Safety and Efficacy of the Rechallenge of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors After Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gemcitabine, capecitabine, and tislelizumab in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma following prior anti-PD-1 therapy failure: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine in combination with tislelizumab for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) who have previously received other anti-PD-1 therapies.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included patients with RM-NPC who had prior treatment with anti-PD-1 therapy and subsequently received tislelizumab along with low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine between March 2019 and August 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 25 eligible patients, 8 (20%) achieved a complete response (CR). The objective response rate (ORR) was 68%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 80%. The 1-year PFS rate was 78%. All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were all grade 1 or 2.

CONCLUSION

The combination of tislelizumab with low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine demonstrated promising antitumor effectiveness in RM-NPC patients who had failed previous anti-PD-1 therapy, with a manageable safety profile.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer: Current evidence and future directions

Immunotherapy, remarkably immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has significantly altered the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite their success, the discontinuation of ICIs therapy may occur due to factors such as prior treatment completion, disease progression during ICIs treatment, or immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As numerous studies highlight the dynamic nature of immune responses and the sustained benefits of ICIs, ICIs rechallenge has become an attractive and feasible option. However, the decision-making process for ICIs rechallenge in clinical settings is complicated by numerous uncertainties. This review systematically analyses existing clinical research evidence, classifying ICIs rechallenge into distinct clinical scenarios, exploring methods to overcome ICIs resistance in rechallenge instances, and identifying biomarkers to select patients likely to benefit from rechallenge. By integrating recent studies and new technologies, we offer crucial recommendations for future clinical trial design and provide a practical guideline to maximize the therapeutic benefits of immunotherapy for NSCLC patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated cranial nerves involvement: a systematic literature review on 136 patients

OBJECTIVE

Describe the demographic data and clinical phenotype of cranial palsy induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (CNP-ICI).

METHODS

A systematic literature review of the literature was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase, including 68 articles and 136 patients (PROSPERO no. CRD42024517262).

RESULTS

Out of the 1205 articles screened, 68 articles were included after fulfilling the inclusion criteria, for a total of 136 patients. All articles were case reports and case series. In the cohort studied, 52% of patients were treated with anti PD-1/PDL-1 therapies, 14% with anti CTLA-4 therapies, and 34% with a combination of anti CTLA-4 and anti PD-1/PDL-1 therapies. The facial nerve was the most affected cranial nerve, involved in 38% of cases, followed by the optic nerve (35%), the cochleovestibular nerve (12%), and the abducens nerve (10%). The median time from the initial immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) injection to the onset CNP-ICI was 10 weeks (IQR 4-20). Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated contrast enhancement or abnormal signal of the affected nerve in 43% of cases. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis indicated lymphocytic pleocytosis in 59% of cases. At the onset of immune-related adverse events, 89% of patients discontinued immunotherapy, and 92% received treatment for CNP-ICI. Treatment regimens included corticosteroids in 86% of cases, intravenous immunoglobulin in 21%, and plasma exchange in 5.1%. Among the whole population, 33% achieved recovery, 52% showed clinical improvement, 16% remained stable, and 3% experienced worsening of their condition. Rechallenge with immunotherapy was significantly associated with the emergence of new immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs).

CONCLUSION

ICI therapy may lead to cranial nerve involvement, particularly affecting the facial nerve, typically presenting around 10 weeks after treatment initiation. While corticosteroid therapy often resulted in patient improvement, rechallenging with ICIs were associated with new irAEs.

Real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab-tremelimumab as second-line systemic therapy after atezolizumab-bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

The efficacy and safety of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma are known. We explored ICI rechallenges with direct switching from 1 ICI regimen to another. This retrospective study included 16 patients who received atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and durvalumab-tremelimumab (Dur+Tre) as the first-line and second-line combination therapy, respectively, at Hiroshima University Hospital. The radiological response and adverse event were evaluated in all patients. Of the 16 patients, 12 were male, and the median age at Atezo+Bev induction was 71 years. The reasons for medication changes were disease progression in 11 patients and adverse events in 5 patients. With Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre initiation, the Barcelona-Clinic Liver-Cancer stage (A/B/C) progressed in 9/6/3 and 3/4/9 patients and the Child-Pugh classification (A/B/C) progressed in 12/4/0 and 9/6/3 patients, respectively. The disease control rate and overall response rate of Atezo+Bev were 87.5% and 58.3%, respectively, and of Dur+Tre were 62.5% and 0%, respectively. The most common immune-related adverse event in both the Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre groups was colitis; 3 of the 5 patients with colitis on Atezo+Bev treatment had colitis with Dur+Tre, and 2 had exacerbations. Regarding liver function, ALBI score significantly decreased during Atezo+Bev, but not Dur+Tre, treatment. In patients with colitis following Atezo+Bev, subsequent Dur+Tre treatment may induce colitis recurrence or exacerbation. For immune-related adverse events other than colitis, Dur+Tre could provide relatively safe disease control while maintaining liver function.

Advances in Melanoma: From Genetic Insights to Therapeutic Innovations

Advances in melanoma research have unveiled critical insights into its genetic and molecular landscape, leading to significant therapeutic innovations. This review explores the intricate interplay between genetic alterations, such as mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and KIT, and melanoma pathogenesis. The MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways are highlighted for their roles in tumor growth and resistance mechanisms. Additionally, this review delves into the impact of epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and histone changes, on melanoma progression. The tumor microenvironment, characterized by immune cells, stromal cells, and soluble factors, plays a pivotal role in modulating tumor behavior and treatment responses. Emerging technologies like single-cell sequencing, CRISPR-Cas9, and AI-driven diagnostics are transforming melanoma research, offering precise and personalized approaches to treatment. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors and personalized mRNA vaccines, has revolutionized melanoma therapy by enhancing the body's immune response. Despite these advances, resistance mechanisms remain a challenge, underscoring the need for combined therapies and ongoing research to achieve durable therapeutic responses. This comprehensive overview aims to highlight the current state of melanoma research and the transformative impacts of these advancements on clinical practice.

Single Institution Experience with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Vulvar and Vaginal Melanomas

Objectives

This study aimed to report clinical outcomes of patients with vaginal melanoma (VaM) or vulvar melanoma (VuM) who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and discuss the development of immune-related adverse events (irAE).

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with VaM or VuM between July 2011 and September 2022 at the University of Virginia, Emily Couric Clinical Cancer Center. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment outcomes, and adverse events were abstracted. The primary outcome was incidence of irAE.

Results

Eight patients were included in this study, four with VaM and four with VuM. Most (n = 6) had local or regional disease at first presentation, and 25% (n = 2) presented with distant metastasis. All patients received a CTLA-4 inhibitor and 75% (n = 6) received PD-1 inhibitor alone or in combination with a CTLA-4 inhibitor. Most (75%, n = 6) patients experienced irAE. Of those who had irAE, 83% (n = 5) required therapy interruption or discontinuation. Most (66%, n = 4) underwent ICI rechallenge of which 75% (n = 3) experienced subsequent irAE. Of all patients in the series, 75% of patients (n = 6) had partial or complete response to ICI.

Conclusion

This series is the first to detail incidence of irAEs and ICI rechallenges in vulvovaginal melanoma. Our findings indicate that while ICIs are effective, their use is associated with significant irAE development. Rechallenge of ICI after irAE is feasible but associated with risk of recurrent/new irAE. Further studies are needed to better quantify this risk.

