Comparison of systemic adverse events associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injection: ranibizumab versus bevacizumab

Cardiovascular Outcomes with Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Diabetes: A Real-World Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is commonly used intravitreally for diabetic proliferative retinopathy, but when used systemically for treating cancers, an excess of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events has been noted. The latter is of concern for people with diabetes, who are at higher risk of CVD. This study aims to explore the relationship between incident CVD and intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with diabetes, compared to other therapies, using a large real-world global federated dataset.

METHODS

Data were analysed using TriNetX, a global electronic medical real-world ecosystem. The study included adults with diabetes and excluded those with a history of CVD prior to the time window of data extraction. Patients were categorised into two cohorts: anti-VEGF therapy or control cohort (laser or steroid therapies). The cohorts were 1:1 propensity score-matched for age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, and cardiovascular medications. Outcomes analysed at 1, 6 and 12 months were: (1) mortality; (2) acute myocardial infarction (MI); (3) cerebral infarction; and (4) heart failure. Relative risk analyses were performed using the built-in R statistical computing platform on TriNetX.

RESULTS

In patients with diabetes (n = 2205; mean age 58.8 ± 15.8, Std diff 0.05; 56% male), anti-VEGF therapy was associated with a numerical but non-statistically significant increased CVD risk over 1, 6, and 12 months: Mortality over 1 month (RR 1; 95% CI 0.42, 2.40), 6 months (RR 1.46; 95% CI 0.72, 2.95) and 12 months (RR 1.41; 95% CI 0.88, 2.27). There was no excess of acute MI over 1 (RR n/a: not applicable; 0/0: 0 events in the anti-VEGF group/0 events in the control group), 6 and 12 months (RR n/a; 0/10 events); cerebral infarction over 1, 6 months (RR n/a; 0/0 events), and 12 months (RR n/a; 0/10); and heart failure over 1 month (RR n/a; 0/0 events), 6 months (RR 1; 95% CI 0.42, 2.40) and 12 months (RR 1; 95% CI 0.42, 2.34).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistically significant risk of cardiovascular-related events in the short or medium term in patients with diabetes who received intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy, despite a small increase in the number of CVD events. Our study supports the real-world safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with diabetes free of baseline CVD.

Intravitreal Injectable Hydrogels for Sustained Drug Delivery in Glaucoma Treatment and Therapy

Glaucoma is extensively treated with topical eye drops containing drugs. However, the retention time of the loaded drugs and the in vivo bioavailability of the drugs are highly influenced before reaching the targeted area sufficiently, due to physiological and anatomical barriers of the eye, such as rapid nasolacrimal drainage. Poor intraocular penetration and frequent administration may also cause ocular cytotoxicity. A novel approach to overcome these drawbacks is the use of injectable hydrogels administered intravitreously for sustained drug delivery to the target site. These injectable hydrogels are used as nanocarriers to intimately interact with specific diseased ocular tissues to increase the therapeutic efficacy and drug bioavailability of the anti-glaucomic drugs. The human eye is very delicate, and is sensitive to contact with any foreign body material. However, natural biopolymers are non-reactive, biocompatible, biodegradable, and lack immunogenic and inflammatory responses to the host whenever they are incorporated in drug delivery systems. These favorable biomaterial properties have made them widely applicable in biomedical applications, with minimal adversity. This review highlights the importance of using natural biopolymer-based intravitreal hydrogel drug delivery systems for glaucoma treatment over conventional methods.

Risk of Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, or Death in New Users of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Ranibizumab: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Introduction

The risk of thromboembolic events or death in patients treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (IVT anti-VEGF) is poorly described on a large scale and by molecule. This study aimed to assess the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or death in new users of IVT aflibercept versus ranibizumab in real-world practice.

Methods

A nationwide cohort study using the French National Health Insurance databases covering 99% of the French population was conducted in patients aged 18 years or older who initiated IVT therapy with ranibizumab or aflibercept between 2014 and 2018. Patients were followed for up to 6 years until December 31, 2019. The risks of MI, stroke, and death were compared in new aflibercept versus ranibizumab users using Kaplan–Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models adjusted on sociodemographic characteristics and cardiovascular disease or risk factors. Subgroup analyses were performed according to history of ischemic heart disease or stroke, diabetes, indication for treatment, sex, age, and number of IVT anti-VEGF injections.

