1
|
Kogan F, Yoon D, Teeter MG, Chaudhari AJ, Hales L, Barbieri M, Gold GE, Vainberg Y, Goyal A, Watkins L. Multimodal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in non-oncologic musculoskeletal radiology. Skeletal Radiol 2024; 53:1833-1846. [PMID: 38492029 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04640-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders are associated with large impacts on patient's pain and quality of life. Conventional morphological imaging of tissue structure is limited in its ability to detect pain generators, early MSK disease, and rapidly assess treatment efficacy. Positron emission tomography (PET), which offers unique capabilities to evaluate molecular and metabolic processes, can provide novel information about early pathophysiologic changes that occur before structural or even microstructural changes can be detected. This sensitivity not only makes it a powerful tool for detection and characterization of disease, but also a tool able to rapidly assess the efficacy of therapies. These benefits have garnered more attention to PET imaging of MSK disorders in recent years. In this narrative review, we discuss several applications of multimodal PET imaging in non-oncologic MSK diseases including arthritis, osteoporosis, and sources of pain and inflammation. We also describe technical considerations and recent advancements in technology and radiotracers as well as areas of emerging interest for future applications of multimodal PET imaging of MSK conditions. Overall, we present evidence that the incorporation of PET through multimodal imaging offers an exciting addition to the field of MSK radiology and will likely prove valuable in the transition to an era of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feliks Kogan
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Daehyun Yoon
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laurel Hales
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Marco Barbieri
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Garry E Gold
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Yael Vainberg
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ananya Goyal
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lauren Watkins
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lehman VT, Tiegs-Heiden CA, Broski SM. Beyond Anatomy: Fat-Suppressed MR and Molecular Imaging of Spinal Pain Generators. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:247-261. [PMID: 38272618 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Spine pain is highly prevalent and costly, but evaluation with clinical features and anatomic imaging remain limited. Fat-suppressed MR imaging and molecular imaging (MI) may help identify inflammatory, lesional, and malignant causes. Numerous MI agents are available, each with advantages and disadvantages. Herein, FDG PET, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), bone radiotracers, and others are highlighted. No specific pain MI agents have been identified, but mechanisms of key agents are shown in video format, and the mechanism of PSMA as a theranostic agent is displayed. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to master this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vance T Lehman
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SouthWest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | | | - Stephen M Broski
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SouthWest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hascalovici J, Babb A, Norwood BA. Radiotracers in the Diagnosis of Pain: A Mini Review. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2023; 27:655-660. [PMID: 37935212 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis and understanding of pain is challenging in clinical practice. Assessing pain relies heavily on self-reporting by patients, rendering it inherently subjective. Traditional clinical imaging methods such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can only detect anatomical abnormalities, offering limited sensitivity and specificity in identifying pain-causing conditions. Radiotracers play a vital role in molecular imaging that aims to identify abnormal biological processes at the cellular level, even in apparently normal anatomical structures. Therefore, molecular imaging is an important area of research as a prospective diagnostic modality for pain-causing pathophysiology. We present a mini review of the current knowledge base regarding radiotracers for identification of pain in vivo. We also describe radiocaine, a novel positron emission tomography imaging agent for sodium channels that has shown great potential for identifying/labeling pain-producing nerves and producing an objectively measurable pain intensity signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Hascalovici
- Relief Medical Group PA, New York, New York
- Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, The Arthur S. Abramson Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
PET Imaging in Osteoarthritis. PET Clin 2023; 18:21-29. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Spirig JM, Hüllner M, Cornaz F, Betz M, Wanivenhaus F, Hofbauer M, Johayem A, Kaufmann PA, Farshad M. [18F]-sodium fluoride PET/MR for painful lumbar facet joint degeneration - a randomized controlled clinical trial. Spine J 2022; 22:769-775. [PMID: 34848344 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT [18F]-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/MR is a modern diagnostic modality for imaging increased bone turnover. Its merits in detecting painful facet joint osteoarthritis in patients with lumbar back pain are unknown. PURPOSE To perform a prospective randomized controlled study investigating [18F]-NaF PET/MR for detecting painful facet joints in comparison to the standard of care (SOC), including clinical examination and conventional MRI. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Randomized controlled clinical study. PATIENT SAMPLE Thirty-nine patients. OUTCOME MEASURES Visual analog pain scale (VAS) before and at several time points after facet joint infiltration. METHODS Patients with low back pain and suspected facet joint osteoarthritis underwent lumbar [18F]-NaF PET/MR, besides conventional MRI and clinical examination. After randomization, they either received local anesthetics/ corticosteroid infiltration of facet joints as defined by clinical examination and conventional MRI (SOC), or according to the hot spots on PET/MR. VAS was documented at 15 minutes, 1 day, 1 week and 1 month after infiltration. Thirty-nine patients underwent PET/MR before the study was stopped due to new Good Manufacturing Practice requirement and new regulations by radiation protection authorities limiting staff radiation exposure during the production of this radiotracer. RESULTS Significant pain reduction compared to baseline was shown at every timepoint in both groups, except at 1 month after infiltration in the SOC group. Pain levels did not differ between SOC (n=17) and PET/MR patients (n=12) before infiltration and at 15 minutes, 1 day, 1 week and 1 month after infiltration. No significant correlation was detected between the sum of the PET/MR activity and the initial pain scores or relative reduction of pain after 15 minutes. The constructed study groups of patients with infiltration of all facet joints being PET/MR-positive (n=18) had significantly less pain after 1 months than patients with infiltration in PET/MR-negative facet joints (n=11) (VAS: 4 [0, 9] vs. 7 [2, 10], p=.046). CONCLUSIONS There is no correlation of pain to NaF activity nor a relevant superiority of [18F]-NaF PET/MR for identification of painful facet joints compared to the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Miguel Spirig
- Spine Division, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich 8008, Switzerland.
