Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Symptoms and Prevalence of Insomnia in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Longitudinal Study

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Efficacy for Co-Morbid Insomnia and Sleep Apnea (COMISA): Evidence from Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis

OBJECTIVES

A multitude of physical and mental challenges are being faced in the population with Co-morbid Insomnia and Sleep Apnea (COMISA). Unfortunately, research about clinical characteristics and management of COMISA based on quantitative evidence is lacking.

METHOD

Standard procedures for literature retrieval, selection and quality assessment, data extraction, analysis, and interpretation were conducted step by step. For studying the sleep characteristics, common complications and widely recognized treatment options for COMISA, Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) and Odds Ratio (OR) were applied to assess the mean and risk differences between compared groups. Outcomes included sleep health parameters and secondary impairments in physical and mental well-being.

RESULTS

COMISA showed worse sleep quality than OSA only by PSQI (WMD = 3.38 point) and heavier sleep fragmentation (WMD = 11.46 min) than insomnia only. Besides, COMISA patients showed a higher risk for depression (OR [95%CI] = 5.03[2.31, 10.93]) and PTSD (OR [95%CI] = 3.96[1.85, 8.46]) in comparison with OSA alone. Compared to insomnia alone, COMISA patients suffered from more than two times higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and diabetes. In treating COMISA patients, combining CBTI with PAP treatment can enhance the improvement of insomnia severity (ISI, WMD [95%CI] =-3.26[-4.51, -2.00] point) and sleep efficiency (WMD [95%CI] = 6.39[1.97, 10.81] %) compared to PAP alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired sleep domains in COMISA cover sleep quality and sleep structure. Also, COMISA has a higher risk for cardiometabolic diseases and mental disorders. Combining CBTI with PAP can be a recommended treatment to relieve sleep impairments for COMISA.

Evaluation of daytime sleepiness and insomnia symptoms in OSA patients with a characterization of symptom-defined phenotypes and their involvement in depression comorbidity-a cross-sectional clinical study

Introduction

Recent research highlights the significance of insomnia and sleepiness, shifting from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and sleep structure, in defining OSA phenotypes.

Objectives

This study aimed to characterize insomnia and sleepiness associated with OSA phenotypes and assess their involvement in depression symptoms (DS) in OSA.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional, clinical study included 181 participants who underwent polysomnography (PSG) and filled out questionnaires, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Beck Depression Index (BDI). They were categorized into phenotypes: insomnia-sleepiness (I + S; ESS ≥ 11; ISI ≥ 15; n = 20), sleepiness (S; ESS ≥ 11; ISI < 15; n = 22), insomnia (I; ESS < 11; ISI ≥ 15), and asymptomatic (A; ESS < 11; ISI<15; n=55).

Results

A linear regression model for the BDI score (R2 = 0.357, p < 0.001) included ISI score and subjective-to-objective sleep latency ratio. The ISI score was a predictive factor for mild and moderate DS [OR = 1.23 (95% CI: 1.09-1.38), p < 0.001 and OR = 1.39 (95% CI: 1.13-1.72), p = 0.002]. The I and I + S phenotypes are characterized by higher BDI scores (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02), longer subjective sleep latency (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04), and shorter subjective total sleep time (TST; p = 0.049 and p = 0.006) compared to A. Furthermore, the I and I + S groups had shorter subjective TST than S (p = 0.03 and p = 0.047). The I and I + S had higher BDI scores than A (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively) and S (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). The I phenotype was associated with the risk of mild and moderate DS (OR = 5.61 (95% CI: 1.91-16.53), p < 0.001 and OR = 9.55 (95% CI: 1.81-50.48), p = 0.008 respectively). Moreover, the I + S phenotype presented an even greater risk for mild DS (OR = 10.29 (95% CI: 2.95-35.85), p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Using clinical features for OSA phenotyping holds promise for finding OSA individuals with increased risk for DS occurrence.

Comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea in children: a preliminary explorative study

Insomnia and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) are prevalent sleep disorders. These disorders can therefore be concurrently present - comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA). The prevalence of COMISA in the paediatric age range is unclear. As such, phenotypic constructs should help better define this comorbid condition if it exists in children and improve both diagnostic sensitivity and ultimately clinical care outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of insomnia in children and adolescents referred for evaluation of sleep symptoms suggestive of SDB in one initial (Cohort#1) and verify such findings in an independent cohort (Cohort#2) using a retrospective cross-sectional approach in patients aged 9-19 years presenting at a sleep centre to be evaluated for symptoms of SDB. Cohort #1 comprised 50 consecutive children (58% males; mean [SD] age 13.6 [3.3] years; median [interquartile range, IQR] Epworth Sleepiness Scale score 10 [6-12]) who were evaluated using validated SDB and insomnia questionnaires. Cohort#2 was extracted from electronic medical records and included 384 polysomnographically evaluated children (mean [SD] age 12.9 [3.6] years; mean [SD] body mass index z score 1.27 [0.28]; median Epworth Sleepiness Scale score 9.7 [4-17]). In Cohort #1, 56% were at high risk of SDB, 36% had insomnia alone, and 18% were at high risk of COMISA. The prevalence of COMISA in Cohort #2 was 16%, 72% had SDB alone, and 12% had insomnia alone. In both cohorts, COMISA manifested as increased propensity for sleepiness and fatigue during both waking and daytime. Thus, the presence of COMISA is frequent in the paediatric age range and accompanied by a more prominent symptomatic phenotype.

More than sleepiness: prevalence and relevance of nonclassical symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the nonclassical symptoms and manifestations occurring in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), both from a standpoint of prevalence and in terms of clinical relevance. Particular emphasis will be given to nightmares, comorbid insomnia, restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder, bruxism, morning headache, nocturia, acid reflux, chronic cough and dysphagia.

RECENT FINDINGS

A review of the recent literature suggests that nonclassical symptoms have a high prevalence, are underestimated, and can interact with quality of life. Although these disturbances may occur together by mere coincidence, they may interact reciprocally. However, the degree of symptoms is not always correlated with OSA severity.

SUMMARY

OSA is a heterogeneous disease with variable clinical manifestations. This review highlights the need for detailed evaluation of patients with OSA to diagnose other important sleep disorders and clinical manifestations, given their frequent association.

Association of Excessive Sleepiness, Pathological Fatigue, Depression, and Anxiety With Different Severity Levels of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate possible associations between obstructive sleep apnea and fatigue. This naturally led to considering the association between OSA and excessive sleepiness, depression, and anxiety.

Background

OSA is a highly prevalent sleep disorder, associated with a risk of hypertension, cardiovascular events, daytime sleepiness, poor cognitive function, and sudden death during sleep. Both excessive sleepiness, fatigue, and symptoms of depression are frequently reported.

Method

5,464 patients referred to a university hospital for obstructive sleep apnea underwent standard respiratory polygraphy. The severity of OSA was defined as either mild, moderate, or severe, using the apnea–hypopnea index. Validated questionnaires were used to assess excessive sleepiness, pathological fatigue, depression, and anxiety.

Results

Nearly 70% of the patients were men, and median age was 50 (range: 16–89) years. One in three had moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15). Excessive sleepiness and pathological fatigue were present in 43 and 39%, respectively. The prevalence of possible depression and anxiety was 19 and 28%, respectively. The proportion of patients with male sex, obesity, and excessive sleepiness increased with the severity of OSA. In contrast, the proportion of patients with pathological fatigue did not increase with OSA severity, and there was a decrease in depression and anxiety with increasing OSA severity.

Conclusion

Our study reports that pathological fatigue, as well as anxiety and depression, did not increase with OSA severity, whereas excessive sleepiness did. Knowledge concerning conditions related to OSA severity may be indicative of pretest probability of OSA and thus change the priority for polygraphy. Furthermore, the high prevalence rates of fatigue, anxiety, and depression among these patients warrant further investigations.