Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation for stabilization of the osteoporotic spine : a three-year follow-up of 37 patients

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Osteoporosis on Reoperation Rates and Complications after Surgical Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disease

BACKGROUND

There is considerable heterogeneity in findings and a lack of consensus regarding the interplay between osteoporosis and outcomes in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather and analyze existing data on the effect of osteoporosis on radiographic, surgical, and clinical outcomes following surgery for lumbar degenerative spinal disease.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to determine the effect of osteoporosis on the incidence of adverse outcomes after surgical intervention for lumbar degenerative spinal diseases. The approach focused on the radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates, and other medical and surgical complications. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was performed on the eligible studies.

RESULTS

The results of the meta-analysis suggested that osteoporotic patients experienced increased rates of adjacent segment disease (ASD; p=0.015) and cage subsidence (p=0.001) while demonstrating lower reoperation rates than non-osteoporotic patients (7.4% vs. 13.1%; p=0.038). The systematic review also indicated that the length of stay, overall costs, rates of screw loosening, and rates of wound and other medical complications may increase in patients with a lower bone mineral density. Fusion rates, as well as patient-reported and clinical outcomes, did not differ significantly between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis was associated with an increased risk of ASD, cage migration, and possibly postoperative screw loosening, as well as longer hospital stays, incurring higher costs and an increased likelihood of postoperative complications. However, a link was not established between osteoporosis and poor clinical outcomes.

Comparison of cement-augmented pedicle screw and conventional pedicle screw for the treatment of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and clinical efficacy between using cement-augmented pedicle screws (CAPS) and conventional pedicle screws (CPS) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis. Management of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis undergoing spine surgery is challenging. The clinical efficacy and potential complications of the mid-term performance of the CAPS technique in the treatment of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis remain to be evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of 131 lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis who were treated with screw fixation from May 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The patients were divided into the following two groups according to the type of screw used: (I) the CAPS group (n = 85); and (II) the CPS group (n = 46). Relevant data were compared between two groups, including the demographics data, clinical results and complications.

RESULTS

The difference in the VAS, ODI and JOA scores at three and 6 months after the operation between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At 12 months after surgery and the final follow-up, a significant difference in the fusion rate was found between the two groups (P < 0.05). Four cemented screws loosening were observed in the CAPS group (loosening rate 4/384, 1.04%) and 15 screws loosening were observed in the CPS group (loosening rate 15/214, 7.01%). In the CAPS group, a total of 384 augmented screws were used, and cement leakage was observed in 25 screws (25/384, 6.51%), but no obvious clinical symptoms or serious complications were observed. Adjacent vertebral fractures occurred in six patients in the CAPS group and one in the CPS group.

CONCLUSIONS

CAPS technique is an effective strategy for the treatment of lumbar degenerative patients with osteoporosis, with a higher fusion rate and lower screw loosening rate than CPS.

High Rate of Pulmonary Cement Embolism after Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation: A 12-Year Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

 The global trend toward increased life expectancy because of remarkable improvements in health care quality has drawn increased attention to osteoporotic fractures and degenerative spine diseases. Cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation has been established as the mainstay treatment for patients with poor bone quality. This study aimed to determine the number of patients with cement leakage and pulmonary cement embolism (PCE) as detected on thoracic computed tomography (CT), and to assess the potential risk factors for PCE.

METHODS

 Patients undergoing cement-augmented pedicle screw placement in our institution between May 2008 and December 2020 were included. Data regarding baseline characteristics, complications, and cement leakage rates were collected. Indications for the performance of a postoperative thoracic CT due to the suspicion of PCE were intra- or postoperative complications, or postoperative oxygen supplementation. Moreover, PCE was accidently diagnosed because the thoracic CT was performed for medical reasons other than the suspicion of PCE (tumor staging, severe pneumonia, or exacerbated chronic pulmonary obstructive disease).

RESULTS

 A total of 104 patients with a mean age of 72.8 years (standard deviation of 6.7) were included. Of 802 screws, 573 were cement augmented. Of the 104 patients, 44 (42.3%) underwent thoracic CT scans to diagnose PCE; additionally, 67 (64.4%) demonstrated cement leakage, of whom 27 developed PCE and 4 were symptomatic. Cement-augmented thoracic screws were a risk factor for PCE (odds ratio: 1.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.1; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

 This study showed a high prevalence of cement leakage after cement-augmented pedicle screw insertion, with a relatively frequent incidence of PCE, as tracked by thoracic CT scans. Cement-augmented thoracic screw placement was a unique risk factor for PCE.

Cardiopulmonary Cement Embolism Following Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Narrative Review

Fixation using cement-augmented pedicle screws (CAPS) is being increasingly performed. However, CAPS-associated cement leakage is a critical problem that can lead to cardiopulmonary cement embolism (CPCE). This narrative review aimed to explore the incidence of and risk factors and treatment strategies for CPCE and cement leakage-related complications after CAPS fixation. Data were extracted from each article, including characteristics of CPCE after CAPS fixation (incidence, location, diagnostic method and criteria, treatment, and outcome and prognosis). Overall, 28 case series and 14 case reports that met the inclusion criteria were included. Of the 1974 cases included in the review, CPCE was noted in 123, symptomatic CPCE in 35, and death in six, respectively. The frequencies of PCE and symptomatic PCE after CAPS fixation were 6% (range: 0-28.6%) and 1.3% (range: 0-26%), respectively. The range of frequencies of PCE and symptomatic PCE after CAPS fixation may have been wide because the definition of CPCE and data collection methods differed among the reports analyzed. Since PCE due to large cement emboli may be primarily related to the surgical technique, improved technique, such as minimizing the number of CAPSs by injecting low-volume high-viscosity cement at low velocity and pressure, and careful observation of cement leakage during CAPS insertion may reduce PCE associated with cement leakage. Spinal surgeons should pay more attention to the occurrence of CPCE during and after CAPS insertion, which can cause serious complications in some patients.

Comparison of pedicle screw fixation with or without cement augmentation for treating single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis in the osteoporotic spine

The present study examined the necessity of cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic patients with single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis.Fifty-nine cases were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-three cases were in the polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) group, and the other 26 cases were in the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) group. Evaluation data included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization cost, hospitalization days, rates of fusion, screw loosening, bone cement leakage, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS).The operation time and blood loss in the CPS group decreased significantly compared to those in the PMMA-PS group. The average hospitalization cost of the PMMA-PS group was significantly higher than that of the CPS group. There was no significant difference in the average hospital stay between the 2 groups. The initial and last follow-up postoperative VAS and ODI scores improved significantly in the two groups. There were no significant differences in VAS and ODI between the 2 groups at each time point. The last postoperative spine-pelvic parameters were significantly improved compared with those preoperatively. In the PMMA-PS group, the fusion rate was 100%. The fusion rate was 96.15% in the CPS group. No significant difference was found between the two groups for the fusion rate. Nine patients in the PMMA-PS group had bone cement leakage. There was no screw loosening in the PMMA-PS group. There were 2 cases of screw loosening in the CPS group. There were no significant differences in screw loosening, postoperative adjacent segment fractures, postoperative infection or postoperative revision between the 2 groups. The use of PMMA-PS on a regular basis is not recommended in posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws and conventional pedicle screw in surgery for spinal metastases: a retrospective comparative cohort study

Background

The incidence of cancer patients with bone metastasis is increasing annually. With the advancement of medical treatment for malignant tumors, the survival time of patients with spinal metastases is gradually being prolonged, and adjacent segment vertebral metastases often occur after conventional pedicle screw (CPS) surgery, leading to spinal instability, pain and nerve function injury again, with repeated symptoms. Combined pedicle screw fixation can maintain or reconstruct the spinal stability. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws in the posterior approach for spinal metastases by comparing with CPS.

Methods

From January 2017 to August 2019, 52 patients with spinal metastases who underwent separation surgery and internal fixation via posterior approach were retrospectively enrolled. Cases were divided into the cement-augmented pedicle screw (CAPS) group (28 cases) and the CPS group (24 cases). The baseline data [age, gender, surgical sites, surgical segment, Tomita classification, Tomita score, Tokuhashi score, spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS)], surgical information, and local progression-free survival (PFS) time were compared between the two groups. Every patient was followed-up every 3 months with imaging examination. The visual analog scale (VAS) score and Frankel grade of the two groups were recorded before and 3 months after the operation were used to evaluate the efficacy. The operation time, the amount of intraoperative blood loss, the amount of bone cement injected in the pedicle screw group, and the complications of the surgery were recorded to evaluate the safety of CAPS.

Results

The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two group. Compared with the CPS group, the CAPS group showed significantly longer operation time (163±20 vs. 138±18 min, P<0.001) and lower VAS scores (2.93±1.33 vs. 4.17±1.34, P=0.002). Adjacent segment vertebral metastasis occurred in 10 cases (2 in the CAPS group and 8 in the CPS group, P=0.017). Internal implant failure occurred in 8 cases (1 in the CAPS group and 7 in the CPS group, P=0.011). Compared with the CPS group, the CAPS group had a significantly longer local PFS time (P<0.05).

Conclusions

CAPS could be a safe and effective choice in surgery for spinal metastases with the posterior approach.

Percutaneous Cement-Augmented Screws Short Fixation for the treatment of Severe Osteoporotic Vertebral Burst Fractures

OBJECTIVE (BACKGROUND)

This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic reliability of posterior percutaneous cement-augmented screws short fixation(PASF) in patients with severe osteoporotic vertebral burst fractures(OVBFs).

