Impact of aminoglycoside cycling in six tertiary intensive care units: prospective longitudinal interventional study

Bloodstream Infections at Two Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Ghana: Multidrug Resistant Enterobacterales Undermine the Usefulness of Standard Antibiotic Regimes

BACKGROUND

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized neonates. Data on antibiotic resistance in neonatal BSIs and their impact on clinical outcomes in Africa are limited.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study at 2 tertiary level neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Ghana. All neonates admitted to the NICUs were included from October 2017 to September 2019. We monitored BSI rates and analyzed the effect of BSI and antibiotic resistance on mortality and duration of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Of 5433 neonates included, 3514 had at least one blood culture performed and 355 had growth of a total of 368 pathogenic microorganisms. Overall incidence of BSI was 1.0 (0.9-1.1) per 100 person days. The predominant organisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae 49.7% (183/368) and Streptococcus spp. 10.6% (39/368). In addition, 512 coagulase negative Staphylococci were isolated but considered probable contaminants. Among K. pneumoniae, resistance to gentamicin and amikacin was 91.8% and 16.4%, respectively, while carbapenem resistance was 4.4%. All-cause mortality among enrolled neonates was 19.7% (1066/5416). The mortality rate was significantly higher in neonates with BSI compared with culture-negative neonates in univariate analysis (27.9%, n = 99/355 vs. 16.5%, n = 520/3148; hazard ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.70) but not in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The diversity of etiologic agents and the high-risk of antibiotic resistance suggest that standard empirical treatment is unlikely to improve the outcome of BSIs in low and middle income. Such improvements will depend on access to reliable clinical microbiologic services.

Strategies to enhance rational use of antibiotics in hospital: a guideline by the German Society for Infectious Diseases

Introduction

In the time of increasing resistance and paucity of new drug development there is a growing need for strategies to enhance rational use of antibiotics in German and Austrian hospitals. An evidence-based guideline on recommendations for implementation of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programmes was developed by the German Society for Infectious Diseases in association with the following societies, associations and institutions: German Society of Hospital Pharmacists, German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology, Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy, The Austrian Association of Hospital Pharmacists, Austrian Society for Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Austrian Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Robert Koch Institute.

Materials and methods

A structured literature research was performed in the databases EMBASE, BIOSIS, MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library from January 2006 to November 2010 with an update to April 2012 (MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library). The grading of recommendations in relation to their evidence is according to the AWMF Guidance Manual and Rules for Guideline Development.

Conclusion

The guideline provides the grounds for rational use of antibiotics in hospital to counteract antimicrobial resistance and to improve the quality of care of patients with infections by maximising clinical outcomes while minimising toxicity. Requirements for a successful implementation of ABS programmes as well as core and supplemental ABS strategies are outlined. The German version of the guideline was published by the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in December 2013.

Patient-level interventions to prevent the acquisition of resistant gram-negative bacteria in critically ill patients: a systematic review

The rising incidence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (MDR-GNB) infections acquired in intensive care units has prompted a variety of patient-level infection control efforts. However, it is not known whether these measures are effective in reducing colonisation and infection. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of patient-level interventions for the prevention of colonisation with MDR-GNB and whether these interventions are associated with a reduction in the rate of infection due to MDR-GNB in the intensive care unit. Searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and World of Science databases to identify comparative interventional studies on patient-level interventions implemented in the intensive care unit. Literature published in English, Spanish or French from January 1, 2000, until April 30, 2013, was searched. A total of 631 reports were found and we included and analysed 13 comparative studies that reported outcomes for an intervention compared with a control group. There were ten randomised and three observational interventional trials evaluating seven interventions. Overall, there was a reduction in colonisation (odds ratio [OR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.85) and infection (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.75) with MDR-GNB. This trend persisted after restricting pooled analysis to randomised controlled trials (pooled OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.76 and pooled OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72, respectively). We identified a significant reduction in MDR-GNB colonisation and infection through the use of patient-level interventions. This effect was mostly accounted for by selective digestive decontamination. However, given the limitations of the analysed trials, adequately powered controlled studies are needed to further explore the effects of patient-level interventions on colonisation and infection with MDR-GNB.

