1
|
Nurmi T, Hakonen M, Bourguignon M, Piitulainen H. Proprioceptive response strength in the primary sensorimotor cortex is invariant to the range of finger movement. Neuroimage 2023; 269:119937. [PMID: 36791896 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Proprioception is the sense of body position and movement that relies on afference from the proprioceptors in muscles and joints. Proprioceptive responses in the primary sensorimotor (SM1) cortex can be elicited by stimulating the proprioceptors using evoked (passive) limb movements. In magnetoencephalography (MEG), proprioceptive processing can be quantified by recording the movement evoked fields (MEFs) and movement-induced beta power modulations or by computing corticokinematic coherence (CKC) between the limb kinematics and cortical activity. We examined whether cortical proprioceptive processing quantified with MEF peak strength, relative beta suppression and rebound power and CKC strength is affected by the movement range of the finger. MEG activity was measured from 16 right-handed healthy volunteers while movements were applied to their right-index finger metacarpophalangeal joint with an actuator. Movements were either intermittent, every 3000 ± 250 ms, to estimate MEF or continuous, at 3 Hz, to estimate CKC. In both cases, 4 different ranges of motion of the stimuli were investigated: 15, 18, 22 and 26 mm for MEF and 6, 7, 9 and 13 mm for CKC. MEF amplitude, relative beta suppression and rebound as well as peak CKC strength at the movement frequency were compared between the movement ranges in the source space. Inter-individual variation was also compared between the MEF and CKC strengths. As expected, MEF and CKC responses peaked at the contralateral SM1 cortex. MEF peak, beta suppression and rebound and CKC strengths were similar across all movement ranges. Furthermore, CKC strength showed a lower degree of inter-individual variation compared with MEF strength. Our result of absent modulation by movement range in cortical responses to passive movements of the finger indicates that variability in movement range should not hinder comparability between different studies or participants. Furthermore, our data indicates that CKC is less prone to inter-individual variability than MEFs, and thus more advantageous in what pertains to statistical power.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo Nurmi
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä 40014, Finland; Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.
| | - Maria Hakonen
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä 40014, Finland; Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland; A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, United States
| | - Mathieu Bourguignon
- Laboratory of Neurophysiology and Movement Biomechanics, UNI - ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium; Laboratoire de Neuroanatomie et Neuroimagerie Translationnelles, UNI - ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium; BCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian 20009, Spain
| | - Harri Piitulainen
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä 40014, Finland; Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland; Aalto NeuroImaging, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jousmäki V. Gratifying Gizmos for Research and Clinical MEG. Front Neurol 2022; 12:814573. [PMID: 35153989 PMCID: PMC8830907 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.814573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Experimental designs are of utmost importance in neuroimaging. Experimental repertoire needs to be designed with the understanding of physiology, clinical feasibility, and constraints posed by a particular neuroimaging method. Innovations in introducing natural, ecologically-relevant stimuli, with successful collaboration across disciplines, correct timing, and a bit of luck may cultivate novel experiments, new discoveries, and open pathways to new clinical practices. Here I introduce some gizmos that I have initiated in magnetoencephalography (MEG) and applied with my collaborators in my home laboratory and in several other laboratories. These gizmos have been applied to address neuronal correlates of audiotactile interactions, tactile sense, active and passive movements, speech processing, and intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) in humans. This review also includes additional notes on the ideas behind the gizmos, their evolution, and results obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veikko Jousmäki
- Aalto NeuroImaging, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
- Cognitive Neuroimaging Centre, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
- *Correspondence: Veikko Jousmäki
