The association between clinical and laboratory findings of bullous pemphigoid and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in the elderly: a retrospective study

Skin-Related Adverse Reactions Induced by Oral Antidiabetic Drugs-A Review of Literature and Case Reports

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disease with a steadily increasing prevalence worldwide. Diabetes affects the function of many organs, including the skin. Pharmacotherapy for T2DM is mainly based on oral hypoglycemic drugs. The therapeutic strategy is chosen taking into account the individual patient's characteristics, among other comorbidities. Antidiabetic drugs can induce cutaneous adverse reactions (CADRs) ranging in severity from mild erythema to serious disorders such as DRESS or Stevens-Johnson syndrome. CADRs can result from hypersensitivity to the drug but can also be related to the mechanism of action of the drug or cross-reactivity with drugs of similar structure. This paper reviews CADRs induced by oral antidiabetic drugs, considering their dermatological manifestations and possible pathomechanisms. Particular attention was paid to specific dermatological conditions such as dipeptidylpeptidase 4 inhibitor-associated bullous pemphigoid or Fournier's gangrene associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapy. Knowledge of the dermatological manifestations of CADRs is important in clinical practice. Recognition of a skin lesion resulting from an adverse drug reaction allows for appropriate management, which in this case is primarily related to drug discontinuation. This is particularly important in the treatment of T2DM since this disease has a high prevalence in the elderly, who are at higher risk of adverse drug reactions.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor‒Associated Bullous Pemphigoid Is Characterized by an Altered Expression of Cytokines in the Skin

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is), commonly used drugs for treatment of type 2 diabetes, increase the risk for bullous pemphigoid (BP). Currently, the mechanism leading to the loss of immunological tolerance of the cutaneous adhesion molecule BP180 as well as similarities and differences in disease progression between DPP4i-associated BP (DPP4i-BP) and DPP4i-independent regular BP are largely unknown. We analyzed the expression of 32 cytokines and two proteases by Luminex and ELISA assays in samples taken from lesional and nonlesional skin of patients with regular BP or DPP4i-BP and healthy controls. Cytokines mediating B-cell survival and targeting such as BAFF, CCL4, CXCL12, and IL-6 were expressed at a higher level in the lesional regular BP skin than the levels in the lesional DPP4i-BP skin. The DPP4i-BP samples had increased levels of eosinophilic cytokines CCL1, CCL17, CCL26, and IL-5, which correlated with the serum level of anti-BP180 NC16A IgG autoantibodies. The mRNA expression of BAFF, IL6, CCL1, CCL17, CCL26, and IL5 measured by qPCR correlated with the protein levels. Taken together, the cutaneous cytokine profiles were found to provide distinctive molecular fingerprints between regular BP and DPP4i-BP.

Clinical, Laboratory and Histological Features of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Related Noninflammatory Bullous Pemphigoid

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease of elderly patients that has shown increasing incidence in the last decades. Higher prevalence of BP may be due to more frequent use of provoking agents, such as antidiabetic dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) drugs. Our aim was to assess DPP4i-induced bullous pemphigoid among our BP patients and characterize the clinical, laboratory and histological features of this drug-induced disease form. In our patient cohort, out of 127 BP patients (79 females (62.2%), 48 males (37.7%)), 14 (9 females and 5 males) were treated with DPP4i at the time of BP diagnosis. The Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) urticaria/erythema score was significantly lower, and the BPDAI damage score was significantly higher in DPP4i-BP patients compared to the nonDPP4i group. Both the mean absolute eosinophil number and the mean periblister eosinophil number was significantly lower in DPP4i-BP patients than in nonDPP4i cases (317.7 ± 0.204 vs. 894.0 ± 1.171 cells/μL, p < 0.0001; 6.75 ± 1.72 vs. 19.09 ± 3.1, p = 0.0012, respectively). Our results provide further evidence that DPP4i-associated BP differs significantly from classical BP, and presents with less distributed skin symptoms, mild erythema, normal or slightly elevated peripheral eosinophil count, and lower titers of BP180 autoantibodies. To our knowledge, this is the first case series of DPP4i-related BP with a non-inflammatory phenotype in European patients.