Cost-benefit value of microscopic examination of intervertebral discs

The Role of Routine Pathologic Assessment After Pediatric Osteochondroma Excision

BACKGROUND

Osteochondromas are benign osseous lesions often excised for pain, growth abnormalities, and aesthetic concerns. While characteristic clinical and radiographic features leave little diagnostic ambiguity in most cases of osteochondroma, pathologic analysis to confirm the diagnosis and screen for malignancy is routinely performed following surgical excision. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and economic value of routine pathologic analysis after osteochondroma excision in a pediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of clinical records from 2 pediatric orthopaedic hospitals (St. Louis Children's Hospital and Shriner's Hospital for Children, St. Louis) identified 426 osteochondroma lesions surgically resected from 201 patients. Patients with solitary and multiple lesions were included. Clinical, radiographic, and surgical data were recorded for each resection surgery. Pathologic reports were evaluated. Costs incurred for routine pathologic assessment was also noted.

RESULTS

Totally, 132 patients were treated with surgical resection of a solitary osteochondroma lesion, while an additional 291 lesions were resected from 69 patients with multiple lesions. Average age at the time of surgical resection was 13.0 years (2.1 to 17.9). The most common anatomic locations of excised lesions included the distal femur (110, 25.8%), proximal tibia/fibula (95, 22.3%), and distal radius/ulna (58, 13.6%). All resected specimens were sent for pathologic analysis. The average size of the resected lesions was 19.9 mm 3 (0.02 to 385.0 mm 3 ). In all cases, the histologic diagnosis confirmed benign osteochondroma. The total charges of pathologic analysis including processing and interpretation fees was ∼$755.00 for each lesion assessed, for a total cohort charge of $321,630.

CONCLUSION

We propose that in most cases of pediatric osteochondroma excision procedures, postoperative histologic analysis is not strictly indicated as it rarely, if ever, alters diagnosis or management. We suggest using a "gross only" analysis in these cases. However, we do believe that with preoperative diagnostic ambiguity, or if patients present with concerning features such as rapidly expansile lesions or cortical destruction, have axial skeleton or pelvic involvement, or enlarged cartilaginous caps, full histologic evaluation of the excised lesions will continue to be prudent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Examination of total hip and knee arthroplasty tissues

BACKGROUND

Many practices require tissues from hip and knee arthroplasty procedures to be sent for pathologic examination. These examinations rarely provide information beyond the clinical or radiologic diagnosis and rarely alter clinical management. We aimed to determine the rate at which histologic diagnoses based on gross assessment alone or gross plus microscopic assessment correspond with reported clinical diagnoses in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties and whether the histologic diagnoses alter patient management.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed arthroplasty cases performed at a high-volume teaching hospital in Manitoba, Canada. The clinical diagnosis was compared with the final pathology report based on gross examination, with or without histologic assessment. The results of the comparison were classified into 3 categories: concordant (same diagnosis), discrepant (different diagnoses without alterations in management) and discordant (different diagnoses resulting in management change). The overall provincial cost for pathologic examination was determined by multiplying the total examination cost by the estimated number of arthroplasty cases.

RESULTS

There were 773 patients in our study sample. The concordant rate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.1%-99.1%), the discrepant rate was 1.7% (95% CI 0.9%-2.9%) and the discordant rate was 0.0% (95% CI 0%-0.5%) for 773 cases. The pathology diagnosis did not alter patient management in any case. A total of 91.5% of specimens did not require full histologic review and received gross descriptions only. The discrepancy rate was higher in cases that included microscopic examination than in those that received only gross descriptions (15.2% v. 0.4%, p < 0.001). The overall provincial cost for pathologic examination was estimated at Can$304 556.

CONCLUSION

Submitting routine tissue from arthroplasty procedures to pathology does not affect patient management and therefore provides no value for the health care resources expended in doing so.