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stronger proprioceptive BOLD-responses in the somatosensory cortices reflect worse sensorimotor function in adolescents with and without cerebral palsy. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 32:102795. [PMID: 34474316 PMCID: PMC8411230 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a motor disorder where the motor defects are partly due to impaired proprioception. We studied cortical proprioceptive responses and sensorimotor performance in adolescents with CP and their typically-developed (TD) peers. Passive joint movements were used to stimulate proprioceptors during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) session to quantify the proprioceptive responses whose associations to behavioral sensorimotor performance were also examined. Twenty-three TD (15 females, age: mean ± standard deviation 14.2 ± 2.4 years) and 18 CP (12 females, age: mean ± standard deviation, 13.8 ± 2.3 years; 12 hemiplegic, 6 diplegic) participants were included in this study. Participants' index fingers and ankles were separately stimulated at 3 Hz and 1 Hz respectively with pneumatic movement actuators. Regions-of-interest were used to quantify BOLD-responses from the primary sensorimotor (SM1) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices and were compared across the groups. Associations between responses strengths and sensorimotor performance measures were also examined. Proprioceptive responses were stronger for the individuals with CP compared to their TD peers in SM1 (p < 0.001) and SII (p < 0.05) cortices contralateral to their more affected index finger. The ankle responses yielded no significant differences between the groups. The CP group had worse sensorimotor performance for hands and feet (p < 0.001). Stronger responses to finger stimulation in the dominant SM1 (p < 0.001) and both dominant and non-dominant SII (p < 0.01, p < 0.001) cortices were associated with the worse hand sensorimotor performance across all participants. Worse hand function was associated with stronger cortical activation to the proprioceptive stimulation. This association was evident both in adolescents with CP and their typically-developed controls, thus it likely reflects both clinical factors and normal variation in the sensorimotor function. The specific mechanisms need to be clarified in future studies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Jaatela J, Aydogan DB, Nurmi T, Vallinoja J, Piitulainen H. Identification of Proprioceptive Thalamocortical Tracts in Children: Comparison of fMRI, MEG, and Manual Seeding of Probabilistic Tractography. Cereb Cortex 2022; 32:3736-3751. [PMID: 35040948 PMCID: PMC9433422 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Studying white matter connections with tractography is a promising approach to understand the development of different brain processes, such as proprioception. An emerging method is to use functional brain imaging to select the cortical seed points for tractography, which is considered to improve the functional relevance and validity of the studied connections. However, it is unknown whether different functional seeding methods affect the spatial and microstructural properties of the given white matter connection. Here, we compared functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography, and manual seeding of thalamocortical proprioceptive tracts for finger and ankle joints separately. We showed that all three seeding approaches resulted in robust thalamocortical tracts, even though there were significant differences in localization of the respective proprioceptive seed areas in the sensorimotor cortex, and in the microstructural properties of the obtained tracts. Our study shows that the selected functional or manual seeding approach might cause systematic biases to the studied thalamocortical tracts. This result may indicate that the obtained tracts represent different portions and features of the somatosensory system. Our findings highlight the challenges of studying proprioception in the developing brain and illustrate the need for using multimodal imaging to obtain a comprehensive view of the studied brain process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Jaatela
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo FI-02150, Finland
| | - Dogu Baran Aydogan
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo FI-02150, Finland
- Department of Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki FI-00029, Finland
- A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio FI-70211, Finland
| | - Timo Nurmi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo FI-02150, Finland
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä FI-40014, Finland
| | - Jaakko Vallinoja
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo FI-02150, Finland
| | - Harri Piitulainen
- Address correspondence to Harri Piitulainen, associate professor, Harri Piitulainen, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. BOX 35, FI-40014, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Piitulainen H, Nurmi T, Hakonen M. Attention directed to proprioceptive stimulation alters its cortical processing in the primary sensorimotor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2021; 54:4269-4282. [PMID: 33955066 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Movement-evoked fields to passive movements and corticokinematic coherence between limb kinematics and magnetoencephalographic signals can both be used to quantify the degree of cortical processing of proprioceptive afference. We examined in 20 young healthy volunteers whether processing of proprioceptive afference in the primary sensorimotor cortex is modulated by attention directed to the proprioceptive stimulation of the right index finger using