Real-world incidences and risk factors of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A nationwide retrospective cohort study

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are rare but fatal, requiring systemic steroid use. Therefore, to examine the outcomes, incidence, timing, and risk factors of ICI-associated steroid-requiring severe irAEs, we conducted a nationwide, retrospective, cohort study utilizing the Korean Health Insurance and Review Assessment database. We identified 357,010 patients with lung cancer, bladder cancer, or skin melanoma, eligible for ICI reimbursement in Korea between January 2012 to June 2020. Steroid-requiring severe irAEs following ICI treatment or treatment-emergent AEs following cytotoxic chemotherapy were defined as moderate- or high-dose steroid administration for over 2 consecutive days, along with corresponding ICD-10 codes indicating affected organ systems. The ICI-exposed group (N = 10,118) was compared to a matched cohort of 55,436 ICI-unexposed patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Incidences of acute severe irAEs requiring moderate- and high-dose steroids were higher in the ICI-exposed group (1.95% and 6.42%, respectively). The ICI-exposed group also had a higher risk of developing delayed severe irAEs requiring moderate- and high-dose steroid use (3.89% and 7.39%). Male sex, high comorbidity index, or previously diagnosed autoimmune diseases were associated with an increased risk of severe irAEs. Notably, 27.4-38.8% of the patients experienced recurrent severe irAEs after re-challenge with ICIs following moderate- or high-dose steroid use, with the severity matching the initial episode. Steroid-requiring severe irAEs were significantly more prevalent among patients exposed to ICIs than among those treated with chemotherapy in acute and delayed periods.

Delayed immune-related adverse events in long-responders of immunotherapy: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) often cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The spectrum of irAEs and their managements has been partially clarified, however the knowledge on time-course of irAEs is not well understood.

METHODS

A retrospective study based on the medical record was performed. The study subjects were consisting of patients with various types of solid tumors for whom ICIs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab plus ipilimumab) were used between April 2016 and October 2021. We focused on irAEs developed more than 1-year after commencement ICIs (delayed irAE group) and compared with irAEs developed within 1-year (non-delayed irAE group) in terms of types and severity of irAEs.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients were enrolled in the study. Eighty-eight patients (26.2%) developed irAEs and 248 did not. Most of the patients developing irAEs were treated using PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors. Eighty-one patients (24.1%) in non-delayed irAE group and 7 patients (2.1%) in delayed irAE group developed irAEs. The median onset of irAEs in the delayed irAE group was 18.6 months (range: 13.5-24.3). The types of irAEs observed in delayed irAE group were dermatitis (2 cases), pneumonitis (2 cases), nephritis (1 case), arthritis (1 case), and gastritis (1 case). The severity of irAEs was almost mild (≤G2), but one patient (.3%) developed G3 nephritis.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors frequently caused various irAEs but their severities were mostly tolerable. Few patients developed delayed irAE with mild toxities.

Prognostic relevance of immune-related adverse events in lung cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) work by activating the immune system, a mechanism that may also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study seeks to investigate on how different irAEs impact prognosis of advanced lung cancer (LC) patients and identify useful approaches to manage irAEs.

Methods

A thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and manual searches up to January 2024 were undertaken. Treatment outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were obtained. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software (version 4.3.1).

Results

There were 106 studies with 41,050 advanced or recurrent LC patients included. The occurrence of irAEs was correlated with better PFS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.59], OS (HR =0.57; 0.51-0.63), ORR [risk ratio (RR) =2.03; 95% CI: 1.81-2.28] and DCR (RR =1.55; 95% CI: 1.40-1.72) and remained significant after adjusting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) level. IrAEs affecting skin (OS: HR =0.45; 95% CI: 0.38-0.53) and endocrine system (OS: HR =0.51; 95% CI: 0.41-0.62), of mild severity (OS: HR =0.52; 95% CI: 0.35-0.79), arising in multiple sites (OS: HR =0.47; 95% CI: 0.38-0.59), induced by monotherapy (OS: HR =0.58; 95% CI: 0.52-0.65), with a delayed onset (cutoff: 3 months; OS: HR =0.37; 95% CI: 0.19-0.71) were identified as positive prognostic markers. In contrast, though pulmonary irAEs were found to be corelated with enhanced treatment response (ORR: RR =1.75; 95% CI: 1.37-2.25), they may harm survival, especially those with grade ≥3 (OS: HR =2.40; 95% CI: 1.39-4.14). Treatment resumption tended to improve PFS but might not reduce the risk of death compared to permanent discontinuation.

Conclusions

IrAEs suggest better treatment outcomes generally, yet severe pneumonia could increase mortality risk. Close supervision and appropriate handling protocols are warranted to weigh treatment benefit against risk.

Construction of a nomogram with IrAE and clinic character to predict the survival of advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients undergoing anti-PD-1 treatment

Objective

This study aimed to develop and validate a survival prediction model and nomogram to predict survival in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma undergoing treatment with anti-programmed cell death 1 receptor (PD-1). This model incorporates immune-related adverse events (irAEs) alongside common clinical characteristics as predictive factors.

Method

A dataset comprising 255 adult patients diagnosed with advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma was assembled. The irAEs affecting overall survival (OS) to a significant degree were identified and integrated as a candidate variable, together with 12 other candidate variables. These included gender, age, Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS) score, tumor stage, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression status, presence of peritoneal and liver metastases, year and line of anti-PD-1 treatment, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). To mitigate timing bias related to irAEs, landmark analysis was employed. Variable selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to pinpoint significant predictors, and the variance inflation factor was applied to address multicollinearity. Subsequently, a Cox regression analysis utilizing the forward likelihood ratio method was conducted to develop a survival prediction model, excluding variables that failed to satisfy the proportional hazards (PH) assumption. The model was developed using the entire dataset, then internally validated through bootstrap resampling and externally validated with a cohort from another Hospital. Furthermore, a nomogram was created to delineate the predictive model.

Results

After consolidating irAEs from the skin and endocrine systems into a single protective irAE category and applying landmark analysis, variable selection was conducted for the prognostic prediction model along with other candidate variables. The finalized model comprised seven variables: ECOG PS score, tumor stage, HER2 expression status in tumor tissue, first-line anti-PD-1 treatment, peritoneal metastasis, CONUT score, and protective irAE. The overall concordance index for the model was 0.66. Calibration analysis verified the model's accuracy in aligning predicted outcomes with actual results. Clinical decision curve analysis indicated that utilizing this model for treatment decisions could enhance the net benefit regarding 1- and 2-year survival rates for patients.

