1
|
Pavone M, Jochum F, Lecointre L, Bizzarri N, Taliento C, Restaino S, Vizzielli G, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Querleu D, Akladios C. Efficacy and safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of current evidence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 310:1845-1856. [PMID: 38879697 PMCID: PMC11392984 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07586-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND PIPAC is a recent approach for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with promising results for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. A systematic review was conducted to assess current evidence on the efficacy and outcomes of PIPAC in patients affected by ovarian cancer. METHODS The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to December 2023. Studies reporting data on patients with OC treated with PIPAC were included in the qualitative analysis. RESULTS Twenty-one studies and six clinical trials with 932 patients who underwent PIPAC treatment were identified. The reported first access failure was 4.9%. 89.8% of patients underwent one, 60.7% two and 40% received three or more PIPAC cycles. Pathological tumour response was objectivated in 13 studies. Intra-operative complications were reported in 11% of women and post-operative events in 11.5% with a 0.82% of procedure-related mortality. Quality of life scores have been consistently stable or improved during the treatment time. The percentage of OC patients who became amenable for cytoreductive surgery due to the good response after PIPAC treatment for palliative purposes is reported to be 2.3%. CONCLUSION The results showed that PIPAC is safe and effective for palliative purposes, with a good pathological tumour response and quality of life. Future prospective studies would be needed to explore the role of this treatment in different stages of the disease, investigating a paradigm shift towards the use of PIPAC with curative intent for women who are not eligible for primary cytoreductive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Pavone
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Floriane Jochum
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- UMR 7357, Laboratoire Des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie, ICube, Université de Strasbourg, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Taliento
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Stefano Restaino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Denis Querleu
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waheed MT, Ruel N, Whelan RL, Fakih M, Fong Y, Deperalta D, Merchea A, Sun V, Krouse R, Dellinger TH, Raoof M. Impact of PIPAC-Oxaliplatin on Functional Recovery, Good Days, and Survival in a Refractory Colorectal and Appendiceal Carcinomatosis: Secondary Analysis of the US PIPAC Collaborative Phase 1 Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15980-9. [PMID: 39271567 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15980-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel, minimally invasive, safe, and repeatable method to treat carcinomatosis. Evidence regarding the clinical benefit (quality of life and survival) of PIPAC compared with that of conventional standard therapy (ST) is lacking. METHODS This is the secondary analysis of the phase 1 US-PIPAC trial for refractory colorectal and appendiceal carcinomatosis. A PIPAC cohort was compared with a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients receiving ST. The primary outcome was number of good days (number of days alive and out of the hospital). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and objective functional recovery (daily step count). RESULTS The study included 32 patients (PIPAC, 12; ST, 20) with similar baseline characteristics. Compared with the ST cohort, the PIPAC cohort had lower median inpatient hospital stays (> 24 h) within 6 months (0 vs 1; p = 0.015) and 1 year (1 vs 2; p = 0.052) and higher median good days at 6 months (181 vs 131 days; p = 0.042) and 1 year (323 vs 131 days; p = 0.032). There was no worsening of HRQoL after repeated PIPACs. Step counts diminished immediately after PIPAC but returned to baseline within 2-4 weeks. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a favorable association between receipt of PIPAC and OS (median, 11.3 vs 5.1 months; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION Compared with ST, PIPAC was associated with higher number of good days, reduced hospitalization burden, and longer OS without a negative impact on HRQoL with repeated PIPACs. These findings are foundational for evaluation of PIPAC in a randomized clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nora Ruel
- Computation and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Amit Merchea
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Robert Krouse
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thanh H Dellinger
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Luksta M, Bausys A, Gendvilaite N, Bickaite K, Rackauskas R, Paskonis M, Luksaite-Lukste R, Ranceva A, Stulpinas R, Brasiuniene B, Baltruskeviciene E, Lachej N, Bausiene J, Poskus T, Bausys R, Tulyte S, Strupas K. Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastases: Results from the Lithuanian PIPAC Program. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2992. [PMID: 39272850 PMCID: PMC11394265 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal metastases (PM) of gastric cancer (GC) are considered a terminal condition, with reported median survival ranging from 2 to 9 months. Standard treatment typically involves systemic chemotherapy alone or combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy, though efficacy is limited. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has emerged as a novel technique for treating GC PM, although it remains an experimental treatment under investigation. This study aimed to summarize the outcomes of GC PM treatment with PIPAC from the Lithuanian PIPAC program. METHODS All patients who underwent PIPAC for GC PM at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos between 2015 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The safety of PIPAC was assessed by postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Efficacy was evaluated based on the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), ascites dynamics throughout the treatment, and long-term outcomes. RESULTS In total, 32 patients underwent 71 PIPAC procedures. Intraoperative and postoperative morbidity related to PIPAC occurred after three (4.2%) procedures. Following PIPAC, there was a tendency towards a decrease in median PCI from 10 (Q1 3; Q3 13) to 7 (Q1 2; Q3 12), p = 0.75, and a decrease in median ascites volume from 1300 mL (Q1 500; Q3 3600) at the first PIPAC to 700 mL (Q1 250; Q3 4750) at the last PIPAC, p = 0.56; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The median overall survival after PM diagnosis was 12.5 months (95% CI 10-17), and the median survival after the first PIPAC procedure was 5 months (95% CI 4-10). CONCLUSIONS PIPAC is a safe and feasible treatment option for GC PM; however, well-designed prospective studies are needed to fully assess its efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martynas Luksta
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Augustinas Bausys
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Oncology, Translational Health Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Neda Gendvilaite