Cost-benefit analysis of routine pathology examination in primary shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The annual number of shoulder arthroplasty procedures is continuing to increase. Specimens from shoulder arthroplasty cases are routinely sent for pathologic examination. This study sought to evaluate the clinical utility and associated costs of routine pathologic examination of tissue removed during primary shoulder arthroplasty cases and to determine cost-effectiveness of this practice.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of primary shoulder arthroplasty cases. Patients whose humeral head was sent for routine pathologic examination were included. Cases were determined to have concordant, discrepant, or discordant diagnoses based on preoperative/postoperative diagnosis and pathology diagnosis. Costs were estimated in 2015 U.S. dollars, and cost-effectiveness was determined by the cost per discrepant diagnosis and cost per discordant diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 714 cases of primary shoulder arthroplasty in 646 patients who met inclusion criteria. The prevalence of concordant diagnoses was 94.1%, the prevalence of discrepant diagnoses was 5.9%, and no cases had discordant diagnoses. There were 172 cases that had biceps tendon specimens sent for pathology examination, and none led to a change in patient care. Total estimated costs were $77,309.34 in 2015 U.S. dollars. Cost per discrepant diagnosis for humeral head specimens was $1424.09, and cost per discordant diagnosis is at least $59,811.78.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Primary shoulder arthroplasty has a high rate of concordant diagnosis. Discrepant diagnoses were 5.9% in our study, and there were no discordant diagnoses. This study showed limited clinical utility in routinely sending specimens from primary shoulder arthroplasty cases for pathology examination, and calculation using a traditional life-year value of $50,000 showed that the standard for cost-effectiveness is not met.

Histological analysis of surgical samples and a proposed scoring system for infections in intervertebral discs

Back pain remains one the most prevalent types of pain and disability worldwide. Infection is estimated to be the underlying cause in approximately 0.01% of patients. Despite recent evidence demonstrating prominent infection rates, a standardised algorithm for diagnosis of disc infection is lacking. Histopathological evaluation can aid in confirming inflammatory changes and also in identifying degenerative changes. Hence, standardising practice through a clear scoring system with regards to inflammation and degeneration may have some utility in the clinical setting. To our knowledge no such systems exist specifically for intervertebral disc infection. A literature review of current methods of scoring inflammation and degeneration in spine surgery and orthopaedic surgery was performed. Based on the current evidence, a scoring system for disc inflammatory and degenerative changes was proposed. We propose four domains for consideration: (1) granulation tissue, (2) dense fibrosis, (3) chronic inflammatory cells, and (4) neutrophil count. The non-standardised nature of diagnosing infections and degeneration in the spinal surgery literature means that this scoring system is currently of particular value. Based on a literature review, our proposed method for diagnosis incorporates a combination of histopathological criteria expected to increase diagnostic sensitivity in the setting of disc infection. Overall, scoring can be applied to surgically obtained material and integrated directly into routine pathological practice.

Costs Versus Benefits of Routine Histopathological Examination in Total Ankle Replacement

BACKGROUND

Routine histopathological examination has previously been scrutinized as a source of extraneous cost in orthopedic foot and ankle care. As an increasingly prevalent joint replacement operation, total ankle replacement poses a notable cost to the health care market in an era of cost containment. The purpose of this study was to compare the costs and benefits of routine histopathological examination of specimens removed during total ankle replacement. We hypothesized that a new diagnosis would rarely be found and such examination would seldom alter patient care.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all total ankle replacement operations between 2006 and July 2014 at the investigators' institution. Medical records for 90 patients, undergoing a total of 95 total ankle replacement operations, were reviewed to determine the clinical and pathological diagnoses for each operation and, subsequently, the rates of discrepancy and discordance. Professional charges were determined using estimated reimbursement rates for the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes billed: 88304 (level III microscopic examination), 88305 (level IV microscopic examination), and 88311 (decalcification).

RESULTS

Degenerative joint disease was diagnosed by the pathologist in 93.7% of cases (89/95), pseudogout in 4.2% (4/95), and rheumatoid arthritis in 2.1% (2/95). The 4 diagnoses of pseudogout were the only cases of new diagnoses based on pathological review. A total of $16,536.81 was spent for examination of all specimens, for an estimated $4,134.20 spent per discrepant diagnosis. Patient care was unaffected by pathological examination.

CONCLUSION

A new diagnosis was rarely found by histopathological examination, and patient care remained unaltered in all cases. The costs of routine histopathological examination of tissue specimens removed during total ankle replacement, therefore, outweigh clinical benefits, and such examination should be left to the discretion of the operating surgeon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Routine Examination of Pathology Specimens Following Knee Arthroscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

While the clinical value of routine pathologic examination of tissues removed during orthopaedic procedures has not been determined, limited cost-effectiveness and a low prevalence of findings that alter patient management have been previously demonstrated with arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of routine histological examination of knee arthroscopy specimens.

