Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Correlation between nerve cross-sectional area on ultrasound and clinical features

From Morphology to Therapeutic Strategies: Exploring New Applications of Ultrasound for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Diagnosis and Management

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes that can result in severe lower limb pain and amputation. Early detection and treatment of DPN are vital, but this condition is often missed due to a lack of symptoms and the insensitivity of testing methods. This article reviews various ultrasound imaging modalities in the direct and indirect evaluation of peripheral neuropathy. Moreover, how ultrasound-related therapeutic strategies are playing a role in clinical treatment is discussed. Finally, the application of innovative methodologies in the diagnosis of DPN, including ultrasound attenuation, photoacoustic imaging, and artificial intelligence, is described.

A diminished sciatic nerve structural integrity is associated with distinct peripheral sensory phenotypes in individuals with type 2 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) allows the identification of individuals with rapid progression of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) based on certain sensory phenotypes. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of these phenotypes with the structural integrity of the sciatic nerve among individuals with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Seventy-six individuals with type 2 diabetes took part in this cross-sectional study and underwent QST of the right foot and high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography including diffusion tensor imaging of the right distal sciatic nerve to determine the sciatic nerve fractional anisotropy (FA) and cross-sectional area (CSA), both of which serve as markers of structural integrity of peripheral nerves. Participants were then assigned to four sensory phenotypes (participants with type 2 diabetes and healthy sensory profile [HSP], thermal hyperalgesia [TH], mechanical hyperalgesia [MH], sensory loss [SL]) by a standardised sorting algorithm based on QST.

RESULTS

Objective neurological deficits showed a gradual increase across HSP, TH, MH and SL groups, being higher in MH compared with HSP and in SL compared with HSP and TH. The number of participants categorised as HSP, TH, MH and SL was 16, 24, 17 and 19, respectively. There was a gradual decrease of the sciatic nerve's FA (HSP 0.444, TH 0.437, MH 0.395, SL 0.382; p=0.005) and increase of CSA (HSP 21.7, TH 21.5, MH 25.9, SL 25.8 mm2; p=0.011) across the four phenotypes. Further, MH and SL were associated with a lower sciatic FA (MH unstandardised regression coefficient [B]=-0.048 [95% CI -0.091, -0.006], p=0.027; SL B=-0.062 [95% CI -0.103, -0.020], p=0.004) and CSA (MH β=4.3 [95% CI 0.5, 8.0], p=0.028; SL B=4.0 [95% CI 0.4, 7.7], p=0.032) in a multivariable regression analysis. The sciatic FA correlated negatively with the sciatic CSA (r=-0.35, p=0.002) and markers of microvascular damage (high-sensitivity troponin T, urine albumin/creatinine ratio).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

The most severe sensory phenotypes of DSPN (MH and SL) showed diminishing sciatic nerve structural integrity indexed by lower FA, likely representing progressive axonal loss, as well as increasing CSA of the sciatic nerve, which cannot be detected in individuals with TH. Individuals with type 2 diabetes may experience a predefined cascade of nerve fibre damage in the course of the disease, from healthy to TH, to MH and finally SL, while structural changes in the proximal nerve seem to precede the sensory loss of peripheral nerves and indicate potential targets for the prevention of end-stage DSPN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03022721.

Posterior Tibial Nerve Ultrasound Assessment of Peripheral Neuropathy in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common and debilitating complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Early detection and prompt institution of appropriate therapy could prevent undesirable outcomes such as paresthesia, pain, and amputation. Although the gold standard for diagnosing DPN is nerve conduction studies, high-resolution peripheral nerve ultrasonography may serve as a noninvasive and low-cost alternative for diagnosing and staging DPN. This study investigated the clinical utility of sonographic posterior tibial nerve cross-sectional area (PTN CSA) for diagnosing DPN in individuals with T2DM.

Methods

Eighty consecutive adults with T2DM and 80 age-/sex-matched controls were recruited. Clinical information was obtained, including symptoms, disease duration, Toronto clinical neuropathy score (TCNS), and biochemical parameters. The left PTN CSA at 1 cm, 3 cm, and 5 cm above the medial malleolus (MM) was measured with a high-frequency ultrasound transducer and compared to the detection of DPN using the TCNS.