METHODS

Single-level OVBFs with an anterior vertebral body height(VBH) reduction equal or superior to 60% were included. A frailty index was employed for preoperative frailty assessment. Back pain and related disability were assessed through the VAS scale and Oswestry low-back pain disability index(ODI), being administered at injury time, preoperative, postoperative, twelfth-month and last patient follow-up evaluations. The main radiological outcomes were represented by Cobb angle(CA) and anterior vertebral body compression percentage(AVBC%), being measured at injury time, preoperative, postoperative and twelfth-month examinations. Among the others, the incidence of cement leakages and hardware failures was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients resulted frail(76%) or semi-frail(24%). Significant VBH restoration and segmental kyphosis improvement after PASF was documented (AVBC%:-40(-43;-37) VS -67(-70;-65), P = 0.0001; CA: 10(8-12) VS 24(23-26), P = 0.0001). The mean VAS and ODI scores documented optimal and long-enduring pain relief and related disability reduction after PASF (VAS: 2(2-3) VS 8(7-8), P = 0.0001; ODI: 22(17-26) VS 64(60-69), P = 0.0001). Only one cement leakage (3%), asymptomatic, occurred. After a mean follow-up of 33 months, no early/late hardware failures were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and radiological results of this study suggest that PASF could be a safe and effective treatment option for severe OVBFs when conservative treatments failed.

A meta-analysis of complications associated with the use of cement-augmented pedicle screws in osteoporosis of spine

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to provide updated and comprehensive evidence on the complications associated with the use of cement-augmented pedicle screws (CAPS) in osteoporosis patients undergoing spinal instrumentation.

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, Embase, Ovoid, and Google Scholar were screened from January 2000-February 2020 for studies reporting complications of CAPS in osteoporosis patients. Pooled estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included. The pooled risk of screw loosening, screw breakage and screw migration was 2.0% (0.2%-4.9%), 0.6% (0%-2.0%) and 0.2% (0%-1.2%) respectively. On pooling of data from 1277 patients, we found the risk of all cement leakage to be 21.8% (6%-43.1%). However, data from 1654 patients indicated the risk of symptomatic cement leakage was 1.2% (0.6%-1.9%). The incidence of pulmonary embolism was 3.0% (0.5%-6.8%) while the risk of symptomatic pulmonary embolism was 0.8% (0.2%-1.5%). Pooled risk of neurovascular complications was 1.6% (0.3%-3.6%), adjacent compression fracture was 3.3% (1.2%-6.2%) and infectious complications was 3.1% (1.1%-5.7%). There were high heterogeneity and variability in the study outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of screw-related complications like loosening, breakage, and migration with the use of CAPS in spinal instrumentation of osteoporotic patients is low. The risk of cement leakage is high and variable but the incidence of symptomatic cement leakage and related neurovascular or pulmonary complications is low. Further studies using homogenous methods of reporting are needed to strengthen current evidence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Novel Biodegradable Composite of Calcium Phosphate Cement and the Collagen I Mimetic P-15 for Pedicle Screw Augmentation in Osteoporotic Bone

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures often necessitate fusion surgery, with high rates of implant failure. We present a novel bioactive composite of calcium phosphate cement (CPC) and the collagen I mimetic P-15 for pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic bone. Methods involved expression analysis of osteogenesis-related genes during osteoblastic differentiation by RT-PCR and immunostaining of osteopontin and Ca²⁺ deposits. Untreated and decalcified sheep vertebrae were utilized for linear pullout testing of pedicle screws. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Expression of ALPI II (p < 0.0001), osteopontin (p < 0.0001), RUNX2 (p < 0.0001), and osteocalcin (p < 0.0001) was upregulated after co-culture of MSC with CPC-P-15. BMD was decreased by 28.75% ± 2.6%. Pullout loads in untreated vertebrae were 1405 ± 6 N (p < 0.001) without augmentation, 2010 ± 168 N (p < 0.0001) after augmentation with CPC-P-15, and 2112 ± 98 N (p < 0.0001) with PMMA. In decalcified vertebrae, pullout loads were 828 ± 66 N (p < 0.0001) without augmentation, 1324 ± 712 N (p = 0.04) with PMMA, and 1252 ± 131 N (p < 0.0078) with CPC-P-15. CPC-P-15 induces osteoblastic differentiation of human MES and improves pullout resistance of pedicle screws in osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic bone.

Comparison of clinical effectiveness of fenestrated and conventional pedicle screws in patients undergoing spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Pedicle screws are commonly used for spinal procedures for fusion stability, which is particularly important in osteoporotic patients, who are at an increased risk of requiring revision procedures.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare clinical effectiveness of conventional pedicle screws (CPS) vs fenestrated pedicle screws (FPS) in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Primary outcomes included screw loosening, revision surgeries (involving an implant) and reoperations (not involving intervention on an implant) in patients treated with CPS vs FPS, sub-stratified by with and without osteoporosis. Secondary outcomes included changes in pain scores. Forty-eight studies with 8,302 patients were included, with 1,565 (19.18%) treated with FPS and 6,710 (80.82%) treated with CPS. FPS was associated with a lower risk of screw loosening (p = 0.001) vs CPS. In the general population, there was a non-significant trend of lower revision rate, but no difference in reoperation rate, between patients treated with FPS vs CPS. In osteoporotic patients, revision rates were significantly lower for FPS vs CPS (p = 0.009).

EXPERT OPINION

This review suggests that FPS are effective for surgical fixation and reduce rates of screw loosening, and in osteoporotic patients, revision surgeries, compared to CPS.

Cement-Augmented Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Spinal Metastases: Safety and Efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the complication rates and long-term implant failure rates in a monocentric study of a consecutive cohort of patients with thoracolumbar spinal metastases after posterior instrumentation with a fenestrated carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (CFRP) pedicle screw system.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed demographics, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale scores, complications, and implant failure rates.

RESULTS

Between June 2016 and November 2019, 51 consecutive patients underwent cement-augmented CFRP pedicle screw instrumentation at our institution. Mean age was 68 years (standard deviation 10.5), the median preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status Scale of 80 increased to 90 postoperatively (P = 0.471). Most common primary entities were breast (25.5%), lung (15.7%), and prostate (13.7%) cancers. Of 428 placed screws, 293 (68.5%) were augmented with polymethylmethacrylate, a mean 6 per patient (standard deviation ±2). Screws were inserted via a minimally invasive system technique in 54.9% of cases. In total, 11.8% of patients had immediate postoperative sequelae related to the cement. Pulmonary cement embolisms were noted in 3 patients, 2 had paravertebral extravasation, and 1 had an embolism into a segmental artery. Of these 6, 2 patients with pulmonary embolisms reported related symptoms. Follow-up was available for 80.4%. After a mean 9.8 months, screw loosening was noted in 11.8% of cases on computed tomography, although it was asymptomatic in all but 1 patient. Screw pull-out did not occur. Neither cement-related (P = 0.353) nor general complication rates (P = 0.507) differed significantly between open and minimally invasive system techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous cement-augmented CFRP pedicle screw instrumentation facilitates artifact-reduced postoperative imaging, while maintaining a risk profile and implant failure rates comparable to conventional metallic instrumentation.

Fenestrated pedicle screws for thoracolumbar instrumentation in patients with poor bone quality: Case series and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To describe the results of a single-surgeon series and systematically review the literature on cement-augmented instrumented fusion with fenestrated pedicle screws.

METHODS

All patients treated by the senior surgeon using fenestrated screws between 2017 and 2019 with a minimum of 6-months of clinical and radiographic follow-up were included. For the systematic review, we used PRISMA guidelines to identify all prior descriptions of cement-augmented instrumented fusion with fenestrated pedicle screws in the English literature. Endpoints of interest included hardware loosening, cement leakage, and pulmonary cement embolism (PCE).

RESULTS

Our series included 38 patients (mean follow-up 14.8 months) who underwent cement-augmented instrumentation for tumor (47.3%), deformity/degenerative disease (39.5%), or osteoporotic fracture (13.2%). Asymptomatic screw lucency was seen in 2.6%, cement leakage in 445, and pulmonary cement embolism (PCE) in 5.2%. Our literature review identified 23 studies (n = 1526 patients), with low reported rates of hardware loosening (0.2%) and symptomatic PCE (1.0%). Cement leakage, while common (55.6%), produced symptoms in fewer than 1% of patients. Indications for cement-augmentation in this cohort included: spine metastasis with or without pathologic fracture (n = 18; 47.3%), degenerative spine disease or fixed deformity with poor underlying bone quality (n = 15; 39.5%), and osteoporotic fracture (n = 5; 13.2%).

CONCLUSION

Cement-augmented fusion with fenestrated screws appears to be a safe, effective means of treating patients with poor underlying bone quality secondary to tumor or osteoporosis. High-quality evidence with direct comparisons to non-augmented patients is needed.

Comparison of three different screw trajectories in osteoporotic vertebrae: a biomechanical investigation

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic patients is challenging. Achieving more screw-cortical bone purchase and invasiveness minimization, the cortical bone trajectory and the midline cortical techniques represent alternatives to traditional pedicle screws. This study compares the fatigue behavior and fixation strength of the cement-augmented traditional trajectory (TT), the cortical bone trajectory (CBT), and the midline cortical (MC).

METHODS

Ten human cadaveric spine specimens (L1 - L5) were examined. The average age was 86.3 ± 7.2 years. CT scans were provided for preoperative planning. CBT and MC were implanted by using the patient-specific 3D-printed placement guide (MySpine®, Medacta International), TT were implanted freehand. All ten cadaveric specimens were randomized to group A (CBT vs. MC) or group B (MC vs. TT). Each screw was loaded for 10,000 cycles. The failure criterion was doubling of the initial screw displacement resulting from the compressive force (60 N) at the first cycle, the stop criterion was a doubling of the initial screw displacement. After dynamic testing, screws were pulled out axially at 5 mm/min to determine their remaining fixation strength.

