Establishment of an Individualized Predictive Model to Reduce the Core Number for Systematic Prostate Biopsy: A Dual Center Study Based on Stratification of the Disease Risk Score

UPCARE: Urinary Extracellular Vesicles-Derived Prostate Cancer Assessment for Risk Evaluation

In the quest for efficient tumor diagnosis via liquid biopsy, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have shown promise as a source of potential biomarkers. This study addresses the gap in biomarker efficacy for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) between the Western and Chinese populations. We developed a urinary extracellular vesicles-based prostate score (EPS) model, utilizing the EXODUS technique for EV isolation from 598 patients and incorporating gene expressions of FOXA1, PCA3, and KLK3. Our findings reveal that the EPS model surpasses prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in diagnostic accuracy within a training cohort of 234 patients, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.730 compared to 0.659 for PSA (p = 0.018). Similarly, in a validation cohort of 101 men, the EPS model achieved an AUC of 0.749, which was significantly better than PSA's 0.577 (p < 0.001). Our model has demonstrated a potential reduction in unnecessary prostate biopsies by 26%, with only a 3% miss rate for csPCa cases, indicating its effectiveness in the Chinese population.

Omission of axillary surgery for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence with negative nodes after previous breast-conserving surgery: is it oncologically safe?

Purpose

Salvage mastectomy is traditionally recommended for patients who developed ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in light of previous breast irradiation. However, it remains controversial whether surgical axillary staging (SAS) is necessary for IBTR patients with negative nodes. This study aimed to evaluate the oncologic safety of omitting SAS for IBTR.

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients who developed invasive IBTR with negative nodes after undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) from 2010 to 2018. Patterns of care in nodal staging were analyzed based on prior axillary staging status. Clinicopathologic characteristics and adjuvant treatment of the initial tumor, as well as the IBTR, were compared between the SAS and no SAS groups. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression model were utilized to compare the locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) rates after IBTR removal between the two groups.

Results

A total of 154 IBTR patients were eligible for final analysis. Compared to the no SAS group, SAS group was less likely to undergo ALND (15.1 vs 73.3%, p < 0.001) at initial BCS, had a longer recurrence interval (2.8 vs 2.1 years, p = 0.03), and were more likely to have discordant molecular subtype (35.8 vs 12.9%, p = 0.001) and different quadrant location (37.7 vs 19.8%, p = 0.02) with primary tumor. However, the extent of axillary staging did not affect systemic or radiation recommendations. In the subgroup of patients without previous ALND, the clinicopathologic characteristics were roughly comparable. No significant differences were observed in LRRFS, DMFS or OS between the two groups.

Conclusion

For node-negative IBTR patients, we observed selection bias on the basis of prior ALND, shorter recurrence interval, and concordant molecular subtype favoring no SAS but comparable LRRFS, DMFS, and OS. These results support a wider consideration of sparing SAS in the management of IBTR, especially in patients without previous ALND.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06708-y.