Conclusion

This study developed a prognostic prediction model by integrating common clinical characteristics of irAEs and G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. This model exhibits good clinical practicality and possesses accurate predictive ability for overall survival OS in patients with advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS

There is little evidence on the safety, efficacy, and survival benefit of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with cancer after discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or progressive disease (PD). Here, we performed a meta-analysis to elucidate the possible benefits of ICI rechallenge in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of irAEs were the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies involving 2026 patients were analyzed. ICI rechallenge was associated with a lower incidence of all-grade (OR, 0.05; 95%CI, 0.02-0.13, P < .05) and high-grade irAEs (OR, 0.37; 95%CI, 0.21-0.64, P < .05) when compared with initial ICI treatment. Though no significant difference was observed between rechallenge and initial treatment regarding ORR (OR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.39-1.20, P = .29) and DCR (OR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.51-1.40, P = 0.52), patients receiving rechallenge had improved PFS (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.43-0.73, P < .05) and OS (HR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.43-0.72, P < .05) than those who discontinued ICI therapy permanently. Subgroup analysis revealed that for patients who stopped initial ICI treatment because of irAEs, rechallenge showed similar safety and efficacy with initial treatment, while for patients who discontinued ICI treatment due to PD, rechallenge caused a significant increase in the incidence of high-grade irAEs (OR, 4.97; 95%CI, 1.98-12.5, P < .05) and a decrease in ORR (OR, 0.48; 95%CI, 0.24-0.95, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

ICI rechallenge is generally an active and feasible strategy that is associated with relative safety, similar efficacy, and improved survival outcomes. Rechallenge should be considered individually with circumspection, and randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor induced acute interstitial nephritis: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a recognized complication of immunotherapy (IO), but literature on its management and outcomes is limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who received ICIs and developed biopsy-proven or clinically-suspected ICI-associated AIN at the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2012-2023. We analyzed baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, including treatment interruption and rechallenge rates. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined as a ≥ 1.5-fold increase in baseline creatinine under seven days, a two-fold increase above the upper limit of normal, or an increase by ≥0.3 mg/dL. Kidney function returning to within 0.3 mg/dL or less than twice baseline was considered complete (CRc) and partial (PRc) recovery, respectively.

RESULTS

We identified 12 cases of ICI-AIN: four by biopsy (33%) and eight (67%) by clinical suspicion. Two patients received anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1, six received anti-PD1 alone, and four received chemo-immunotherapy. The majority (58%) of patients developed AIN within the first 5 cycles. Eight patients developed ≥ Grade 3 AKI, and six developed multiple irAEs. ICI was permanently discontinued in seven patients (58%) and temporarily interrupted in four (30%). The CRc and PRc rates were 67% and 8%, respectively. Upon AIN onset, the best disease response was stable disease in five patients, partial response in three, and progressive disease in three. Median overall survival was 4.87 years, and progression-free survival was 1.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Rechallenge with IO after kidney irAE may be possible in some patients but requires careful evaluation on an individual basis.

Acute pancreatitis associated with pembrolizumab-induced hypertriglyceridemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) following drug-induced hypertriglyceridemia is a rare clinical phenomenon. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized treatment for a variety of solid organ and hematological malignancies. Pembrolizumab is a programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor that has shown promising responses in many advanced cancers. However, a constellation of immune-related adverse events has also been described. There are reports of pembrolizumab-induced hypertriglyceridemia, but AP as a result of this side effect remains an exceedingly rare clinical sequela.

CASE REPORT

We delineate a case of a patient with stage IVB non-small-cell lung cancer who developed progressive abdominal pain and nausea following administration of pembrolizumab for four months. Laboratory studies revealed increased serum lipase and triglyceride levels at 12,562 IU/L and 16,901 mg/dL, respectively. The diagnosis of AP was made based on the revised Atlanta classification criteria. After ruling out alternative causes, pembrolizumab-induced hypertriglyceridemia was considered the likely etiology of AP.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient was transferred to the medical intensive care unit for close monitoring. Treatment was initiated with intravenous fluids, pain medications, and an insulin infusion. However, her hypertriglyceridemia levels remained persistently elevated, necessitating therapeutic apheresis. She recovered well with no complications after triglyceride apheresis.

DISCUSSION

AP following pembrolizumab-associated hypertriglyceridemia remains a rare clinicopathologic entity. Given the widespread clinical use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, knowledge of such rare adverse events is crucial. Evaluation of serum triglyceride levels before and after initiating pembrolizumab therapy may be mandated, especially in patients with metabolic comorbidities.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2% to 40%, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Knowledge domains and emerging trends in immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors: A bibliometrics and visualized analysis

Objective

The primary objective of this paper is to investigate the research hotspots and future trends of immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, offering valuable insights for researchers in this field.

Methodology

Using the visual analysis software, this study conducted quantitative statistics and visualization research on the relevant literature concerning immune-related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors in the Web of Science Core Collection Database. By evaluating the publication trends, countries, institutions, keywords, research status, cited documents, and document co-citations, among several others, the discussion revolved around the hot spots and future development trends in this field and provided references for future research.

Findings and conclusions

A total of 514 English articles were included, and the top three countries in the research field at the time of this study were the United States, Japan, and China. More specifically, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Massachusetts General Hospital have been the top three research institutes with more than 10 publications. The frequency of keyword use linked to immune-related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors in literature research has been steadily growing over the years. Additionally, the research with respect to the disease focuses on melanoma, cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer. In the context of drugs, cancer-related research has mainly focused on the combined use of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Meanwhile, research on adverse events has delved into the immune checkpoint inhibitors causing vitiligo, thyroid dysfunction, pancreatitis, cholangitis, and rheumatism. Related studies cover acute arthritis, myositis, acute kidney injury, as well as the combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and docetaxel, management of irAEs in cancer immunotherapy, and biomarkers of immune adverse reactions of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Finally, case report studies of immune adverse reactions caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors could serve as research hotspots in the future.

Severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia following immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors in two patients with metastatic melanoma: a case report

Introduction

Over the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as antibodies against cytotoxicity T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have become an important armamentarium against a broad spectrum of malignancies. However, these specific inhibitors can cause adverse autoimmune reactions by impairing self-tolerance. Hematologic side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors, including autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), are rare but can be life-threatening.

Case report

Herein, we report two patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic melanoma who developed AIHA with symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue. In the first patient, symptoms alleviated after discontinuation of combined anti CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapy, initiation of corticosteroids and application of a single red blood cell transfusion. Due to subsequent progress of melanoma, combinational anti-PD-1 and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy was initiated based on multidisciplinary tumor board decision. After two months, she again developed the described hematological and clinical signs of AIHA leading to cessation of anti-PD-1 therapy and initiation of corticosteroids, which again resulted in an alleviation of her symptoms. Due to further progression, the patient received dacarbazine for several months before she decided to stop any therapy other than palliative supportive care. In the second patient, discontinuation of anti-PD-1 therapy and initiation of corticosteroids entailed a complete alleviation of his symptoms. After refusing chemotherapy due to subsequent melanoma progression, he received radiotherapy of bone metastases and is currently enrolled in a clinical trial. The patient did not develop AIHA ever since.

Conclusion

Hematologic immune-related adverse events due to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors are rare but can have life-threatening consequences. If dyspnea and other clinical symptoms are present, AIHA should be considered as a potential cause and treated promptly in a multidisciplinary setting. An expanded comprehension of risk factors and pathogenesis of AIHA is needed to identify high-risk patients beforehand, leading to more effective predictive and reactive treatment approaches.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis: research advances in prediction and management

The advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of malignant solid tumors in the last decade, producing lasting benefits in a subset of patients. However, unattended excessive immune responses may lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs can manifest in different organs within the body, with pulmonary toxicity commonly referred to as immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP). The CIP incidence remains high and is anticipated to rise further as the therapeutic indications for ICIs expand to encompass a wider range of malignancies. The diagnosis and treatment of CIP is difficult due to the large individual differences in its pathogenesis and severity, and severe CIP often leads to a poor prognosis for patients. This review summarizes the current state of clinical research on the incidence, risk factors, predictive biomarkers, diagnosis, and treatment for CIP, and we address future directions for the prevention and accurate prediction of CIP.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2 % to 40 %, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Clinical characteristics and novel strategies of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has entered the immunotherapy era, marked by significant survival improvements due to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, owing to factors, such as disease progression, long-term use, and side effects, some patients discontinue immunotherapy, resulting in limited subsequent treatment option and a negative impact on their survival and quality of life. We have collected relevant data which reveal that ICI rechallenge may be an effective clinical strategy. However, many factors affect the efficacy of rechallenge, including patient characteristics, initial treatment drugs, treatment duration, efficacy, toxicity, and side effects. Additionally, the side effects of rechallenge and mechanisms of reversing drug resistance play crucial roles. Identifying suitable candidates, optimizing treatment plans and duration, enhancing treatment efficacy, and minimizing toxicity and adverse effects in rechallenges are pressing clinical needs. Addressing these issues can provide guidance for the clinical use of immunotherapy rechallenges to better serve patients. This review focuses on the clinical considerations and strategies for immune therapy rechallenges in NSCLC.

