1
|
Weller M, Remon J, Rieken S, Vollmuth P, Ahn MJ, Minniti G, Le Rhun E, Westphal M, Brastianos PK, Soo RA, Kirkpatrick JP, Goldberg SB, Öhrling K, Hegi-Johnson F, Hendriks LEL. Central nervous system metastases in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the therapeutic landscape. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 130:102807. [PMID: 39151281 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
Up to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Current treatments for this subgroup of patients with advanced NSCLC include local therapies (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and, less frequently, whole-brain radiotherapy), targeted therapies for oncogene-addicted NSCLC (small molecules, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (as monotherapy or combination therapy), with multiple new drugs in development. However, confirming the intracranial activity of these treatments has proven to be challenging, given that most lung cancer clinical trials exclude patients with untreated and/or progressing CNS metastases, or do not include prespecified CNS-related endpoints. Here we review progress in the treatment of patients with CNS metastases originating from NSCLC, examining local treatment options, systemic therapies, and multimodal therapeutic strategies. We also consider challenges regarding assessment of treatment response and provide thoughts around future directions for managing CNS disease in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Jordi Remon
- Paris-Saclay University, Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Lower Saxony (CCC-N), University Hospital Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Division for Computational Radiology & Clinical AI, Clinic for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Division for Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Manfred Westphal
- Department of Neurosurgery and Institute for Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | - Ross A Soo
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | | | - Fiona Hegi-Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tian Q, Wu Y, Li G, Huang X, Cai Q. Lung cancer brain metastasis and hemorrhagic cerebral venous thrombosis: experiences and lessons. Thromb J 2024; 22:61. [PMID: 38992686 PMCID: PMC11238355 DOI: 10.1186/s12959-024-00629-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of lung cancer brain metastasis combined with hemorrhagic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is very rare, and the understanding and treatment experience of this case is insufficient. We reported a case of lung cancer brain metastasis accompanied by venous sinus thrombosis, and describe the diagnosis and treatment plan for colleagues to learn from experience and lessons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qilong Tian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yingxi Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiaofeng Huang
- Department of Oncology, Tangdu hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
| | - Qing Cai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang TW, Hsu MS, Lee WK, Pan HC, Yang HC, Lee CC, Wu YT. Brain metastasis tumor segmentation and detection using deep learning algorithms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:110007. [PMID: 37967585 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Manual detection of brain metastases is both laborious and inconsistent, driving the need for more efficient solutions. Accordingly, our systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of deep learning algorithms in detecting and segmenting brain metastases from various primary origins in MRI images. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to May 24, 2023, which yielded 42 relevant studies for our analysis. We assessed the quality of these studies using the QUADAS-2 and CLAIM tools. Using a random-effect model, we calculated the pooled lesion-wise dice score as well as patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivity. We performed subgroup analyses to investigate the influence of factors such as publication year, study design, training center of the model, validation methods, slice thickness, model input dimensions, MRI sequences fed to the model, and the specific deep learning algorithms employed. Additionally, meta-regression analyses were carried out considering the number of patients in the studies, count of MRI manufacturers, count of MRI models, training sample size, and lesion number. RESULTS Our analysis highlighted that deep learning models, particularly the U-Net and its variants, demonstrated superior segmentation accuracy. Enhanced detection sensitivity was observed with an increased diversity in MRI hardware, both in terms of manufacturer and model variety. Furthermore, slice thickness was identified as a significant factor influencing lesion-wise detection sensitivity. Overall, the pooled results indicated a lesion-wise dice score of 79%, with patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivities at 86% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The study underscores the potential of deep learning in improving brain metastasis diagnostics and treatment planning. Still, more extensive cohorts and larger meta-analysis are needed for more practical and generalizable algorithms. Future research should prioritize these areas to advance the field. This study was funded by the Gen. & Mrs. M.C. Peng Fellowship and registered under PROSPERO (CRD42023427776).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Wei Wang
- Institute of Biophotonics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 155, Sec. 2, Li-Nong St. Beitou Dist., Taipei 112304, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Sheng Hsu
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Kai Lee
- Institute of Biophotonics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 155, Sec. 2, Li-Nong St. Beitou Dist., Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Chuan Pan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Te Wu
- Institute of Biophotonics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 155, Sec. 2, Li-Nong St. Beitou Dist., Taipei 112304, Taiwan; National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Brain Research Center, Taiwan; National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, College Medical Device Innovation and Translation Center, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toader C, Dobrin N, Tataru CI, Covache-Busuioc RA, Bratu BG, Glavan LA, Costin HP, Corlatescu AD, Dumitrascu DI, Ciurea AV. From Genes to Therapy: Pituitary Adenomas in the Era of Precision Medicine. Biomedicines 2023; 12:23. [PMID: 38275385 PMCID: PMC10813694 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
This review presents a comprehensive analysis of pituitary adenomas, a type of brain tumor with diverse behaviors and complexities. We cover various treatment approaches, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and their integration with newer treatments. Key to the discussion is the role of biomarkers in oncology for risk assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, and the monitoring of pituitary adenomas. We highlight advances in genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic analyses and their contributions to understanding the pathogenesis and molecular pathology of these tumors. Special attention is given to the molecular mechanisms, including the impact of epigenetic factors like histone modifications, DNA methylation, and transcriptomic changes on different subtypes of pituitary adenomas. The importance of the tumor immune microenvironment in tumor behavior and treatment response is thoroughly analyzed. We highlight potential breakthroughs and innovations for a more effective management and treatment of pituitary adenomas, while shedding light on the ongoing need for research and development in this field to translate scientific knowledge into clinical advancements, aiming to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corneliu Toader
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (C.T.); (R.-A.C.-B.); (B.-G.B.); (L.A.G.); (H.P.C.); (D.-I.D.); (A.V.C.)
- Department of Vascular Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurovascular Diseases, 077160 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolaie Dobrin
- Neurosurgical Clinic, “Prof. Dr. N. Oblu” Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700309 Iași, Romania
| | - Catalina-Ioana Tataru
- Department of Ophthalmology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Ophthalmology, Clinical Hospital of Ophthalmological Emergencies, 010464 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Razvan-Adrian Covache-Busuioc
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (C.T.); (R.-A.C.-B.); (B.-G.B.); (L.A.G.); (H.P.C.); (D.-I.D.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Bogdan-Gabriel Bratu
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (C.T.); (R.-A.C.-B.); (B.-G.B.); (L.A.G.); (H.P.C.); (D.-I.D.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Luca Andrei Glavan
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (C.T.); (R.-A.C.-B.); (B.-G.B.); (L.A.G.); (H.P.C.); (D.-I.D.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Horia Petre Costin
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (C.T.); (R.-A.C.-B.); (B.-G.B.); (L.A.G.); (H.P.C.); (D.-I.D.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Antonio Daniel Corlatescu
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (C.T.); (R.-A.C.-B.); (B.-G.B.); (L.A.G.); (H.P.C.); (D.-I.D.); (A.V.C.)
| | - David-Ioan Dumitrascu
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (C.T.); (R.-A.C.-B.); (B.-G.B.); (L.A.G.); (H.P.C.); (D.-I.D.); (A.V.C.)
- Neurosurgery Department, Sanador Clinical Hospital, 010991 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandru Vlad Ciurea
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (C.T.); (R.-A.C.-B.); (B.-G.B.); (L.A.G.); (H.P.C.); (D.-I.D.); (A.V.C.)