METHODS

Retrospective chart analysis of 3797 consecutive knee arthroscopies by two surgeons from 2004 to 2013 at three affiliated hospitals within one health-care system was undertaken. Pathology reports regarding tissue removed during partial meniscectomies and anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions were reviewed to determine if the results altered patient care. The total costs of histological examination were estimated in 2012-adjusted U.S. dollars. The cost per health effect was determined by calculating the cost per discrepant and discordant diagnosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of concordant diagnoses was 99.3% (3769 of 3797), the prevalence of discrepant diagnoses was 0.7% (twenty-seven of 3797), and the prevalence of discordant diagnoses was 0.026% (one of 3797). The total cost of histological examinations was estimated to be $371,810. The total cost of the pathology cost per discrepant diagnosis was $13,771, and the cost per discordant diagnosis was $371,810.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine pathological examination of surgical specimens from patients undergoing knee arthroscopy had limited cost-effectiveness because of the low prevalence of findings that altered patient management. Histological examination of surgical specimens from arthroscopic knee surgery did not alter patient care and increased costs. We suggest that gross and histological examination of tissue removed during knee arthroscopy should be done at the discretion of the orthopaedic surgeon rather than being mandatory.

Does histology predict the clinical outcome after lumbar intervertebral disc herniation: no

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The histological analysis of extirpated intervertebral disc material from patients undergoing discectomy due to lumbar disc herniation remains an established procedure. In looking at whether the high costs that histological examination entails can be justified, it is worthwhile to ascertain the actual diagnostic benefit of this procedure. The aim of this study was to address the following hypothesis: Do histological characteristics such as the presence of inflammatory cells (macrophages) predict the clinical outcome of patients undergoing discectomy?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 343 patients (221 males, 122 females, mean age 44.7 years) were treated microsurgically by root decompression subsequent to interlaminar fenestration. The patient history, the operated disc segment, the radicular and vegetative symptoms as well as the early and long-term outcome were evaluated. The excised disc material was classified histologically. CD68 staining was performed in 11 randomly chosen patients with good and in 11 patients with poor subjective long-term outcome for quantitative evaluation of macrophage count.

RESULTS

The follow up rate was 69.7%. Three hundred and five patients underwent disc surgery for the first time and 38 patients underwent relapse disc surgery. Moderate, pronounced and severe degeneration was found in 16, 231 and 92 patients, respectively. Positive subjective assessment of early outcome was 91% and 92% for the primary and relapse group, whereas long-term outcome was positive in 69% and 50% for the primary and the relapse group respectively. No histological features including CD68 (macrophage) count showed statistically significant correlations with the success of clinical treatment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

A reliable prediction of the success of treatment, including patient outcome, cannot be made on the basis of the present histological criteria. The hypothesis must therefore be rejected.

Histologic examinations of arthroplasty specimens are not cost-effective: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Many hospitals require all operative specimens be sent to pathologists for routine examination. Although previous studies indicate this practice increases medical cost, it remains unclear whether it alters patient management and whether it is cost-effective.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore (1) determined the rate of discordance between clinical and histologic examinations of routine operative specimens during elective primary arthroplasties, (2) determined the cost of routine histologic screening, and (3) estimated its cost-effectiveness in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, as compared with gross examination or no examination.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 1247 patients who underwent 1363 routine elective primary total joint arthroplasties between January 18, 2006 and March 15, 2010. We compared preoperative, postoperative, and histologic diagnoses for each patient and categorized them into three classes: concordant (clinical and histologic diagnoses agreed), discrepant (diagnoses differed but with no resultant change in treatment), and discordant (diagnoses differed with resultant change in treatment). Medicare reimbursements were determined through the pathology department's administrative office.

RESULTS

In 1363 cases, 1335 (97.9%) clinical and histologic diagnoses were concordant, 28 (2.1%) were discrepant, and none were discordant. Total reimbursement for routine pathological examination was $139,532, or $102.37 per specimen. The average cost to identify each discrepant case was $4983.29. Routine histologic examination did not alter patient management, and there was no direct gain in quality-adjusted life years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations show routine histologic examinations of routine operative specimens during elective primary arthroplasties increase medical cost but rarely alter patient management and are not cost-effective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, economic and decision analyses. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Histological analysis of surgical lumbar intervertebral disc tissue provides evidence for an association between disc degeneration and increased body mass index

Background

Although histopathological grading systems for disc degeneration are frequently used in research, they are not yet integrated into daily care routine pathology of surgical samples. Therefore, data on histopathological changes in surgically excised disc material and their correlation to clinical parameters such as age, gender or body mass index (BMI) is limited to date. The current study was designed to correlate major physico-clinical parameters from a population of orthopaedic spine center patients (gender, age and BMI) with a quantitative histologic degeneration score (HDS).

