Modified osteomyocutaneous iliac crest flaps transplantation

Variations in deep iliac circumflex artery perforator chimeric flap design for single-stage customized-reconstruction of composite bone and soft-tissue defect

BACKGROUND

The deep iliac circumflex artery (DICA) perforator (DICAP) chimeric flap is a valuable treatment strategy for single-stage reconstruction of composite bone and soft-tissue defects in upper and lower extremities. However, its utilization rate remains low owing to anatomical variations that lead to challenges when identifying and dissecting perforators.

METHODS

A comprehensive anatomical investigation was conducted on the DICA system by injecting lead oxide into 12 fresh cadavers following a standardized procedure. From January 2008 to December 2020, 30 patients with composite bone and soft-tissue defects received reconstruction surgery with DICAP chimeric flap. One of the four specified surgical techniques was used to create a modified DICAP chimeric flap for the patients based on the size, shape, and location of the defect.

RESULTS

Two branching patterns of DICA, transverse and ascending branches, were observed, and the former gave off the osteomusculocutaneous perforators and terminal musculocutaneous perforators. Thirty DICAP chimeric flaps were elevated successfully. The size of the skin paddles measured from 9 × 4.5 cm to 22 × 9 cm, and the bone components ranged from 3 × 2.5 × 1.5 cm to 6 × 3.5 × 2 cm. All flaps survived successfully after the operation, and all patients achieved primary closure of the donor sites. No patient encountered the fracture of transferred iliac segments. The mean bone union time was 5.5 months (ranging from 4 to 8 months).

CONCLUSION

The DICA system is a suitable source for harvesting the DICAP chimeric flap to reconstruct composite bone and soft-tissue defects. It provides a flexible design for individualized coverage of such defects with limited donor-site morbidity.

Frontal Cranioplasty with Vascularized Split-iliac Crest Bone Flap

Defects of the frontal bone require thoughtful consideration of reconstructive material to satisfy the aesthetic and functional demands of the region, as well as the anatomic adjacency to the frontal sinus. Some cases may be further complicated by a suboptimal operative field due to prior radiation, reconstructive procedures, or infection. Vascularized bone offers an ideal option to successfully reconstruct bony defects in harsh wound beds. Here, we report the case of a 47-year-old man with adenoid cystic carcinoma who underwent secondary reconstruction of the frontal bone with a split-iliac crest bone flap based on the deep circumflex iliac artery. The patient’s course following an initial ablative procedure was complicated by recurrent periorbital cellulitis, radiation, and eventual recurrence of the malignancy. Reconstructive requirements included restoration of the superior orbital rim, cranialization of the frontal sinus, and reconstruction of a sizeable frontal bone defect. In this setting, the iliac crest served as an excellent reconstructive option owing to its natural curvature and large surface area. The split-iliac crest deep circumflex iliac artery bone flap offers a robust and valuable reconstructive option for calvarial defects in hostile surgical fields.

The Versatility of the DCIA Free Flap: A Forgotten Flap? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

 Studies reporting on the deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) free flap are restricted to a limited number of patients and areas of application. The aim of this review was to assess the reliability and versatility of the DCIA free flap during reconstruction.

METHODS

 A comprehensive review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and SCOPUS. A critical analysis of pooled data was performed to assess outcomes employing the DCIA free flap.

RESULTS

 A total of 445 DCIA free flaps were included. The main recipient sites were head and neck (72.35%), lower extremity (20.67%), and upper extremity (6.74%). The main indications for reconstruction were tumor resection (73.8%) and trauma (17.43%). Fifty non-DCIA flaps were required to finalize the reconstruction of several defects. The pooled flap failure rate using the DCIA free flap was 4% (95% confidence interval: 1-8%). No significant heterogeneity was present across studies (Q statistic 22.12, p = 0.14; I ² = 27.68%, p = 0.139). Complication rates for head and neck and limb reconstruction were 57.37 and 40.16%, respectively. The average length and surface area of bone flaps were 7.79 cm and 22.8 cm², respectively. The area of the skin paddles was 117 cm².

CONCLUSION

 The DCIA free flap has shown to be a versatile reconstructive alternative for head and neck and short-medium size limb defects. However, the complexity of functions, the recipient site location, and a potential large defect can detract from the use of the DCIA free flap as an initial reconstructive option for head and neck and extensive limb defects.

Combined multi-lobed flaps: A series of 39 extensive hand and multi-digit injuries one-staged reconstructions using modified designs of ALT, DPA and chimeric linking flaps

INTRODUCTION

The use of multiple small flaps linked in a "chain-linked" flap microanastomosed chimeric system is recommended in distal hand and digital defects reconstruction. The aim of this study is to demonstrates our experience utilizing microsurgical fabrication, multi-lobed and linking combined flaps for the reconstruction of hand degloving injuries with complex multidigit soft tissue defects.

METHODS

Microanastomosed chimeric flap systems using ALT and DPA modified designed flaps were combined in five selections to cover extensive soft tissue defects involving the hands and multiple digits of 39 patients (M:F - 36:3) from October 2009 to February 2013. Five different microsurgical combined chimeric flap systems utilised in extensive hand and multidigit injuries; innervated ALT flaps, multilobed DPA flaps, innervated ALT flap with multilobed DPA flap, innervated ALT flap with sensate ALT flap and bilobed ALT flap with multilobed DPA flap. All DPA donor sites were reconstructed using free ALT flap and anterior tibial artery propeller flap.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine combined free flap extremities reconstructions on 39 patients (M:F - 36:3) with average age 28.5 (18-45) years sustained traumatic degloving injuries, 24 from road traffic accidents and 15 from industrial devices. Five different designs of combined multi-lobed flaps have be successfully used without any peri-operative complications. Average follow-up of 12 months, all flaps survived without complications. Operated extremities showed favorable functional recovery with restoration of the diminished protective sensation on the flap through reinnervation. All flaps survived uneventfully with coverage matching the texture and color of the recipients. Donor sites healed without complication.

CONCLUSION

The microsurgical fabrication of chimeric ALT flaps and multilobed DPA flaps is a valuable alternative for the reconstruction of hand degloving injury with complex multidigit soft tissue defects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.