Navigating the ICI Combination Treatment Journey: Patterns of Response and Progression to First-Line ICI-Based Combination Treatment in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or other ICIs has significantly improved the prognosis for patients with mccRCC. This marks a major milestone in the treatment of mccRCC. Nonetheless, most patients will discontinue first-line therapy. In this narrative review, we analyze the different patterns of treatment discontinuation in the four pivotal phase III trials that have shown an improvement in overall survival in mccRCC first-line therapy, starting from 1 January 2017 to 1 June 2023. We highlight the different discontinuation scenarios and their influences on subsequent treatment options, aiming to provide more data to clinicians to navigate a complex decision-making process through a narrative review approach. We have identified several causes for discontinuations for patients treated with ICI-based combinations, such as interruption for drug-related adverse events, ICI treatment completion, treatment discontinuation due to complete response or maximum clinical benefit, or due to progression (pseudoprogression, systemic progression, and oligoprogression); for each case, an extensive analysis of the trials and current medical review has been conducted.

Detectable ctDNA at the time of treatment cessation of ipilimumab and nivolumab for toxicity predicts disease progression in advanced melanoma patients

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has led to unprecedented outcomes for melanoma patients but is associated with toxicity. ICI resumption after high grade irAEs poses a significant challenge in the clinical management of melanoma patients and there are no biomarkers that can help identify patients that might benefit from resuming treatment. This study aims to determine if circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels at the time of treatment-limiting irAE could guide treatment decisions in this clinical context.

Methods

This is a retrospective exploratory biomarker study from 34 patients treated with combination ICI for stage IV melanoma. Patients had a treatment-limiting toxicity and a baseline plasma collection prior to commencing ICI and within 6 weeks of stopping therapy. Blood samples were tested for ctDNA at baseline and cessation therapy.

Results

Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached (24-month PFS rate 54% and OS rate 72.3%). PD occurred in 47% (16/34) of patients. Median PFS with detectable ctDNA from plasma collected at the time of toxicity was 6.5 months while not reached (NR) with undetectable levels (HR: 4.0, 95% CI 0.95-17.5, p=0.0023). Median OS with detectable ctDNA at cessation for toxicity was 19.4 months and NR for undetectable ctDNA (HR: 3.9, 95%CI 20.8-18.6, p=0.024). Positive ctDNA at the time of cessation was highly specific (specificity 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-0.99, PPV 0.88, 95% CI 0.53-0.99). However, ctDNA negativity has low sensitivity as a predictor of ongoing disease control (sensitivity 0.437, 95% CI 0.23-0.67). Notably, 4/9 (44%) ctDNA negative patients who had disease progression had brain only disease progression.

Conclusions

Undetectable ctDNA and CR on imaging after stopping immunotherapy for toxicity results in high rates of long-term durable control. For patients with immunotherapy related toxicity, who have persistent ctDNA at 8 - 12 weeks, the risk of disease progression is significant.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in patients who previously experienced immune-related inflammatory arthritis: a multicentre observational study

OBJECTIVE

Another course of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is often considered in patients with cancer progression and previous immune-related adverse events, including inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA), but there are limited data regarding safety of ICI rechallenge in this setting. We aimed to assess the rate and clinical features associated with ICI-IA flare/recurrence on ICI rechallenge.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre observational study including cancer patients with ICI-IA who started a second course of ICI more than 3 months after ICI discontinuation in four French university hospitals. Primary outcome was the frequency of ICI flare/recurrence after ICI rechallenge.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included. At the time of ICI rechallenge, 18 patients reported no symptoms of ICI-IA (78%) and 5 had grade 1 (22%), 11 patients (48%) were not receiving any ICI-IA treatment, 11 (48%) were still on prednisone, 2 (9%) were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 1 (4%) on anti-IL-6. ICI-IA flare/recurrence occurred in 12 patients (52%) with a median time of 1 month after ICI rechallenge. ICI-IA phenotype, disease activity and ICI-IA treatment at the time of ICI rechallenge did not differ according to ICI-IA flare/recurrence status.

CONCLUSION

In this first observational study of ICI-IA patients rechallenged with ICI, about half of the patients experienced ICI-IA flare/recurrence with a similar phenotype but occurring earlier than the initial ICI-IA, warranting close monitoring during the first month of retreatment. Risk of flare did not differ according to baseline immunosuppressive treatment at the time of rechallenge.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-related Pancreatitis: A Case Series, Review of the Literature and an Expert Opinion

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of various malignancies, but are associated with serious adverse events like pancreatitis. Current guidelines are limited to the first step in treating acute ICI-related pancreatitis with steroids but lack treatment advices for steroid dependent pancreatitis. We describe a case series of 3 patients who developed ICI-related pancreatitis with chronic features such as exocrine insufficiency and pancreatic atrophy at imaging. Our first case developed after treatment with pembrolizumab. The pancreatitis responded well after discontinuation of immunotherapy but imaging showed pancreatic atrophy and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency persisted. Cases 2 and 3 developed after treatment with nivolumab. In both, pancreatitis responded well to steroids. However during steroid tapering, pancreatitis recurred and the latter developed exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and pancreatic atrophy at imaging. Our cases demonstrate resemblances with autoimmune pancreatitis based on clinical and imaging findings. In line, both diseases are T-cell mediated and for autoimmune pancreatitis azathioprine is considered as maintenance therapy. Guidelines of other T-cell mediated diseases like ICI-related hepatitis suggest tacrolimus. After adding tacrolimus in case 2 and azathioprine in case 3, steroids could be completely tapered and no new episodes of pancreatitis have occurred. These findings support the idea that the treatment modalities for other T-cell mediated diseases are worthwhile options for steroid dependent ICI-related pancreatitis.

Re-immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with anti-programmed death-1 and/or anti-programmed death ligand-1 antibodies

BACKGROUND

The role of re-immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. No studies have evaluated the re-immunotherapy regimen including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody for lung cancer treatment. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of re-immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and/or anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibodies.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (without concomitant cytotoxic chemotherapy) between November 2020 and November 2022 at the National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan. Data were extracted from patients who had previously received immunotherapies with anti-PD-1 and/or anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Treatment responses and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 67 patients who received immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 23 were included in final analysis. The objective response rate was 17%, and the disease control rate was 48% for nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy. The highest grade of immune-related adverse events was grade 3, occurring in 11% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Re-immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab after anti-PD-1 and/or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy may be feasible and provide clinical benefit in selected patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify the patient population that may benefit from re-immunotherapy.