| | - Martin Hüllner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
| | - Frédéric Cornaz
- Spine Division, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich 8008, Switzerland
| | - Michael Betz
- Spine Division, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich 8008, Switzerland
| | - Florian Wanivenhaus
- Spine Division, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich 8008, Switzerland
| | - Marlena Hofbauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
| | - Anass Johayem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
| | - Philipp A Kaufmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
| | - Mazda Farshad
- Spine Division, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich 8008, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raynor WY, Borja AJ, Hancin EC, Werner TJ, Alavi A, Revheim ME. Novel Musculoskeletal and Orthopedic Applications of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET. PET Clin 2021; 16:295-311. [PMID: 33589389 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PET imaging with 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF), combined with computed tomography or magnetic resonance, is a sensitive method of assessing bone turnover. Although NaF-PET is gaining popularity in detecting prostate cancer metastases to bone marrow, osseous changes represent secondary effects of cancer cell growth. PET tracers more appropriate for assessing prostate cancer metastases directly portray malignant activity and include 18F-fluciclovine and prostatic specific membrane antigen ligands. Recent studies investigating NaF-PET suggest utility in the assessment of benign musculoskeletal disorders. Emerging applications in assessing traumatic injuries, joint disease, back pain, orthopedic complications, and metabolic bone disease are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Y Raynor
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 West Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA
| | - Austin J Borja
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Emily C Hancin
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3500 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Thomas J Werner
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Mona-Elisabeth Revheim
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo 0372, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Problemveien 7, Oslo 0315, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Identifying Musculoskeletal Pain Generators Using Molecular Imaging. Mol Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-816386-3.00076-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
8
|
Yoon D, Kogan F, Gold GE, Biswal S. Identifying Musculoskeletal Pain Generators Using Clinical PET. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2020; 24:441-450. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIdentifying the source of a person's pain is a significant clinical challenge because the physical sensation of pain is believed to be subjective and difficult to quantify. The experience of pain is not only modulated by the individual's threshold to painful stimuli but also a product of the person's affective contributions, such as fear, anxiety, and previous experiences. Perhaps then to quantify pain is to examine the degree of nociception and pro-nociceptive inflammation, that is, the extent of cellular, chemical, and molecular changes that occur in pain-generating processes. Measuring changes in the local density of receptors, ion channels, mediators, and inflammatory/immune cells that are involved in the painful phenotype using targeted, highly sensitive, and specific positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers is therefore a promising approach toward objectively identifying peripheral pain generators. Although several preclinical radiotracer candidates are being developed, a growing number of ongoing clinical PET imaging approaches can measure the degree of target concentration and thus serve as a readout for sites of pain generation. Further, when PET is combined with the spatial and contrast resolution afforded by magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists can potentially identify pain drivers with greater accuracy and confidence. Clinical PET imaging approaches with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose, fluorine-18 sodium fluoride, and sigma-1 receptor PET radioligand and translocator protein radioligands to isolate the source of pain are described here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daehyun Yoon
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Feliks Kogan
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Garry E. Gold
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sandip Biswal
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yolcu YU, Lehman VT, Bhatti AUR, Goyal A, Alvi MA, Bydon M. Use of Hybrid Imaging Techniques in Diagnosis of Facet Joint Arthropathy: A Narrative Review of Three Modalities. World Neurosurg 2019; 134:201-210. [PMID: 31655232 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Facet joint osteoarthritis/arthropathy of the spine is a common cause of back and neck pain that frequently overlaps clinically with other diseases of the spine. Because of the possible overlap, it is crucial to have an accurate diagnostic strategy, especially when determining the management approach. Various strategies have been suggested and adopted, with several these still being used in clinics. Over the years, because of the disadvantages of single-modality imaging methods (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography), the interest in radiologic examination started to move toward hybrid imaging techniques. Although the data are mixed, many initial studies have shown promise. However, there are relatively few data with comparative medial branch blocks, and further investigation is needed. Given the advantages and disadvantages of these new techniques, the imaging results have to be interpreted within clinical context and with consideration of the current state of knowledge in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yagiz Ugur Yolcu
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Vance T Lehman
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Atiq Ur Rehman Bhatti
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anshit Goyal
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mohammed Ali Alvi
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|