RESULTS

The mean pull-out forces did not differ significantly. Concerning the fatigue performance, only one out of ten MC of group A failed prematurely due to loosening after 1500 cycles (L3). Five CBT already loosened during the first 500 cycles. The mean displacement was always lower in the MC. In group B, all TT showed no signs of failure or loosening. Three MC failed already after 26 cycles, 1510 cycles or 2144 cycles. The TT showed always a lower mean displacement. In the subsequent pull-out tests, the remaining mean fixation strength of the MC (449.6 ± 298.9 N) was slightly higher compared to the mean pull-out force of the CBT (401.2 ± 261.4 N). However, MC (714.5 ± 488.0 N) were inferior to TT (990.2 ± 451.9 N).

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that cement-augmented TT have the best fatigue and pull-out characteristics in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae, followed by the MC and CBT. MC represent a promising alternative in osteoporotic bone if cement augmentation should be avoided. Using the patient-specific placement guide contributes to the improvement of screws' biomechanical properties.

Fenestrated Pedicle Screws in Spinal Oncology: Technique and Comparative Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of spinal stabilization with decompression has been shown to improve survival, spinal stability, and ambulatory status in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. However, the poor bone quality typically seen in these patients can prevent adequate stabilization. Fenestrated pedicle screws permit augmented fixation via injection of bone cement into the vertebral body upon screw placement, potentially mitigating the difficulties in achieving adequate stabilization in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical outcomes of posterior spinal fusion in patients with cancerous spinal lesions between polymethyl methacrylate cement-augmented fenestrated screws and standard pedicle screws.

METHODS

A total of 19 consecutive patients with cancerous spinal lesions receiving posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with pedicle screws from a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed for demographic information, comorbidities, surgical parameters, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent PSF with cement augmentation, whereas 9 underwent standard PSF. There was no significant difference in demographics, comorbidities, or surgical characteristics. Operative time was significantly greater in the cement-augmented group (302 ± 100 minutes vs 203 ± 55 minutes; P = .015). There was no significant difference in rates of operation or readmission between the cohorts nor was there any significant difference in discharge disposition. There was 1 case of surgical site infection (in a patient with a fenestrated screw) and no cases of cement extravasation. No instances of mechanical hardware failure were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenestrated screws confer similar risk profiles as nonfenestrated screws for posterior spinal fusion in patients with spinal cancer. However, fenestrated screws may affect operative time, radiation exposure, and impose risk of cement extravasation. Cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws may be a viable option for patients with poor bone quality associated with metastatic disease without significantly increased rates of surgical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

[Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation in treatment of senile thoracolumbar tuberculosis combined with severe osteoporosis]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety and effectiveness of polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation (PASF) in the treatment of elderly thoracolumbar tuberculosis combined with severe osteoporosis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 20 elderly patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis and severe osteoporosis who underwent PASF after anterior or posterior debridement and bone grafting and met the selection criteria between December 2012 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males and 12 females with an average age of 68.5 years (range, 65-72 years). T value of bone mineral density was -4.2 to -3.6, with an average of -3.9. There were 12 cases of thoracic tuberculosis, 3 cases of thoracolumbar tuberculosis, and 5 cases of lumbar tuberculosis. The diseased segments involved T 3-L 4, including 11 cases of single-segment disease, 6 cases of double-segment disease, and 3 cases of multi-segment disease. The disease duration was 3-9 months, with an average of 6 months. The preoperative spinal nerve function of the patients was evaluated by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading. There were 2 cases of grade A, 5 cases of grade B, 6 cases of grade C, 4 cases of grade D, and 3 cases of grade E. Postoperative imaging examination was used to evaluate the bone graft fusion and paravertebral abscess absorption, and to measure the Cobb angle of the segment to evaluate the improvement of kyphosis. The levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were tested. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and ASIA grading were used to evaluate the effectivreness before operation, at 1 month after operation, and at last follow-up. The clinical cure of tuberculosis was also evaluated.

RESULTS

All operation successfully completed. The operation time was 154-250 minutes, with an average of 202 minutes; the intraoperative blood loss was 368-656 mL, with an average of 512 mL. All 20 patients were followed up 18-42 months, with an average of 26.8 months. The postoperative pain and symptoms of tuberculosis in all patients relieved, and the paravertebral abscess was absorbed, reaching the cure standard for spinal tuberculosis. All bone grafts fusion achieved within 1 year after operation. Only 1 case had asymptomatic bone cement leakage into the paravertebral veins, and the remaining patients had no serious complications such as bone cement leakage in the spinal canal, pulmonary embolism, and neurovascular injury. At last follow-up, spinal cord nerve function significantly improved when compared with preoperative one. Among them, ASIA grading were 7 cases of grade C, 8 cases of grade D, and 5 cases of grade E, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative one ( Z=2.139, P=0.000). VAS score, ODI score, segmental Cobb angle, ESR, and CRP at 1 month after operation and at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between 1 month after operation and last follow-up ( P>0.05). During the follow-up, no complications such as failure of internal fixation, proximal junctional kyphosis, or tuberculosis recurrence occurred.

CONCLUSION

For elderly patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis and severe osteoporosis, PASF treatment is safe and effective.

Comparison of unilateral and bilateral polymethylmethacrylate-augmented cannulated pedicle screw fixation for the management of lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis

Background

Cannulated pedicle screw (CPS) augmented by polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis. However, accurate application of CPSs will help to avoid the difficulty of screw revision and reduce the incidence of PMMA-related complications. This study aimed to investigate the mid-term efficacy of CPS compared to unilateral and bilateral applications in this common lumbar degenerative disease.

Methods

May 2011 and May 2018, 50 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis who underwent posterior fixation and fusion using traditional pedicle screws or CPSs were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the application: the unilateral PMMA-augmented CPS group (UC, n = 29) and the bilateral PMMA-augmented CPS group (BC, n = 21). Operation time, blood loss, average hospitalization time, PMMA leakage, and other complications were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate symptom recovery. Radiographic results were compared for intervertebral fusion and screw loosening.

Results

There were no significant differences in the baseline data of the two groups.

The VAS and ODI scores improved significantly after surgery (P < 0.05), with no significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). The operation time and blood loss in the UC group were significantly lower than those in the BC group (P < 0.05). However, the loss of intervertebral disk height and Taillard index did not differ significantly between the groups. The rates of PMMA leakage in the UC and BC groups were 7.0% and 11.9%, respectively (P < 0.05). Bony fusion was achieved in all groups without screw loosening at the last follow-up. Only one patient experienced superficial infection in both groups, while cerebrospinal fluid leakage was observed in two patients in the BC group.

Conclusions

Unilateral application of PMMA-augmented CPS may provide adequate clinical safety and effectiveness in the surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.

Effect of Fenestrated Pedicle Screws with Cement Augmentation in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis is a well-known risk factor for instrumentation failure and subsequent pseudoarthrosis after spinal fusion. In the present systematic review, we analyzed the biomechanical properties, clinical efficacy, and complications of cement augmentation via fenestrated pedicle screws in spinal fusion.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Reports appearing in the PubMed database up to March 31, 2020 were queried using the key words "cement," "pedicle screw," and "osteoporosis." We excluded non-English language studies, studies reported before 2000, studies that had involved use of cement without fenestrated pedicle screws, nonhuman studies, technical reports, and individual case reports.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies had tested the biomechanics of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws. The magnitude of improvement achieved by cement augmentation of pedicle screws increased with the degree of osteoporosis. The cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw was superior biomechanically to the alternative "solid-fill" technique. Fourteen studies had evaluated complications. Cement extravasation with fenestrated screw usage was highly variable, ranging from 0% to 79.7%. However, cement extravasation was largely asymptomatic. Thirteen studies had assessed the outcomes. The use of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicles decreased screw pull out and improved fusion rates; however, the clinical outcomes were similar to those with traditional pedicle screw placement.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws can be an effective strategy for achieving improved pedicle screw fixation in patients with osteoporosis. A potential risk is cement extravasation; however, this complication will typically be asymptomatic. Larger comparative studies are needed to better delineate the clinical efficacy.

Effect and potential risks of using multilevel cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative disease

Background

The increase of augmented level and bone cement dose are accompanied by the rising incidence of cement leakage (CL) of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI). But the effect and potential risks of the application of CAPSI to osteoporotic lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) have not been studied in the case of multilevel fixation. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and potential complications of using multilevel CAPSI for patients with osteoporotic LDD.

Methods

A total of 93 patients with multilevel LDD were divided into the CAPSI group (46 subjects) and the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) group (47 subjects), including 75 cases for three levels and 18 cases for four levels. Relevant data were compared between two groups, including baseline data, clinical results, and complications.

Results

In the CAPSI group, a total of 336 augmented screws was placed bilaterally. The CL was observed in 116 screws (34.52%). Three cemented screws (0.89%) were found loosened during the follow-up and the overall fusion rate was 93.47%. For perioperative complications, two patients (4.35%) experienced pulmonary cement embolism (PCE), one patient augmented vertebral fracture, and three patients (6.52%) wound infection. And in the CPS group, thirty-three screws (8.46%) suffered loosening in cranial and caudal vertebra with a fusion rate of 91.49%. The operation time and hospital stay of CAPSI group were longer than the CPS group, but CAPSI group has a lower screw loosening percentage (P<0. 05). And in terms of blood loss, perioperative complications, fusion rate, and VAS and ODI scores at the follow-up times, there were no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions

Patients with osteoporotic LDD underwent multilevel CPS fixation have a higher rate of screw loosening in the cranial and caudal vertebra. The application of cemented pedicle screws for multilevel LDD can achieve better stability and less screw loosening, but it also accompanied by longer operating time, higher incidence of CL, PCE and wound infections. Selective cement augmentation of cranial and caudal pedicle screws may be a worthy strategy to decrease the complications.