- Neurosurgery Department, Sanador Clinical Hospital, 010991 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Voglis S, Padevit L, van Niftrik CHB, Kälin V, Beyersdorf B, Da Mutten R, Stumpo V, Bellomo J, Sarnthein J, Staartjes VE, Carretta A, Krayenbühl N, Regli L, Serra C. Safety of microneurosurgical interventions for superficial and deep-seated brain metastases: single-center cohort study of 637 consecutive cases. J Neurooncol 2023; 165:271-278. [PMID: 37945819 PMCID: PMC10689541 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04478-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Microneurosurgical techniques have greatly improved over the past years due to the introduction of new technology and surgical concepts. To reevaluate the role of micro-neurosurgery in brain metastases (BM) resection in the era of new systemic and local treatment options, its safety profile needs to be reassessed. The aim of this study was to analyze the rate of adverse events (AEs) according to a systematic, comprehensive and reliably reproducible grading system after microneurosurgical BM resection in a large and modern microneurosurgical series with special emphasis on anatomical location. METHODS Prospectively collected cases of BM resection between 2013 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Number of AEs, defined as any deviations from the expected postoperative course according to Clavien-Dindo-Grade (CDG) were evaluated. Patient, surgical, and lesion characteristics, including exact anatomic tumor locations, were analyzed using uni- and multivariate logistic regression and survival analysis to identify predictive factors for AEs. RESULTS We identified 664 eligible patients with lung cancer being the most common primary tumor (44%), followed by melanoma (25%) and breast cancer (11%). 29 patients (4%) underwent biopsy only whereas BM were resected in 637 (96%) of cases. The overall rate of AEs was 8% at discharge. However, severe AEs (≥ CDG 3a; requiring surgical intervention under local/general anesthesia or ICU treatment) occurred in only 1.9% (n = 12) of cases with a perioperative mortality of 0.6% (n = 4). Infratentorial tumor location (OR 5.46, 95% 2.31-13.8, p = .001), reoperation (OR 2.31, 95% 1.07-4.81, p = .033) and central region tumor location (OR 3.03, 95% 1.03-8.60) showed to be significant predictors in a multivariate analysis for major AEs (CDG ≥ 2 or new neurological deficits). Neither deep supratentorial nor central region tumors were associated with more major AEs compared to convexity lesions. CONCLUSIONS Modern microneurosurgical resection can be considered an excellent option in the management of BM in terms of safety, as the overall rate of major AEs are very rare even in eloquent and deep-seated lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanos Voglis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Luis Padevit
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christiaan Hendrik Bas van Niftrik
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vincens Kälin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Beyersdorf
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Raffaele Da Mutten
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vittorio Stumpo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jacopo Bellomo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Sarnthein
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Victor Egon Staartjes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Carretta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Niklaus Krayenbühl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luca Regli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carlo Serra
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Crompton D, Koffler D, Fekrmandi F, Lehrer EJ, Sheehan JP, Trifiletti DM. Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2023; 165:21-28. [PMID: 37889441 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04466-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a method of delivering conformal radiation, which allows minimal radiation damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Adjuvant radiation therapy has been shown to improve local control in a variety of intracranial neoplasms, such as brain metastases, gliomas, and benign tumors (i.e., meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, etc.). For brain metastases, adjuvant SRS specifically has demonstrated positive oncologic outcomes as well as preserving cognitive function when compared to conventional whole brain radiation therapy. However, as compared with neoadjuvant SRS, larger post-operative volumes and greater target volume uncertainty may come with an increased risk of local failure and treatment-related complications, such as radiation necrosis. In addition to its role in brain metastases, neoadjuvant SRS for high grade gliomas may enable dose escalation and increase immunogenic effects and serve a purpose in benign tumors for which one cannot achieve a gross total resection (GTR). Finally, although neoadjuvant SRS has historically been delivered with photon therapy, there are high LET radiation modalities such as carbon-ion therapy which may allow radiation damage to tissue and should be further studied if done in the neoadjuvant setting. In this review we discuss the evolving role of neoadjuvant radiosurgery in the treatment for brain metastases, gliomas, and benign etiologies. We also offer perspective on the evolving role of high LET radiation such as carbon-ion therapy. METHODS PubMed was systemically reviewed using the search terms "neoadjuvant radiosurgery", "brain metastasis", and "glioma". ' Clinicaltrials.gov ' was also reviewed to include ongoing phase III trials. RESULTS This comprehensive review describes the evolving role for neoadjuvant SRS in the treatment for brain metastases, gliomas, and benign etiologies. We also discuss the potential role for high LET radiation in this setting such as carbon-ion radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Early clinical data is very promising for neoadjuvant SRS in the setting of brain metastases. There are three ongoing phase III trials that will be more definitive in evaluating the potential benefits. While there is less data available for neoadjuvant SRS for gliomas, there remains a potential role, particularly to enable dose escalation and increase immunogenic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Crompton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Daniel Koffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Fatemeh Fekrmandi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Covell MM, Warrier A, Rumalla KC, Dehney CM, Bowers CA. RAI-measured frailty predicts non-home discharge following metastatic brain tumor resection: national inpatient sample analysis of 20,185 patients. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:663-670. [PMID: 37787907 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04461-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preoperative risk stratification for patients undergoing metastatic brain tumor resection (MBTR) is based on established tumor-, patient-, and disease-specific risk factors for outcome prognostication. Frailty, or decreased baseline physiologic reserve, is a demonstrated independent risk factor for adverse outcomes following MBTR. The present study sought to assess the impact of frailty, measured by the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), on MBTR outcomes. METHODS All MBTR were queried from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2019 to 2020 using diagnosis and procedural codes. The relationship between preoperative RAI frailty score and our primary outcome - non-home discharge (NHD) - and secondary outcomes - complication rates, extended length of stay (eLOS), and mortality - were analyzed via univariate and multivariable analyses. Discriminatory accuracy was tested by computation of concordance statistics in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis. RESULTS There were 20,185 MBTR patients from the NIS database from 2019 to 2020. Each patient's frailty status was stratified by RAI score: 0-20 (robust): 34%, 21-30 (normal): 35.1%, 31-40 (very frail): 13.9%, 41+ (severely frail): 16.8%. Compared to robust patients, severely frail patients demonstrated increased complication rates (12.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001), eLOS (37.6% vs. 13.2%, p < 0.001), NHD (52.0% vs. 20.6%, p < 0.001), and mortality (9.9% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001). AUROC curve analysis demonstrated good discriminatory accuracy of RAI-measured frailty in predicting NHD after MBTR (C-statistic = 0.67). CONCLUSION Increasing RAI-measured frailty status is significantly associated with increased complication rates, eLOS, NHD, and mortality following MBTR. Preoperative frailty assessment using the RAI may aid in preoperative surgical planning and risk stratification for patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Covell
- School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Kranti C Rumalla
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Christian A Bowers
- Bowers Neurosurgical Frailty and Outcomes Data Science Lab, Sandy, Utah, 84070, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Galve-Calvo E, Alonso-Babarro A, Martínez-García M, Pi-Figueras M, Villalba G, Alonso S, Contreras J. Narrative Review of Multidisciplinary Management of Central Nervous Involvement in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Focus on Elderly Patients. Adv Ther 2023; 40:3304-3331. [PMID: 37291377 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02538-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The tumor biology of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) promotes the development of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, with 25% of patients with HER2-positive BC developing CNS metastases. Furthermore, the incidence of HER2-positive BC brain metastases has increased in the last decades, likely because of the improved survival with targeted therapies and better detection methods. Brain metastases are detrimental to quality of life and survival and represent a challenging clinical problem, particularly in elderly women, who comprise a substantial proportion of patients diagnosed with BC and often have comorbidities or an age-related decline in organ function. Treatment options for patients with BC brain metastases include surgical resection, whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, and targeted agents. Ideally, local and systemic treatment decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary team, with input from several specialties, based on an individualized prognostic classification. In elderly patients with BC, additional age-associated conditions, such as geriatric syndromes or comorbidities, and the physiologic changes associated with aging, may impact their ability to tolerate cancer therapy and should be considered in the treatment decision-making process. This review describes the treatment options for elderly patients with HER2-positive BC and brain metastases, focusing on the importance of multidisciplinary management, the different points of view from the distinct disciplines, and the role of oncogeriatric and palliative care in this vulnerable patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Galve-Calvo
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Basurto (OSI Bilbao-Basurto), Avda. Montevideo 18, 48013, Bilbao, Bisczy, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jorge Contreras
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Diehl CD, Giordano FA, Grosu AL, Ille S, Kahl KH, Onken J, Rieken S, Sarria GR, Shiban E, Wagner A, Beck J, Brehmer S, Ganslandt O, Hamed M, Meyer B, Münter M, Raabe A, Rohde V, Schaller K, Schilling D, Schneider M, Sperk E, Thomé C, Vajkoczy P, Vatter H, Combs SE. Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3670. [PMID: 37509330 PMCID: PMC10377800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Medical Faculty, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ille
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Niedersachsen (CCC-N), 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Jürgen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Ganslandt
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Andreas Raabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Karl Schaller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Geneva Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- Mannheim Cancer Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grossenbacher B, Lareida A, Moors S, Roth P, Kulcsar Z, Regli L, Le Rhun E, Weller M, Wolpert F. Prognostic assessment in patients operated for brain metastasis from systemic tumors. Cancer Med 2023; 12:12316-12324. [PMID: 37039262 PMCID: PMC10278502 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Established models for prognostic assessment in patients with brain metastasis do not stratify for prior surgery. Here we tested the prognostic accuracy of the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score model in patients operated for BM and explored further prognostic factors. METHODS We included 285 patients operated for brain metastasis at the University Hospital Zurich in the analysis. Information on patient characteristics, imaging, staging, peri- and postoperative complications and survival were extracted from the files and integrated into a multivariate Cox hazard model. RESULTS The GPA score showed an association with outcome. We further identified residual tumor after surgery (p = 0.007, hazard ratio (HR) 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.3) steroid use (p = 0.021, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6) and number of extracranial metastasis sites (p = 0.009, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.6) at the time of surgery as independent prognostic factors. A trend was observed for postoperative infection of the subarachnoid space (p = 0.102, HR 3.5, 95% CI 0.8-15.7). CONCLUSIONS We confirm the prognostic capacity of the GPA score in a cohort of operated patients with brain metastasis. However, extent of resection and steroid use provide additional aid for the prognostic assessment in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Grossenbacher
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Anna Lareida
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Selina Moors
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Patrick Roth
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Zsolt Kulcsar
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Luca Regli
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Fabian Wolpert
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gagliardi F, De Domenico P, Snider S, Nizzola MG, Mortini P. Efficacy of neoadjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases from solid cancer: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2023; 46:130. [PMID: 37256368 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02031-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (NaSRT) is a novel strategy for brain metastasis (BM) treatment, promising to achieve good local control, improved survival, and low toxicity. This is a systematic review of available literature and meta-analysis of 8 articles eligible for inclusion after searching MEDLINE via PubMed, Web-of-science, Cochrane Wiley, and Embase databases up to March 2023. A total of 484 patients undergoing NaSRT to treat 507 lesions were included. The median age was 60.9 (IQR 57-63) years, with a median tumor volume of 12.1 (IQR 9-14) cm3. The most frequent histology was non-small-cell lung cancer (41.3%), followed by breast (18.8%), and melanoma (14.3%). Lesions had a preferred supratentorial location (77.4%). Most of the studies used a single fraction schedule (91% of patients, n = 440). Treatment parameters were homogeneous and showed a median dose of 18 (IQR 15.5-20.5) Gy at a median of 80% isodose. Surgery was performed after a median of 1.5 (IQR 1-2.4) days and achieved gross-total extent in 94% of cases. Median follow-up was 12.9 (IQR 10-15.7) months. NaSRT showed an overall mortality rate of 58% (95% CI 43-73) at the last follow-up. Actuarial outcomes rates were 60% (95% CI 55-64) for 1-year overall survival (1y-OS), 38% (95% CI 33-43) for 2y-OS, 29% (95% CI 24-34) for 3y-OS; overall 15% (95% CI 11-19) for local failure, 46% (95% CI 37-55) for distant brain failure, 6% (95% CI 3-8) for radionecrosis, and 5% (95% CI 3-8) for leptomeningeal dissemination. The median local progression-free survival time was 10.4 (IQR 9.5-11.4) months, while the median survival without distant failure was 7.4 (IQR 6.9-8) months. The median OS time for the entire cohort was 17 (IQR 14.9-17.9) months. Existing data suggest that NaSRT is effective and safe in the treatment of BMs, achieving good local control on BMs with and low incidence of radionecrosis and leptomeningeal dissemination. Distant control appears limited compared to other radiation regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Gagliardi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pierfrancesco De Domenico
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Snider
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Nizzola
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kalyvas A, Gutierrez-Valencia E, Lau R, Ye XY, O'Halloran PJ, Mohan N, Wong C, Millar BA, Laperriere N, Conrad T, Berlin A, Bernstein M, Zadeh G, Shultz DB, Kongkham P. Anatomical and surgical characteristics correlate with pachymeningeal failure in patients with brain metastases after neurosurgical resection and adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:269-279. [PMID: 37165117 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04325-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neurosurgery (NS) is an essential modality for large brain metastases (BM). Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the standard of care adjuvant treatment. Pachymeningeal failure (PMF) is a newly described entity, distinct from classical leptomeningeal failure (LMF), that is uniquely observed in postoperative patients treated with adjuvant SRS. We sought to identify risk factors for PMF in patients treated with NS + SRS. METHODS From a prospective registry (2009 to 2021), we identified all patients treated with NS + SRS. Clinical, imaging, pathological, and treatment factors were analyzed. PMF incidence was evaluated using a competing risks model. RESULTS 144 Patients were identified. The median age was 62 (23-90). PMF occurred in 21.5% (31/144). Female gender [Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.65, p = 0.013], higher Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) index (HR 2.4, p < 0.001), absence of prior radiation therapy (HR N/A, p = 0.018), controlled extracranial disease (CED) (HR 3.46, p = 0.0038), and pia/dura contact (PDC) (HR 3.30, p = 0.0053) were associated with increased risk for PMF on univariate analysis. In patients with PDC, wider target volumes correlated with reduced risk of PMF. Multivariate analysis indicated PDC (HR 3.51, p = 0.0053), piecemeal resection (HR 2.38, p = 0.027), and CED (HR 3.97, p = 0.0016) independently correlated with PMF risk. PMF correlated with reduced OS (HR 2.90, p < 0.001) at a lower rate compared to LMF (HR 10.15, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION PMF correlates with tumor PDC and piecemeal resection in patients treated with NS + SRS. For unclear reasons, it is also associated with CED. In tumors with PDC, wider dural radiotherapy coverage was associated with a lower risk of PMF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotelis Kalyvas
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada.
