between August 2013 to August 2016. The details of patients' medical history and comprehensive physical examination, as well as demographic data were recorded precisely. Routine blood test results, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, and synovial leukocyte counts were collected. Additionally, aspiration was conducted during surgery to avoid pollution unless when PJI was strongly suspected, in which case, joint puncture and aspiration were conducted before surgery. Intraoperatively, the implant-surrounding tissue and the prosthesis were collected under aseptic conditions. Postoperatively, the prosthesis, implant-surrounding tissue and synovium were sent to the laboratory immediately. The sonicate extraction (the prosthesis was sent for ultrasound sonication first), implant surrounding tissue and synovium were sent for microbiologic culture, and the implant-surrounding tissue was also sent for pathological examination. The isolated bacteria strains and drug-resistance rates for each pathogen for different antibiotics were presented.

RESULTS

There were 59 PJI cases in the infectious group and 101 cases in the non-infectious group (PJI is diagnosed according to the diagnosing criteria from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society). Of 69 strains of pathogens isolated, Gram-positive bacterium is the most common pathogenic bacteria causing PJI (60, 86.96%). Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus played an important role as well, followed by Gram-negative bacteria (8, 11.59%) and fungus (1, 1.45%). Penicillin (78.57%), erythromycin (66.67%) and clindamycin (44.74%) showed high antibiotic resistance rate. In addition, the second-generation cephalosporin, usually as the prophylactic antibiotic, resistance rate was high (20%) as well. Fortunately, no vancomycin-resistant bacteria were discovered in the current study.

CONCLUSION

This study provides some information on the most common pathogens in our institution and the selection of antibiotics in the perioperative period in northern China. Cefuroxime and clindamycin might not be appropriate for use as prophylactic antibiotics in revision total knee or hip arthroplasty. Vancomycin is ideal for empiric antibiotic use in suspected PJI cases because of the low drug-resistance rate.

Microbial Identification Using DNA Target Amplification and Sequencing: Clinical Utility and Impact on Patient Management

Broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is increasingly used in patients with culture-negative infections; however, few studies have assessed the diagnostic utility of this test in this context. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had clinical specimens sent for broad-range PCR, aiming to evaluate performance and determine impact on patient management. Organisms were identified in 21/71 samples. High numbers of polymorphonuclear leukocytes on Gram stain (odds ratio [OR], 4.17; P = .04) and acute inflammation on histopathology (OR, 5.69; P = .02) were significantly associated with a positive result. Management was altered in 18 patients, 11 with positive and 7 with negative results. Overall, broad-range PCR assay had the highest impact in patients with microscopic evidence of inflammation. Physicians ordering this complex, difficult to interpret, and expensive test should carefully consider all available clinical information on an individualized basis to optimize its performance.

Preoperative PCR analysis of synovial fluid has limited value for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of total knee arthroplasties

Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is important because of the therapeutic consequences. This prospective study was designed to answer the question, if preoperative PCR analysis of the synovial fluid in addition to the culture and the CRP analysis of the blood are helpful for the diagnosis of PJI in knee arthroplasties. Before revision CRP analysis of the blood, cultivation and PCR analysis of synovial fluid of 116 knee endoprostheses were performed. During revision surgery, five tissue samples of the periprosthetic tissue were cultured and five further samples subjected to histological analysis. These analyses of the periprosthetic tissue were used to verify the results of the preoperative diagnostic methods. Twenty-seven prostheses were identified as infected (prevalence 23.3%). The combined analyses of the joint fluid cultivation and the CRP blood level resulted in a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 95.5%, a positive-predictive value of 84.0%, a negative-predictive value of 93.4% and an accuracy of 91.4%. The PCR analysis of the synovial fluid resulted in a sensitivity of 55.6%, a specificity of 82.0%, a positive-predictive value of 48.4%, a negative-predictive value of 85.9% and an accuracy of 75.9%. The sensitivity for culture of the aspirate and PCR analysis in combination with an elevated CRP level was 85.2%, the specificity 82.0%, the positive-predictive value 58.9%, the negative-predictive value 94.8% and the accuracy 82.7%. The preoperative PCR analysis of synovial fluid has only limited value in addition to the standard culture analysis.

Histopathology in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: When Will the Morphomolecular Diagnosis Be a Reality?

The presence of a polymorphonuclear neutrophil infiltrate in periprosthetic tissues has been shown to correlate closely with the diagnosis of septic implant failure. The histological criterion considered by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society to be diagnostic of periprosthetic joint infection is “greater than five neutrophils per high-power field in five high-power fields observed from histologic analysis of periprosthetic tissue at ×400 magnification.” Surgeons and pathologists should be aware of the qualifications introduced by different authors during the last years in the histological techniques, samples for histological study, cutoffs used for the diagnosis of infection, and types of patients studied. Recently, immunohistochemistry and histochemistry studies have appeared which suggest that the cutoff point of five polymorphonuclear neutrophils in five high-power fields is too high for the diagnosis of many periprosthetic joint infections. Therefore, morphomolecular techniques could help in the future to achieve a more reliable histological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

Diagnostic performance of swab PCR as an alternative to tissue culture methods for diagnosing infections associated with fracture fixation devices

BACKGROUND

Molecular procedures could potentially improve diagnoses of orthopaedic implant-related infections, but are not yet clinically implemented. Analysis of sonication fluid shows the highest sensitivity for diagnosing implant infections in cases of revision surgery with implant removal. However, there remains controversy regarding the best method for obtaining specimens in cases of revision surgery with implant retention. Tissue culture is the most common diagnostic method for pathogen identification in such cases. Here we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of swab PCR analysis compared to tissue culture from patients undergoing revision surgery of fracture fixation devices.