Novel Surgical Strategy for Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures with Cord Compression

Objectives

Treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) with cord compression is challenging and it usually requires surgical interventions to decompress nerves and restore spinal sequences. To describe a novel surgical strategy for treating OVFs with cord compression.

Methods

This is a single‐center retrospective analysis. The inclusion criteria were Frankel grade C‐E, single level T₁₀‐L₂. Between January 2008 and December 2016, a total of 56 OVF patients (47 females and nine males, with an average age of 72 years (66–88 years), comprising of eight grade C, 23 grade D, and 25 grade E patients) were enrolled. The treatment algorithm included preoperative evaluation by MRI, extension CT, and radiography to classify the OVFs as type 1.1 (reducible, stable; n = 13), type1.2 (reducible, unstable; n = 16), type 2 (irreducible; n = 19) or type 2M (modifier; n = 8). Vertebroplasty (VP)/kyphoplasty (KP) was applied in type 1.1. VP/KP with posterior fixation and posterolateral fusion was applied in type 1.2. And additional laminectomy/osteotomy was used in type 2, except in a modifier group (2M) where same procedure as applied for type 1.2 was used. VAS, ODI, Cobb angle, Frankel functional grade, and complications were recorded.

Results

Thirteen cases were classified as type 1.1, 16 cases as type 1.2, 19 cases as type 2, and eight cases as type 2M. The follow‐up period was 38.9 months (range, 24–108 months). All patients were followed‐up in at least 24 months, in which time four patients died, two patients were lost at the last follow‐up, and 50 patients completed the full study. The total VAS and ODI improved from 8 (7, 9) and 75.5% (67.2%, 80.0%) preoperatively to 2 (1, 3) and 31% (24.0%, 37.0%) on conclusion, respectively (P < 0.01). The local kyphotic angle was corrected from 22.3° (17.1°, 33. 8°) preoperatively to 10.4° (6.4°, 15.3°) on conclusion (P < 0.01). Twenty‐three patients had achieved neurological recovery on conclusion (42E, 8D, P < 0.01). Asymptotic cement leakage was observed in 17/56 cases (30.4%), 6/56 in the affected vertebra (10.7%), and 24/330 in the screw trajectory (7.3%). At 2 years postoperatively, 11 new VFs had occurred in nine patients (16.1%), including VFs in nine adjacent segments that all occurred within 1 year after surgery. No cement migration or implant failure was noted.

Conclusion

The novel surgical strategy for treating OVFs with cord compression consists of the most tailored and least invasive treatment for each patient. The positive mid‐ and long‐term clinical and radiological outcomes observed could represent a step forward in devising the proposed algorithm.

Surgical Trend Analysis for Use of Cement Augmented Pedicle Screws in Osteoporosis of Spine: A Systematic Review (2000-2017)

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Study indications for cement-augmented pedicle screws (CAPS) in patients with osteoporosis. Have they changed over the years (2000-2017)? Are there any differences in usage of CAPS based on the geographical region? (2) What were the outcome of the studies? (3) What are the complications associated with this technique?

METHODS

Electronic database and reference list of desired articles were searched from the database (2000-2017). Articles were selected discussing indications, clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications in cases of preexistent osteoporosis treated surgically using CAPS.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified; 3 were comparative studies and had a control arm (cemented vs noncemented screws). Most studies originated from Europe (10) or Asia (7). Painful vertebral fracture with or without neurological deficit, Kummell's lesion, deformity and failure to respond to conservative treatment are the common indications for cement augmentation. Visual analogue scale score was the most commonly used to assess pain and average improvement after surgery was 6.1. Average improvement in kyphosis was 13.21° and average loss of correction at the end of the study was 3°. Cement leak was the most common complication observed and pulmonary cement embolism was the most dreaded complication. Nevertheless, majority of cement leaks discussed in studies were asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

CAPS are being increasingly used in osteoporotic spine. Pain scores, functional quality of life, and neurological function indices were studied. CAPS improved anchorage in osteoporotic vertebra and helped improve/maintain clinical and radiological improvement. Common risks of cement leak were observed.

Biomechanical study of the fixation stability of broken pedicle screws and subsequent strategies

Pedicles are often broken when screws are inserted into hard pedicles with small diameters or when the diameter of the screw itself is inadequate. However, there is a lack of biomechanical literature that addresses screw loosening as a result of broken pedicles or the resulting salvage of those screws. We performed a novel in vitro study to compare the pullout strength of screws between intact pedicles and two different types of broken pedicles; strategies to prevent screw loosening were also compared. Thirty L4 Sawbones were designed to represent intact pedicles, semi-pedicles, and nonpedicles and were prepared for screw insertion. Three sizes of polyaxial screws (diameter × length dimensions of 6.0 mm × 45 mm, 6.0 mm × 50 mm and 6.5 mm × 45 mm) were independently and randomly distributed into the intact-pedicle group (IP group, n = 30), the semi-pedicle group (SP group, n = 15), or the nonpedicle group (NP group, n = 15). The experiments were conducted across a minimum of five trials for each of the chosen screw sizes. We then analyzed the results of the imaging, pullout testing, and embedded bone volume. Any fractures or defects of the vertebrae caused by screw insertion were excluded from the study. The appropriate screw trajectory and insertional depth were confirmed using axial and sagittal X-ray imaging prior to screw pullout testing. A pullout strength of only 41% to 45% for the SP group and 29% to 39% for the NP group was retained following a broken pedicle. The use of longer or larger-diameter screws appears to be an effective salvaging procedure for the NP group (p < 0.05). The embedded bone volume percentage analysis indicated that, compared to the IP group, 68% to 76% of effective bone embedded into the screw threads in the SP group, and 58% to 65% in the NP group. There was no direct correlation between the pullout strength and the embedded bone volume; however, less effective embedded bone volume was associated with lower pullout strength. This study describes the evolution of the well-established screw pullout test being applied to the broken pedicle Sawbone testing model. The pedicle plays an important role in determining the pullout strength of a screw. However, a salvage procedure that utilizes a longer or larger-diameter screw might be a reliable clinical approach to address broken pedicles.

Clinical evaluation of a bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate: 128 osteoporotic patients with 42 months of follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic spinal surgery.

METHODS

This study included 128 patients with osteoporosis (BMD T-score -3.2±1.9; range, -5.4 to -2.5) who underwent spinal decompression and instrumentation with a polymethylmethacrylate-augmented bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale scores and the Oswestry Disability Index were compared with preoperative values. Postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed immediately after surgery; at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 42.4±13.4 months (range, 23 to 71 months). A total of 418 polymethylmethacrylate-augmented bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws were used. Cement extravasations were detected in 27 bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws (6.46%), mainly in cases of vertebral fracture, without any clinical sequela. The postoperative low back and lower limb Visual Analogue Scale scores were significantly reduced compared with the preoperative scores (<0.01), and similar results were noted for the Oswestry Disability Index score (p<0.01). No significant screw migration was noted at the final follow-up relative to immediately after surgery (p<0.01). All cases achieved successful bone fusion, and no case required revision. No infection or blood clots occurred after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The polymethylmethacrylate-augmented bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw is safe and effective for use in osteoporotic patients who require spinal instrumentation.

Biomechanical study of injectable hollow pedicle screws for PMMA augmentation in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: effect of PMMA distribution and volume on screw stability

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to compare stability of injectable hollow pedicle screws with different numbers of holes using different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae and analyze the relationship between screw stability and distribution and volume of PMMA.METHODSForty-eight severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into 3 groups-groups A, B, and C (16 vertebrae per group). The screws used in group A had 4 holes (2 pairs of holes, with the second hole of each pair placed 180° further along the thread than the first). The screws used in group B had 6 holes (3 pairs of holes, placed with the same 180° difference in position). Unmodified conventional screws were used in group C. Each group was randomly divided into subgroups 0, 1, 2, and 3, with different volumes of PMMA used in each subgroup. Type A and B pedicle screws were directly inserted into the vertebrae in groups A and B, respectively, and then different volumes of PMMA were injected through the screws into the vertebrae in subgroups 0, 1, 2, and 3. The pilot hole was filled with different volumes of PMMA followed by insertion of screws in groups C0, C1, C2, and C3. Distributions of PMMA were evaluated radiographically, and axial pull-out tests were performed to measure the maximum axial pullout strength (Fmax).RESULTSRadiographic examination revealed that PMMA surrounded the anterior third of the screws in the vertebral bodies (VBs) in groups A1, A2, and A3; the middle third of screws in the junction area of the vertebral body (VB) and pedicle in groups B1, B2, and B3; and the full length of screws evenly in both VB and pedicle in groups C1, C2, and C3. In addition, in groups A3 and B3, PMMA from each of the screws (left and right) was in contact with PMMA from the other screw and the PMMA was closer to the posterior wall and pedicle than in groups A1, A2, B1, and B2. One instance of PMMA leakage was found (in group B3). Two-way analysis of variance revealed that 2 factors-distribution and volume of PMMA-significantly influenced Fmax (p < 0.05) but that they were not significantly correlated (p = 0.078). The Fmax values in groups in which screws were augmented with PMMA were significantly better than those in groups in which no PMMA was used (p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONSPMMA can significantly improve stability of different injectable pedicle screws in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae, and screw stability is significantly correlated with distribution and volume of PMMA. The closer the PMMA is to the pedicle and the greater the quantity of injected PMMA used, the greater the pedicle screw stability is. Injection of 3.0 mL PMMA through screws with 4 holes (2 pair of holes, with the screws in each pair placed on opposite sides of the screw) produces optimal stability in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.

