Efficacy of Lauromacrogol Injection for Ablation of Benign Predominantly Cystic Thyroid Nodules and Related Factors: A Prospective Study

Effect of different retention doses of ultrasound-guided polidocanol chemical ablation for benign cystic-solid thyroid nodules

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of varying retention doses of ultrasound-guided polidocanol chemical ablation for benign cystic-solid thyroid nodules.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted from December 2019 to January 2022, including 78 patients with benign cystic-solid thyroid nodules, of which 31 received polidocanol chemical ablation alone, 23 received polidocanol chemical plus thermal ablation, and 24 received open surgery. Patients who received polidocanol chemical ablation were assigned into groups based on the retention dose of polidocanol: 0 %, 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, and 50 %. Follow-ups were done at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The volume of the nodules, postoperative complications, and recurrence of the nodules were examined before treatment and during follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Total operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume for patients who received ablation were substantially lower than those for patients who received open surgery (P < 0.001). Among patients in the polidocanol chemical ablation group, volume shrinkage rate of thyroid nodules in the 10 % retention dose group was significantly lower than that in the 0 % retention dose group at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The 30 % retention dose group had the highest nodule shrinkage rate (98.46 ± 1.55 %) at 12 months postoperatively, which was significantly higher than that in the 50 % retention dose group (P < 0.05). Among patients in the polidocanol chemical and thermal ablation group, the volume shrinkage rate of thyroid nodules in the 10 % and 30 % retention dose groups at 1 month postoperatively was significantly lower than that in the 0 % retention dose group (P < 0.05). Although volume shrinkage rate in the 20 % retention dose group after thermal ablation was higher than that in the 0 % retention dose group, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In terms of adverse reactions, the incidence of hoarseness and coughing was higher in the open surgery group than in the polidocanol chemical ablation and polidocanol chemical and thermal ablation groups, but there was no significant difference (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Chemical ablation with polidocanol was safe and effective for therapy of benign cystic-solid thyroid nodules, and the optimal retention dose may be between 20 % and 30 %. Patients with poor efficacy from chemical ablation alone can receive safe and effective treatment through thermal ablation.

Comparison of microwave alone and combined with ethanol ablation for different types of benign mixed thyroid nodules

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) plus ethanol ablation (EA) for different types of benign mixed thyroid nodules.

METHODS

A total of 81 patients with 81 benign mixed thyroid nodules were enrolled into the study; 39 were divided to the MWA group and 42 to the combined group (MWA combined with EA). Nodule ablation rate, volume reduction rate (VRR) and surgical complications of all patients were analyzed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The mean ablation rate were 86.49 ± 6.68% and 90.09 ± 5.79% in the microwave and combined groups respectively, and the ablation rate of nodule decreased as the nodule volume increased. For nodules ≥15 ml in volume, the mean ablation rate of the combined group was higher than that of the microwave group (all P < 0.05). The mean VRR at 12 months postoperatively was 89.58 ± 4.32% in the microwave group and 92.92 ± 3.49% in the combined group, showing statistical significantly different between both arms (P = 0.001). The combined group decreased in volume more significantly than the microwave group for nodules with 20-50% or 50-80% cystic proportions or >15 ml in volume (all P < 0.05). The complication rate was 23.08% and 2.38% respectively.

CONCLUSION

MWA combined with EA is more effective than MWA for treating mixed thyroid nodules. MWA combined with EA may be the first approach for nodules with >20% cystic proportions or volume >15 ml.

Comparison of the effectiveness of lauromacrogol injection for ablation and microwave ablation in the treatment of predominantly cystic thyroid nodules: a multicentre study

PURPOSE

To compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) and lauromacrogol injection for ablation (LIA) for benign predominantly cystic thyroid nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 85 patients with predominantly cystic thyroid nodules (PCTNs) who underwent microwave ablation (MWA) or lauromacrogol injection for ablation (LIA) between June 2019 and August 2022 at three hospitals were included in our research. Forty-six patients were treated with microwave ablation, and thirty-nine patients were treated with lauromacrogol injection for ablation. The baseline characteristics, nodal volume, volume reduction rate (VRR), and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

After treatment, there were significant differences in the thyroid nodule volume and the volume reduction rate (VRR) at different follow-up times between the groups (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the nodal volume or the volume reduction rate (VRR) between the MWA group and the LIA group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (p > 0.05). Of note, no serious intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in the corresponding group.

CONCLUSION

MWA and LIA are very effective and safe strategies for the treatment of predominantly cystic thyroid nodules. However, LIA is more advantageous in that it is less expensive and has a shorter length of hospital stay than MWA.