1
|
Wiesel O, Sung SW, Katz A, Leibowitz R, Bar J, Kamer I, Berger I, Nir-Ziv I, Mark Danieli M. A Novel Urine Test Biosensor Platform for Early Lung Cancer Detection. BIOSENSORS 2023; 13:627. [PMID: 37366992 DOI: 10.3390/bios13060627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early detection is essential to achieving a better outcome and prognosis. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) reflect alterations in the pathophysiology and body metabolism processes, as shown in various types of cancers. The biosensor platform (BSP) urine test uses animals' unique, proficient, and accurate ability to scent lung cancer VOCs. The BSP is a testing platform for the binary (negative/positive) recognition of the signature VOCs of lung cancer by trained and qualified Long-Evans rats as biosensors (BSs). The results of the current double-blind study show high accuracy in lung cancer VOC recognition, with 93% sensitivity and 91% specificity. The BSP test is safe, rapid, objective and can be performed repetitively, enabling periodic cancer monitoring as well as an aid to existing diagnostic methods. The future implementation of such urine tests as routine screening and monitoring tools has the potential to significantly increase detection rate as well as curability rates with lower healthcare expenditure. This paper offers a first instructive clinical platform utilizing VOC's in urine for detection of lung cancer using the innovative BSP to deal with the pressing need for an early lung cancer detection test tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ory Wiesel
- Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery the Cardiovascular Center, Tzafon Medical Center, Affiliated to Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Poriya 1520800, Israel
| | - Sook-Whan Sung
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ewha Womens University Seoul Hospital, 260 Gonghang-daero, Gangseo-gu, Seoul 07804, Republic of Korea
| | - Amit Katz
- Head of Thoracic Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, P.O. Box 9602, Haifa 3109601, Israel
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology institute, Shamir Medical Center, Zerifin 703001, Israel
| | - Jair Bar
- Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Iris Kamer
- Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Itay Berger
- Early OM, 4 Meir Ariel St., Natanya 4253063, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lamsisi M, Li G, Chauleur C, Ennaji MM, Bourlet T. The potential of urine for human papillomavirus-related cervical cancer prevention. Future Virol 2022. [DOI: 10.2217/fvl-2021-0246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable cancers. The introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines and the adaptation of regular screening programs are key actions that need to be generalized globally to achieve the goal of cervical cancer elimination. However, it is still challenging to achieve satisfactory coverage rate, and many women are reluctant to participate in gynecologic examination. In this article, we review the research on the application of HPV detection in urine samples for cervical cancer screening and vaccine monitoring, as well as discuss the technical challenges and new technological advancements in urine-based tests. HPV detection in urine is an excellent noninvasive alternative that is widely accepted by women, relatively affordable, and provides the potential to reach women without the necessity for clinical visits. Thus, it is an attractive tool for both cervical cancer screening and vaccine monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryame Lamsisi
- Team of Virology, Oncology & Medical Biotechnologies, Laboratory of Virology, Microbiology, Quality, & Biotechnologies/ETB, Faculty of Science & Techniques Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, 20650, Mohammedia, Morocco
| | - Guorong Li
- Department of Urology/Biology Pathology Lab, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, 42000, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Celine Chauleur
- Deparment of Gynecology & Obstetrics, North Hospital, CHU Saint-Etienne, 42000, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Moulay Mustapha Ennaji
- Team of Virology, Oncology & Medical Biotechnologies, Laboratory of Virology, Microbiology, Quality, & Biotechnologies/ETB, Faculty of Science & Techniques Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, 20650, Mohammedia, Morocco
| | - Thomas Bourlet
- Department of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42000, Saint Etienne, France
- Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP Team 15, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, University of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, 42000, Saint Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah SK, McElfish PA. A Review of Cancer Screening Recommendations during the COVID-19 Pandemic. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e34392. [PMID: 35142621 PMCID: PMC8914792 DOI: 10.2196/34392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer screening tests are recommended to prevent cancer-associated mortality by detecting precancerous and cancerous lesions in early stages. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the utilization of preventive health care services. While there was a rise in the number of cancer screening tests beginning in late 2020, screenings remained 29%-36% lower than in the pre-pandemic era. OBJECTIVE The objective of this review article was to assist health care providers in identifying approaches for prioritizing patients and increasing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening during the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS We used the scoping review framework to identify articles on PubMed and EBSCO databases. A total of 403 articles were identified, and 23 articles were selected for this review. Literature review ranged from January 1st, 2020 to September 30th, 2021. RESULTS The articles included two primary categories of recommendations: (1) risk stratification and triage to prioritize screenings and (2) alternative methods to conduct cancer screenings. Risk stratification and triage recommendations focused on prioritizing high-risk patients with an abnormal or suspicious result on the previous screening test, of certain age group and sex, having personal medical or family history of cancers, currently symptomatic, predisposed to hereditary cancers, and cancer-causing mutations. Other recommended strategies included: identifying areas facing most disparities, creating algorithms and using artificial intelligence to create cancer-risk scores, leveraging in-person visits to assess cancer risk, and providing the option of open access screenings where patients can schedule screenings and can be assigned a priority category by health care staff. Some recommended using telemedicine to categorize patients and determine screening-eligibility for patients with new complaints. Several articles noted the importance of implementing preventive measures such as COVID-19 screening prior to the procedures, maintaining hygiene measures, and social distancing in waiting rooms. Alternative screening methods which do not require an in-person clinic visit and can effectively screen patients for cancers included mailing self-collection sampling kits for cervical and colorectal cancers and implementing or expanding mobile screening units. CONCLUSIONS Although the COVID-19 pandemic had devastating effects on population health globally, it could be an opportunity to adapt and evolve cancer screening methods. Disruption often creates innovation, and focus on alternative methods for cancer screenings may help reach rural and under-resourced areas after the pandemic has ended. CLINICALTRIAL