Methods

Excised lumbar disc material from 854 patients (529 men/325 women/mean age 56 (15-96) yrs.) was graded based on a previously validated histologic degeneration score (HDS) in a cohort of surgical disc samples that had been obtained for the treatment of either disc herniation or discogenic back pain. Cases with obvious inflammation, tumor formation or congenital disc pathology were excluded. The degree of histological changes was correlated with sex, age and BMI.

Results

The HDS (0-15 points) showed significantly higher values in the nucleus pulposus (NP) than in the annulus fibrosus (AF) (Mean: NP 11.45/AF 7.87), with a significantly higher frequency of histomorphological alterations in men in comparison to women. Furthermore, the HDS revealed a positive significant correlation between the BMI and the extent of histological changes. No statistical age relation of the degenerative lesions was seen.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that histological disc alterations in surgical specimens can be graded in a reliable manner based on a quantitative histologic degeneration score (HDS). Increased BMI was identified as a positive risk factor for the development of symptomatic, clinically significant disc degeneration.

Histopathological examination of intervertebral disc specimens: a cost-benefit analysis

OBJECT

Routine histopathological examination of intervertebral disc specimens is commonly performed in North American hospitals, but recent studies have questioned the utility of this practice in cases where the indication for surgery is a benign process such as degenerative disc disease. In this study, we have performed a cost-benefit analysis of this practice.

METHODS

We performed a cost-benefit analysis of routine histopathological examination of 1775 routine (non-neoplastic and non-infectious indications for surgery) and 70 non-routine (suspected neoplastic or infectious indications for surgery) discectomy specimens obtained over an eight-year period (1996 and 2004). Chart reviews were used to determine if any histopathology findings were clinically significant (i.e., affected subsequent patient care). Total costs were calculated. A literature review was conducted to compare our results with other published series.

RESULTS

We found four unexpected histopathology results among 1775 specimens obtained from routine cases, one of which was clinically significant. We calculated costs of $42,165.25 per unexpected histopathological finding and $168,625 per clinically significant histopathological finding. For non-routine surgeries, the cost per abnormal pathological finding was $116.67.

CONCLUSIONS

In routine cases, histopathological examination of disc specimens is not justified. The decision to send specimens for pathological examination should be based on the surgeon's judgment.

Incidence of unusual and clinically significant histopathological findings in routine discectomy

OBJECT

Routine histopathological examination of discectomy specimens remains common practice in many hospitals, although it rarely detects unsuspected clinically significant disease. Controversy exists as to the effectiveness of this practice. The objectives of this study were to compare the authors' experience with a review of the literature.

METHODS

In a retrospective database analysis the authors identified all intervertebral disc specimens obtained during spinal procedures over an 8-year period (1996-2004). Cases of benign (nonneoplastic and noninfectious) indications for surgery were included in the study, whereas cases of nonbenign indications were excluded. The final pathological diagnoses were reviewed, and a chart review was performed to determine whether any unexpected findings affected subsequent patient care. A total of 1858 discectomy specimens were identified: 1775 of these were obtained in 1719 routine discectomy procedures. Unexpected histopathological findings were identified in four cases, and none was clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine histopathological examination of disc specimens is not justified. The decision to send specimens for pathological examination should be determined on a case-by-case basis after consideration of the clinical presentation, results of laboratory and imaging studies, and intraoperative findings.

Use of routine histologic evaluation of carpal ganglions

PURPOSE

Although histologic evaluation is performed routinely on tissue removed during the excision of carpal ganglions, the necessity of this evaluation is uncertain. We evaluated the use of routine histologic evaluation of excised carpal ganglions and performed a cost-benefit analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 160 consecutive carpal ganglion (102 dorsal, 58 volar) excisions performed over the past 7 years by 2 surgeons. The preoperative evaluation, surgical findings, and results of the pathologic assessment were evaluated for patients treated with a typical carpal ganglion excision.