| | - Enrique Gutierrez-Valencia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ruth Lau
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Xiang Y Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philip J O'Halloran
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Nilesh Mohan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Christine Wong
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Barbara-Ann Millar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tatiana Conrad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Bernstein
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - David B Shultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Kongkham
- Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Manfield J, Waqar M, Mercer D, Ehsan S, Bambrough J, Ibrahim N, Sivarajan K, Bailey M, Karabatsou K, Coope D, Ponnusamy A, Phang I, D'Urso PI. Multimodal mapping and monitoring is beneficial during awake craniotomy for intra-cranial tumours: results of a dual centre retrospective study. Br J Neurosurg 2023; 37:182-187. [PMID: 34918613 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.2016622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of awake craniotomy with multimodal neurophysiological mapping and monitoring in intra-axial tumour resection is not well described, but may have theoretical benefits which we sought to investigate. METHODS All patients undergoing awake craniotomy for tumour resection with cortical and/or subcortical stimulation together with one or more of electrocorticography (ECoG/EEG), motor or somatosensory evoked potentials were identified from the operative records of two surgeons at two centres over a 5 year period. Patient, operative and outcome data were collated. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate factors predictive of intra-operative seizures and surgical outcomes. RESULTS 83 patients with a median age 50 years (18-80 years) were included. 80% had gliomas (37% low grade) and 13% metastases. Cortical mapping was negative in 35% (language areas) and 24% (motor areas). Complete or near total resection was achieved in 80% with 5% severe long-term neurological deficits. Negative cortical mapping was combined with positive subcortical mapping in 42% with no significant difference in extent of resection rates to patients undergoing positive cortical mapping (p = 0.95). Awake mapping could not be completed in 14%, but with no compromise to extent of resection (p = 0.55) or complication rates (p = 0.09). Intraoperative seizures occurred in 11% and were significantly associated with intra-operative EEG spikes (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Awake multi-modal monitoring is a safe and well tolerated technique. It provides preservation of extent of resection and clinical outcomes in cases of aborted awake craniotomy. Negative cortical mapping in combination with positive subcortical mapping was also shown to be safe, although not hitherto well described. Electrocorticography further enables the differentiation of seizure activity from true positive mapping, and the successful treatment of spikes prior to full clinical seizures occurring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Manfield
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences (MCCN), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Mueez Waqar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences (MCCN), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Deborah Mercer
- Department of Neurophysiology, MCCN, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Sheeba Ehsan
- Department of Neurophysiology, MCCN, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Jacki Bambrough
- Department of Neurophysiology, MCCN, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Nadir Ibrahim
- Department of Anaesthesia, MCCN, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Kris Sivarajan
- Department of Anaesthesia, MCCN, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Matt Bailey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences (MCCN), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Konstantina Karabatsou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences (MCCN), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - David Coope
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences (MCCN), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Athi Ponnusamy
- Department of Neurophysiology, MCCN, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Isaac Phang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Preston Hospital. Lancashire teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Pietro Ivo D'Urso
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences (MCCN), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Poor Karnofsky performance status is not a contraindication for neurosurgical resection in patients with lung cancer brain metastases: a multicenter, retrospective PSM-IPTW cohort study. J Neurooncol 2023; 162:327-335. [PMID: 36940052 PMCID: PMC10167153 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04293-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGOUND Neurosurgical resection is a standard local treatment for lung cancer brain metastases (BMs). This study aims to investigate whether neurosurgical resection provides survival benefit in lung cancer BMs with poor KPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter retrospective study included 386 lung cancer BMs with pretreatment KPS ≤ 70 among a total of 1177 lung cancer BMs treated at three centers from August 2010 to July 2021. Data analysis was performed from July to September 2022. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity scores matching (PSM) based on propensity scoring were used to minimize bias. The main outcome was overall survival (OS) after diagnosis of BMs. Risk factors of OS were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. All Characteristics were included in the multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS 386 patients with pretreatment KPS ≤ 70 were included (age mean [SD], 57.85 [10.36] years; KPS mean [SD], 60.91 [10.11]). Among them, 111 patients received neurosurgical resection, while 275 patients did not. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups after IPTW or PSM. Neurosurgical resection was associated with significantly better prognosis in unadjusted multivariate COX analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.91, P = 0.01), and PSM-adjusted multivariate COX analysis (HR: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.39-0.94, P = 0.03), IPTW-adjusted multivariate COX analysis (HR: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.40-0.84, P = 0.004). OS was significantly longer in neurosurgical resection group compared with non-surgical resection group according to unadjusted data (Median OS, surgery vs non-surgery, 14.7 vs 12.5 months, P = 0.01), PSM-adjusted data (median OS, 17.7 vs 12.3 months, P < 0.01) and IPTW-adjusted data (median OS, 17.7 vs 12.5 months, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Neurosurgical resection was associated with improved survival in patients with lung cancer BMs with poor KPS, suggesting that poor KPS is not a contraindication for neurosurgical resection in these patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Steinmann J, Rapp M, Sadat H, Staub-Bartelt F, Turowski B, Steiger HJ, Hänggi D, Sabel M, Kamp MA. The impact of preoperative MRI-based apparent diffusion coefficients on local recurrence and outcome in patients with cerebral metastases. Br J Neurosurg 2023; 37:12-19. [PMID: 32990044 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1817856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery of single cerebral metastases is standard but frequently fails to achieve local tumour control. Reliable predictors for local tumour progression and overall survival are unknown. MRI-based apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) correlate with tumour cellularity and invasion. The present study analysed a potential relation between the MRI based apparent diffusion coefficients local recurrence and outcome in patients with brain metastases. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed for patients with cerebral metastases and complete surgical resection evaluated by an early postoperative MRI < 72h. Minimal ADC and mean ADC were assessed in preoperative 1,5T-MRI scans by placing regions of interests in the tumour and the peritumoural tissue. RESULTS Analysis of the relation between ADC values, local progression and outcome was performed in 86 patients with a mean age of 59 years (range 33-83 years). Primary site was NSCLC in 37.2% of all cases. Despite complete resection 33.7% of all patients suffered from local in-brain-progression. There were no significant differences in ADC values in groups based on histology. In the present cohort, the mean ADCmin and the mean ADCmean within the metastasis did not differ significantly between patients with and without a later local in-brain progression (634 × 10-6 vs. 661 × 10-6 mm2/s and 1324 × 10-6 vs. 1361 × 10-6 mm2/s; 1100 × 10-6 vs. 1054 × 10-6 mm2/s; each p > 0.05). Mean ADC values did not correlate significantly with PFS and OAS. CONCLUSION In the present study analysed ADC values had no significant impact on local in brain progression and survival parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Steinmann
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marion Rapp
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hosai Sadat
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Turowski
- Klinik für Radiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hans-Jakob Steiger
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel Hänggi
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Sabel
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marcel A Kamp
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Byun J, Kim JH. Revisiting the Role of Surgical Resection for Brain Metastasis. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2023; 11:1-7. [PMID: 36762802 PMCID: PMC9911712 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2022.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis (BM) is the most common type of brain tumor in adults. The contemporary management of BM remains challenging. Advancements in systemic cancer treatment have increased the survival of patients with cancer. Although the treatment of BM is still complicated, advances in radiotherapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery and chemotherapy, have improved treatment outcomes. Surgical resection is the traditional treatment for BM and its role in the surgical resection of BM has been well established. However, refinement of the surgical resection technique and strategy for BM is needed. Herein, we discuss the evolving role of surgery in patients with BM and the future of BM treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joonho Byun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Diehl CD, Rosenkranz E, Schwendner M, Mißlbeck M, Sollmann N, Ille S, Meyer B, Combs SE, Krieg SM. Dose Reduction to Motor Structures in Adjuvant Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Brain Metastases: nTMS-Derived DTI-Based Motor Fiber Tracking in Treatment Planning. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010282. [PMID: 36612277 PMCID: PMC9818359 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Resection of brain metastases (BM) close to motor structures is challenging for treatment. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) motor mapping, combined with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based fiber tracking (DTI-FTmot.TMS), is a valuable tool in neurosurgery to preserve motor function. This study aimed to assess the practicability of DTI-FTmot.TMS for local adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) planning of BM. Methods: Presurgically generated DTI-FTmot.TMS-based corticospinal tract (CST) reconstructions (FTmot.TMS) of 24 patients with 25 BM resected during later surgery were incorporated into the RT planning system. Completed fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) plans were retrospectively analyzed and adapted to preserve FTmot.TMS. Results: In regular plans, mean dose (Dmean) of complete FTmot.TMS was 5.2 ± 2.4 Gy. Regarding planning risk volume (PRV-FTTMS) portions outside of the planning target volume (PTV) within the 17.5 Gy (50%) isodose line, the DTI-FTmot.TMS Dmean was significantly reduced by 33.0% (range, 5.9−57.6%) from 23.4 ± 3.3 Gy to 15.9 ± 4.7 Gy (p < 0.001). There was no significant decline in the effective treatment dose, with PTV Dmean 35.6 ± 0.9 Gy vs. 36.0 ± 1.2 Gy (p = 0.063) after adaption. Conclusions: The DTI-FTmot.TMS-based CST reconstructions could be implemented in adjuvant IMRT planning of BM. A significant dose reduction regarding motor structures within critical dose levels seems possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D. Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Enrike Rosenkranz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Schwendner
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Mißlbeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ille
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Sandro M. Krieg