Results

Based on the TCNS, 58 (72.5%) of the T2DM group had DPN. Of these, 14 (24.1%), 16 (27.6%), and 28 (48.3%) participants had mild, moderate, and severe DPN, respectively. All the mean PTN CSA (aggregate, 1 cm, 3 cm, and 5 cm above MM) of the participants with T2DM and DPN (T2DM-DPN) were significantly higher than those of T2DM without DPN (WDPN) and controls. All the PTN CSA increased significantly with increasing severity of DPN. The PTN CSA at 3 and 5 cm levels correlated weakly but significantly with fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels.

Conclusion

The PTN CSA is significantly larger in T2DM-DPN than in T2DM-WDPN and healthy controls. PTN ultrasonography can be an additional tool for screening DPN in patients with T2DM.

The vagus nerve cross-sectional area on ultrasound in patients with type 2 diabetes

Diabetic neuropathy, including autonomic neuropathy is a serious complication related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). The vagus nerve (VN) is the longest nerve in the autonomic nervous system, and since diabetic neuropathy manifests first in longer nerves, the VN is commonly affected in early diabetic autonomic neuropathy. The use of high-resolution ultrasound for peripheral and cranial nerve imaging has significantly increased over the past 2 decades. The aim of the study is to compare the cross-sectional area of the VN in patients with T2D to that of a control cohort without T2D. A total of 52 VN cross-sectional areas were recorded from patients with T2D. A total of 56 VN cross-sectional areas were also recorded from asymptomatic subjects without T2D. In each subject, high-resolution ultrasound imaging of the bilateral VNs was performed in the short-axis between the common carotid artery and the internal jugular vein. The VN cross-sectional areas were recorded and compared. In the patients with T2D, HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels were obtained as well as the duration of T2D in years and correlated with the cross-sectional areas. The bilateral VN cross-sectional areas were similar in both cohorts. Additionally, no correlation was seen between the VN cross-sectional areas, demographics, or clinical data of T2D. Our study demonstrated normal VN cross-sectional areas in patients with T2D without any significant relation with the patients' demographic or clinical data.

Normative Reference Values of the Tibial Nerve in Healthy Individuals Using Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

High-resolution ultrasound of the tibial nerve has been used for screening of several neurologic disorders, but normative reference values of tibial nerve cross-sectional areas (CSA) have not been well established. Thus, the present meta-analysis was performed to generate normative estimates of tibial nerve CSA at various sites of the lower limb based on ultrasonography.

METHODS

Google Scholar, Scopus and PubMed were searched for potential studies. Studies were required to report tibial nerve CSA in healthy individuals to be included. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to calculate tibial nerve CSA values. Subgroup and statistical analyses were performed to study covariates.

RESULTS

Forty-eight eligible articles consisting of 2695 limbs were included. The average tibial nerve CSA was found to be 10.9 mm2 at the ankle (95% CI: 9.9-11.8) and should not exceed 11.8 mm2 in healthy adults. At the popliteal fossa, the overall CSA was 21.7 mm2 (95% CI: 17.5-25.8) in healthy adults. At both sites, the average tibial nerve CSA was significantly larger in adults than in children, and the differences by geographical region were not statistically significant. At the ankle, tibial nerve CSA increased with age and body mass index, while at the popliteal fossa it increased with age and weight.

CONCLUSIONS

our findings indicate that the tibial nerve varied not only along its course but also among sub-variables. Establishing normal references values of tibial nerve CSA is helpful to differentiate healthy from diseased tibial nerves such as in diabetic peripheral neuropathy or tarsal tunnel syndrome.

Peripheral Neuropathy in Diabetes: What Can MRI Do?

Diabetes peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is commonly asymptomatic in the early stage. However, once symptoms and obvious defects appear, recovery is not possible. Diagnosis of neuropathy is based on physical examinations, questionnaires, nerve conduction studies, skin biopsies, and so on. However, the diagnosis of DPN is still challenging, and early diagnosis and immediate intervention are very important for prevention of the development and progression of diabetic neuropathy. The advantages of MRI in the diagnosis of DPN are obvious: the peripheral nerve imaging is clear, the lesions can be found intuitively, and the quantitative evaluation of the lesions is the basis for the diagnosis, classification, and follow-up of DPN. With the development of magnetic resonance technology, more and more studies have been conducted on detection of DPN. This article reviews the research field of MRI in DPN.