METHODS

We prospectively investigated 62 consecutive subjects who underwent revision surgery of fracture fixation devices during a two-year period. Tissue samples were collected for cultures, and swabs from the implant surface were obtained for 16S rRNA PCR analysis. Subjects were classified as having an implant-related infection if (1) they presented with a sinus tract or open wound in communication with the implant; or (2) purulence was encountered intraoperatively; or (3) two out of three tissue cultures tested positive for the presence of the same pathogen. Tissue culture and swab PCR results from the subjects were used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) for identifying an orthopaedic implant-related infection.

RESULTS

Orthopaedic implant-related infections were detected in 51 subjects. Tissue culture identified infections in 47 cases, and swab PCR in 35 cases. Among the 11 aseptic cases, tissue culture was positive in 2 cases and swab PCR in 4 cases. Tissue culture showed a significantly higher area under the ROC curve for diagnosing infection (AUC=0.89; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96) compared to swab PCR (AUC=0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.80) (p=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to swab PCR, tissue culture showed better performance for diagnosing orthopaedic implant-related infection. Although molecular methods are expected to yield higher diagnostic accuracy than cultures, it appears that the method of obtaining specimens plays an important role. Improved methods of specimen collection are required before swab PCR can become a reliable alternative to tissue-consumptive methods.

[Hip arthroplasty in the presence of proximal femoral deformity]

INTRODUCTION

Proximal femoral deformities may result in pain in the ipsilateral hip joint and profound functional disability, ultimately requiring arthroplasty. 

PROCEDURE

Primary hip replacement procedures in the presence of markedly altered anatomy of the proximal femur present a technical challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. The deformity and its underlying condition, whether congenital or acquired, may complicate canal preparation and affect the choices of implant, exposure and postoperative physiotherapy protocol. Furthermore, a two- or multi-stage treatment may be required, e.g. for implant removal, for femoral osteotomy or to rule out infection.

DISCUSSION

Treatment strategies must be individually tailored, respecting patient needs, the etiology, the anatomic site and the geometry of the deformity encountered, bone quality, soft tissue deficits, the presence of retained implants in the proximal femur, infection status and comorbidities.

Human beta-defensin-3 producing cells in septic implant loosening

Human β-defensin-3 (hBD-3) has been found in synovial fluid and later in periprosthetic tissues in septic joint implant loosening. The aim of the present study was to identify its cellular sources. Tissue samples from 12 patients were analyzed. A fully automatic Leica BOND MAX staining robot was used. Affinity-purified rabbit anti-human hBD-3 IgG was applied in a two-layer horse radish peroxidase/anti-rabbit-labeled polymer method. Double immunofluorescence of hBD3 together with CD68, CD31, heat shock protein 47 (HSP47) and mast cell tryptase (MCT) staining was done. Human BD-3 was found in monocyte/macrophage-like cells, vascular endothelial cells and fibroblasts-like cells, but was weakly expressed in foreign body giant cells and negative in neutrophils. Human BD-3 was found in CD68 and CD31 immunoreactive cells, whereas HSP47 and MCT positive cells were hBD-3 negative. Immunostaining of hBD-3 was strong in some tissue areas but weak or absent in others. Monocyte/macrophages and endothelial cells were established in this study as the major cellular sources of hBD-3 in septic loosening, but fibroblasts and foreign body giant cells can also contribute to its production. The heterogeneous topological staining of hBD-3 suggests local regulation, possibly by bacterial products, damage-associated molecular patterns and cytokines. The results explain the increased synovial fluid/tissue concentrations of hBD-3 in septic loosening.

Endoglin (CD105) expression differentiates between aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty

The differentiation between aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty is essential for successful therapy. A better understanding of pathogenesis of aseptic loosening and PJI may help to prevent or treat these complications. Previous investigations revealed an increased vascularization in the periprosthetic membrane in cases of PJI via PET signals. Based on these findings our hypothesis was that PJI is associated with an increased neovascularization in the periprosthetic membrane.

Tissue samples from periprosthetic membranes of the bone-implant interface were investigated histologically for inflammation, wear particles, vascularization and fibrosis. To identify vascular structures antibodies against CD 31, CD 34, factor VIII and CD 105 (endoglin) were applied for immunohistochemical investigations. According to a consensus classification of Morawietz the tissue samples were divided into four types: type I (wear particle induced type, n = 11), type II (infectious type, n = 7), type III (combined type, n = 7) and type IV (indeterminate type, n = 7).

Patients with PJI (type II) showed a pronounced infiltration of neutrophil granulocytes in the periprosthetic membrane and an enhanced neovascularization indicated by positive immunoreaction with antibodies against CD 105 (endoglin). Tissue samples classified as type I, type III and type IV showed significantly less immune reaction for CD 105.

In cases of aseptic loosening and PJI vascularization is found in different expression in periprosthetic membranes. However, in aseptic loosening, there is nearly no neovascularization with CD 105-positive immune reaction. Therefore, endoglin (CD 105) expression allows for differentiation between aseptic loosening and PJI.