The Effect and Safety of Polymethylmethacrylate-Augmented Sacral Pedicle Screws Applied in Osteoporotic Spine with Lumbosacral Degenerative Disease: A 2-Year Follow-up of 25 Patients

BACKGROUND

A high rate of instrumentation failure is frequently seen in osteoporotic spines, especially at the sacral segment because of the great shear stress. Several techniques of sacral pedicle screw placement, such as bicortical and tricortical fixation, have been developed; however, the problems of loosening and pulling out of the screws are still a concern. Recently, the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented pedicle screws have been shown to strengthen the purchase in osteoporotic spine, but there are few reports on the effect of S1 pedicle screw with PMMA augmentation.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients receiving cement-augmented pedicle screws at lumbosacral vertebra were enrolled and divided into 3 groups by different patterns of S1 pedicle screw placement: S1 pedicle screw with PMMA augmentation (group A, 25 patients), S1 bicortical pedicle screw fixation (group B, 25 patients), and S1 tricortical pedicle screw fixation (group C, 25 patients). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were assessed preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Besides, the complications, loosening rate, and fusion rate were recorded.

RESULTS

The VAS and ODI scores at the last follow-up were significantly improved in the 3 groups compared with preoperative results. Better pain relief and functional improvement at the last follow-up was seen in group A compared with the other 2 groups; however, no significant difference was detected between groups B and C. Although the lowest screws loosening rates and the highest fusion rate were found in group A, no significant difference among these 3 groups. Furthermore, longer fusion segments and larger postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PL-LL) were found as risks related to S1 screw loosening without cement augmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The S1 pedicle screws with PMMA augmentation achieved better stability with less screw loosening in the osteoporotic spine with lumbosacral degenerative diseases compared with bicortical/tricortical fixation at S1. This procedure is especially recommended for patients with long segment fixation and large postoperative PI-LL, but there is also a risk of bone cement leakage and a learning curve.

Biomechanical comparative study of the stability of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is widely used for pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporosis. Until now, there had been no studies of the relationship between screw stability and the distribution and volume of PMMA.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between screw stability and the distribution pattern and injected volume of PMMA.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a biomechanical comparison of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of PMMA in cadaveric osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.

METHODS

Forty-eight osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into Groups A, B, and C with different pedicle screws (16 vertebrae in each group), and then each group was randomly divided into Subgroups 0, 1, 2, and 3 with different volumes of PMMA (four vertebra with eight pedicles in each subgroup). A pilot hole was prepared in advance using the same method in all samples. Type A and type B pedicle screws were directly inserted into vertebrae in Groups A and B, respectively, and then different volumes of PMMA (0, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mL) were injected through the screws and into vertebrae in Subgroups 0, 1, 2, and 3. The pilot holes were filled with different volumes of PMMA (0, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mL), and then the screws were inserted in Groups C0, C1, C2, and C3. Screw position and distribution of PMMA were evaluated radiographically, and axial pullout tests were performed to measure maximum axial pullout strength (F_max).

RESULTS

Polymethylmethacrylate surrounded the anterior one-third of screws in the vertebral body in Groups A1, A2, and A3; the middle one-third of screws in the junction area of the vertebral body and the pedicle in Groups B1, B2, and B3; and the full length of screws evenly in both the vertebral body and the pedicle in Groups C1, C2, and C3. There was no malpositioning of screws or leakage of PMMA in any sample. Two-way analysis of variance revealed that two factors-distribution and volume of PMMA-significantly influenced F_max (p<.05) but that they were not significantly correlated (p=.088). F_max values in groups using augmentation with PMMA values significantly improved compared with those in groups without PMMA (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Polymethylmethacrylate can significantly enhance the stability of different injectable pedicle screws in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae, and screw stability is significantly correlated with the distribution pattern and the injected volume of PMMA. The closer the PMMA to the pedicle and the greater the quantity of injected PMMA, the greater is the pedicle screw stability. Injection of 2.0 mL of PMMA through screws with four lateral 180° holes or of 1.0 mL of PMMA through screws with six lateral 180° holes increases the stability of pedicle screws.

Application of Cement-Injectable Cannulated Pedicle Screw in Treatment of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Compression Fracture (AO Type A): A Retrospective Study of 28 Cases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the novel polymethyl methacrylate-augmented bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw (CICPS) in patients with thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures (AO type A) associated with osteoporosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 28 patients treated for osteoporosis-related thoracolumbar vertebral body compression fracture at our facility between 2011 and 2015. Treatment involved posterior thoracolumbar fusion or lumbar fusion using CICPS. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated using visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores, degree of fracture reduction, and correction of kyphosis. The safety of CICPS was mainly assessed in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

All 28 patients had severe osteoporosis. The visual analog scale score at final follow-up (0.50 ± 0.69) was significantly (P < 0.001) lower compared with before surgery (4.93 ± 1.30). The Oswestry Disability Index score had also decreased from 57.39% ± 14.46% to 6.83% ± 15.38% at final follow-up (P < 0.001). Radiologic evaluation of vertebral height and Cobb angle showed good fracture reduction and satisfactory correction of kyphosis (preoperative vs. final follow-up, P < 0.001). There were no instances of screw loosening or symptomatic complications except for a few cases of cement leakage from CICPS (10.3%; cement leakage most common in AO type A3.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CICPS and polymethyl methacrylate is an effective and safe surgical technique for management of osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures (AO type A), with good clinical outcomes and low complications rates.

Pulmonary cement embolism following cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw fixation in adult spinal deformity patients with severe osteoporosis (analysis of 2978 fenestrated screws)

INTRODUCTION

There is very limited information about pulmonary cement embolism (PCE) following cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw (CAFPS) fixation in the literature. The aim of this study to report the incidence of PCE following CAFPS fixation in adult deformity patients with severe osteoporosis and to identify risk factors such as; the number of levels, number of screws, and the cement volume used.

METHODS

281 patients (204F, 77M) in whom CAFPS fixation was used during deformity surgery were included. All patients' routine postop 2 day chest X-rays and any available CT scans were reviewed by two radiologists. In patients with PCE, preop, early postop, and latest echocardiography studies were compared in terms of changes in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and right ventricular dilatation. Estimated cement volume used was calculated as: 2 cc (1 cc + 1 cc) per thoracic and 3 cc (1.5 cc + 1.5 cc) per lumbar levels, which are our routine protocol. Statistical analysis for risk factors was assessed with point biserial correlation test.

RESULTS

Average age is 70.5 (51-89) and average follow-up is 3.2 years (2-5). A total of 2978 CAFPS were instrumented with a mean of 10.5 levels (2-16) in 281 patients. PCE was diagnosed radiologically in 46 patients (16.3%). Among these 46 patients, PCE was clinically symptomatic in only 4 patients. Overall incidence of symptomatic PCE was 1.4% (4 of 281). Symptomatic PCE was statistically significant: when CAFPS fixation was performed > 7 levels; > 14 screws were used, and > 20-25 cc cement was used for augmentation (r = 0.378). In PCE group, mean preop PAP values of 27.40 (20-37) mm/Hg increased to 32.34 (20-50) mm/Hg in early postop and decreased to 28.29 (18-49) mm/Hg at final follow-up. In symptomatic PCE patients, mean preop PAP values of 30.75 (28-36) mm/Hg increased to 45.74 (40-50) mm/Hg in early postop and decreased to 38.75 (37-40) mm/Hg at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study showed an overall 16.3% radiological PCE and 1.4% symptomatic PCE incidence when CAFPS were used due to severe osteoporosis. The symptomatic PCE risk was significant when CAFPS were > 7 levels; > 14 fenestrated screws; and > 20-25 cc cement volume is used and this may cause PAP increase and right ventricular dilatation.

Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model

Study Design

Mechanical study.

Purpose

To compare the pullout strength of different screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model.

Overview of Literature

Adequate bone screw pullout strength is a common problem among osteoporotic patients. Various screw designs and augmentation techniques have been developed to improve the biomechanical characteristics of the bone–screw interface.

Methods

Polyurethane blocks were used to mimic human osteoporotic cancellous bone, and six different screw designs were tested. Five standard and expandable screws without augmentation, eight expandable screws with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or calcium phosphate augmentation, and distal cannulated screws with PMMA and calcium phosphate augmentation were tested. Mechanical tests were performed on 10 unused new screws of each group. Screws with or without augmentation were inserted in a block that was held in a fixture frame, and a longitudinal extraction force was applied to the screw head at a loading rate of 5 mm/min. Maximum load was recorded in a load displacement curve.

Results

The peak pullout force of all tested screws with or without augmentation was significantly greater than that of the standard pedicle screw. The greatest pullout force was observed with 40-mm expandable pedicle screws with four fins and PMMA augmentation. Augmented distal cannulated screws did not have a greater peak pullout force than nonaugmented expandable screws. PMMA augmentation provided a greater peak pullout force than calcium phosphate augmentation.

Conclusions

Expandable pedicle screws had greater peak pullout forces than standard pedicle screws and had the advantage of augmentation with either PMMA or calcium phosphate cement. Although calcium phosphate cement is biodegradable, osteoconductive, and nonexothermic, PMMA provided a significantly greater peak pullout force. PMMA-augmented expandable 40-mm four-fin pedicle screws had the greatest peak pullout force.