Nerve ultrasonographic findings in diabetes mellitus are determined by anatomical location and type of diabetes

Objective

A prospective ultrasound study to analyze nerve size and its modifying factors in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

The cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of motor and sensory nerves in both upper and lower limbs were measured at 14 measurement points, using high resolution ultrasound in 26 patients with type 1 and 76 patients with type 2 diabetes, and in 50 control subjects. All diabetic patients underwent electrophysiological assessment to check for the presence of polyneuropathy.

Results

Significant mild/moderate diffuse nerve enlargement was demonstrated in type 2 diabetes, more pronounced at compression sites versus non-compression sites, and on the upper limbs versus lower limbs (p value for pooled DM2 v. control group: <0.001). In type 1 diabetes, nerve enlargement was found only at one compression site (median nerve wrist; p = 0.002). No significant difference was found between patients with or without polyneuropathy.

Conclusions

The primary predictors of nerve size in diabetes are anatomical location (i.e. compression sites versus non-compression sites, upper versus lower limbs) and type of diabetes. Changes occur before the electrophysiological signs of polyneuropathy are detected.

Significance

Nerve ultrasound may contribute to early recognition of the neuropathic complications of diabetes.

Diagnostic value of shear wave ultrasound elastography of tibial nerve in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Background

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a major complication of Diabetes mellitus. So this study aimed at investigation of the value of tibial nerve stiffness measured by shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) for detection of DPN. This case–control study involved 50 patients with DPN, 50 patients with diabetes mellitus but without DPN, and 50 healthy controls. Clinical examination, nerve conduction study of both tibial nerves, high resolution ultrasound and SWE to assess cross sectional area "CSA" of tibial nerves, and tibial nerves mean stiffness, respectively. ROC curve analysis was also performed.

Results

Mean tibial nerve stiffness by SWE was higher in patients with DPN compared to other groups (P value < 0.001). The CSA of the tibial nerve in the DPN group was significantly larger than that in the other groups (P value = 0.01). The cutoff value by ROC curve analysis for tibial nerve stiffness to differentiate patients with DPN and control group was 70.6 kPa (P value < 0.001, 95.4% sensitivity, 94.7% specificity, AUC = 0.963), while 86.5 kPa was the optimal cutoff point to differentiate patients with DPN and other groups with a 94.6% sensitivity, 93.8% specificity, AUC of 0.975 and P value < 0.001. Higher diagnostic accuracy was found when combination of SWE and high resolution US (high resolution US + shear wave; 0.987, P value < 0.001).

Conclusions

Tibial nerve stiffness was increased in patients with DPN. SWE can be used as an effective complementary method in diagnosis of DPN with high sensitivity and accuracy.

Cross-Sectional Area of the Tibial Nerve in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ultrasonography Studies

Background: There is a link between diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) progression and the increase in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the tibial nerve at the ankle. Nevertheless, no prior meta-analysis has been conducted to evaluate its usefulness for the diagnosis of DPN. Methods: We searched Google Scholar, Scopus, and PubMed for potential studies. Studies had to report tibial nerve CSA at the ankle and diabetes status (DM, DPN, or healthy) to be included. A random-effect meta-analysis was applied to calculate pooled tibial nerve CSA and mean differences across the groups. Subgroup and correlational analyses were conducted to study the potential covariates. Results: The analysis of 3295 subjects revealed that tibial nerve CSA was 13.39 mm2 (CI: 10.94−15.85) in DM patients and 15.12 mm2 (CI: 11.76−18.48) in DPN patients. The CSA was 1.93 mm2 (CI: 0.92−2.95, I2 = 98.69%, p < 0.01) larger than DPN-free diabetic patients. The diagnostic criteria of DPN and age were also identified as potential moderators of tibial nerve CSA. Conclusions: Although tibial nerve CSA at the ankle was significantly larger in the DPN patients, its clinical usefulness is limited by the overlap between groups and the inconsistency in the criteria used to diagnose DPN.

High resolution ultrasound in subclinical diabetic neuropathy: A potential screening tool

Introduction

Detection of subclinical neuropathy can aid in triage, timely intervention and dedicated care to reduce disease progression and morbidity. High resolution sonography has emerged as a promising technique for evaluation of peripheral nerves. The aim of the present study was to assess the utility of high resolution sonography in screening diabetic patients for subclinical neuropathy.

Methods

A total of 70 adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 30 controls were enrolled; those with clinical features of neuropathy constituted the diabetic polyneuropathy group and those without symptoms/normal nerve conduction the non-diabetic polyneuropathy group. After institutional ethical committee approval and informed consent, high resolution sonography was performed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Nerves studied were median (elbow and wrist), ulnar (cubital tunnel and Guyon's canal), common peroneal (fibular head) and posterior tibial nerve (medial malleolus).The size (cross sectional area), shape, echogenicity and morphology of nerve were assessed and compared between the groups.