Case Report: A Presentation of Early-Onset Immune-Mediated Bullous Pemphigoid in a Patient with Urothelial Cancer

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are the most common side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy (30-50% for all grades). The vast majority of them are low or mild and can be treated without ICI interruption. Autoimmune blistering disorders, such as immune-mediated bullous pemphigoid (IBP), are rare (<1%) but potentially serious conditions that must be early detected. The onset generally occurs within the first months of the treatment, and it appears to be more common with antiprogrammed death-1 or antiprogrammed ligand 1 (anti-PD1/PDL1) than with anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA4). We present a case of a three-day severe IBP onset after receiving the first cycle of atezolizumab. This exceptional early presentation could suggest the presence of some predisposing condition and demonstrates the need to better understand predictive toxicity-related biomarkers in candidate patients for immunotherapy.

Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis: From Pathogenesis to Management

The advent of immunotherapy, specifically of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), for the treatment of solid tumors has deeply transformed therapeutic algorithms in medical oncology. Approximately one-third of patients treated with ICIs may de velop immune-related adverse events, and the gastrointestinal tract is often affected by different grades of mucosal inflammation. Checkpoint inhibitors colitis (CIC) presents with watery or bloody diarrhea and, in the case of severe symptoms, requires ICIs discontinuation. The pathogenesis of CIC is multifactorial and still partially unknown: anti-tumor activity that collaterally effects the colonic tissue and the upregulation of specific systemic inflammatory pathways (i.e., CD8+ cytotoxic and CD4+ T lymphocytes) are mainly involved. Many questions remain regarding treatment timing and options, and biological treatment, especially with anti-TNF alpha, can be offered to these patients with the aim of rapidly resuming oncological therapies. CIC shares similar pathogenesis and aspects with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the use of ICI in IBD patients is under evaluation. This review aims to summarize the pathogenetic mechanism underlying CIC and to discuss the current evidenced-based management options, including the role of biological therapy, emphasizing the relevant clinical impact on CIC and the need for prompt recognition and treatment.

An updated review of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by PD-1 inhibitors: from mechanisms to management

PD-1 inhibitors, as one of commonly used immune checkpoint inhibitors, enable T-cell activation and prevent immune escape by blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway. They have transformed the treatment landscape for cancer in recent years, due to the advantages of significantly prolonging patients' survival and improving their life quality. However, the ensuing unpredictable immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) plague clinicians, such as colitis and even potentially fatal events like intestinal perforation and obstruction. Therefore, understanding the clinical manifestations and grading criteria, underlying mechanisms, available diverse therapies, accessible biomarkers, and basis for risk stratification is of great importance for the management. Current evidence suggests that irAEs may be a marker of clinical benefit to immunotherapy in patients, so whether to discontinue PD-1 inhibitors after the onset of irAEs and rechallenge after remission of irAEs requires further evaluation of potential risk-reward ratios as well as more data from large-scale prospective studies to fully validate. At the end, the rare gastrointestinal toxicity events caused by PD-1 inhibitors are also sorted out. This review provides a summary of available data on the gastrointestinal toxicity profile caused by PD-1 inhibitors, with the aim of raising clinicians' awareness in daily practice, so that patients can safely benefit from therapy.

Systematic surveillance of immune-related adverse events in clinical practice and impact of subsequent steroid medication on survival outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have highlighted the need for effective management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aimed to conduct a systematic surveillance of real-world development of irAEs for understanding their characteristics and examine the prognostic impact of steroid use for these events.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated cancer patients treated with ICIs between 2014 and 2021 and collected information about irAEs throughout their development, management, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 458 patients (45.4%) developed 670 irAEs. The prevalence of irAEs varied by cancer type, but it was increased in regimens with longer treatment durations. Severe irAEs were more common in the nivolumab + ipilimumab and pembrolizumab + axitinib regimens. Patients who received steroids for irAEs at a dosage of < 2 mg/kg had comparable prognosis to those who did not receive steroids; however, patients who received methylprednisolone pulse therapy, primarily for severe pneumonitis and hepatitis, had shorter overall survival than those who did not receive steroids (7.8 versus 23.4 months, p = 0.016). Furthermore, methylprednisolone pulse therapy for irAEs was a poor prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 2.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.34-2.86, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Steroid treatment for irAE does not affect prognosis and should thus be used promptly to control inflammation. However, pulse therapy for severe cases is a poor prognostic factor, and early detection remains the key to managing such irAEs. The irAE characteristics in each regimen should be clarified to establish and provide more sophisticated irAE management, and the current findings will be beneficial to this goal.

Current Status in Rechallenge of Immunotherapy

The treatment of malignant tumors has entered the era of immunotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought significant benefits to patients. However, some patients are required to discontinue treatment with ICIs owing to factors such as disease progression and intolerable side effects. Faced with limited subsequent treatment options and complex medical needs, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and the NIH clinical trials database and found that ICI rechallenge could be a relevant clinical strategy. The factors that could affect the rechallenge efficacy include the patients' characteristics, therapeutic strategy selection, and the timing of treatment. Multiple factors are used to identify target population, of which clinical features and PD-L1 expression are more potential. Both single ICI rechallenge and combination therapy may have survival benefits. Patients who have tolerated initial immunotherapy well could undergo ICI rechallenge, while patients who have experienced grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events should be carefully assessed prior to rechallenge. Interventions and the interval between two courses of ICI will clearly have an impact on the efficacy of subsequent treatment. Preliminary data evaluation supports further investigation on ICI rechallenge to identify the factors that could contribute to its efficacy.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and the Kidney: A Focus on Diagnosis and Management for Personalised Medicine

Immunity plays a crucial role in fighting cancer, but tumours can evade the immune system and proliferate and metastasize. Enhancing immune responses is a new challenge in anticancer therapies. In this context, efficacy data are accumulating on immune checkpoint inhibitors and adjuvant therapies for various types of advanced-stage solid tumours. Unfortunately, immune-related adverse events are common. Although infrequent, renal toxicity may occur via several mechanisms and may require temporary or permanent drug suspension, renal biopsy, and/or immunosuppressive treatment. This short review aims to provide a practical approach to the multidisciplinary management of cancer patients with renal toxicity during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immunotherapy Resumption/Rechallenge in Melanoma Patients after Toxicity: Do We Have Another Chance?

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have radically changed the prognosis of several neoplasias, among them metastatic melanoma. In the past decade, some of these new drugs have appeared together with a new toxicity spectrum previously unknown to clinicians, until now. A common situation in daily practice is that a patient experiences toxicity due to this type of drug and we need to resume or rechallenge treatment after resolving the adverse event. Methods: A PubMed literature review was carried out. Results: The published data regarding the resumption or rechallenge of ICI treatment in melanoma patients is scarce and heterogeneous. Depending on the study reviewed, the recurrence incidence of grade 3–4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) ranged from 18% to 82%. Conclusion: It is possible to resume or rechallenge, but each patient should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team for close monitoring and assessment of the risk/benefit ratio before initiating treatment.