Results

When compared to new users of ranibizumab (n = 174,794, mean age 76.0 ± 11.9 years, 59.2% female), new users of aflibercept (n = 76,242, mean age 76.6 ± 11.2 years, 59.2% female) did not have an increased risk of MI (n = 1523 incident MI, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.00; 95% CI 0.89–1.11), stroke (n = 2306 incident strokes, aHR 1.03; 95% CI 0.95–1.13), or death (n = 4135 deaths, aHR 0.98; 95% CI 0.92–1.05). However, a small but non-statistically significant increase in the risk of stroke was observed in new users of aflibercept versus ranibizumab among patients with diabetes (aHR 1.15; 95% CI 0.98–1.35), particularly those with diabetic macular edema (aHR 1.20; 95% CI 1.00–1.44). The remaining subgroup analyses did not change the results.

Conclusion

Aflibercept and ranibizumab appear to have similar safety profiles with respect to the risk of MI, stroke, or death under real-world conditions of use.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-021-00451-1.

Intravitreal Injection Therapy: Current Techniques and Supplemental Services

Purpose

Intravitreal injection is the most frequently performed eye procedure in the world and is an essential component in the management of sight-threating retinal diseases and conditions. Given the seriousness and range of diseases treated and the risks of the procedure, retina specialists must weigh the pros and cons of each individual treatment. Complexities guiding injection treatment are multifaceted and involve patient-history review, careful examination, diagnostic testing selection and interpretation, customized medical decision-making, and follow-up considerations.

Methods

This article by the Intravitreal Injection Task Force Committee of the American Society of Retina Specialists documents the intricacies and necessary components of the intravitreal injection procedure.

Results

By expert consensus, the task force further recommends ancillary services and decision-making that may accompany intravitreal injection visits, when appropriate, to monitor response to treatment, adjust treatment, and manage additional considerations in the same or fellow eye.

Conclusions

Retina specialists can optimize safety and therapeutic outcomes with individualized consideration and customization of intravitreal injection treatment for each patient.

The association between myocardial infarction and intravitreal bevacizumab injection

To evaluate the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) after receiving intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who had received IVB injection in 2016, and grouped them according to whether they received the injection for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetes-related complications, or retinal vein occlusion (RVO). We then investigated the prevalence of MI within 2 months after IVB injection and analyzed the possible association of IVB with MI. During 2016, 724 patients were enrolled and received a total of 1870 IVB injections. Seven patients were diagnosed with MI within 2 months after receiving an IVB injection. Of 274 patients with AMD, 2 were diagnosed with MI; of 311 patients with diabetes-related complications, 3 were diagnosed with MI; and of 139 patients with RVO, 2 were diagnosed with MI (P = 0.785). All MIs occurred between 3 days and 3 weeks after IVB injection (mean = 14.00 ± 6.45 days). The MIs after receiving IVB were associated with previous history of MI or cerebrovascular infarction in multivariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in MI prevalence after IVB injection according to the reason for receiving the injection. However, care should be taken when administering IVB injections, especially to patients with risk factors such as history of MI or cerebrovascular infarction.

Effects of intravitreal ranibizumab on the untreated eye and systemic gene expression profile in age-related macular degeneration