a pneumatic-movement actuator to evoke continuous 3-Hz movement for 12 min. The participant attended either to a visual (detected change of fixation cross colour) or movement (detected missing movements) events. The attentional task alternated every 3-min. Coherence was computed between index-finger acceleration and magnetoencephalographic signals, and sustained-movement-evoked fields were averaged with respect to the movement onsets every 333 ms. Attention to the proprioceptive stimulation supressed the sensorimotor beta power (by ~12%), enhanced movement-evoked field amplitude (by ~16%) and reduced corticokinematic coherence strength (by ~9%) with respect to the visual task. Coherence peaked at the primary sensorimotor cortex contralateral to the proprioceptive stimulation. Our results indicated that early processing of proprioceptive afference in the primary sensorimotor cortex is modulated by inter-modal directed attention in healthy individuals. Therefore, possible attentional effects on corticokinematic coherence and movement-evoked fields should be considered when using them to study cortical proprioception in conditions introducing attentional variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harri Piitulainen
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
- Aalto NeuroImaging, MEG Core, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | - Timo Nurmi
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | - Maria Hakonen
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vallinoja J, Jaatela J, Nurmi T, Piitulainen H. Gating Patterns to Proprioceptive Stimulation in Various Cortical Areas: An MEG Study in Children and Adults using Spatial ICA. Cereb Cortex 2021; 31:1523-1537. [PMID: 33140082 PMCID: PMC7869097 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Proprioceptive paired-stimulus paradigm was used for 30 children (10-17 years) and 21 adult (25-45 years) volunteers in magnetoencephalography (MEG). Their right index finger was moved twice with 500-ms interval every 4 ± 25 s (repeated 100 times) using a pneumatic-movement actuator. Spatial-independent component analysis (ICA) was applied to identify stimulus-related components from MEG cortical responses. Clustering was used to identify spatiotemporally consistent components across subjects. We found a consistent primary response in the primary somatosensory (SI) cortex with similar gating ratios of 0.72 and 0.69 for the children and adults, respectively. Secondary responses with similar transient gating behavior were centered bilaterally in proximity of the lateral sulcus. Delayed and prolonged responses with strong gating were found in the frontal and parietal cortices possibly corresponding to larger processing network of somatosensory afference. No significant correlation between age and gating ratio was found. We confirmed that cortical gating to proprioceptive stimuli is comparable to other somatosensory and auditory domains, and between children and adults. Gating occurred broadly beyond SI cortex. Spatial ICA revealed several consistent response patterns in various cortical regions which would have been challenging to detect with more commonly applied equivalent current dipole or distributed source estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaakko Vallinoja
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, 00076 Espoo, Finland
| | - Julia Jaatela
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, 00076 Espoo, Finland
| | - Timo Nurmi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, 00076 Espoo, Finland
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Harri Piitulainen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, 00076 Espoo, Finland
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
- Aalto NeuroImaging, MEG Core, Aalto University School of Science, 00076 Espoo, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sweeney D, Quinlan LR, Browne P, Counihan T, Rodriguez-Molinero A, ÓLaighin G. Applicability and tolerability of electrical stimulation applied to the upper and lower leg skin surface for cueing applications in Parkinson's disease. Med Eng Phys 2021; 87:73-81. [PMID: 33461676 DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Due to possible sensory impairments in people with Parkinson's disease, several methodological aspects of electrical stimulation as a potential cueing method remain to be explored. This study aimed to investigate the applicability and tolerability of sensory and motor electrical stimulation in 10 people with Parkinson's disease. The study focused on assessing the electrical stimulation voltages and visual analogue scale discomfort scores at the electrical sensory, motor, discomfort, and pain thresholds. Results show that sensory electrical stimulation at the tibialis anterior, soleus, hamstrings, and quadriceps stimulation sites was applicable and tolerable for 6/10, 10/10, 9/10, and 10/10 participants, respectively. Furthermore, motor electrical stimulation at the tibialis anterior, soleus, hamstrings, and quadriceps stimulation sites were applicable and tolerable for 7/10, 7/10, 7/10, and 8/10 participants, respectively. Interestingly, the thresholds for the lower leg were higher than those of the upper leg. The data presented in this paper indicate that sensory and motor electrical stimulation is applicable and tolerable for cueing applications in people with Parkinson's disease. Sensory electrical stimulation was applicable and tolerable at the soleus and quadriceps sites. Motor electrical stimulation was not tolerable for two participants at any of the proposed stimulation sites. Therefore, future studies investigating motor electrical stimulation cueing, should apply it with caution in people with Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean Sweeney