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Krauss P, Steininger K, Motov S, Sommer B, Bonk MN, Cortes A, Wolfert C, Stueben G, Shiban E, Kahl KH. Resection of supratentorial brain metastases with intraoperative radiotherapy. Is it safe? Analysis and experiences of a single center cohort. Front Surg 2022; 9:1071804. [PMID: 36632525 PMCID: PMC9826792 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1071804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Intraoperative Radiotherapy (ioRT) is an emerging treatment option in oncologic surgery for various diseases including intraaxial brain lesions to improve surgical outcome and accelerate the adjuvant oncologic therapy. Despite its use in glioma surgery, the application and data regarding ioRT in the treatment of brain metastases (BMs) is sparse. Here were report the largest series of supratentorial BMs treated with resection and ioRT according to functional outcome and adverse events. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review analysis of patients undergoing surgery for BMs following an interdisciplinary tumor board decision in every case with ioRT at our institution. Patient properties, functional status (Karnofsky Performance Score/KPS) before and after surgery as well as oncologic (disease, recursive partitioning analysis, lesion size) and operative parameters were analyzed until hospital discharge. Adverse events (AE) were recorded until 30 days after surgery and rated according to the Clavien Dindo Grading (CDG) scale. Results 70 patients (40 female) with various oncologic diseases were identified and analyzed. Six underwent prior RT. Mean age was 66 ± 11 years. Preoperative median KPS was 80% with a mean BM volume of 3.2 ± 1.2 cm3. Nine patients (13%) experienced in total 14 AEs, including 2 cases (3%) of postoperative death (CDG5) and 2 with new postoperative epilepsy necessitating additional pharmacotreatment (CDG2). Five patients suffered from new neurologic deficit (CDG1) not needing further surgical or medical treatment. After surgery, the neurological status in 7 patients (10%) deteriorated while it improved in 21 cases (30%). Patients experiencing AEs had longer hospitalization and poorer postoperative KPS mdn. 90 vs. 80%. There was no statistically significant deterioration of the functional status during the immediate postoperative course in the whole patient cohort. Conclusion Surgery for supratentorial BMs with ioRT seems safe and feasible. Further studies on the benefit regarding oncologic outcome need to be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany,Correspondence: Philipp Krauss
| | - Kathrin Steininger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Motov
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bjoern Sommer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | - Abraham Cortes
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christina Wolfert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Georg Stueben
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Diehl CD, Pigorsch SU, Gempt J, Krieg SM, Reitz S, Waltenberger M, Barz M, Meyer HS, Wagner A, Wilkens J, Wiestler B, Zimmer C, Meyer B, Combs SE. Low-Energy X-Ray Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (Lex-IORT) for Resected Brain Metastases: A Single-Institution Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010014. [PMID: 36612015 PMCID: PMC9817795 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection followed by local radiation therapy (RT) is the standard of care for symptomatic brain metastases. However, the optimal technique, fractionation scheme and dose are still being debated. Lately, low-energy X-ray intraoperative RT (lex-IORT) has been of increasing interest. METHOD Eighteen consecutive patients undergoing BM resection followed by immediate lex-IORT with 16-30 Gy applied to the spherical applicator were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, RT-specific, radiographic and clinical data were reviewed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IORT for BM. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meyer analysis were applied. RESULTS The mean follow-up time was 10.8 months (range, 0-39 months). The estimated local control (LC), distant brain control (DBC) and overall survival (OS) at 12 months post IORT were 92.9% (95%-CI 79.3-100%), 71.4% (95%-CI 50.2-92.6%) and 58.0% (95%-CI 34.1-81.9%), respectively. Two patients developed radiation necrosis (11.1%) and wound infection (CTCAE grade III); both had additional adjuvant treatment after IORT. For five patients (27.8%), the time to the start or continuation of systemic treatment was ≤15 days and hence shorter than wound healing and adjuvant RT would have required. CONCLUSION In accordance with previous series, this study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of IORT in the management of brain metastases despite the small cohort and the retrospective characteristic of this analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D. Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Steffi U. Pigorsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Sandro M. Krieg
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Silvia Reitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Waltenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Barz
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Hanno S. Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cao L, Tian S, Ma W, Ni Z, Tian G, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Xu Z, Wang J, Liang Z, Zhao H, Yang L, Wang B, Ma J. The tentative application of en bloc concept in the pediatric brain tumor: Experience from a large pediatric center in china. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1018380. [PMID: 36439432 PMCID: PMC9697186 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1018380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Children are more susceptible to the higher rate of massive blood transfusion because of the less allowable blood loss and lower intraoperative tolerance to blood loss during the resection of brain tumors. The surgical concept of en bloc resection, which is widely used in other tumors, may contribute to the improvement of brain tumor resection. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive research on its application in pediatric brain tumors. Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the outcomes of the en bloc concept and the factors associated with the application of the en bloc concept in pediatric brain tumors. Methods According to the surgical concept involved, the patients were divided into three subgroups: complete en bloc concept, partial en bloc concept, and piecemeal concept. The matching comparison (complete and partial en bloc concept groups vs. piecemeal concept group) was conducted to investigate the effect of the en bloc concept on the outcomes. Then, the patient data from January 2018, when the en bloc concept was routinely integrated into the brain tumor surgery in our medical center, were reviewed and analyzed to find out the predictors associated with the application of en bloc concept. Results In the en bloc group, the perioperative parameters, such as hospital stay (p = 0.001), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay (p = 0.003), total blood loss (p = 0.015), transfusion rate (p = 0.005), and complication rate (p = 0.039), were all significantly improved. The multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that tumor volume, bottom vessel, and imaging features, such as encasing nerve or pass-by vessel, finger-like attachment, ratio of “limited line”, and ratio of “clear line”, were independent predictors for the application of the en bloc concept in our medical center. Conclusion This study supports the application of complete and partial en bloc concept in the pediatric brain tumor surgery based on the preoperative evaluation of imaging features, and compared with the piecemeal concept, the en bloc concept can improve the short outcomes without significant increases in the neurological complications. Large-series and additional supportive pieces of evidence are still warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangliang Cao
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuaiwei Tian
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenkun Ma
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhouwen Ni
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Tian
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yang Zhao
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qinhua Wang
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Xu
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiajia Wang
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhuangzhuang Liang
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Heng Zhao
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lingrui Yang
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Baocheng Wang
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Jie Ma, ; Baocheng Wang,
| | - Jie Ma
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Jie Ma, ; Baocheng Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Al-Holou WN, Suki D, Hodges TR, Everson RG, Freeman J, Ferguson SD, McCutcheon IE, Prabhu SS, Weinberg JS, Sawaya R, Lang FF. Circumferential sulcus-guided resection technique for improved outcomes of low-grade gliomas. J Neurosurg 2022; 137:1015-1025. [PMID: 34996044 DOI: 10.3171/2021.9.jns21718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many neurosurgeons resect nonenhancing low-grade gliomas (LGGs) by using an inside-out piecemeal resection (PMR) technique. At the authors' institution they have increasingly used a circumferential, perilesional, sulcus-guided resection (SGR) technique. This technique has not been well described and there are limited data on its effectiveness. The authors describe the SGR technique and assess the extent to which SGR correlates with extent of resection and neurological outcome. METHODS The authors identified all patients with newly diagnosed LGGs who underwent resection at their institution over a 22-year period. Demographics, presenting symptoms, intraoperative data, method of resection (SGR or PMR), volumetric imaging data, and postoperative outcomes were obtained. Univariate analyses used ANOVA and Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analyses were performed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Newly diagnosed LGGs were resected in 519 patients, 208 (40%) using an SGR technique and 311 (60%) using a PMR technique. The median extent of resection in the SGR group was 84%, compared with 77% in the PMR group (p = 0.019). In multivariate analysis, SGR was independently associated with a higher rate of complete (100%) resection (27% vs 18%) (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6; p = 0.03). SGR was also associated with a statistical trend toward lower rates of postoperative neurological complications (11% vs 16%, p = 0.09). A subset analysis of tumors located specifically in eloquent brain demonstrated SGR to be as safe as PMR. CONCLUSIONS The authors describe the SGR technique used to resect LGGs and show that SGR is independently associated with statistically significantly higher rates of complete resection, without an increase in neurological complications, than with PMR. SGR technique should be considered when resecting LGGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wajd N Al-Holou
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dima Suki
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Tiffany R Hodges
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Richard G Everson
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Jacob Freeman
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Sujit S Prabhu
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Raymond Sawaya
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Frederick F Lang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery
- 2Brain Tumor Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Quality of Life and Cognitive Function Evaluations and Interventions for Patients with Brain Metastases in the Radiation Oncology Clinic. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174301. [PMID: 36077835 PMCID: PMC9454858 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common brain malignancy and are projected to increase in incidence over the coming decades. Historically, brain metastasis studies have focused on improving survival outcomes, but recently, the importance of evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and cognitive function has gained recognition. Although there is a myriad of validated HRQOL and cognitive assessments available in the radiation oncology clinic, there is an urgent need to identify tools tailored to patients with BMs and to adopt a uniform set of tests that measure HRQOL and cognition. This review presents various assessments for measuring HRQOL and cognitive function, current recommendations to improve standardization, and treatments known to preserve HRQOL and cognitive function. Abstract Brain metastases (BMs) account for a disproportionately high percentage of cancer morbidity and mortality. Historically, studies have focused on improving survival outcomes, and recent radiation oncology clinical trials have incorporated HRQOL and cognitive assessments. We are now equipped with a battery of assessments in the radiation oncology clinic, but there is a lack of consensus regarding how to incorporate them in modern clinical practice. Herein, we present validated assessments for BM patients, current recommendations for future clinical studies, and treatment advances that have improved HRQOL and cognitive outcomes for BM patients.