RESULTS

In 156 of 160 patients the preoperative and intraoperative data were highly suggestive of a carpal ganglion; the pathology reports confirmed the diagnosis in all of these patients. No new information was provided by pathologic assessment. In 4 patients the preoperative and intraoperative assessments were less certain; the pathologic assessments in these patients also were equivocal. No malignancy or condition requiring additional treatment was identified. At our institution the total cost of pathologic evaluation for a carpal ganglion including processing and interpretation fees is $352.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine histologic examination of excised dorsal and volar carpal ganglions may be unnecessary if the preoperative and intraoperative evaluations are consistent with a diagnosis of carpal ganglion.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV.

Frequency of unexpected and important histopathological findings in routine intervertebral disc surgery

Object

The value of routine histopathological examination of intervertebral disc tissue has been questioned, but sufficient numbers of studies have yet to be conducted to provide a definitive sense of its importance. The aim of this study was to investigate the nature and frequency of unexpected histopathological findings in intervertebral disc surgery.

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective examination of consecutive surgical specimens obtained in patients with benign indication for discectomy at four neurosurgical centers.

Surgical specimens obtained during 2102 operations (2177 intervertebral discs) in 2017 patients were evaluated. In addition to one case of cavernous malformation, two specimens (obtained in 0.1% of patients) revealed unexpected pathological diagnoses of malignancy (metastasized prostate carcinoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma).

Conclusions

The results of this retrospective study suggest that routine histopathological examination of specimens obtained during intervertebral disc procedures is both justified and cost effective.

Complicaciones intra-abdominales de la cirugía de la hernia discal lumbar

INTRODUCTION

: Removal of a lumbar disc herniation is, at present, the most frequent surgical procedure, related to the spine in Neurosurgical Departments. It carries a very low rates of complications and a short postoperative hospital stay. However, in spite of their rarity, serious adverse intraoperative complications may occur, so we must be aware of its existence in order to make an early diagnosis and treatment to prevent a fatal outcome. It is important to ensure that the patient understand the possible complications and obtaining written consent to avoid later medico-legal problems.

CLINICAL CASES

We report two cases with typical lumbociatic pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation operated at our Department, that resulted in intraoperative complications, due to perforation of intraabdominal structures. Initially, the patients underwent planned flavectomy, followed by simple disc removal. However, symptoms of abdominal pain and systemic hypotension in each case, began some hours later. Early diagnosis was achieved using abdominal-pelvic CT scan, showing an intestinal perforation in one patient and a tear of both iliac artery and vein in the other. In both, an urgent laparotomy was performed by colleagues from the Department of General and Vascular Surgery, with surgical repair. The final outcome was good and both are asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

Surgical removal of the lumbar disc herniation is a very effective procedure, but is not free from certain severe though rare complications. Intestinal perforation and vascular tears are two possible complications to suspect if abdominal pain or systemic arterial to suspect if abdominal pain or systemic arterial urgent surgical repair of such complications. It is of vital importance that the patient knows the existence of such complications and so obtain a written consent.

Pathological evaluation of intervertebral disc tissue specimens after routine cervical and lumbar decompression. A cost-benefit analysis retrospective study

BACKGROUND

After decompression of cervical and lumbar nerve roots for radicular pain, pathological evaluation of the extracted disc material is commonly performed. Although histological examination rarely detects clinically significant unsuspected disease, it remains a common practice in most hospitals in the United States. To determine the cost-effectiveness of this routine practice, we conducted a retrospective study. The results are contained within this report.

METHODS

Using the University Neurosurgery database, we retrospectively identified 1,387 patients who had spinal decompression surgery (laminectomy and/or discectomy). These cases were broadly classified into routine and non-routine cases depending on the preoperative diagnosis. Benign and noninfectious cases were classified as routine; malignant and all other cases were classified as nonroutine. We reviewed the medical records and pathology reports of these routine and nonroutine cases in an attempt to study the efficacy of the pathological evaluation of the disc material. The cost-benefit value of histopathology in these cases was analyzed, retrospectively.

RESULTS

In all routine cases, the histopathology was consistent with benign disc disease and yielded no additional information that could have altered the treatment plan. In the nonroutine cases, however, histopathology was significant in the management of the patient. The cost factor for pathological study was the same for both case groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological study of intervertebral disc specimens is cost beneficial only in cases with significant preoperative clinical diagnoses. Pathological evaluation of routine herniated nucleus pulposus extracted during decompressive surgeries is not warranted.