Results

The mean cross sectional area of all nerves was significantly higher both in diabetic polyneuropathy and non-diabetic polyneuropathy group compared to controls (p value < .001). Common peroneal nerve cross sectional area of 4.5 mm² had the highest sensitivity (93%) and specificity (86%) for detecting nerve changes in the non-diabetic polyneuropathy group. The nerves were more rounded, hypoechoic and had an altered morphology in both study groups.

Conclusion

Presence of sonographic nerve changes in asymptomatic diabetics depicted that morphological alterations in nerves precede clinical symptoms. High resolution sonography detected nerve changes with a good accuracy, and thus, can be a potential screening tool for detection of subclinical diabetic polyneuropathy.

Neuropathic Pain and Ultrasonography: A Multiperspective Literature Evaluation

Among the tools useful for the management of neuropathic pain, ultrasound presents several advantages, shown by the literature. We assessed the scientific production about neuropathic pain and ultrasound from different points of view: general topics, journal categories, geographical origin and lexical analysis. We searched papers on PubMed using the Medical Subject Headings "neuropathic pain" AND "ultrasound". We collected data about the journals where the papers were published, the country of the affiliation of the first author. For the lexical analysis, we evaluated the presence of selected words in the papers, and we built a graph representing the connections among words and papers. The papers were focused on the use of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool and guide for the therapy, assessing its application in different diseases such as Morton's neuroma and piriformis syndrome. The most represented journal category was anesthesia while the most common country the United States of America. The lexical analysis confirmed the importance of ultrasound for diagnosis of specific disease and treatment of pain. The described approaches provide a multiperspective evaluation of the literature and may support the interpretation of the information contained by the papers.

Value of shear wave elastography combined with the Toronto clinical scoring system in diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy

To evaluate the diagnostic values of shear wave elastography (SWE) alone and in combination with the Toronto clinical scoring system (TCSS) on diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).The study included 41 DPN patients, 42 non-DPN patients, and 21 healthy volunteers. Conventional ultrasonography and SWE were performed on the 2 sides of the tibial nerves, and cross-sectional area (CSA) and nerve stiffness were measured. TCSS was applied to all patients. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed.The stiffness of the tibial nerve, as measured as mean, minimum or maximum elasticity, was significantly higher in patients in the DPN group than the other groups (P < .05). The tibial nerve of subjects in the non-DPN group was significantly stiffer compared to the control group (P < .05). There was no significant difference of the tibial nerve CSA among the 3 groups (P > .05). Mean elasticity of the tibial nerve with a cutoff of 71.3 kPa was the most sensitive (68.3%) and had a higher area under the curve (0.712; 0.602-0.806) among the 3 shear elasticity indices for diagnosing DPN when used alone. When combining SWE with TCSS in diagnosing DPN, the most effective parameter was the EMax, which yielded a sensitivity of 100.00% and a specificity of 95.24%.SWE is a better diagnostic tool for DPN than the conventional ultrasonic parameter CSA, and a higher diagnostic value is attained when combining SWE with TCSS.

High resolution ultrasonography of peripheral nerves in diabetic patients to evaluate nerve cross sectional area with clinical profile

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this observational study was ultrasound evaluation of peripheral nerves cross-sectional area (CSA) in subjects with probable diabetic peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy (DPN). CSA was analyzed with reference to clinical and nerve conduction study's (NCS) parameters for early diagnosis and pattern of involvement.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients with probable DPN due to Type 2 diabetes and 50 age-matched healthy controls underwent sonographic examinations of ulnar nerve at the lower arm, median nerve proximal to carpal tunnel, the common peroneal nerve proximal to fibular head, tibial nerve proximal to the tarsal tunnel, and sural nerve at lower third leg.

