Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic drug monotherapy and combination therapy for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

As the development of novel anti-angiogenic drugs and the continuous evolution of guideline recommendations, the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic agents in ovarian cancer (OC) remains unclear. Consequently, a meta-analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic drug monotherapy and combination therapy for OC.

Methods

An exhaustive literature review was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, encompassing all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up until 6 April 2024. The evaluation of efficacy outcomes incorporated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). Safety was assessed through the occurrence of any grade adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs. Synthesis of the data involved the calculation of hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks (RRs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and prediction intervals (PIs). Trial sequential analysis was executed employing TSA v0.9.5.10 Beta software, STATA 12.0, and R software 4.3.1.

Results

In this meta-analysis, 35 RCTs were included, encompassing 16,199 subjects in total. The overall analysis indicated that anti-angiogenic drug combination therapy significantly improved PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.678 [0.606-0.759], 95% PI: 0.415-1.108), OS (HR [95% CI] = 0.917 [0.870-0.966], 95% PI: 0.851-0.984), and ORR (RR [95% CI] = 1.441 [1.287-1.614], 95% PI: 1.032-2.014), but also increased the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.137 [1.099-1.177], 95% PI: 1.011-1.252). The analysis did not corroborate any benefit of anti-angiogenic monotherapy over placebo concerning PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.956 [0.709-1.288], 95% PI: 0.345-2.645) and OS (HR [95% CI] = 1.039 [0.921-1.173], 95% PI: 0.824-1.331). However, it was observed that monotherapy with anti-angiogenic drugs did increase the incidence of any grade AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.072 [1.036-1.109], 95% PI: 0.709-1.592).

Conclusion

Our study confirmed the PFS, OS, and ORR benefits of anti-angiogenic drug combination therapy for OC patients. The efficacy results of anti-angiogenic monotherapy necessitates further evaluation as more RCTs become available. Clinicians should be vigilant of AEs when administering anti-angiogenic agents in a clinical setting.

[Effects of extended aromatase inhibitors in women with hormone-dependent breast cancer who have already received five years of adjuvant hormone therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis]

INTRODUCTION

Evaluating the benefits and risks of prolonged hormonal treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for treating hormone-dependent breast cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Studies reporting on randomized clinical trials concerning prolongating hormonal therapy with AIs as compared to a placebo or no prolongation, after an initial five years of hormonal therapy, were eligible.

RESULTS

Seven clinical trials were included. Prolonged AI therapy was associated with a statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.80). A statistically significant increase was observed for osteoporosis (RR=1.17, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.33), hot flushes/flashes (RR=1.27, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.49), myalgia (RR=1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.39), fractures (RR=1.26, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.45) and arthralgia (RR=1.17, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.25). However, no statistically significant association was observed between prolonged AI therapy and overall survival, cardiovascular events, and bone pain.

DISCUSSION

Prolonged AI therapy has significant benefits in terms of disease-free survival in women with hormone-dependent breast cancer. However, adverse effects and a lack of evidence for a benefit on overall survival must be considered in the decision-making process regarding adjuvant hormone therapy extension.

Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors combined with antiangiogenic agents in the maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor and antiangiogenic agent monotherapy have shown to be effective as maintenance treatment in patients with ovarian cancer (OC). However, there is currently a lack of evidence-based study to directly compare the effects of combination therapy with these two drugs. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents in women with OC using a meta-analysis. Methods: An exhaustive search of literature was undertaken using multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up until 17 December 2023. The data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were pooled. We computed the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS and OS, along with the relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for AEs. Trial sequential analysis, heterogeneity test, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed. Stata 12.0 and Software R 4.3.1 were utilized for all analyses. Results: This meta-analysis included 7 RCTs with a total of 3,388 participants. The overall analysis revealed that combination therapy of PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.615, 95% CI = 0.517-0.731; 95% PI = 0.379-0.999), but also increased the risk of AEs, including urinary tract infection (RR = 1.500, 95% CI = 1.114-2.021; 95% PI = 0.218-10.346), fatigue (RR = 1.264, 95% CI = 1.141-1.400; 95% PI = 1.012-1.552), headache (RR = 1.868, 95% CI = 1.036-3.369; 95% PI = 0.154-22.642), anorexia (RR = 1.718, 95% CI = 1.320-2.235; 95% PI = 0.050-65.480), and hypertension (RR = 5.009, 95% CI = 1.103-22.744; 95% PI = 0.016-1580.021) compared with PARP inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent monotherapy. Our study has not yet confirmed the benefit of combination therapy on OS in OC patients (HR = 0.885, 95% CI = 0.737-1.063). Additionally, subgroup analyses further showed that combination therapy resulted in an increased risk of AEs, encompassing thrombocytopenia, vomiting, abdominal pain, proteinuria, fatigue, headache, anorexia, and hypertension (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the PFS benefit of combination therapy with PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents in patients with OC. The OS result need to be updated after the original trial data is mature. Clinicians should be vigilant of AEs when administering the combination therapy in clinical practice. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023494482.

10 years or less of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant hormonal therapy, with or without prior chemotherapy, has been widely recognised as the preferred treatment strategy for resected breast cancer (BC) for a minimum duration of 5 years. If the effectiveness of therapy beyond a 5-year period has been established, there is still ongoing debate regarding the optimal duration for this prolonged period. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to ascertain the optimal duration of extended therapy for resected BC in postmenopausal women.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, to identify all randomised trials on extended duration of endocrine therapy. The search was limited to trials that had been published before 30th April 2023. The study focused on evaluating disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary outcome, with overall survival (OS) as the secondary endpoint. Under the Bayesian framework, NMA was performed using the GeMTC package. The relative rankings of the treatments were determined by utilising surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) p scores. A network meta-regression analysis was employed to ascertain the impact of the baseline characteristics of the disease and the initial treatments administered.

RESULTS

In the overall population, increasing the duration by 5 years did not result in a significantly better DFS compared to durations of 2-3 and 3-4 more years (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.88-1.08] and HR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.72-1.06]). This effect was independent of adjuvant chemotherapy and nodal status. However, the effect of 5 more years of AI was significantly better in node-positive BC and in those who received some years of tamoxifen instead of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as initial adjuvant therapy. OS was not affected by the administration of extended endocrine therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that an extended course of AI lasting 2-3 years, following an initial 5-year treatment, may be considered an appropriate regimen for achieving DFS benefits. In node-positive BC cases, it has been observed that a duration of 10 years provides a greater advantage compared to shorter durations, especially when tamoxifen is administered initially. Therefore, it is suggested that a longer duration is a potential standard of care in these cases.