In vitro simulation of intraoperative vertebroplasty applied for pedicle screw augmentation. A biomechanical evaluation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an in vitro simulation of intraoperative vertebroplasty on embedded pedicle screws resistance to pullout. This method involved an application of acrylic cement into the vertebral bodies only after pedicle screws implementation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the purpose of conducting this research, the authors used the spines of fully-grown pigs. The procedure was as follows: firstly, the pedicle screws were bilaterally implemented in 10 vertebrae; secondly, cancellous bone was removed from vertebral bodies selected for screws augmentation and lastly it was replaced by polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Six vertebrae with implemented pedicle screws served as a control group. The pullout strength of thirty-two screws (20 augmented and 12 control) was tested. All screws were pulled out at a crosshead speed of 5mm/min.

RESULTS

The PMMA-augmented screws showed a 1.3 times higher average pullout force than the control group: respectively 1539.68N and 1156.59N. In essence, no significant discrepancy was determined between average pullout forces of screws which were pulled as first when compared with consecutive contralateral ones.

CONCLUSIONS

An in vitro simulation of intraoperative injection of PMMA in the vertebral body instrumented with screws (intraoperative vertebroplasty) resulted in enhancing its pullout strength by 33%. Pulling of one of the pedicular screws from the augmented vertebral body did not affect the pullout resistance of the contralateral one.

Radiofrequency-activated PMMA-augmentation through cannulated pedicle screws: A cadaver study to determine the biomechanical benefits in the osteoporotic spine

INTRODUCTION

PMMA-augmentation of pedicle screws strengthens the bone-screw-interface reducing cut-out risk. Injection of fluid cement bears a higher risk of extravasation, with difficulty of application because of inconsistent viscosity and limited injection time.

OBJECTIVE

To test a new method of cement augmentation of pedicle screws using radiofrequency-activated PMMA, which is suspected to be easier to apply and have less extravasations.

METHODS

Twenty-seven fresh-frozen human cadaver lumbar spines were divided into 18 osteoporotic (BMD ≤ 0.8 g/cm2) and 9 non-osteoporotic (BMD > 0.8 g/cm2) vertebral bodies. Bipedicular cannulated pedicle screws were implanted into the vertebral bodies; right screws were augmented with ultra-high viscosity PMMA, whereas un-cemented left pedicle screws served as negative controls. Cement distribution was controlled with fluoroscopy and CT scans. Axial pullout forces of the screws were measured with a material testing machine, and results were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Fluoroscopy and CT scans showed that in all cases an adequately big cement depot with homogenous form and no signs of extravasation was injected. Pullout forces showed significant differences (p < 0.001) between the augmented and non-augmented pedicle screws for bone densities below 0.8 g/cm2 (661.9 N ± 439) and over 0.8 g/cm2 (744.9 N ± 415).

CONCLUSIONS

Pullout-forces were significantly increased in osteoporotic as well as in non-osteoporotic vertebral bodies without a significant difference between these groups using this standardized, simple procedure with increased control and less complications like extravasation.

Influence of cement compressive strength and porosity on augmentation performance in a model of orthopedic screw pull-out

Disease and injuries that affect the skeletal system may require surgical intervention and internal fixation, i.e. orthopedic plate and screw insertion, to stabilize the injury and facilitate tissue repair. If the surrounding bone quality is poor the screws may migrate, or the bone may fail, resulting in fixation failure. While numerous studies have shown that cement augmentation of the interface between bone and implant can increase screw pull-out force, the physical properties of cement that influence pull-out force have not been investigated. The present study sought to determine how the physical properties of high strength calcium phosphate cements (hsCPCs, specifically dicalcium phosphate) affected the corresponding orthopedic screw pull-out force in urethane foam models of "healthy" and "osteoporotic" synthetic bone (Sawbones). In the simplest model, where only the bond strength between screw thread and cement (without Sawbone) was tested, the correlation between pull-out force and cement compressive strength (R² = 0.79) was weaker than correlation with total cement porosity (R² = 0.89). In open pore Sawbone that mimics "healthy" cancellous bone density the stronger cements produced higher pull-out force (50-60% increase). High strength, low porosity cements also produced higher pull-out forces (50-190% increase) in "healthy" Sawbones with cortical fixation if the failure strength of the cortical material was similar to, or greater than (a metal shell), actual cortical bone. This result is of particular clinical relevance where fixation with a metal plate implant is indicated, as the nearby metal can simulate a thicker cortical shell, thereby increasing the pull-out force of screws augmented with stronger cements. The improvement in pull-out force was apparent even at low augmentation volumes of 0.5mL (50% increase), which suggest that in clinical situations where augmentation volume is limited the stronger, lower porosity calcium phosphate cement (CPC) may still produce a significant improvement in screw pull-out force. When the correlation strength of all the tested models were compared both cement porosity and compressive strength accurately predicted pull-out force (R²=1.00, R²=0.808), though prediction accuracy depended upon the strength of the material surrounding the Sawbone. The correlations strength was low for bone with no, or weak, cortical fixation (R²=0.56, 0.36). Higher strength and lower porosity CPCs also produced greater pull-out force (1-1.5kN) than commercial CPC (0.2-0.5kN), but lower pull-out force than PMMA (2-3kN). The results of this study suggest that the likelihood of screw fixation failure may be reduced by selecting calcium phosphate cements with lower porosity and higher compressive strength, in patients with healthy bone mineral density and/or sufficient cortical thickness. This is of particular clinical relevance when fixation with metal plates is indicated, or where the augmentation volume is limited.

Osteoporosis and the Management of Spinal Degenerative Disease (I)

Osteoporosis has become a major medical problem as the aged population of the world rapidly grows. Osteoporosis predisposes patients to fracture, progressive spinal deformities, and stenosis, and is subject to be a major concern before performing spine surgery, especially with bone fusions and instrumentation. Osteoporosis has often been considered a contraindication for spinal surgery, while in some instances patients have undergone limited and inadequate procedures in order to avoid concomitant instrumentation. As the population ages and the expectations of older patients increase, the demand for surgical treatment in older patients with osteoporosis and spinal degenerative diseases becomes progressively more important. Nowadays, advances in surgical and anesthetic technology make it possible to operate successfully on elderly patients who no longer accept disabling physical conditions. This article discusses the biomechanics of the osteoporotic spine, the diagnosis and management of osteoporotic patients with spinal conditions, as well as the novel treatments, recommendations, surgical indications, strategies and instrumentation in patients with osteoporosis who need spine operations.

Potential risks of using cement-augmented screws for spinal fusion in patients with low bone quality

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Dramatic increases in the average life expectancy have led to increases in the variety of degenerative changes and deformities observed in the aging spine. The elderly population can present challenges for spine surgeons, not only because of increased comorbidities, but also because of the quality of their bones. Pedicle screws are the implants used most commonly in spinal surgery for fixation, but their efficacy depends directly on bone quality. Although polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-augmented screws represent an alternative for patients with osteoporotic vertebrae, their use has raised some concerns because of the possible association between cement leakages (CLs) and other morbidities.

PURPOSE

To analyze potential complications related to the use of cement-augmented screws for spinal fusion and to investigate the effectiveness of using these screws in the treatment of patients with low bone quality.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective single-center study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study included 313 consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion using a total of 1,780 cement-augmented screws.

METHODS AND OUTCOME MEASURES

We analyzed potential complications related to the use of cement-augmented screws, including CL, vascular injury, infection, screw extraction problems, revision surgery, and instrument failure. There are no financial conflicts of interest to report.

RESULTS

A total of 1,043 vertebrae were instrumented. Cement leakage was observed in 650 vertebrae (62.3%). There were no major clinical complications related to CL, but two patients (0.6%) had radicular pain related to CL at the S1 foramina. Of the 13 patients (4.1%) who developed deep infections requiring surgical debridement, two with chronic infections had possible spondylitis that required instrument removal. All patients responded well to antibiotic therapy. Revision surgery was performed in 56 patients (17.9%), most of whom had long construction. A total of 180 screws were removed as a result of revision. There were no problems with screw extraction.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of cement-augmented screws for the treatment of patients with low bone mineral density.

Risk of cement leakage and pulmonary embolism by bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation of the thoracolumbar spine

BACKGROUND

Cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) of the thoracolumbar spine is indicated in osteoporosis or osteopenia to improve pullout strength and biomechanical stability of pedicle screws (PS). Only a few studies report on the incidence of pulmonary cement embolism or other complications associated with CAPSI.

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the rate of CAPSI-associated complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients who underwent CAPSI due to spinal tumors or degenerative spine disease.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cement leakage, pulmonary cement embolism (PCE), mortality rate.

METHODS

Our clinical database was reviewed for patients who underwent CAPSI between January 2012 and June 2015. A total of 165 patients (mean age 71±11.2; range: 46 to 93 years; m=62, f=103) were included. Indications were osteoporotic fractures (n=40), spinal metastases (n=57), degenerative (n=49) or infectious spine disease (n=5), and traumatic vertebral fractures (n=14) with an associated osteoporosis. Every patient received between 2 and 21 (mean 8±3.3) cement-augmented pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine. Both intraoperative cement leakage in prevertebral veins, the inferior vena cava, and/or pulmonary arteries, and leakage detected on postoperative imaging were evaluated. We assessed the incidence of clinically symptomatic and asymptomatic events.