Management, risk factors and prognostic impact of checkpoint-inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) in lung cancer – A multicenter observational analysis

INTRODUCTION

Checkpoint-inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) represents a major immune-related adverse event (irAE) in patients with lung cancer. We aimed for the clinical characterization, diagnostics, risk factors, treatment and outcome in a large cohort of patients from everyday clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For this retrospective analysis, 1,376 patients having received checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in any line of therapy from June 2015 until February 2020 from three large-volume lung cancer centers in Berlin, Germany were included and analyzed.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 35 months, all-grade, high-grade (CTCAE ≥ 3) and fatal CIP were observed in 83 (6.0%), 37 (2.7%) and 12 (0.9%) patients, respectively, with a median onset 4 months after initiation of CPI therapy. The most common radiologic patterns were organizing pneumonia (OP) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (37% and 31%). All except 7 patients with G1-2 CIP interrupted treatment. Corticosteroids were administered to 74 patients with a median starting dose of 0.75 mg/kg. After complete restitution (n = 67), re-exposure to CPI (n = 14) led to additional irAE in 43% of the cases. Thoracic radiotherapy targeting the lung was the only independent risk factor for CIP (odds ratio 2.8, p < 0.001) and pretherapeutic diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide inversely correlated with CIP severity. Compared with patients without CIP and non-CIP irAE, CIP was associated with impaired overall survival (hazard ratios 1.23, p = 0.24 and 2.01, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade CIP accounts for almost half of all CIP cases in an allcomer lung cancer population. A continuous vigilance, rapid diagnostics and adequate treatment are key to prevent disease progression associated with impaired survival.

Survivals following discontinuation of PD-1 inhibitor treatment in advanced melanoma patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival post-treatment discontinuation survival (OS PTD ) in advanced melanoma patients started on immunotherapy. This retrospective study included all unresectable advanced or metastatic melanoma patients who had permanent treatment discontinuation after receiving at least one cycle of palliative-intent programmed death-1 ± cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4 inhibitor treatment from 2014 to 2019. Indications of permanent treatment discontinuation included treatment completion, toxicity or progression. OS PTD was defined as a time of permanent treatment discontinuation to the time of death. Our study ( N  = 96) had 27, 12 and 57 patients who discontinued PD-1 inhibitor treatment due to treatment completion, toxicity and progression, respectively. Median treatment durations received for the treatment completion, toxicity and progression groups were 24, 6 and 3 months, respectively. As expected those patients who had disease progression on immunotherapy had very poor survival compared to those that completed treatment or stopped due to toxicity. A multivariable Cox model excluding the patients who progressed indicated no significant OS PTD differences between the toxicity and treatment completion group (HR, 0.894; 95% CI, 0.232-3.449; P  = 0.871) who received single or dual immunotherapy. Our real-world study highlighted similar, durable survival at PD-1 inhibitor discontinuation due to either toxicity or treatment completion, despite longer treatment duration received in the completion group than toxicity group. Patients with progression on PD-1 inhibitor treatment have very poor survival. Our findings must be interpreted with caution due to its retrospective nature and small sample size.

Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: how will it reshape treatment sequencing?

The treatment landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has broadened with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) setting a novel standard of care. With the increased number of therapies either in first or in further line, disentangling the possible treatment sequences has become much more complex. Yet, all the second-line therapies have been evaluated after sorafenib. After ICIs, offering multikinase inhibitors is a widespread approach, either shifting forward sorafenib or lenvatinib, or choosing among regorafenib or cabozantinib, already approved in the refractory setting. Under specific circumstances, ICIs could be maintained beyond disease progression in patients with proven clinical benefit, as supported by some data emerging from phase III clinical trials with immunotherapy in HCC. Rechallenge with ICIs is an additional attractive alternative, although requiring careful and individual evaluation as efficacy and safety of such a strategy have not been yet clarified. Still, a considerable number of patients displays primary resistance to ICIs and might benefit from antiangiogenics either alone or in addition to ICIs instead. Hopefully, the ongoing clinical trials will enlighten regarding the most effective treatment pathways. The identification of predictive correlates of response to immunotherapy will help treatment allocation at each stage, thus representing an urgent matter to address in HCC research. With programmed death ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite status being inadequate biomarkers in HCC, patient characteristics, drug safety profile, and regulatory approval remain key elements to acknowledge in routine practice. Despite the tissue remaining a preferred source, biomarkers discovery could take advantage of liquid biopsy to overcome the matter of tissue availability and track tumor changes. Lastly, tumor genetic phenotypes, tumor microenvironment features, gut microbiome, and markers of immune response and systemic inflammation are all potential emergent predictors of response to ICIs, pending validation in the clinical setting.

Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus routine neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy (nICT) or chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) in locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) is currently an area of active ongoing research. Therefore, we carried out a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of the new strategy with routine neoadjuvant strategy, which included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Patients and methods

MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via OVID), ISI Web of Science database and Cochrane Library were included. And, all of them were searched for eligible studies between January, 2000 and February, 2023. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) were primary outcome of our study. The second outcome of interest was R0 resection rate. Odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% CI were used as the effect indicators comparing the safety and efficiency of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy with the routine neoadjuvant therapy. Fixed-effect model (Inverse Variance) or random-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was performed depending on the statistically heterogeneity.

Results

There were eight trials with 652 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The estimated pCR rate was higher in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group (OR =1.86; 95% CI, 1.25-2.75; I² = 32.8%, P=0.166). The different results were found in the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) subgroups, the estimated OR was 2.35 (95%CI, 1.00-2.72; I² = 30.9%, P=0.215) in the EAC subgroup, and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.20-4.54; I² = 45.3%, P=0.161) in the ESCC subgroup, respectively. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy also showed the advantage in the MPR rates (OR =2.66; 95% CI, 1.69-4.19; I² = 24.3%, P=0.252). There was no obvious difference between the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy with respect to surgical resection rate, R0 resection rate, surgical delay rate; while more treatment-related adverse events were observed for the neoadjuvant immunotherapy for pneumonitis/pneumonia (OR=3.46, 95% CI, 1.31-9.16; I² = 67.3%, P=0.005) and thyroid dysfunction (OR=4.69, 95% CI, 1.53-14.36; I² = 56.5%, P=0.032).

Conclusion

The pooled correlations indicated that the neoadjuvant immunotherapy (both nICT and nICRT) could significantly increase the rates of pCR and MPR, compared with routine neoadjuvant therapy (both nCT and nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced EC. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy were with acceptable toxicity. However, randomized studies with larger groups of patients need to performed to confirm these results.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020155802.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Oncology: Current Uses and Future Directions: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a major class of immuno-oncology therapeutics that have significantly improved the prognosis of various cancers, both in (neo)adjuvant and metastatic settings. Unlike other conventional therapies, ICIs elicit antitumor effects by enhancing host immune systems to eliminate cancer cells. There are 3 approved ICI classes by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration: inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4, programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1, and lymphocyte-activation gene 3, with many more in development. ICIs are commonly associated with distinct toxicities, known as immune-related adverse events, which can arise during treatment or less frequently be of late onset, usually relating to excessive activation of the immune system. Acute cardiovascular immune-related adverse events such as myocarditis are rare; however, data suggesting chronic cardiovascular sequelae are emerging. This review presents the current landscape of ICIs in oncology, with a focus on important aspects relevant to cardiology.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic NSCLC After Discontinuation of Immunotherapy Because of Immune-Related Adverse Effects

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is an important treatment modality in metastatic NSCLC and management of immunotherapy-related adverse effects (irAEs) can be challenging. Retreatment after discontinuation of ICI because of irAEs is a frequent clinical dilemma with limited available data.

Methods

This single-center retrospective observational study reviewed the clinical course of 30 patients with metastatic NSCLC in whom ICI had to be discontinued owing to a serious irAE after an initial objective response to therapy.

Results

After ICI discontinuation, 14 patients (47%) developed a durable response of more than 6 months, seven patients (23%) developed oligoprogression treated with local radiotherapy leading to disease control, six patients (20%) had progression of disease within 6 months, and three patients (10%) died owing to a severe irAE.

Conclusions

A watchful waiting approach is justified after discontinuation of ICI owing to irAEs in patients with metastatic NSCLC with an initial response to therapy.