Collapse
|
23
|
Gong W, Jiang T, Zuo D. Recurrence benefit from supramarginal resection in brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma. Heliyon 2022; 8:e10109. [PMID: 35991983 PMCID: PMC9389190 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is growing evidence that brain metastases (BM) have no well-defined boundaries and that conventional microsurgical circumferential dissection of BM is often inadequate to prevent local tumor recurrence. Previous studies have suggested that supramarginal resection can significantly improve local tumor control. We retrospectively analyzed the local tumor control in a series of patients with BM from lung adenocarcinoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with BM for lung adenocarcinoma in Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital from May 2015 to May 2020. 26 resected lesions were located in eloquent areas and underwent standard gross total resection (GTR group); 22 resected lesions were located in ineloquent areas, after standard gross total resection, the periphery was expanded and resected by 5 mm (MTR group). The postoperative tumor recurrence was compared between the two groups. Results During the follow-up period, the local recurrence rates in the GTR group and the MTR group were 61.5% and 27.3% (p = 0.022), respectively. Within 6 months after surgery, the local recurrence rates in the GTR group and the MTR group were 42.3% and 13.6% (p = 0.029), respectively. Within 12 months after surgery, the local recurrence rates in the GTR group and the MTR group were 57.7% and 22.7% (p = 0.014), respectively. The median progression-free survival time after surgery was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.0–10.0 months) in the GTR group and 14.0 months (95% CI 11.4–16.6 months) in the MTR group (Log-Rank p = 0.008). Compared with the MTR group, the HR of local recurrence in the GTR group was 3.74 (95% CI 1.38–10.39, p = 0.010). Cox multivariable analysis showed no other factors associated with local recurrence except for the surgical method (p = 0.012). Conclusions On the basis of conventional surgical total resection, expanded peripheral resection of 5 mm around the brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma can significantly reduce the local recurrence rate and prolongs the progression-free survival time.
Collapse
|
24
|
Aftahy AK, Barz M, Lange N, Baumgart L, Thunstedt C, Eller MA, Wiestler B, Bernhardt D, Combs SE, Jost PJ, Delbridge C, Liesche-Starnecker F, Meyer B, Gempt J. The Impact of Postoperative Tumor Burden on Patients With Brain Metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:869764. [PMID: 35600394 PMCID: PMC9114705 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.869764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases were considered to be well-defined lesions, but recent research points to infiltrating behavior. Impact of postoperative residual tumor burden (RTB) and extent of resection are still not defined enough. Patients and Methods Adult patients with surgery of brain metastases between April 2007 and January 2020 were analyzed. Early postoperative MRI (<72 h) was used to segment RTB. Survival analysis was performed and cutoff values for RTB were revealed. Separate (subgroup) analyses regarding postoperative radiotherapy, age, and histopathological entities were performed. Results A total of 704 patients were included. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 487/704 (69.2%) patients, median preoperative tumor burden was 12.4 cm3 (IQR 5.2–25.8 cm3), median RTB was 0.14 cm3 (IQR 0.0–2.05 cm3), and median postoperative tumor volume of the targeted BM was 0.0 cm3 (IQR 0.0–0.1 cm3). Median overall survival was 6 months (IQR 2–18). In multivariate analysis, preoperative KPSS (HR 0.981982, 95% CI, 0.9761–0.9873, p < 0.001), age (HR 1.012363; 95% CI, 1.0043–1.0205, p = 0.0026), and preoperative (HR 1.004906; 95% CI, 1.0003–1.0095, p = 0.00362) and postoperative tumor burden (HR 1.017983; 95% CI; 1.0058–1.0303, p = 0.0036) were significant. Maximally selected log rank statistics showed a significant cutoff for RTB of 1.78 cm3 (p = 0.0022) for all and 0.28 cm3 (p = 0.0047) for targeted metastasis and cutoff for the age of 67 years (p < 0.001). (Stereotactic) Radiotherapy had a significant impact on survival (p < 0.001). Conclusions RTB is a strong predictor for survival. Maximal cytoreduction, as confirmed by postoperative MRI, should be achieved whenever possible, regardless of type of postoperative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Kaywan Aftahy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Barz
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicole Lange
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lea Baumgart
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Cem Thunstedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mario Antonio Eller
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp J Jost
- III. Medical Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Claire Delbridge
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Liesche-Starnecker
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brenner AW, Patel AJ. Review of Current Principles of the Diagnosis and Management of Brain Metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:857622. [PMID: 35686091 PMCID: PMC9171239 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.857622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and are increasing in incidence as overall cancer survival improves. Diagnosis of brain metastases involves both clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment may involve a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic medical therapy depending on the patient's neurologic status, performance status, and overall oncologic burden. Advances in these domains have substantially impacted the management of brain metastases and improved performance status and survival for some patients. Indications for surgery have expanded with improved patient selection, imaging, and intraoperative monitoring. Robust evidence supports the use of whole brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, for both standalone and adjuvant indications, in almost all patients. Lastly, while systemic medical therapy has historically provided little benefit, modern immunotherapeutic agents have demonstrated promise. Current investigation seeks to determine the utility of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and laser interstitial thermal therapy, which have shown benefit in limited studies to date. This article provides a review of the epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of brain metastases and the corresponding supporting evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Akash J. Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The Clinical Frailty Scale as useful tool in patients with brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:51-57. [PMID: 35419752 PMCID: PMC9166853 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04008-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) evaluates patients' level of frailty on a scale from 1 to 9 and is commonly used in geriatric medicine, intensive care and orthopedics. The aim of our study was to reveal whether the CFS allows a reliable prediction of overall survival (OS) in patients after surgical treatment of brain metastases (BM) compared to the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS). METHODS Patients operated for BM were included. CFS and KPS were retrospectively assessed pre- and postoperatively and at follow-up 3-6 months after resection. RESULTS 205 patients with a follow-up of 22.8 months (95% CI 18.4-27.1) were evaluated. CFS showed a median of 3 ("managing well"; IqR 2-4) at all 3 assessment-points. Median KPS was 80 preoperatively (IqR 80-90) and 90 postoperatively (IqR 80-100) as well as at follow-up after 3-6 months. CFS correlated with KPS both preoperatively (r = - 0.92; p < 0.001), postoperatively (r = - 0.85; p < 0.001) and at follow-up (r = - 0.93; p < 0.001). The CFS predicted the expected reduction of OS more reliably than the KPS at all 3 assessments. A one-point increase (worsening) of the preoperative CFS translated into a 30% additional hazard to decease (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15-1.46; p < 0.001). A one-point increase in postoperative and at follow-up CFS represents a 39% (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25-1.54; p < 0.001) and of 42% risk (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.59; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The CFS is a feasible, simple and reliable scoring system in patients undergoing resection of brain metastasis. The CFS 3-6 months after surgery specifies the expected OS more accurately than the KPS.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ene CI, Ferguson SD. Surgical Management of Brain Metastasis: Challenges and Nuances. Front Oncol 2022; 12:847110. [PMID: 35359380 PMCID: PMC8963990 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.847110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis is the most common type of intracranial tumor. The contemporary management of brain metastasis is a challenging issue and traditionally has carried a poor prognosis as these lesions typically occur in the setting of advanced cancer. However, improvement in systemic therapy, advances in radiation techniques and multimodal therapy tailored to the individual patient, has given hope to this patient population. Surgical resection has a well-established role in the management of brain metastasis. Here we discuss the evolving role of surgery in the treatment of this diverse patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Krist DT, Naik A, Thompson CM, Kwok SS, Janbahan M, Olivero WC, Hassaneen W. Management of Brain Metastasis. Surgical Resection versus Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Meta-analysis. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac033. [PMID: 35386568 PMCID: PMC8982204 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Treatment of metastatic brain tumors often involves radiotherapy with or without surgical resection as the first step. However, the indications for when to use surgery are not clearly defined for certain tumor sizes and multiplicity. This study seeks to determine whether resection of brain metastases versus exclusive radiotherapy provided improved survival and local control in cases where metastases are limited in number and diameter.
Methods
According to PRISMA guidelines, this meta-analysis compares outcomes from treatment of a median number of brain metastases ≤4 with a median diameter ≤4 cm with exclusive radiotherapy versus surgery followed by radiotherapy. Four randomized control trials and 11 observational studies (1693 patients) met inclusion criteria. For analysis, studies were grouped based on whether radiation involved stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).
Results
In both analyses, there was no difference in survival between surgery ±SRS versus SRS alone two years after treatment (OR 1.89 (95% CI: 0.47 - 7.55, p = 0.23) or surgery + WBRT versus radiotherapy alone (either WBRT and/or SRS) (OR 1.18 (95% CI: 0.76 – 1.84, p = 0.46). However, surgical patients demonstrated greater risk for local tumor recurrence compared to SRS alone (OR 2.20 (95% CI: 1.49 - 3.25, p < 0.0001)) and compared to WBRT/SRS (OR 2.93; 95% CI: 1.68 - 5.13, p = 0.0002).
