Data Driven Models of Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity

A computational view of short-term plasticity and its implications for E-I balance

Short-term plasticity (STP) and excitatory-inhibitory balance (EI balance) are both ubiquitous building blocks of brain circuits across the animal kingdom. The synapses involved in EI are also subject to short-term plasticity, and several experimental studies have shown that their effects overlap. Recent computational and theoretical work has begun to highlight the functional implications of the intersection of these motifs. The findings are nuanced: while there are general computational themes, such as pattern tuning, normalization, and gating, much of the richness of these interactions comes from region- and modality specific tuning of STP properties. Together these findings point towards the STP-EI balance combination as being a versatile and highly efficient neural building block for a wide range of pattern-specific responses.

Synaptic Dynamics Convey Differential Sensitivity to Input Pattern Changes in Two Muscles Innervated by the Same Motor Neurons

Postsynaptic responses depend on input patterns as well as short-term synaptic plasticity, summation, and postsynaptic membrane properties, but the interactions of those dynamics with realistic input patterns are not well understood. We recorded the responses of the two pyloric dilator (PD) muscles, cpv2a and cpv2b, that are innervated by and receive identical periodic bursting input from the same two motor neurons in the lobster Homarus americanus. Cpv2a and cpv2b showed quantitative differences in membrane nonlinearities and synaptic summation. At a short timescale, responses in both muscles were dominated by facilitation, albeit with different frequency and time dependence. Realistic burst stimulations revealed more substantial differences. Across bursts, cpv2a showed transient depression, whereas cpv2b showed transient facilitation. Steady-state responses to bursting input also differed substantially. Neither muscle had a monotonic dependence on frequency, but cpv2b showed particularly pronounced bandpass filtering. Cpv2a was sensitive to changes in both burst frequency and intra-burst spike frequency, whereas, despite its much slower responses, cpv2b was largely insensitive to changes in burst frequency. Cpv2a was sensitive to both burst duration and number of spikes per burst, whereas cpv2b was sensitive only to the former parameter. Neither muscle showed consistent sensitivity to changes in the overall spike interval structure, but cpv2b was surprisingly sensitive to changes in the first intervals in each burst, a parameter known to be regulated by dopamine (DA) modulation of spike propagation of the presynaptic axon. These findings highlight how seemingly minor circuit output changes mediated by neuromodulation could be read out differentially at the two synapses.

Modeling the Short-Term Dynamics of in Vivo Excitatory Spike Transmission

Information transmission in neural networks is influenced by both short-term synaptic plasticity (STP) as well as nonsynaptic factors, such as after-hyperpolarization currents and changes in excitability. Although these effects have been widely characterized in vitro using intracellular recordings, how they interact in vivo is unclear. Here, we develop a statistical model of the short-term dynamics of spike transmission that aims to disentangle the contributions of synaptic and nonsynaptic effects based only on observed presynaptic and postsynaptic spiking. The model includes a dynamic functional connection with short-term plasticity as well as effects due to the recent history of postsynaptic spiking and slow changes in postsynaptic excitability. Using paired spike recordings, we find that the model accurately describes the short-term dynamics of in vivo spike transmission at a diverse set of identified and putative excitatory synapses, including a pair of connected neurons within thalamus in mouse, a thalamocortical connection in a female rabbit, and an auditory brainstem synapse in a female gerbil. We illustrate the utility of this modeling approach by showing how the spike transmission patterns captured by the model may be sufficient to account for stimulus-dependent differences in spike transmission in the auditory brainstem (endbulb of Held). Finally, we apply this model to large-scale multielectrode recordings to illustrate how such an approach has the potential to reveal cell type-specific differences in spike transmission in vivo Although STP parameters estimated from ongoing presynaptic and postsynaptic spiking are highly uncertain, our results are partially consistent with previous intracellular observations in these synapses.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although synaptic dynamics have been extensively studied and modeled using intracellular recordings of postsynaptic currents and potentials, inferring synaptic effects from extracellular spiking is challenging. Whether or not a synaptic current contributes to postsynaptic spiking depends not only on the amplitude of the current, but also on many other factors, including the activity of other, typically unobserved, synapses, the overall excitability of the postsynaptic neuron, and how recently the postsynaptic neuron has spiked. Here, we developed a model that, using only observations of presynaptic and postsynaptic spiking, aims to describe the dynamics of in vivo spike transmission by modeling both short-term synaptic plasticity (STP) and nonsynaptic effects. This approach may provide a novel description of fast, structured changes in spike transmission.