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland; Human Movement Laboratory, CÚRAM Centre for Research in Medical Devices, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Leo R Quinlan
- Human Movement Laboratory, CÚRAM Centre for Research in Medical Devices, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland; Physiology, School of Medicine, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Patrick Browne
- Neurology Department, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle, Galway, Ireland; School of Nursing and Midwifery, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Timothy Counihan
- Neurology Department, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle, Galway, Ireland; School of Medicine, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Alejandro Rodriguez-Molinero
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland; Consorci Sanitari del Garraf, Clinical Research Unit, Vilanova I la Geltrú, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Gearóid ÓLaighin
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland; Human Movement Laboratory, CÚRAM Centre for Research in Medical Devices, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Piitulainen H, Illman M, Jousmäki V, Bourguignon M. Feasibility and reproducibility of electroencephalography-based corticokinematic coherence. J Neurophysiol 2020; 124:1959-1967. [DOI: 10.1152/jn.00562.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The most important message in this report is that the corticokinematic coherence (CKC) method is a feasible and reproducible tool to quantify, map, and follow cortical proprioceptive (“the movement sense”) processing using EEG that is more widely available for CKC recordings than previously used magnetoencephalographic designs, in basic research, but especially in clinical environments. We provide useful recommendations for optimal EEG derivations for cost-effective experimental designs, allowing large sample size studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harri Piitulainen
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | - Mia Illman
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
- Aalto NeuroImaging, MEG Core, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | - Veikko Jousmäki
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
- Aalto NeuroImaging, MEG Core, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | - Mathieu Bourguignon
- Laboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau, Université libre de Bruxelles Neuroscience Institute, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratoire Cognition Langage et Développement, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)–ULB Neuroscience Institute, Brussels, Belgium
- Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Seri FAS, Abd Hamid AI, Abdullah JM, Idris Z, Omar H. Brain responses to frequency changes due to vibratory stimulation of human fingertips: An fMRI study. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS: CONFERENCE SERIES 2019; 1248:012029. [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1248/1/012029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Vibratory (e.g., piezoelectric) devices can stimulate cortical responses from the somatosensory area during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Twelve healthy, right-handed subjects (7 males and 5 females) were scanned with a 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner and stimulated at 30-240 Hz using a piezoelectric vibrator attached to the subjects’ index fingers. The functional images were analysed to determine the brain activation region by performing random effects analyses at the group level. One-way analysis of variance was used to measure changes in frequency on brain activity. The activated regions were identified with WFU PickAtlas software, and the images were thresholded at Puncorrected < 0.001 for multiple comparisons. The average effect of frequency revealed significant activations in the right insula and right middle frontal gyrus; the corresponding region in the somatosensory area may act as a top-down control signal to improve sensory targets. Results revealed significant differences between frequencies; 90 Hz > 120 Hz activated right inferior parietal gyrus, 120 Hz > 150 Hz activated right cerebellum, and 60 Hz > 90 Hz activated right supramarginal gyrus and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus pars triangularis. Findings indicated the role of secondary somatosensory areas and the cerebellum in performing higher-order functions and discriminating various frequencies during vibratory stimulation. Increasing the patient sample size and testing higher frequencies in future experiments will contribute to furthering brain mapping of somatosensory areas.
Collapse
|