RESULTS

CSA was increased in cases of DPN as compared to healthy controls. Area changes were more marked with demyelinating pattern. Probable DPN cases with normal NCS had significantly higher number of peripheral nerves showing increased CSA as compared to healthy control. A cut-off of >4 nerve thickening showed a sensitivity of 86 %, and specificity of 56%. The neuropathy pattern in the lower limb was axonal, whereas in the upper limb, it was demyelinating with the majority showing sonographic feature of associated compressive neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

There is an increase in CSA of peripheral nerve in diabetic patients. It can be used as a morphological marker for classifying DPN with changes being picked up earlier to NCS abnormality. Clinical neurological presentation in probable DPN can also be due to compressive neuropathy in early phases, and ultrasound can be a useful tool.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Early pick up of DPN cases shall be useful for early therapy and motivating the patients to actively participate in the treatment. Morphological changes on ultrasonography precedes the electrodiagnostic change in DPN. Symptoms of DPN is not only due to metabolic changes but also compressive neuropathy.

Applicability of High-Frequency Ultrasound to the Early Diagnosis of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

This study investigated the applicability of high-frequency ultrasound (HFU) to the early diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Patients with type 2 diabetes (N = 60) were divided into diabetic nonperipheral neuropathy and DPN groups (group A and group B, respectively; n = 30 each) based on electroneurophysiologic findings. Additionally, 30 nondiabetic patients were included as the healthy control group (group C). We calculated the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve (MN) of the right upper limb at 7 different sites (MN1–7) based on measured width (W) and thickness (T). Ultrasound imaging characteristics of the MN including internal echo, internal structure, boundary, epineurium, and blood flow were recorded. The 90 subjects (51 male and 39 female) had an average age of 56.09 ± 12.66 years. W, T, and CSA of the MN were increased in group A compared to group C (with significant differences at MN1, MN4, and MN7 (P < 0.05)) and in group B compared to group C (with significant differences at all 7 levels, especially MN6 and MN7 (P < 0.05)). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that CSA at the MN7 level had the highest diagnostic accuracy for DPN in group B, with a threshold value of 12.42 mm². Ultrasound examination revealed that the MN had lost the internal sieve mesh structure and showed reduced echo, a partial blood flow signal, and thickened epineurium in patients with DPN; these findings were particularly obvious at MN6 and MN7, corresponding to the carpal tunnel. CSA was positively correlated with motor latency and F wave average latency and negatively correlated with motor conduction velocity, motor amplitude, and sensory conduction velocity in group B. Thus, HFU may be useful for the early diagnosis of DPN, which can improve clinical outcomes.

WITHDRAWN: Efficacy of High-frequency Ultrasound Image Information Diagnosis on Neurological-abnormality in Patients with Type-2-diabetes Combined with Peripheral- neuropathy

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the Editor-in-Chief. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Application value of conventional ultrasound and real-time shear wave elastography in patients with type 2 diabetic polyneuropathy

PURPOSE

To explore the application value of conventional ultrasound and real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) to the tibial nerve (TN) and the common peroneal nerve (CPN) in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three healthy volunteers, 33 diabetic patients without DPN, and 30 diabetic patients with DPN were enrolled in this study. The anteroposterior diameter (APD), the cross-sectional area (CSA), and the perimeter of the TN and the CPN were measured by conventional ultrasound, and the stiffness of the nerves was measured by SWE.

RESULTS

The conventional ultrasound parameters and stiffness of the TN in patients with DPN were significantly larger than those of the other two groups (P < 0.01). The conventional ultrasound parameters of the CPN were significantly higher in patients with DPN than in the other two groups (P < 0.01).The patients with DPN demonstrated a greater stiffness of the CPN compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The comparison of all parameters for the left and right TNs and CPNs among the three groups showed no significant difference. The area under the curve (AUC) of TN stiffness for the diagnosis of DPN was significantly greater than that of conventional ultrasound parameters.

CONCLUSION

The conventional ultrasound parameters and the stiffness of the TN and the CPN were significantly higher in patients with DPN. The stiffness of the TN could better diagnose DPN than conventional ultrasound parameters. In short, conventional ultrasound and SWE of nerves are of good application value in the diagnosis of DPN.