RESULTS

In 29 of 31 patients with intraoperative suspicion of cement leakage into prevertebral veins or the inferior vena cava on lateral fluoroscopy, which were without hemodynamic relevance, cement extrusion was confirmed on postoperative X-ray or computed tomography (CT) scan. In three of eight patients with suspicion of PCE, PCE was verified on thoracic CT. Four patients experienced life-threatening intraoperative hemodynamic reactions, either due to cement embolism (n=2; 1.2%) or anaphylactic shock (n=2; 1.2%) with need for intraoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation in three cases. Two patients died due to fulminant PCE. Three patients with dyspnea 1 day after surgery were also confirmed with PCE on chest CT. In five patients, an asymptomatic PCE was found incidentally on postoperative imaging. In addition, 68 patients with cement leakage into prevertebral veins or the ascending cava vein were found incidentally on postoperative spine X-ray or CT. Two of 10 patients with intraspinal epidural cement leakage required revision surgery. One hundred ten of 165 patients (66.7%) had clinically asymptomatic cement leakage. Thirteen patients had PCE (7.9%), of whom five (3.0%) were symptomatic. Two patients experienced intraoperative cement-induced anaphylaxis (1.2%). The overall symptomatic complication rate was 5.5% (n=9). The 30-day mortality rate was 1.8% (n=3).

CONCLUSIONS

CAPSI bears a high risk of asymptomatic cement leakage. The risk for associated severe complications was also relatively high and probably underestimated considering the retrospective nature of the present study. A strict indication for cement augmentation, especially in patients with cardiac predisposition, should be the consequence. We doubt that technical aspects of cement application and/or different types of cement are capable of reducing the risk of these complications substantially.

Pull out Strength of Dual Outer Diameter Pedicle Screws Compared to Uncemented and Cemented Standard Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical in vitro Study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the potential of the dual outer diameter screw and systematically evaluate the pull-out force of the dual outer diameter screw compared to the uncemented and cemented standard pedicle screws with special regard to the pedicle diameter and the vertebra level.

METHODS

Sixty vertebrae of five human spines (T ₆ -L ₅ ) were sorted into three study groups for pairwise comparison of the uncemented dual outer diameter screw, the uncemented standard screw, and the cemented standard screw, and randomized with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebra level. The vertebrae were instrumented, insertion torque was determined, and pull-out testing was performed using a material testing machine. Failure load was evaluated in pairwise comparison within each study group. The screw-to-pedicle diameter ratio was determined and the uncemented dual outer diameter and standard screws were compared for different ratios as well as vertebra levels.

RESULTS

Significantly increased pull-out forces were measured for the cemented standard screw compared to the uncemented standard screw (+689 N, P < 0.001) and the dual outer diameter screw (+403 N, P < 0.001). Comparing the dual outer diameter screw to the uncemented standard screw in the total study group, a distinct but not significant increase was measured (+149 N, P = 0.114). Further analysis of these two screws, however, revealed a significant increase of pull-out force for the dual outer diameter screw in the lumbar region (+247 N, P = 0.040), as well as for a screw-to-pedicle diameter ratio between 0.6 and 1 (+ 488 N, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

For clinical application, cement augmentation remains the gold standard for increasing screw stability. According to our results, the use of a dual outer diameter screw is an interesting option to increase screw stability in the lumbar region without cement augmentation. For the thoracic region, however, the screw-to-pedicle diameter should be checked and attention should be paid to screw cut out, if the dual outer diameter screw is considered.

A Systematic Review of Treatment Strategies for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery in Patients With Osteoporosis

Purpose:

To evaluate the current evidence in the literature on treatment strategies for degenerative lumbar spine fusion in patients with osteoporosis.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature from 1950 to 2015.

Results:

The review of the literature yielded 15 studies on the effect of treatment options for osteoporosis on lumbar fusion rates. This study evaluated only degenerative lumbar spine conditions and excluded deformity patients. One study demonstrated an association between low bone mass as measured by Hounsfield units and lower fusion rates. Six studies evaluated perioperative medical treatment of osteoporosis and showed higher fusion rates in patients treated with alendronate and teriparatide. The strongest evidence was for perioperative teriparatide. Eight studies evaluated surgical treatment strategies in patients with osteoporosis and showed that cement augmentation of pedicle screws and expandable pedicle screws demonstrated improved fusion rates than traditional pedicle screws. The strongest evidence was for expandable pedicle screws.

Conclusion:

There are 15 articles evaluating osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar fusion and the highest level of evidence is for perioperative use of teriparatide.

Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae

Objectives

Cement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae. However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied. Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).

Materials and Methods

A total of 54 osteoporotic human cadaver thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (uncemented, solid cemented or fenestrated cemented) and augmented with high-viscosity PMMA cement (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL). The insertion torque and bone mineral density were determined. Radiographs and CT scans were undertaken to evaluate cement distribution and cement leakage. Pull-out testing was performed with a material testing machine to measure failure load and stiffness. The paired t-test was used to compare the two screws within each vertebra.

Results

Mean failure load was significantly greater for fenestrated cemented screws (+622 N; p ⩽ 0.001) and solid cemented screws (+460 N; p ⩽ 0.001) than for uncemented screws. There was no significant difference between the solid and fenestrated cemented screws (p = 0.5). In the lower thoracic vertebrae, 1 mL cement was enough to significantly increase failure load, while 3 mL led to further significant improvement in the upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar regions.

Conclusion

Conventional, solid pedicle screws augmented with high-viscosity cement provided comparable screw stability in pull-out testing to that of sophisticated and more expensive fenestrated screws. In terms of cement volume, we recommend the use of at least 1 mL in the thoracic and 3 mL in the lumbar spine.

Cite this article: C. I. Leichtle, A. Lorenz, S. Rothstock, J. Happel, F. Walter, T. Shiozawa, U. G. Leichtle. Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:419–426.

Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: an experimental study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is widely used for pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporosis. Intriguingly, there have been no biomechanical comparisons of the stability of pedicle screws augmented with different volumes of PMMA or studies of the relationship between screw stability and volume of PMMA, especially in different degrees of osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

The purposes of the study reported here were to compare screw stability by different volumes of PMMA augmentation, to analyze the relationship between screw stability and PMMA volume, and to make a preliminary determination of the optimum volume of PMMA augmentation for different degrees of osteoporosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws augmented with various volumes of PMMA in cadaveric lumbar vertebrae.

METHODS

Thirty-six pedicles from 18 osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into groups A0 through A5, and 36 pedicles from 18 severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into groups B0 through B5. A different volume of PMMA was injected into each one of groups A0 through A5 (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mL, respectively) and into each one of groups B0 through B5 (0, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mL, respectively), and then pedicle screws were inserted in all vertebrae. After complete solidification of the PMMA, we examined pedicle X-rays, performed axial pullout tests, and determined the maximum axial pullout strength (Fmax) for all samples.

RESULTS

No PMMA was found around the screws in groups A0 and B0. In groups A1 to A5 and B1 to B5, screws were wrapped by gradually increasing amounts of PMMA. There was no PMMA leakage or screw malpositioning in any samples. The Fmax in groups A1 through A5 increased by 32.40%, 64.42%, 116.02%, 174.07%, and 207.42%, respectively, compared with that in group A0. There were no significant differences in Fmax between groups A0 and A1, A1 and A2, A2 and A3, A3 and A4, and A4 and A5 (p>.05), but there were significant differences in Fmax between any other two groups (p<.05). The Fmax in groups B1 through B5 increased by 23.48%, 48.40%, 106.60%, 134.73%, and 210.04%, respectively, compared with that in group B0. There were no significant differences in Fmax between groups B0 and B1, B0 and B2, B1 and B2, B2 and B3, B3 and B4 (p>.05), but there were significant differences in Fmax between any other two groups (p<.05). There was a significant positive correlation between Fmax and volume of PMMA in both osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Polymethylmethacrylate can significantly enhance stability of pedicle screws in both osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae. There is a significant positive correlation between screw stability and volume of PMMA. Within a certain range, nevertheless, increasing the volume of PMMA does not significantly improve screw stability. We suggest that 1.5 and 3 mL, respectively, are the volumes of injected PMMA that will optimize pedicle screw stability in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.

Biomechanical Comparison of Expansive Pedicle Screw and Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented Pedicle Screw in Osteoporotic Synthetic Bone in Primary Implantation: An Experimental Study

STUDY DESIGN

Expansive pedicle screws (EPS) and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screws (PMMA-PS) were inserted into osteoporotic synthetic bones, which were then tested by radiographic and biomechanical examinations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the stability of EPS and PMMA-PS with that of a conventional pedicle screw (CPS) in an osteoporotic synthetic bone.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

It is a significant challenge for orthopedic surgeons performing transpedicular fixation in the osteoporotic spine. Prior studies have suggested that both EPS and PMMA-PS can increase the screw stability effectively. However, there are no biomechanical comparisons of EPS and PMMA-PS, especially in primary spinal surgery in osteoporosis.

METHODS

Thirty osteoporotic synthetic bone blocks were divided into 3 groups randomly. A pilot hole was prepared in advance in all samples by the same method. Then, the CPS was inserted directly into the pilot hole in the CPS group; the hole in the PMMA-PS group was first filled with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA; 2.5 mL) and then inserted with CPS, and the EPS was inserted directly into the blocks in the EPS group. Twenty-four hours later, x-ray and computed tomography examination and axial pullout tests were performed on all samples; the block destructions were then recorded, and the hole diameters were measured.

RESULTS

In the CPS group, the screw was surrounded directly by the synthetic bone without any other materials, whereas in the PMMA-PS group, the screw was totally wrapped up by PMMA, and the PMMA was evenly distributed in the synthetic bone around the screw, indicating obvious improvement of the local density around the track. In the EPS group, the anterior part of the EPS presented an obvious expansion in synthetic bone and formed an unguiform structure pressing the surrounding synthetic bone. Screw stabilities in both the PMMA-PS and the EPS groups were significantly enhanced compared with those in the CPS group, and the screw stability in the PMMA-PS group was significantly higher than that in the EPS group. After the pullout tests, the block destructions were the most severe in the PMMA-PS group and the lightest in the CPS group. Hole diameters in the PMMA-PS and the EPS groups were significantly larger than that in the CPS group, whereas the diameter of the hole in the PMMA-PS group was significantly greater than that in the EPS group.