Cycling empirical antibiotic therapy in hospitals: meta-analysis and models

The rise of resistance together with the shortage of new broad-spectrum antibiotics underlines the urgency of optimizing the use of available drugs to minimize disease burden. Theoretical studies suggest that coordinating empirical usage of antibiotics in a hospital ward can contain the spread of resistance. However, theoretical and clinical studies came to different conclusions regarding the usefulness of rotating first-line therapy (cycling). Here, we performed a quantitative pathogen-specific meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing cycling to standard practice. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar and identified 46 clinical studies addressing the effect of cycling on nosocomial infections, of which 11 met our selection criteria. We employed a method for multivariate meta-analysis using incidence rates as endpoints and find that cycling reduced the incidence rate/1000 patient days of both total infections by 4.95 [9.43–0.48] and resistant infections by 7.2 [14.00–0.44]. This positive effect was observed in most pathogens despite a large variance between individual species. Our findings remain robust in uni- and multivariate metaregressions. We used theoretical models that reflect various infections and hospital settings to compare cycling to random assignment to different drugs (mixing). We make the realistic assumption that therapy is changed when first line treatment is ineffective, which we call “adjustable cycling/mixing”. In concordance with earlier theoretical studies, we find that in strict regimens, cycling is detrimental. However, in adjustable regimens single resistance is suppressed and cycling is successful in most settings. Both a meta-regression and our theoretical model indicate that “adjustable cycling” is especially useful to suppress emergence of multiple resistance. While our model predicts that cycling periods of one month perform well, we expect that too long cycling periods are detrimental. Our results suggest that “adjustable cycling” suppresses multiple resistance and warrants further investigations that allow comparing various diseases and hospital settings.

The rise of antibiotic resistance is a major concern for public health. In hospitals, frequent usage of antibiotics leads to high resistance levels; at the same time the patients are especially vulnerable. We therefore urgently need treatment strategies that limit resistance without compromising patient care. Here, we investigate two strategies that coordinate the usage of different antibiotics in a hospital ward: “cycling”, i.e. scheduled changes in antibiotic treatment for all patients, and “mixing”, i.e. random assignment of patients to antibiotics. Previously, theoretical and clinical studies came to different conclusions regarding the usefulness of these strategies. We combine meta-analyses of clinical studies and epidemiological modeling to address this question. Our meta-analyses suggest that cycling is beneficial in reducing the total incidence rate of hospital-acquired infections as well as the incidence rate of resistant infections, and that this is most pronounced at low baseline levels of resistance. We corroborate our findings with theoretical epidemiological models. When incorporating treatment adjustment upon deterioration of a patient's condition (“adjustable cycling”), we find that our theoretical model is in excellent accordance with the clinical data. With this combined approach we present substantial evidence that adjustable cycling can be beneficial for suppressing the emergence of multiple resistance.

Resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections

Drug resistance is a common problem in the fight against infectious diseases. Recent studies have shown conditions (which we call antiR) that select against resistant strains. However, no specific drug administration strategies based on this property exist yet. Here, we mathematically compare growth of resistant versus sensitive strains under different treatments (no drugs, antibiotic, and antiR), and show how a precisely timed combination of treatments may help defeat resistant strains. Our analysis is based on a previously developed model of infection and immunity in which a costly plasmid confers antibiotic resistance. As expected, antibiotic treatment increases the frequency of the resistant strain, while the plasmid cost causes a reduction of resistance in the absence of antibiotic selection. Our analysis suggests that this reduction occurs under competition for limited resources. Based on this model, we estimate treatment schedules that would lead to a complete elimination of both sensitive and resistant strains. In particular, we derive an analytical expression for the rate of resistance loss, and hence for the time necessary to turn a resistant infection into sensitive (tclear). This time depends on the experimentally measurable rates of pathogen division, growth and plasmid loss. Finally, we estimated tclear for a specific case, using available empirical data, and found that resistance may be lost up to 15 times faster under antiR treatment when compared to a no treatment regime. This strategy may be particularly suitable to treat chronic infection. Finally, our analysis suggests that accounting explicitly for a resistance-decaying rate may drastically change predicted outcomes in host-population models.

Factors Affecting Gentamicin Penetration in Lower Extremity Ischemic Tissues With Ulcers

The aims of the study were to analyze the penetration of gentamicin in foot ulcers in patients with different severities of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and to determine significant parameters affecting lower limb tissue concentrations. Patients undergoing debridement of a wound or an amputation procedure were included. All patients received a 120 mg or 240 mg intravenous dose of gentamicin prior to the procedure. Patients were classified according to the degree of PAD. Tissue and serum samples were collected at the time of intervention, and gentamicin concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Blood and tissue samples were taken from 61 patients, 41 males and 20 females with a mean age of 66 years. Nineteen patients had nil or borderline PAD, 9 patients had mild or moderate PAD, and 26 patients had severe PAD. Forty-eight patients had type 2 diabetes, 8 patients had type 1 diabetes, and 5 patients were nondiabetic. The concentration of gentamicin in peripheral skeletal muscle tissue was dependent on the serum concentration, degree of PAD, gender, and age. For patients with ischemic lower extremity wounds (patients with mild, moderate, and severe PAD), the concentration of gentamicin was significantly lower ( P = .010) than the concentration in nonischemic wounds, and the concentration in female patients was also significantly lower than in male patients ( P = .047). The concentration in peripheral subcutaneous tissue was 0.663 times the concentration in skeletal muscle tissue ( P < .00001). Gentamicin showed greatest penetration in male patients without PAD. For patients with severe PAD, higher doses of gentamicin may be required to achieve the same effect.