Conclusion
The higher incidence of local tumor recurrence for surgical patients suggests that more prospective studies are needed to clarify outcomes for treatment of 1-4 metastasis less than 4 cm diameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Krist
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, IL
| | - Anant Naik
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, IL
| | - Charee M Thompson
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, IL
- Department of Communication, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
| | - Susanna S Kwok
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, IL
| | - Mika Janbahan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, IL
| | - William C Olivero
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, IL
| | - Wael Hassaneen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, IL
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Subpial en bloc resection improves extent of resection in infiltrating gliomas – a propensity matched comparative cohort analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022; 215:107197. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
30
|
Mitchell D, Kwon HJ, Kubica PA, Huff WX, O’Regan R, Dey M. Brain metastases: An update on the multi-disciplinary approach of clinical management. Neurochirurgie 2022; 68:69-85. [PMID: 33864773 PMCID: PMC8514593 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Brain metastasis (BM) is the most common malignant intracranial neoplasm in adults with over 100,000 new cases annually in the United States and outnumbering primary brain tumors 10:1. OBSERVATIONS The incidence of BM in adult cancer patients ranges from 10-40%, and is increasing with improved surveillance, effective systemic therapy, and an aging population. The overall prognosis of cancer patients is largely dependent on the presence or absence of brain metastasis, and therefore, a timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial for improving long-term outcomes, especially in the current era of significantly improved systemic therapy for many common cancers. BM should be suspected in any cancer patient who develops new neurological deficits or behavioral abnormalities. Gadolinium enhanced MRI is the preferred imaging technique and BM must be distinguished from other pathologies. Large, symptomatic lesion(s) in patients with good functional status are best treated with surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Due to neurocognitive side effects and improved overall survival of cancer patients, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is reserved as salvage therapy for patients with multiple lesions or as palliation. Newer approaches including multi-lesion stereotactic surgery, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy are also being investigated to improve outcomes while preserving quality of life. CONCLUSION With the significant advancements in the systemic treatment for cancer patients, addressing BM effectively is critical for overall survival. In addition to patient's performance status, therapeutic approach should be based on the type of primary tumor and associated molecular profile as well as the size, number, and location of metastatic lesion(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Mitchell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - HJ Kwon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - PA Kubica
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, UW Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - WX Huff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - R O’Regan
- Department of Medicine/Hematology Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, UW Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - M Dey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, UW Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA,Correspondence Should Be Addressed To: Mahua Dey, MD, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; Tel: 317-274-2601;
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Roshchina KE, Bekyashev AK, Gasparyan TG, Aleshin VA, Osinov IK, Savateev AN, Khalafyan DA. Modern possibilities of neurosurgical treatment of brain metastases. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEIROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2022; 86:119-125. [PMID: 36252202 DOI: 10.17116/neiro202286051119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Despite significant progress in neuroimaging and introduction of new combined treatments for solid tumors, brain metastases are still adverse factor for overall survival. Brain metastases are diagnosed in 8-10% of patients and associated with extremely poor prognosis. These lesions result focal and general cerebral symptoms. Literature review highlights the current principles of surgical treatment of metastatic brain lesions in patients with solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K E Roshchina
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - A Kh Bekyashev
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
- Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
| | - T G Gasparyan
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
- Scientific Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | - V A Aleshin
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - I K Osinov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vogelbaum MA, Brown PD, Messersmith H, Brastianos PK, Burri S, Cahill D, Dunn IF, Gaspar LE, Gatson NTN, Gondi V, Jordan JT, Lassman AB, Maues J, Mohile N, Redjal N, Stevens G, Sulman E, van den Bent M, Wallace HJ, Weinberg JS, Zadeh G, Schiff D. Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 40:492-516. [PMID: 34932393 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 284] [Impact Index Per Article: 94.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. RECOMMENDATIONS Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Stuart Burri
- Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | - Dan Cahill
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ian F Dunn
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Laurie E Gaspar
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.,University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO
| | - Na Tosha N Gatson
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ.,Geisinger Neuroscience Institute. Danville, PA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | | | | | - Julia Maues
- Georgetown Breast Cancer Advocates, Washington, DC
| | - Nimish Mohile
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Navid Redjal
- Capital Health Medical Center - Hopewell Campus, Princeton, NJ
| | | | | | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kahl KH, Balagiannis N, Höck M, Schill S, Roushan Z, Shiban E, Müller H, Grossert U, Konietzko I, Sommer B, Maurer CJ, Berlis A, Heidecke V, Janzen T, Stüben G. Intraoperative radiotherapy with low-energy x-rays after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases-an Augsburg University Medical Center experience. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1124-1130. [PMID: 34415358 PMCID: PMC8604815 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01831-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE External-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the predominant method for localized brain radiotherapy (LBRT) after resection of brain metastases (BM). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50-kV x‑rays is an alternative way to focally irradiate the resection cavity after BM surgery, with the option of shortening the overall treatment time and limiting normal tissue irradiation. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who underwent neurosurgical resection of BM and 50-kV x‑ray IORT between 2013 and 2020 at Augsburg University Medical Center. RESULTS We identified 40 patients with 44 resected BM treated with 50-kV x‑ray IORT. Median diameter of the resected metastases was 2.8 cm (range 1.5-5.9 cm). Median applied dose was 20 Gy. All patients received standardized follow-up (FU) including 3‑monthly MRI of the brain. Mean FU was 14.4 months, with a median MRI FU for alive patients of 12.2 months. Median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 26.4 months (estimated 1‑year OS 61.6%). The observed local control (LC) rate of the resection cavity was 88.6% (estimated 1‑year LC 84.3%). Distant brain control (DC) was 47.5% (estimated 1‑year DC 33.5%). Only 25% of all patients needed WBI in the further course of disease. The observed radionecrosis rate was 2.5%. CONCLUSION IORT with 50-kV x‑rays is a safe and appealing way to apply LBRT after neurosurgical resection of BM, with low toxicity and excellent LC. Close MRI FU is paramount to detect distant brain failure (DBF) early.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Balagiannis
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael Höck
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Schill
- Medizinische Physik und Strahlenschutz, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Zoha Roushan
- Medizinische Physik und Strahlenschutz, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Heiko Müller
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ute Grossert
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ina Konietzko
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Björn Sommer
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christoph J. Maurer
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ansgar Berlis
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Heidecke
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Tilman Janzen
- Medizinische Physik und Strahlenschutz, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Georg Stüben
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Le Rhun E, Guckenberger M, Smits M, Dummer R, Bachelot T, Sahm F, Galldiks N, de Azambuja E, Berghoff AS, Metellus P, Peters S, Hong YK, Winkler F, Schadendorf D, van den Bent M, Seoane J, Stahel R, Minniti G, Wesseling P, Weller M, Preusser M. EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with brain metastasis from solid tumours. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1332-1347. [PMID: 34364998 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 236] [Impact Index Per Article: 78.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - T Bachelot
- Département de Cancérologie Médicale, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - F Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University of Heidelberg and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Consortium for Transnational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - E de Azambuja
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet and L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A S Berghoff
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Metellus
- Ramsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Clairval, Department of Neurosurgery, Marseille; Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INP, Neurophysiopathology Institute, Marseille, France
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Y-K Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - F Winkler
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Clinical Cooperation Unit, Neuro-oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, Department of Dermatology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - M van den Bent
- The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Seoane
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona; CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Stahel
- Department for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - P Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc and Brain Tumour Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Laboratory for Childhood Cancer Pathology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Surgical Treatment of Cerebellar Metastases: Survival Benefits, Complications and Timing Issues. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215263. [PMID: 34771427 PMCID: PMC8582465 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cerebellar metastases are often considered to have a poor prognosis. This retrospective study investigated the clinical course and functional outcome of 73 patients who underwent surgical treatment for cerebellar metastases. Median overall survival was 9.2 months which compares favorably with the more recent literature. Prognosis varied strikingly between individuals. This suggests a policy of individualized decision-making which includes offering surgery also in selected cases with adverse prognostic parameters. The presence of extracerebral metastases did not significantly influence survival which may justify expedited surgery in selected cases prior to the oncological work-up. Systemic therapy was associated with substantially better survival indicating that recent advances in medical oncology might amplify any survival benefit derived from surgery. Surgery was found to carry significant morbidity and even mortality. Major complications often precluded adjuvant treatment and correlated with markedly reduced survival. Complication avoidance is therefore of utmost importance. Abstract We retrospectively studied 73 consecutive patients who underwent surgery 2015–2020 for removal of cerebellar metastases (CM). Median overall survival (medOS) varied widely between patients and compared favorably with the more recent literature (9.2, 25–75% IQR: 3.2–21.7 months vs. 5–8 months). Prognostic factors included clinical (but not radiological) hydrocephalus (medOS 11.3 vs. 5.2 months, p = 0.0374). Of note, a third of the patients with a KPI <70% or multiple metastases survived >12 months. Chemotherapy played a prominent prognostic role (medOS 15.5 vs. 2.3, p < 0.0001) possibly reflecting advances in treating systemic vis-à-vis controlled CNS disease. Major neurological (≥30 days), surgical and medical complications (CTCAE III–V) were observed in 8.2%, 13.7%, and 9.6%, respectively. The occurrence of a major complication markedly reduced survival (10.7 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.020). The presence of extracerebral metastases did not significantly influence OS. Postponing staging was not associated with more complications or shorter survival. Together these data argue for individualized decision making which includes offering surgery in selected cases with a presumably adverse prognosis and also occasional urgent operations in cases without a preoperative oncological work-up. Complication avoidance is of utmost importance.