CONCLUSIONS

EPS can significantly increase the strength of screw fixation compared with CPS in osteoporotic synthetic bone. Although EPS shows a weaker fixation strength compared with PMMA-PS in the osteoporotic synthetic bone, it may still provide an alternative option to prevent screw loosening in the clinical treatment of osteoporosis.

Cement leakage in pedicle screw augmentation: a prospective analysis of 98 patients and 474 augmented pedicle screws

OBJECTIVE Loosening and pullout of pedicle screws are well-known problems in pedicle screw fixation surgery. Augmentation of pedicle screws with bone cement, first described as early as 1975, increases the pedicle-screw interface and pullout force in osteoporotic vertebrae. The aim of the present study was to identify cement leakage and pulmonary embolism rates in a large prospective single-center series of pedicle screw augmentations. METHODS All patients who underwent cement-augmented pedicle screw placement between May 2006 and October 2010 at the authors' institution were included in this prospective cohort study. Perivertebral cement leakage and pulmonary cement embolism were evaluated with a CT scan of the area of operation and with a radiograph of the chest, respectively. RESULTS A total of 98 patients underwent placement of cement-augmented pedicle screws; 474 augmented screws were inserted in 237 vertebrae. No symptomatic perivertebral cement leakage or symptomatic pulmonary cement embolism was observed, but asymptomatic perivertebral cement leakage was seen in 88 patients (93.6%) and in 165 augmented vertebrae (73.3%). Cement leakage most often occurred in the perivertebral venous system. Clinically asymptomatic pulmonary cement embolism was found in 4 patients (4.1%). CONCLUSIONS Perivertebral cement leakage often occurs in pedicle screw augmentation, but in most cases, it is clinically asymptomatic. Cement augmentation should be performed under continuous fluoroscopy to avoid high-volume leakage. Alternative strategies, such as use of expandable screws, should be examined in more detail for patients at high risk of screw loosening.

The Biomechanical Properties of Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined With Trajectory Bone Cement Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebrae

STUDY DESIGN

The biomechanics of pedicle screw fixation combined with trajectory cement augmentation with various filling volumes were measured by pull-out, periodic antibending, and compression fatigue tests.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the biomechanical properties of the pedicle screw fixation combined with trajectory bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate) augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae and to explore the optimum filling volume of the bone cement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw fixation is considered to be the most effective posterior fixation method. The decrease of the bone mineral density apparently increases the fixation failure risk caused by screw loosening and displacement. Trajectory bone cement augmentation has been confirmed to be an effective method to increase the bone intensity and could markedly increase the stability of the fixation interface.

METHODS

Sixteen elderly cadaveric 1-5 lumbar vertebral specimens were diagnosed with osteoporosis. The left and right vertebral pedicles were alternatively randomized for treatment in all groups, with the contralateral pedicles as control. The study groups included: group A (pedicle screw fixation with full trajectory bone cement augmentation), group B (75% filling), group C (50% filling), and group D (25% filling). Finally, the bone cement leakage and dispersion were assessed and the mechanical testing was conducted.

RESULTS

The bone cement was well dispersed around the pedicle screw. The augmented bone intensity, pull-out strength, periodic loading times, and compression fatigue performance were markedly higher than those of the control groups. With the increase in trajectory bone cement, the leakage was also increased (P<0.05). The pull-out strength of the pedicle screw was increased with an increase in bone mineral density and trajectory bone cement. It peaked at 75% filling, with the largest power consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal filling volume of the bone cement was 75% of the trajectory volume (about 1.03 mL). The use of excessive bone cement did not increase the fixation intensity but increased the risk of leakage.

Biomechanical Comparison of Pedicle Screw Augmented with Different Volumes of Polymethylmethacrylate in Osteoporotic and Severely Osteoporotic Synthetic Bone Blocks in Primary Implantation: An Experimental Study

This study was designed to compare screw stabilities augmented with different volumes of PMMA and analyze relationship between screw stability and volume of PMMA and optimum volume of PMMA in different bone condition. Osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic synthetic bone blocks were divided into groups A0-A5 and B0-B5, respectively. Different volumes of PMMA were injected in groups A0 to A5 and B0 to B5. Axial pullout tests were performed and F_max was measured. F_max in groups A1-A5 were all significantly higher than group A0. Except between groups A1 and A2, A3 and A4, and A4 and A5, there were significant differences on F_max between any other two groups. F_max in groups B1-B5 were all significantly higher than group B0. Except between groups B1 and B2, B2 and B3, and B4 and B5, there were significant differences on F_max between any other two groups. There was significantly positive correlation between F_max and volume of PMMA in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic blocks. PMMA can significantly enhance pedicle screw stability in osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis. There were positive correlations between screw stability and volume of PMMA. In this study, injection of 3 mL and 4 mL PMMA was preferred in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic blocks, respectively.

Augmented PMMA distribution: improvement of mechanical property and reduction of leakage rate of a fenestrated pedicle screw with diameter-tapered perforations

OBJECTIVE This study investigated the optimum injection volume of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) to augment a novel fenestrated pedicle screw (FPS) with diameter-tapered perforations in the osteoporotic vertebral body, and how the distribution characteristics of PMMA affect the biomechanical performance of this screw. METHODS Two types of FPSs were designed (FPS-A, composed of 6 perforations with an equal diameter of 1.2 mm; and FPS-B, composed of 6 perforations each with a tapered diameter of 1.5 mm, 1.2 mm, and 0.9 mm from tip to head. Each of 28 human cadaveric osteoporotic vertebrae were randomly assigned to 1 of 7 groups: FPS-A1.0: FPS-A+1.0 ml PMMA; FPS-A1.5: FPS-A+1.5 ml PMMA; FPS-A2.0: FPS-A+2.0 ml PMMA; FPS-B1.0: FPS-B+1.0 ml PMMA; FPS-B1.5: FPS-B+1.5 ml PMMA; FPS-B2.0: FPS-B+2.0 ml PMMA; and conventional pedicle screws (CPSs) without PMMA. After the augmentation, 3D CT was performed to assess the cement distribution characteristics and the cement leakage rate. Axial pullout tests were performed to compare the maximum pullout force thereafter. RESULTS The CT construction images showed that PMMA bone cement formed a conical mass around FPS-A and a cylindrical mass around FPS-B. When the injection volume was increased from 1.0 ml to 2.0 ml, the distribution region of the PMMA cement was enlarged, the PMMA was distributed more posteriorly, and the risk of leakage was increased. When the injection volume reached 2.0 ml, the risk of cement leakage was lower for screws having diameter-tapered perforations. The pullout strengths of the augmented FPS-A groups and FPS-B groups were higher than that of the CPS group (p < 0.0001). All FPS-B groups had a higher pullout strength than the FPS-A groups. CONCLUSIONS The diameter of the perforations affects the distribution of PMMA cement. The diameter-tapered design enabled PMMA to form larger bone-PMMA interfaces and achieve a relatively higher pullout strength, although statistical significance was not reached. Study results indicated 1.5-ml of PMMA was a conservative volume for PMMA augmentation; more cement injection would significantly increase the risk of cement leakage.

A Biomechanical Comparison of Expansive Pedicle Screws for Severe Osteoporosis: The Effects of Screw Design and Cement Augmentation

Expansive pedicle screws significantly improve fixation strength in osteoporotic spines. However, the previous literature does not adequately address the effects of the number of lengthwise slits and the extent of screw expansion on the strength of the bone/screw interface when expansive screws are used with or without cement augmentation. Herein, four designs for expansive pedicle screws with different numbers of lengthwise slits and different screw expansion levels were evaluated. Synthetic bones simulating severe osteoporosis were used to provide a comparative platform for each screw design. The prepared specimens were then tested for axial pullout failure. Regardless of screw design, screws with cement augmentation demonstrated significantly higher pullout strength than pedicle screws without cement augmentation (p < 0.001). For screws without cement augmentation, solid screws exhibited the lowest pullout strength compared to the four expansive groups (p < 0.01). No significant differences in pullout strength were observed between the expansive screws with different designs (p > 0.05). Taken together, our results show that pedicle screws combined with cement augmentation may greatly increase screw fixation regardless of screws with or without expansion. An increase in both the number of slits and the extent of screw expansion had little impact on the screw-anchoring strength. Cement augmentation is the most influential factor for improving screw pullout strength.

Surgical treatment of the osteoporotic spine with bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation: technical description and preliminary application in 43 patients

OBJECTIVES

To describe a new approach for the application of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws.

METHODS

Between June 2010 and February 2013, 43 patients with degenerative spinal disease and osteoporosis (T-score <-2.5) underwent lumbar fusion using cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index. Patients were given radiographic follow-up examinations after 3, 6, and 12 months and once per year thereafter.

RESULTS

All patients were followed for a mean of 15.7 ± 5.6 months (range, 6 to 35 months). The Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores showed a significant reduction in back pain (p = 0.018) and an improvement in lower extremity function (p = 0.025) in patients who underwent lumbar fusion using the novel screw. Intraoperative cement leakage occurred in four patients, but no neurological complications were observed. Radiological observation indicated no loosening or pulling out of the novel screw, and bone fusion was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

The described polymethylmethacrylate augmentation technique using bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws can reduce pain and improve spinal dysfunction in osteoporotic patients undergoing osteoporotic spine surgery.