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit K Shah
- Office of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, US
| | - Pearl A McElfish
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Avenue, Fayetteville, US
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Advances in HPV Screening Tests for Cervical Cancer-A Review. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2022; 72:13-18. [PMID: 35125734 PMCID: PMC8804131 DOI: 10.1007/s13224-021-01569-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
HPV is responsible for almost all cases of cervical cancer which in turn is one of the common causes of death among female genital malignancies. Cervical cancer being a preventable disease, screening plays a vital role in its reduction. In this era of advanced health care system and technologies this cancer is still in the increasing trend, especially in the Low and Middle Income Countries, which reflects the poor coverage of women for screening. Advances in screening tests and techniques for better and larger coverage of women is the need of the hour globally. Clinicians also need to be aware of the various promising technologies available for screening of cervical cancer precursors, application of which in general practice can be of immense help in cervical cancer reduction.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hernández-López R, Hermosillo L, León-Maldonado L, Velázquez-Cruz R, Torres-Ibarra L, Lazcano-Ponce E, Lörincz A, Wheeler CM, Bosch FX, Cuzick J, Rivera-Paredez B, Nedjai B, Salmerón J. Performance of an affordable urine self-sampling method for human papillomavirus detection in Mexican women. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254946. [PMID: 34288949 PMCID: PMC8294492 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urine self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening is a non-invasive method that offers several logistical advantages and high acceptability, reducing barriers related to low screening coverage. This study developed and evaluated the performance of a low-cost urine self-sampling method for HPV-testing and explored the acceptability and feasibility of potential implementation of this alternative in routine screening. METHODS A series of sequential laboratory assays examined the impact of several pre-analytical conditions for obtaining DNA from urine and subsequent HPV detection. Initially, we assessed the effect of ethylaminediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a DNA preservative examining several variables including EDTA concentration, specimen storage temperature, time between urine collection and DNA extraction, and first-morning micturition versus convenience sample collection. We further evaluated the agreement of HPV-testing between urine and clinician-collected cervical samples among 95 women. Finally, we explored the costs of self-sampling supplies as well as the acceptability and feasibility of urine self-sampling among women and healthcare workers. RESULTS Our results revealed higher DNA concentrations were obtained when using a 40mM EDTA solution, storing specimens at 25°C and extracting DNA within 72 hrs. of urine collection, regardless of using first-morning micturition or a convenience sampling. We observed good agreement (Kappa = 0.72) between urine and clinician-collected cervical samples for HPV detection. Furthermore, urine self-sampling was an affordable method (USD 1.10), well accepted among cervical cancer screening users, healthcare workers, and decision-makers. CONCLUSION These results suggest urine self-sampling is feasible and appropriate alternative for HPV-testing in HPV-based screening programs in lower-resource contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubí Hernández-López
- Oficina de Análisis del Plan de Salud, Subgerencia Técnica del Plan de Salud, Gerencia de Administración del Plan de Salud, Banco de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis Hermosillo
- Facultad de Medicina, Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Leith León-Maldonado
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología-Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Rafael Velázquez-Cruz
- Laboratorio de Genómica del Metabolismo Óseo, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Leticia Torres-Ibarra
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Attila Lörincz
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Department of Pathology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - F. Xavier Bosch
- Unit of Infections and Cancer—Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)—IDIBELL, l’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Open University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Berenice Rivera-Paredez
- Facultad de Medicina, Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Belinda Nedjai
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jorge Salmerón
- Facultad de Medicina, Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuriakose S, Sabeena S, Damodaran B, Ravishankar N, Ramachandran A, Ameen N. Comparison of two self-sampling methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing among women with high prevalence rates. J Med Virol 2020; 92:3884-3888. [PMID: 32436997 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
One major advantage of molecular assays for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection is that these assays can be performed on self-collected samples unlike cytology or visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). This cross-sectional study was carried out between March 2017 and April 2019 to compare the diagnostic performance in self-collected urine and vaginal samples for HPV DNA detection. Viral DNA was extracted from processed samples using a Qiagen viral DNA extraction Kit (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit). To detect four common high-risk HPV types (16, 18, 31, 45), multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the LCR/E6/E7 region of the HPV genome was performed in ABI 7500 cycler (Applied Biosystems). The negative samples were screened by conventional PCR targeting the L1 capsid region to exclude other HPV types. The overall agreement between the two self-collecting sampling methods was 64.04% with a κ value of 0.29 pointing towards a fair agreement (P < .01). The sensitivity of HPV DNA detection in urine samples was 57.95% (47.52%, 67.72), and specificity was 84.6% (66.47%, 93.85%) when compared with vaginal samples. The study concludes that self-collected vaginal HPV DNA testing is more sensitive than unpreserved-urine samples for HPV DNA detection in a hospital-based setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santhosh Kuriakose
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
| | | | - Binesh Damodaran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
| | - N Ravishankar
- Department of Data Science, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Amrutha Ramachandran
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
| | - Nurul Ameen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|