A Clinicogenetic Prognostic Classifier for Prediction of Recurrence and Survival in Asian Breast Cancer Patients

Strengths and limitations of non-disclosive data analysis: a comparison of breast cancer survival classifiers using VisualSHIELD

Preserving data privacy is an important concern in the research use of patient data. The DataSHIELD suite enables privacy-aware advanced statistical analysis in a federated setting. Despite its many applications, it has a few open practical issues: the complexity of hosting a federated infrastructure, the performance penalty imposed by the privacy-preserving constraints, and the ease of use by non-technical users. In this work, we describe a case study in which we review different breast cancer classifiers and report our findings about the limits and advantages of such non-disclosive suite of tools in a realistic setting. Five independent gene expression datasets of breast cancer survival were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and pooled together through the federated infrastructure. Three previously published and two newly proposed 5-year cancer-free survival risk score classifiers were trained in a federated environment, and an additional reference classifier was trained with unconstrained data access. The performance of these six classifiers was systematically evaluated, and the results show that i) the published classifiers do not generalize well when applied to patient cohorts that differ from those used to develop them; ii) among the methods we tried, the classification using logistic regression worked better on average, closely followed by random forest; iii) the unconstrained version of the logistic regression classifier outperformed the federated version by 4% on average. Reproducibility of our experiments is ensured through the use of VisualSHIELD, an open-source tool that augments DataSHIELD with new functions, a standardized deployment procedure, and a simple graphical user interface.

Concordance of RT-qPCR with immunohistochemistry and its beneficial role in breast cancer subtyping

This study was to compare the concordance of transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in determining estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and tumor proliferation index (Ki67) status in breast cancer, and to assess the prognosis based on different subtypes. Totally 323 breast cancer patients were selected, including 216 in the training set and 107 in the validation set. Logistic regression models were constructed using 5-fold cross-validation with the mRNA expression of each biomarker as the predictor and the corresponding IHC expression level as the binary response variable. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the cutoff value. When the thresholds of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 were 0.764, 0.709, 0.161, and 0.554, there existed high concordance rates between IHC and RT-qPCR in ER (94.4%), PR (88.0%) and HER2 (89.4%) and a medium concordance rate in Ki67 (67.8%), which were further confirmed in the validation set (ER: 81.3%, PR: 78.3%, HER2: 80.4%, and Ki67: 69.1%). Based on the subtyping stratified by RT-qPCR, the 5-year recurrence-free interval rates of patients with luminal, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative subtypes were 88% (95% CI: 0.84-0.93), 82% (95% CI: 0.73-0.92) and 58% (95% CI: 0.42-0.80), respectively, which were similar to those assessed by IHC (88%, 78% and 47%). RT-qPCR may be a complementary method to IHC, which can not only provide additional useful information in clinic, but also show more advantages over IHC in determining certain subtypes of breast cancer.

Comparing Genetic Risk and Clinical Risk Classification in Luminal-like Breast Cancer Patients Using a 23-Gene Classifier

Background: A 23-gene classifier has been developed based on gene expression profiles of Taiwanese luminal-like breast cancer. We aim to stratify risk of relapse and identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy based on genetic model among distinct clinical risk groups. Methods: There were 248 luminal (hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor II-negative) breast cancer patients with 23-gene classifier results. Using the modified Adjuvant! Online definition, clinical high/low-risk groups were tabulated with the genetic model. The primary endpoint was a recurrence-free interval (RFI) at 5 years. Results: There was a significant difference between the high/low-risk groups defined by the 23-gene classifier for the 5-year prognosis of recurrence (16 recurrences in high-risk and 3 recurrences in low-risk; log-rank test: p < 0.0001). Among the clinically high-risk group, the 5-year RFI of high risk defined by the 23-gene classifier was significantly higher than that of the low-risk group (15 recurrences in high-risk and 2 recurrences in low-risk; log-rank test: p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This study showed that 23-gene classifier can be used to stratify clinically high-risk patients into distinct survival patterns based on genomic risks and displays the potentiality to guide adjuvant chemotherapy. The 23-gene classifier can provide a better estimation of breast cancer prognosis which can help physicians make a better treatment decision.