Collapse
|
36
|
González L, Castro S, Villa E, Zomosa G. Surgical resection versus stereotactic radiosurgery on local recurrence and survival for patients with a single brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg 2021; 35:703-713. [PMID: 34431733 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1950623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) are the most frequent intracranial tumours in adults. In patients with solitary BM, surgical resection (SR) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is performed. There is limited evidence comparing one treatment over the other. OBJECTIVE To compare SR versus SRS on patients with solitary BMs, regarding local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS Systematic review of literature following PRISMA guidelines, using the databases of Medline, Clinicaltrials.gov, Embase, Web of Science, Sciencedirect, CINAHL, Wiley Online Library, Springerlink and LILACS. Following study selection based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction and a critical analysis of the literature was performed according to the GRADE scale. For quantitative analysis, a random effects model was used. Data were synthetized and evaluated on a forest plot and funnel plot. RESULTS Two randomized clinical trials, four cohort studies and one case-control studies met our inclusion criteria for the qualitative analysis. None was excluded subsequently. Overall, 614 patients with single metastasis were included. Studies had high heterogeneity. Multiple significant variables affecting the outcome were signalized. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences for survival (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.75-1.45) or LR (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.42-1.20). CONCLUSIONS According to current evidence, in patients with a single small metastasis there is no statistically significant difference in OS or LR among the chosen techniques (SR or SRS). Multiple significant co-variables may affect both outcomes. Different outcomes better than OS should be evaluated in further randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas González
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Eduardo Villa
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Gustavo Zomosa
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Karschnia P, Le Rhun E, Vogelbaum MA, van den Bent M, Grau SJ, Preusser M, Soffietti R, von Baumgarten L, Westphal M, Weller M, Tonn JC. The evolving role of neurosurgery for central nervous system metastases in the era of personalized cancer therapy. Eur J Cancer 2021; 156:93-108. [PMID: 34425408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Recent therapeutic advances involving the use of systemic targeted treatments and immunotherapeutic agents in patients with advanced cancers have translated into improved survival rates. Despite the emergence of such promising pharmacological therapies and extended survival, the frequency of metastases in the central nervous system has steadily increased. Effective medical and surgical therapies are available for many patients with brain metastases and need to be incorporated into multi-disciplinary care protocols. The role of neurosurgeons is evolving within these multi-disciplinary care teams. Surgical resection of brain metastases can provide immediate relief from neurological symptoms due to large lesions and provides the histopathological diagnosis in cases of no known primary malignancy. In situations where immunotherapy is part of the oncological treatment plan, surgery may be proposed for expeditious relief of edema to remove the need for steroids. In patients with multiple brain metastases and mixed response to therapeutics or radiosurgery, tumour resampling allows tissue analysis for druggable targets or to distinguish radiation effects from progression. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting may improve quality of life in patients with hydrocephalus associated with leptomeningeal tumour dissemination and may allow for time to administer more therapy thus prolonging overall survival. Addressing the limited efficacy of many oncological drugs for brain metastases due to insufficient blood-brain barrier penetrance, clinical trial protocols in which surgical specimens are analysed after pre-surgical administration of therapeutics offer pharmacodynamic insights. Comprehensive neurosurgical assessment remains an integral element of multi-disciplinary oncological care of patients with brain metastases and is integral to tumour biology research and therapeutic advancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery & Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan J Grau
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Manfred Westphal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Redmond KJ, De Salles AAF, Fariselli L, Levivier M, Ma L, Paddick I, Pollock BE, Regis J, Sheehan J, Suh J, Yomo S, Sahgal A. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Postoperative Metastatic Surgical Cavities: A Critical Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:68-80. [PMID: 33891979 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this critical review is to summarize the literature specific to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and multiple-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) for postoperative brain metastases resection cavities and to present practice recommendations on behalf of the ISRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS The Medline and Embase databases were used to apply the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach to search for manuscripts reporting SRS/SRT outcomes for postoperative brain metastases tumor bed resection cavities with a search end date of July 20, 2018. Prospective studies, consensus guidelines, and retrospective series that included exclusively postoperative brain metastases and had at minimum 100 patients were considered eligible. RESULTS The Embase search revealed 157 manuscripts, of which 77 were selected for full-text screening. PubMed yielded 55 manuscripts, of which 23 were selected for full text screening. We deemed 8 retrospective series, 1 phase 2 prospective study, 3 randomized controlled trials, and 1 consensus contouring paper appropriate for inclusion. The data suggest that SRS/SRT to surgical cavities with prescription doses of 30 to 50 Gy equivalent effective dose (EQD) 210, 50 to 70 Gy EQD25, and 70 to 90 EQD22 are associated with rates of local control ranging from 60.5% to 91% (median, 80.5%). Randomized data suggest improved local control with single-fraction SRS compared with observation and improved cognitive outcomes compared with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The toxicity of SRS/SRT in the postoperative setting was limited and is reviewed herein. CONCLUSIONS Although randomized data raise concern for poorer local control after resection cavity SRS than WBRT, these findings may be driven by factors such as conservative prescription doses used in the SRS arm. Retrospective studies suggest high rates of local control after single-fraction SRS and hypofractionated SRT for postoperative brain metastases. With a superior neurocognitive profile and no survival disadvantage to withholding WBRT, the ISRS recommends SRS as first-line treatment for eligible postoperative patients. Emerging data suggest that fractionated SRT may provide superior local control compared with single-fraction SRS, in particular, for large tumor cavity volumes/diameters and potentially for patients with a preoperative diameter greater than 2.5 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | | | - Laura Fariselli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Unit of Radiotherapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C Besta, Milano, Italy
| | - Marc Levivier
- Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lijun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ian Paddick
- Medical Physics Ltd, Queen Square Radiosurgery Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bruce E Pollock
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jean Regis
- Aix-Marseille University, INSERM, UMR 1106, Timone University Hospital, Functional Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery Department, Marseille, France
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - John Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussing Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Proescholdt MA, Schödel P, Doenitz C, Pukrop T, Höhne J, Schmidt NO, Schebesch KM. The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1616. [PMID: 33807384 PMCID: PMC8036330 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases (BM) consists of surgical resection, different radiation treatment modalities, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and targeted molecular treatment. This review presents the current state of neurosurgical technology applied to achieve maximal resection with minimal morbidity as a treatment paradigm in patients with BM. In addition, we discuss the contribution of neurosurgical resection on functional outcome, advanced systemic treatment strategies, and enhanced understanding of the tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A. Proescholdt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Petra Schödel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Christian Doenitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Tobias Pukrop
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Julius Höhne
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Nils Ole Schmidt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Karl-Michael Schebesch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
McCutcheon IE. Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Prevent Local Recurrence of Brain Metastasis After Surgery: Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2021; 128:85-100. [PMID: 34191064 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69217-9_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 15-20 years, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become the dominant method for treating patients with brain metastases (BM). The role of surgery for management of large tumors also remains important. Combining these two treatment modalities may well achieve the best local control, safety, and symptomatic relief in cases of neoplasms for which resection is desirable. After 10 years of retrospective studies that suggested patients might do better if surgery were followed by early adjuvant SRS, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted to compare such treatment with postoperative observation after tumor removal, and it showed significantly better local control in the former cohort, especially in smaller lesions, but no difference in overall survival. On the other hand, in the past 5 years, some groups have argued that neoadjuvant SRS before resection of BM might be superior to adjuvant SRS, while no clinical trial has yet been concluded that compares these two treatment strategies. For now, adjuvant and neoadjuvant SRS show evidence of utility in achieving better local control after surgical removal of BM in comparison with surgery alone, but no specific guidelines exist favoring one method over the other, and both should be considered beneficial in clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zuo F, Hu K, Kong J, Zhang Y, Wan J. Surgical Management of Brain Metastases in the Perirolandic Region. Front Oncol 2020; 10:572644. [PMID: 33194673 PMCID: PMC7649351 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.572644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) are the most frequent intracranial tumors, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality when the lesions involve the perirolandic region. Surgical intervention for BM in the perirolandic region is still under discussion even though prompt relief of mass effect and avoidance of necrosis together with brain edema may not be achieved by radiotherapy. More recently, several researchers attempt to evaluate the benefit of surgery for BM within this pivotal sensorimotor area. Nevertheless, data are sparse and optimal treatment paradigm is not yet widely described. Since the advance in intraoperative neuroimaging and neurophysiology, resection of BM in the perirolandic region has been proven to be safe and efficacious, sparing this eloquent area while retaining reasonably low morbidity rates. Although management of BM becomes much more tailored and multimodal, surgery remains the cornerstone and principles of resection as well as indications for surgery should be well defined. This is the first review concerning the characteristics of BM involving the perirolandic region and the current impact of surgical therapy for the lesions. Future perspectives of advanced neurosurgical techniques are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuxing Zuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianxin Kong
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jinghai Wan
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial neoplasm and represent a major clinical challenge across many medical disciplines. The incidence of BM is increasing, largely due to improvements in primary disease therapeutics conferring greater systemic control, and advancements in neuroimaging techniques and availability leading to earlier diagnosis. In recent years, the landscape of BM treatment has changed significantly with the advent of personalized targeted chemotherapies and immunotherapy, the adoption of focal radiotherapy (RT) for higher intracranial disease burden, and the implementation of new surgical strategies. The increasing permutations of options available for the treatment of patients diagnosed with BM necessitate coordinated care by a multidisciplinary team. This review discusses the current treatment regimens for BM as well as examines the salient features of a modern multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
|
43
|
Lee KL, Chen G, Chen TY, Kuo YC, Su YK. Effects of Cancer Stem Cells in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Brain Metastasis: Challenges and Solutions. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082122. [PMID: 32751846 PMCID: PMC7463650 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A higher propensity of developing brain metastasis exists in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Upon comparing the metastatic patterns of all breast cancer subtypes, patients with TNBC exhibited increased risks of the brain being the initial metastatic site, early brain metastasis development, and shortest brain metastasis-related survival. Notably, the development of brain metastasis differs from that at other sites owing to the brain-unique microvasculature (blood brain barrier (BBB)) and intracerebral microenvironment. Studies of brain metastases from TNBC have revealed the poorest treatment response, mostly because of the relatively backward strategies to target vast disease heterogeneity and poor brain efficacy. Moreover, TNBC is highly associated with the existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which contribute to circulating cancer cell survival before BBB extravasation, evasion from immune surveillance, and plasticity in adaptation to the brain-specific microenvironment. We summarized recent literature regarding molecules and pathways and reviewed the effects of CSC biology during the formation of brain metastasis in TNBC. Along with the concept of individualized cancer therapy, certain strategies, namely the patient-derived xenograft model to overcome the lack of treatment-relevant TNBC classification and techniques in BBB disruption to enhance brain efficacy has been proposed in the hope of achieving treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kha-Liang Lee
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Gao Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Yuan Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Che Kuo
- Taipei Medical University (TMU) Research Center for Cell Therapy and Regeneration Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan;
| | - Yu-Kai Su
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan; (K.-L.L.); (G.C.); (T.-Y.C.)