Cardiotoxicity Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: What a Cardio-Oncology Team Should Know and Do

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the therapeutic scenario for several malignancies. However, they can be responsible for immune-related adverse events (irAEs), involving several organs, with a pooled incidence ranging between 54% and 76%. The frequency of cardiovascular system involvement is <1%. Among the cardiovascular irAEs, myocarditis is the most common and the most dangerous but other, less common manifestations of ICI-related cardiotoxicity include pericardial disease, arrhythmias, Takotsubo-like syndrome, and acute myocardial infarction, all of which remain poorly explored. Both oncologists and cardiologists, as well as the patients, should be aware of the possible occurrence of one or more of these complications, which in some cases are fatal, in order to implement effective strategies of cardiac surveillance. In this review, we summarize the latest studies and recommendations on the pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, diagnosis, and management of ICI-related cardiotoxicity in order to realize a complete and updated overview on the main aspects of ICI-related cardiotoxicity, from surveillance to diagnosis to management, useful for both oncologists and cardiologists in their clinical practice. In particular, in the first part of the review, we realize a description of the pathogenetic mechanisms and risk factors of the main cardiovascular irAEs. Then, we focus on the management of ICI-related cardiotoxicity by analyzing five main points: (1) identifying and evaluating the type and severity of the cardiotoxicity; (2) deciding whether to withhold ICI therapy; (3) initiating steroid and immunosuppressive therapy; (4) starting conventional cardiac treatment; and (5) restarting ICI therapy. Finally, we discuss the existing evidence on surveillance for ICI-related cardiotoxicity and propose a surveillance strategy for both short- and long-term cardiotoxicity, according to the most recent guidelines.

Cutaneous Toxicities Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Observational, Pharmacovigilance Study

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are the most prevalent complication to arise from immunotherapy and cause significant morbidity. We aimed to determine the spectrum, timing, clinical features, and outcomes of cirAEs by conducting an observational pharmacovigilance study using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global database of individual case safety reports from over 130 member countries (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04898751). We compared adverse event reporting in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (91,323 adverse events) with those of the full reporting database (18,919,358 adverse events). There were 10,933 cases of cirAEs within 51 distinct dermatologic types, with 27 specific eruptions with disproportionate signal represented (information component [IC]025 > 0). Of these 27 eruptions, there were eight cirAEs with n > 100 reports, including vitiligo (IC025 = 4.87), bullous pemphigoid (IC025 = 4.08), lichenoid dermatitis (IC025 = 3.69), erythema multiforme (IC025 = 1.03), toxic epidermal necrolysis (IC025 = 0.95), Stevens‒Johnson syndrome (IC025 = 0.41), drug eruption (IC025 = 0.11), and eczematous dermatitis (IC025 = 0.11). There were differences in time to onset after immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation, with a median of approximately 1 month (erythema multiforme, Stevens‒Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis), 2 months (drug eruption and eczematous dermatitis), 4 months (lichenoid dermatitis), and 5‒6 months (bullous pemphigoid and vitiligo). CirAEs are diverse, dependent on cancer type, and have distinct and different onset times that are linked to the cirAE subtype.

A case of refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis with Clostridioides difficile infection

The clinical symptoms of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)‐induced colitis are similar to those of ulcerative colitis. ICI‐induced colitis, like ulcerative colitis, may be complicated by other colitis, such as Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). A 72‐year‐old man was admitted because of watery and bloody stools 10 times a day after three courses of nivolumab (antibodies against programmed death 1) and ipilimumab (cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated antigen‐4) for stage IV renal cell carcinoma. Colonoscopy revealed erythema and multiple erosions in the colon. Histopathological examination of colonic mucosa revealed diffuse inflammatory cell infiltration and apoptosis. The initial cytomegalovirus antigen test and C. difficile detection assay results were negative. Based on these findings, we diagnosed the patient with ICI‐induced colitis and discontinued ICI therapy. The symptoms did not improve despite the administration of Prednisolone and infliximab. A repeat colonoscopy revealed a new appearance of pseudomembranes from the sigmoid colon to the rectum one month after the start of these treatments. At this point, the patient tested positive for C. difficile. With treatment with vancomycin for CDI, the abdominal symptoms gradually decreased. Nivolumab alone was cautiously restarted. However, no colitis recurrence and further tumor reduction were observed. Here, we report our experience of a case of refractory ICI‐induced colitis complicated by CDI. ICI‐induced colitis may be complicated by CDI and should be carefully treated with repeated CDI testing if refractory to treatment. We believe that our observation will provide helpful information for determining an appropriate treatment strategy for ICI‐induced colitis.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Other Immune Therapies in Breast Cancer: A New Paradigm for Prolonged Adjuvant Immunotherapy

Background: Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer in women worldwide. Advances in the early diagnosis and treatment of cancer in the last decade have progressively decreased the cancer mortality rate, and in recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a relevant tool against cancer. HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are considered more immunogenic and suitable for this kind of treatment due to the higher rate of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. In TNBC, genetic aberrations further favor immunogenicity due to more neo-antigens in cancer cells. Methods: This review summarizes the principal ongoing conventional and investigational immunotherapies in breast cancer. Particularly, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and their use alone or combined with DNA damage repair inhibitors (DDRis) are described. Then, the issue on immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies against HER-2 family receptors is updated. Other investigational immunotherapies include a new schedule based on the interferon beta-interleukin-2 sequence that was given in ER+ metastatic breast cancer patients concomitant with anti-estrogen therapy, which surprisingly showed promising results. Results: Based on the scientific literature and our own findings, the current evaluation of tumor immunogenicity and the conventional model of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) are questioned. Conclusions: A novel strategy based on additional prolonged adjuvant immunotherapy combined with hormone therapy or alternated with CT is proposed.

A Challenging Case of Eyelid Ptosis and Diplopia Induced by Pembrolizumab

We present the case of an 83-year-old female patient with gastric adenocarcinoma, who developed a subacute onset of eyelid ptosis and ophthalmoparesis, while being treated with pembrolizumab, raising the suspicion of myasthenia gravis. Workup exposed a broader systemic involvement, with liver, cardiac and skeletal muscle being affected as well. Further investigation lead us to change our initial diagnosis to multisystem inflammatory syndrome with isolated symptomatic ocular myositis, induced by pembrolizumab. High-dose steroids and immunoglobulin were started with a good outcome.

Prognostic role of the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

It remains controversial whether the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) serves as a potential indicator for the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to address this concern.

Methods

Up to March 2022, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to retrieve potentially eligible articles. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the relationship between PLR and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS), while the combined odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated to evaluate the relationship between PLR and the objective response rate (ORR) as well as the disease control rate (DCR). Subgroup analyses were further performed to detect the source of heterogeneity and potential predictive value of PLR in different groups in terms of OS and PFS.