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the systemic effects of intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The impact of intravitreal ranibizumab injections on central retinal thickness (CRT) of treated and contralateral untreated eyes, and differences in gene expression patterns in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed. The study included 29 patients aged 50 years old and over with diagnosed neovascular AMD. The treatment was defined as 0.5 mg of ranibizumab injected intravitreally in the form of one injection every month during the period of 3 months. CRT was measured by optical coherence tomography. The gene expression profile was assigned using oligonucleotide microarrays of Affymetrix HG-U133A. Studies have shown that there was a change of CRT between treated and untreated eyes, and there were differences in CRT at baseline and after 1, 2, and 3 months of ranibizumab treatment. Three months after intravitreal injection, mean CRT was reduced in the treated eyes from 331.97±123.62 to 254.31±58.75 μm, while mean CRT in the untreated fellow eyes reduced from 251.07±40.29 to 235.45±36.21 μm at the same time. Furthermore, the research has shown that among all transcripts, 3,097 expresses change after the ranibizumab treatment in relation to controls. Among these transcripts, 1,339 were up-regulated, whereas 1,758 were down-regulated. Our results show the potential systemic effects of anti-VEGF therapy for AMD. Moreover, our study indicated different gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before and after intravitreal ranibizumab treatment.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs safety and efficacy in ophthalmic diseases

Macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness in developed countries. In the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has emerged as a key target for therapy. The intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs has been widely employed to reduce the disease progression and improve the visual outcomes of the affected patients. However, each intravitreal inoculation poses a risk of several complications as infection, inflammation, endophthalmitis, intraocular inflammation, increase of intraocular pressure and vitreous hemorrhage. This short review evaluates the efficacy and the incidence of adverse drug reactions related to intravitreal administration of the main anti-VEGF drugs actually available: Bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept.

Systemic thromboembolic adverse events in patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: an overview

INTRODUCTION

Anti-VEGF therapy improved the quality of life for millions of patients suffering from wet age-related macular degeneration (wet-AMD); unfortunately, this therapy involves multiple injections over many years. The administration of anti-VEGF can overcome the blood-retinal barrier with agents entering the systemic circulation and causing a significant decrease in VEGF serum concentration. Although circulating VEGF protects the integrity and patency of vessels, prolonged anti-VEGF treatment has the potential to increase the risk of thromboembolic events.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the safety data from recent trials involving available anti-VEGF drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

During the 2 years of follow-up in the relevant clinical trials, the rates of serious adverse events such as stroke, heart attack and death were similar for patients treated with different anti-VEGF drugs. Moreover the arterial thrombotic risk appears sufficiently low when compared with the natural incidence of arterial thrombotic events in this category of elderly patients and acceptably balanced against the advantage of improved vision. Since the use of these drugs is likely to become increasingly widespread and prolonged, it is desirable that the scientific community improves the pharmacovigilance program on all anti-VEGF drugs, expanding knowledge with studies that compares head to head all four compounds belonging to anti-VEGF armamentarium.

Treatments for macular oedema following central retinal vein occlusion: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To review systematically the randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence for treatment of macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CDSR, DARE, HTA, NHSEED, CENTRAL and meeting abstracts (January 2005 to March 2013).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

RCTs with at least 12 months of follow-up assessing pharmacological treatments for CRVO were included with no language restrictions.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

2 authors screened titles and abstracts and conducted data extracted and Cochrane risk of bias assessment. Meta-analysis was not possible due to lack of comparable studies.

RESULTS

8 studies (35 articles, 1714 eyes) were included, assessing aflibercept (n=2), triamcinolone (n=2), bevacizumab (n=1), pegaptanib (n=1), dexamethasone (n=1) and ranibizumab (n=1). In general, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept and triamcinolone resulted in clinically significant increases in the proportion of participants with an improvement in visual acuity of ≥15 letters, with 40-60% gaining ≥15 letters on active drugs, compared to 12-28% with sham. Results for pegaptanib and dexamethasone were mixed. Steroids were associated with cataract formation and increased intraocular pressure. No overall increase in adverse events was found with bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept or pegaptanib compared with control. Quality of life was poorly reported. All studies had a low or unclear risk of bias.

LIMITATIONS

All studies evaluated a relatively short primary follow-up (1 year or less). Most had an unmasked extension phase. There was no head-to-head evidence. The majority of participants included had non-ischaemic CRVO.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept and triamcinolone appear to be effective in treating macular oedema secondary to CRVO. Long-term data on effectiveness and safety are needed. Head-to-head trials and research to identify 'responders' is needed to help clinicians make the right choices for their patients. Research aimed to improve sight in people with ischaemic CRVO is required.