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bakhsheshian J, Strickland BA, Jackson C, Chaichana KL, Young R, Pradilla G, Chen JW, Bailes J, Zada G. Multicenter Investigation of Channel-Based Subcortical Trans-Sulcal Exoscopic Resection of Metastatic Brain Tumors: A Retrospective Case Series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2020; 16:159-166. [PMID: 29912398 DOI: 10.1093/ons/opy079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent advancements have aimed to optimize visualization and minimize insult to healthy cortical and subcortical tissue through the use of tubular-based retractors. OBJECTIVE To investigate outcomes following resection of cerebral metastases using an integrated tubular retraction system with an exoscope and neuronavigation. METHODS A multicenter retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes in consecutive patients who underwent resection of a brain metastasis using a tubular retraction system and exoscope was performed. RESULTS Twenty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 61 yr (24-81 yr). Primary sources included lung (n = 13), breast (n = 3), renal cell (n = 3), and other (n = 6). Locations were frontal (n = 5), parietal (n = 8), cerebellar (n = 8), occipital (n = 3), and splenium (n = 1). Most lesions had a maximum diameter > 3.0 cm (n = 20) and a tumor depth > 4 cm (n = 14). Conversion to open (microscopic) craniotomy was not required in any case. Gross total resection was achieved in 20 cases (80.0%) and subtotal resection in 5 cases (20.0%). Median hospital stay was 2 d (1-12 d). All patients underwent postoperative radiation therapy. Perioperative complications developed in 1 patient (4.0%; hemiparesis and subsequent deep vein thrombosis). At 3-mo follow-up, no mortalities were observed, 19 patients (76.0%) demonstrated neurological improvements, 5 patients (20.0%) had a stable neurological exam, and 1 patient (4.0%) had a neurological decline. CONCLUSION Utilization of a channel-based, navigable retractor and exoscope is a feasible option for surgical resection of metastatic brain lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Bakhsheshian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ben A Strickland
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christina Jackson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kaisorn L Chaichana
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ronald Young
- Brain and Spine Center of South Florida, Delray, Florida
| | - Gustavo Pradilla
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jefferson W Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California
| | - Julian Bailes
- Department of Neurosurgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bae S, An C, Ahn SS, Kim H, Han K, Kim SW, Park JE, Kim HS, Lee SK. Robust performance of deep learning for distinguishing glioblastoma from single brain metastasis using radiomic features: model development and validation. Sci Rep 2020; 10:12110. [PMID: 32694637 PMCID: PMC7374174 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68980-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the diagnostic performance and generalizability of traditional machine learning and deep learning models for distinguishing glioblastoma from single brain metastasis using radiomics. The training and external validation cohorts comprised 166 (109 glioblastomas and 57 metastases) and 82 (50 glioblastomas and 32 metastases) patients, respectively. Two-hundred-and-sixty-five radiomic features were extracted from semiautomatically segmented regions on contrast-enhancing and peritumoral T2 hyperintense masks and used as input data. For each of a deep neural network (DNN) and seven traditional machine learning classifiers combined with one of five feature selection methods, hyperparameters were optimized through tenfold cross-validation in the training cohort. The diagnostic performance of the optimized models and two neuroradiologists was tested in the validation cohort for distinguishing glioblastoma from metastasis. In the external validation, DNN showed the highest diagnostic performance, with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.956 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.918–0.990), 90.6% (95% CI, 80.5–100), 88.0% (95% CI, 79.0–97.0), and 89.0% (95% CI, 82.3–95.8), respectively, compared to the best-performing traditional machine learning model (adaptive boosting combined with tree-based feature selection; AUC, 0.890 (95% CI, 0.823–0.947)) and human readers (AUC, 0.774 [95% CI, 0.685–0.852] and 0.904 [95% CI, 0.852–0.951]). The results demonstrated deep learning using radiomic features can be useful for distinguishing glioblastoma from metastasis with good generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohi Bae
- Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, 10444, Korea
| | - Chansik An
- Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, 10444, Korea.,Research and Analysis Team, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, 10444, Korea
| | - Sung Soo Ahn
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Image Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
| | - Hwiyoung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Image Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
| | - Kyunghwa Han
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Image Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Sang Wook Kim
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Korea University College of Health Science, Seoul, 02841, Korea
| | - Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Seung-Koo Lee
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Image Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mezei T, Hajdu M, Czigléczki G, Lotz G, Kocsis J, Kulka J, Horváth A. Sterile, abscess-like cerebral lesion during trastuzumab therapy after HER2 status switch in a triple negative breast cancer patient: a case report and literature review. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:615. [PMID: 32611325 PMCID: PMC7329406 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07114-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is a global health problem – it is the most common malignancy among women. Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) account for 10–20% of female breast cancer. Most TNBC cases confer poor prognosis. Brain metastasis appears in more than 15% in the triple negative breast cancer population, which causes serious decrease in survival. Changes of immunophenotype are not uncommon in breast cancer, offering new therapeutic options in cases where targetable proteins or pathways are being identified. Case presentation After five lines of chemotherapy and 82 months following the first diagnosis, our patient with brain metastatic triple negative breast cancer had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) genetic heterogeneity in the metastatic tissue sample interpreted as HER2 status conversion. After the removal of the metastasis, we started first line therapy for metastatic HER2 positive cancer with trastuzumab and paclitaxel. After the first cycle of trastuzumab, on day 8, she had a seizure, and neurosurgical examination showed an abscess-like lesion. The punctate proved to be sterile by microbiological and pathological examination, so we continued cytostatic therapy without the anti-HER2 antibody. 3 months later, we could not identify the previous abscess-like lesion in the control computer tomography (CT) scan, and our patient had no neurological deficits. Conclusion We emphasize the importance of regular tissue confirmation of predictive markers in progressive tumorous disease even if our presented case is not unequivocally a “conversion case”. Tumor subtype is determined according to algorithms and definitions published in guidelines, nevertheless, use of different guidelines may lead to controversial interpretation in cases where HER2 genetic heterogeneity is present. Furthermore, we suggest that seronegative, aseptic intracranial fluid effusion after the removal of a brain metastasis may possibly be a side effect of trastuzumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Mezei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, 57 Amerikai street, Budapest, Pest, 1145, Hungary. .,National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, 57 Amerikai street, Budapest, Pest, 1145, Hungary.
| | - Melinda Hajdu
- 1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, 26 Üllői street, Budapest, Pest, 1085, Hungary
| | - Gábor Czigléczki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, 57 Amerikai street, Budapest, Pest, 1145, Hungary.,National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, 57 Amerikai street, Budapest, Pest, 1145, Hungary
| | - Gábor Lotz
- 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, 93 Üllői street, Budapest, Pest, 1091, Hungary
| | - Judit Kocsis
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, 4 Kútvölgyi street, Budapest, Pest, 1125, Hungary
| | - Janina Kulka
- 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, 93 Üllői street, Budapest, Pest, 1091, Hungary
| | - Anna Horváth
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, 4 Kútvölgyi street, Budapest, Pest, 1125, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Brain metastases are a very common manifestation of cancer that have historically been approached as a single disease entity given the uniform association with poor clinical outcomes. Fortunately, our understanding of the biology and molecular underpinnings of brain metastases has greatly improved, resulting in more sophisticated prognostic models and multiple patient-related and disease-specific treatment paradigms. In addition, the therapeutic armamentarium has expanded from whole-brain radiotherapy and surgery to include stereotactic radiosurgery, targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which are often used sequentially or in combination. Advances in neuroimaging have provided additional opportunities to accurately screen for intracranial disease at initial cancer diagnosis, target intracranial lesions with precision during treatment and help differentiate the effects of treatment from disease progression by incorporating functional imaging. Given the numerous available treatment options for patients with brain metastases, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended to personalize the treatment of each patient in an effort to improve the therapeutic ratio. Given the ongoing controversies regarding the optimal sequencing of the available and expanding treatment options for patients with brain metastases, enrolment in clinical trials is essential to advance our understanding of this complex and common disease. In this Review, we describe the key features of diagnosis, risk stratification and modern paradigms in the treatment and management of patients with brain metastases and provide speculation on future research directions.
Collapse
|
48
|
Brown DA, Lu VM, Himes BT, Burns TC, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Chaichana KL, Parney IF. Breast brain metastases are associated with increased risk of leptomeningeal disease after stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Metastasis 2020; 37:341-352. [DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10019-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
49
|
Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Radiosurgery: a Further Evolution in the Management of Brain Metastases. Curr Oncol Rep 2019; 21:73. [DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0817-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
50
|
Risk factors for in-brain local progression in elderly patients after resection of cerebral metastases. Sci Rep 2019; 9:7431. [PMID: 31092876 PMCID: PMC6520351 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43942-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Intracranial metastases are the most frequent brain tumor with recurrence rates after treatment of around 40–60%. Age is still considered a determinant of treatment and prognosis in this pathology. Recent studies analyzing the impact of metastasectomy in elderly patients focused on reporting perioperative mortality and morbidity rates but not on the evaluation of oncological outcome parameters. Aim of this study is to determine risk factors for in-brain local recurrence after brain surgery in this sub-population. From October 2009 until September 2016 all patients aged 65 years and above with histopathologically confirmed metastasis after surgical resection were retrospectively studied. Clinical, radiological and perioperative information was collected and statistically analysed. Follow-up consisted of clinical and radiological assessment every 3-months following surgery. 78 patients were included, of these 50% were female (39 patients). Median age was 71 years (66–83). Early postoperative-MRI verified a complete surgical resection in 41 patients (52.6%) and showed a tumor-remnant in 15 patients (19.2%). In 22 patients the MRI result was inconclusive (28.2%). None of the patients experienced severe complications due to surgery. The median postoperative NIHSS was adequate 1 ± 1.4 (0–6), nonetheless, insignificantly improved in comparison to the preoperative NIHSS (p = 0.16). A total of 20 patients (25.6%) presented local recurrence. The only statistically significant factor for development of local in-brain recurrence after resection of cerebral metastases in patients above 65 years of age was a tumor-remnant in the early postoperative MRI (p = 0.00005). Median overall survival was 13 months. Local in-brain recurrence after surgical resection of a cerebral metastasis in patients above 65 years of age was 25.6%. In our analysis, tumor-remnant in early postoperative MRI is the only risk factor for local in-brain recurrence. Oncological parameters in the present cohort do not seem to differ from recent phase III studies with non-geriatric patients. Nevertheless, controlled studies on the impact of metastasectomy in elderly patients delivering high quality reliable data are required.
Collapse
|