Results

A total of 21 included studies involving 2312 patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy were included. The combined results suggested that elevated PLR was associated with poorer OS (HR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.87-2.68; I² =44%; P=0.01) and PFS (HR=1.66; 95% CI: 1.36-2.04; I² =64%; P<0.01). Furthermore, elevated PLR showed a lower ORR (OR= 0.61; 95% CI: 0.43-0.87, I²=20%; P=0.29) and DCR (OR= 0.44; 95% CI: 0.27-0.72, I²=61%; P=0.02). In subgroup analyses, pretreatment PLR was significantly associated with adverse OS and PFS. The same results were observed in different PLRs in terms of cutoff value (>200 vs. ≤200). Furthermore, high PLR was significantly associated with poor OS and PFS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, PLR was not associated with OS and PFS in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In addition, PLR predicted poor OS irrespective of regions and types of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Conclusion

On the whole, patients with low PLR had better OS and PFS, as well as higher ORR and DCR when receiving immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer especially for advanced NSCLC. And further investigations are warranted to confirm the prognostic value of PLR in advanced SCLC.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022315976.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge After Prior Immune Toxicity

OPINION STATEMENT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an essential part of treatment for many cancer types. These monoclonal antibodies remove a critical negative regulatory signal that allows the immune system to recognize and destroy malignant cells that were previously undetectable. Unfortunately, their use has ushered in a whole new form of drug toxicity whereby the immune system attacks normal tissues in the body, referred to hereafter as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). irAEs are common and can result in treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, and death. When alternative modes of treatment are limited, or considered less efficacious, there may be a desire to resume treatment with ICIs after an irAE. Rechallenge with ICIs carries with it a heightened risk of subsequent toxicity, but with careful consideration and appropriate patient selection, this can be considered a reasonable approach.

Safety of sequential immune checkpoint inhibitors after prior immune therapy

BACKGROUND

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has transformed cancer treatment. Subsequent ICI use has become increasingly common following disease progression. We aim to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the sequential ICI treatment modality.

METHODS

Retrospective review of confirmed carcinoma from January 2014 to December 2018. Patients were categorized into "initial ICI arm" and "sequential ICI arm" defined as patients receiving single, dual or chemo-immunotherapy ICI following an initial ICI regimen. Primary outcome was the development of a new or recurrent immune related adverse event (irAE) during sequential therapy. Secondary outcomes were the number of cycles prior to the development of irAE and grade of irAE.

RESULTS

A total of 483 patients received ICI during the timeframe. Of those, 22 patients received sequential ICI. The diagnoses included ten lung cancer, seven melanoma, four renal cell carcinoma and one bladder cancer. 16 patients received single agent ICI following the initial ICI, three patients received dual ICI following the initial ICI, one patient received chemotherapy-immunotherapy following initial ICI, and two patients received chemo-immunotherapy after dual ICI. Four patients developed new irAE and one patient developed the same irAE on sequential treatment. A higher proportion of patients experienced grade 3 irAE in the sequential arm compared to the initial ICI arm (p = 0.03). No statistical difference was found between the development of irAE and the number of cycles prior to development of irAE in either treatment groups (p = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Our data shows overall safety of sequencing ICI when close monitoring was employed.

Efficacy, prognosis and safety analysis of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor rechallenge in advanced lung cancer patients: a cohort study

Background

The rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is now an optional strategy for patients who discontinued ICI due to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or disease progression. However, little data is available for the prognosis and prognostic factors of patients receiving ICI rechallenge treatment in advanced lung cancer patients. Our study aimed to explore the efficacy, prognosis and safety of patients who received anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitor rechallenge.

Methods

In our retrospective cohort study, data of advanced lung cancer patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and discontinued due to irAEs or disease progression were collected from December 2016 to August 2021. Enrolled patients were categorized into two groups: rechallenge group (R group) and non-rechallenge group (NR group). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety data were analyzed. Cox model and subgroup analysis were analyzed according to baseline characteristics, ICI type, the reason for discontinuing ICI, etc. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), evaluation was performed routinely every 6–8 weeks after initiating treatment with the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The last follow-up in the study was on September 20, 2021.

Results

Eighty-one patients who met our inclusion criteria were enrolled. In the whole cohort, the R group achieved better OS than the NR group [hazard ratio (HR) =0.176; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.065–0.477; P=0.001). In the irAEs group, the survival analyses showed a trend toward improved OS in the rechallenge subgroup (HR =0.287; 95% CI: 0.081–1.025; P=0.055), and a promising DCR of 75% after an ICI rechallenge. Additionally, the exploration of safety outcomes indicated an acceptable recurrence rate (22.5%) of irAEs and an early onset of irAEs after an ICI rechallenge. In the disease progression group, the rechallenge subgroup did not improve OS (HR =0.214; 95% CI: 0.027–1.695; P=0.144), and the DCR of the rechallenge subgroup was 40% after ICI rechallenge.

Conclusions

ICI rechallenge might be an attractive option for patients who discontinue treatment due to irAEs. For patients with disease progression, further research should be conducted. The recurrence of irAEs and their early onset during the second round of ICI should be considered.

Mechanism and Management of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Toxicities in Genitourinary Cancers

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is rapidly increasing as more combinations and clinical indications are approved in the field of genitourinary malignancies. Most immunotherapeutic agents being approved are for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and bladder cancer, which mainly involve PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways. There is an ongoing need for recognizing and treating immunotherapy-related autoimmune adverse effects (irAEs). This review aims to critically appraise the recent literature on the mechanism, common patterns, and treatment recommendations of irAEs in genitourinary malignancies. We review the epidemiology of these adverse effects as well as general treatment strategies. The underlying mechanisms will also be discussed. Diagnostic considerations including differential diagnosis are also included in this review.

Heterogeneous Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in Patients With NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in NSCLC remain uncertain. This study estimated the safety and efficacy of ICI rechallenge and compared rechallenge benefit among different reasons of initial ICI discontinuation in NSCLC.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on NSCLC retreated with ICI. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) at initial ICI and rechallenge were analyzed.

Results

A total of 15 studies including 442 patients between 2018 and 2022 were eligible for meta-analysis. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 irAE was lower in rechallenge than initial ICI (8.6% versus 17.8%, p < 0.001). Patients rechallenged with ICI had lower ORR and DCR than initial ICI (13.2% versus 42.4%, p < 0.001; 51.1% versus 74.0%, p < 0.001). The ORR and DCR to ICI rechallenge were both higher in patients who experienced disease progression after stopping ICI or irAE than patients with disease progression during ICI treatment (ORR: 46.2% versus 20% versus 11.4%, p = 0.003; DCR: 84.6% versus 90.0% versus 55.0%, p = 0.002). In addition, 34.7% of 69 patients with individual response to ICI and PFS experienced the same or better response to ICI rechallenge in comparison with initial ICI, although PFS in initial ICI was longer than that in ICI rechallenge (median: 8.90 versus 3.67 mo, hazard ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.59).

Conclusions

ICI rechallenge had less severe toxicity than initial ICI treatment. Patients undergoing disease progression after ICI cessation or ICI discontinuation owing to irAE are more likely to benefit from ICI rechallenge in NSCLC.

Efficacy and predictors of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has not yet been fully clarified. This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with NSCLC who benefited from rechallenge with ICIs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 24 patients who were diagnosed with NSCLC and rechallenged with ICIs between August 2016 and July 2021.

RESULTS

Of the 24 patients included in the study, 11 were in the responder group (45.8%) and 13 in the nonresponder group (54.2%). The number of patients who used a different ICI from that used in the initial therapy was significantly higher in the responder group than in the nonresponder group (p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis identified lung metastasis and female sex as significant independent risk factors for nonresponse to rechallenge with ICIs. Compared to the nonresponder group, the duration of treatment after rechallenge with ICIs was significantly longer in the responder group (p = 0.016), and there was a trend toward longer overall survival (p = 0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lung cancer who were rechallenged with ICIs and without progressive disease after initial ICI therapy were able to continue ICI therapy for a longer period of time. This may be associated with longer survival. Patients with lung metastases and female patients are more likely to be nonresponsive to rechallenge with ICIs. Administration of a different type of ICI from that used in the initial ICI therapy may result in disease control.