Ultrasound elastography in the evaluation of peripheral neuropathies: a systematic review of the literature

Peripheral neuropathy is associated with an increase in intraneural pressure, and hence ultrasound elastography seems to be an ideal method to detect early stages of this condition based on changes in the affected nerve stiffness. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse the applicability of strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) in the evaluation of peripheral nerves in patients with neuropathy of various aetiologies. Published evidence shows clearly that ultrasound elastography can accurately diagnose many types of peripheral neuropathies (carpal tunnel syndrome and other entrapment neuropathies, diabetic peripheral neuropathy and peripheral neuropathy associated with other systemic diseases), sometimes at the stages at which the condition is still asymptomatic. However, it is still unclear whether elastographic changes within the nerves precede functional anomalies detectable on nerve conduction studies. Also, relatively little is known about the relationship between the stiffness of peripheral nerves and the severity of peripheral neuropathy and its underlying condition. Based on the reproducibility data, SWE seems to be superior to SE. Nevertheless, the sources of heterogeneity in the peripheral nerve stiffness in healthy persons need to be identified, and the sets of reference values for specific peripheral nerves need to be determined. Finally, the potential confounding effect of hardening artefacts, such as bones, on the stiffness of peripheral nerves needs to be verified. After addressing all these issues, elastographic evaluation of peripheral nerve stiffness might become a reliable, easily accessible, and convenient diagnostic test performed routinely in patients with various peripheral neuropathies.

Comparison of neurosensory devices in detecting cutaneous thresholds related to protective sensibility: A cross-sectional study in São Paulo, Brazil

AIMS

To quantify the static and moving cutaneous sensibility threshold of diabetic patients using a neurosensory device for quantitative pressure detection.

METHODS

Three hundred thirty-four (n = 334) patients with type 2 diabetes and no previous history of wounds on the feet were studied using the one- and two-point static (1SP;2 SP) and one- and two-point moving (1MP;2 MP) tests through the pressure-specified sensory device (PSSD) on the cutaneous territory of the dorsal first web, hallux pulp, and medial calcaneal. In addition, patients were evaluated using the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) No. 5.07 and tuning fork (128 Hz), which were used as normality parameters to detect the loss of protective sensibility. The same examinations were used to assess the control group (228 nondiabetic).

RESULTS

Altered values were observed for the static and moving tests over the three studied nerve territories. In comparing the sensibility threshold between diabetic patients who were sensitive and nonsensitive to SWM 5.07, we observed that this filament is not the most indicated for identifying the loss of sensibility in these patients. The prevalence of patients at risk varied between 85 and 89%. The biochemical marker associated with these high rates was HbA1c (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Numeric quantification of the pressure threshold allowed us to determine the functional deficit of nerve fibers. Our findings suggest that the neurosensory device should be used as an adjuvant tool to evaluate the degree of loss of sensation on the skin.

Shear wave elastography evaluation of the median and tibial nerve in diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Background

To evaluate the value of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) of the median and tibial nerves.

Methods

The study included 40 DPN patients, 40 diabetic mellitus (DM) patients without DPN, and 40 healthy subjects. High-resolution ultrasonography (US) and SWE were performed on the median nerve (MN) and tibial nerve (TN), and cross-sectional area (CSA) and nerve stiffness were measured. ROC analysis was also performed.

Results

The patients with DPN demonstrated higher stiffness of the median and tibial nerve compared with that of healthy volunteers and DM patients (P<0.001). Bilateral analysis showed that there was no significant difference in nerve stiffness between the left and right median nerves and tibial nerves in DPN patients (P>0.05). The stiffness of median nerve and tibial nerve in each one side also had no significant difference in patients with DPN (P>0.05). The CSA of the tibial nerve in the DPN group was significantly larger than that in the other groups (P<0.001), while there was no significant difference of median nerve CSA among the three groups (P>0.05). The area under curve (AUC) of SWE (MN: 0.899, TN: 0.927) to diagnose DPN was significantly greater than that of CSA (TN: 0.798). The optimal cut-off value in SWE of the tibial nerve and median nerve for diagnosis of DPN was 4.11 and 4.06 m/s, respectively, with a good sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions

Median and tibial nerve stiffness was significantly higher in patients with DPN. These findings suggest that SWE-based stiffness measurement of the nerve was a better method than CSA, and it can be used as another effective assistant method in the diagnosis of DPN.

Fortuitous Diagnosis of Preexisting Neuropathy During Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia Performance: A Case Report

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia requires the anesthesia provider to interpret new information. This article reports on the case of a 38-year-old man scheduled for a fifth metacarpal fracture repair. Ultrasound nerve examination revealed abnormal pathology of the axillary brachial plexus consisting of an increased volume of the terminal nerves of the brachial plexus. Ultrasound scanning initiated the subsequent diagnosis of multifocal motor neuropathy. Regional anesthesia was abandoned in favor of general anesthesia. Ultrasonography training needs to be expanded in the coming years to include awareness of the abnormal pathology, as it might impact the choice of anesthetic procedure and patient outcome.