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Klaudija Bickaite
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rokas Rackauskas
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Marius Paskonis
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Raminta Luksaite-Lukste
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Physics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Anastasija Ranceva
- Hematology, Oncology, and Transfusion Medicine Center, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08410 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rokas Stulpinas
- National Center of Pathology, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Birute Brasiuniene
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Edita Baltruskeviciene
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Nadezda Lachej
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Juste Bausiene
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Tomas Poskus
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Oncology, Translational Health Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rimantas Bausys
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Skaiste Tulyte
- Hematology, Oncology, and Transfusion Medicine Center, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08410 Vilnius, Lithuania
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kestutis Strupas
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Oncology, Translational Health Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ramalho-Vasconcelos F, Gomes R, Bouça-Machado R, Aral M, Nogueiro J, Bouça-Machado T, Sousa-Pinto B, Santos-Sousa H. Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Feasibility, Efficacy and Safety-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3320. [PMID: 38893031 PMCID: PMC11173180 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an emerging technique for delivering chemotherapy directly to the peritoneum via a pressurized aerosol. Its growing attention stems from its effectiveness in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) originating from various primary tumors, with gastric cancer (GC) being among the most prevalent. This study aimed to systematically investigate PIPAC's therapeutic role in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis (GCPM). Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching Pubmed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. The meta-analysis of relative risks and mean differences compared patients undergoing one or two PIPAC sessions with those completing three or more, assessing various outcomes. Results: Eighteen studies underwent qualitative analysis, and four underwent quantitative analysis. Patients with three or more PIPAC procedures had shorter hospital stays (MD = -1.2; 95%CI (-1.9; -0.5); p < 0.001), higher rates of histopathological response (RR = 1.77, 95%CI 1.08; 2.90; p = 0.023), and significantly improved overall survival (MD = 6.0; 95%CI 4.2; 7.8; p < 0.001). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. Conclusions: PIPAC demonstrated efficacy in carefully selected patients, enhancing histopathologic response rates and overall survival without prolonging hospital stays. This study underscores the necessity for randomized controlled trials and precise selection criteria to refine PIPAC's implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raquel Gomes
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Raquel Bouça-Machado
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes—Edifício Egas Moniz, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Marisa Aral
- São João Local Health Unit, Surgery Department, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Jorge Nogueiro
- São João Local Health Unit, Surgery Department, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS—Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS—Centre for Health Technologies and Services Research, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Hugo Santos-Sousa
- São João Local Health Unit, Obesity Integrated Responsibility Unit (CRI-O), 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Angulo-Elizari E, Henriquez-Figuereo A, Morán-Serradilla C, Plano D, Sanmartín C. Unlocking the potential of 1,4-naphthoquinones: A comprehensive review of their anticancer properties. Eur J Med Chem 2024; 268:116249. [PMID: 38458106 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
Cancer encompasses a group of pathologies with common characteristics, high incidence, and prevalence in all countries. Although there are treatments available for this disease, they are not always effective or safe, often failing to achieve the desired results. This is why it is necessary to continue the search for new therapies. One of the strategies for obtaining new antitumor drugs is the use of 1,4-naphthoquinone as a scaffold in synthetic or natural products with antitumor activity. This review focuses on compiling studies related to the antitumor activity of 1,4-naphthoquinone and its natural and synthetic derivatives over the last 10 years. The work describes the main natural naphthoquinones with antitumor activity and classifies the synthetic naphthoquinones based on the structural modifications made to the scaffold. Additionally, the formation of metal complexes using naphthoquinones as a ligand is considered. After a thorough review, 197 synthetic compounds with potent biological activity against cancer have been classified according to their chemical structures and their mechanisms of action have been described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Angulo-Elizari
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Andreina Henriquez-Figuereo
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cristina Morán-Serradilla
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Daniel Plano
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
| | - Carmen Sanmartín
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kryh-Jensen CG, Fristrup CW, Ainsworth AP, Detlefsen S, Mortensen MB, Pfeiffer P, Tarpgaard LS, Graversen M. What is long-term survival in patients with peritoneal metastasis from gastric, pancreatic, or colorectal cancer? A study of patients treated with systemic chemotherapy and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura Peritoneum 2023; 8:147-155. [PMID: 38144215 PMCID: PMC10739291 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives A definition of long-term survival (LTS) in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC), pancreatic cancer (PC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with systemic chemotherapy and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is lacking. We aimed to define LTS and investigate characteristics and treatment response in patients who reached LTS in data from two prospective trials. Methods Retrospective study of patients with GC-, PC-, or CRC-PM from the prospective PIPAC-OPC1 and PIPAC-OPC2 studies. The definition of LTS was based on published systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. LTS was defined at the time point where 25 % of the patients were alive in these studies. Histology based response was evaluated by the mean Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) using biopsies obtained prior to PIPAC 3, and defined by a mean PRGS of ≤2.0 or a decrease of mean PRGS of ≥1, compared to baseline. Results LTS was defined at 21 (GC), 15 (PC), and 24 (CRC) months. Fifty-one (47.2 %) patients (nine GC, 17 PC, 25 CRC) reached LTS calculated from the date of PM diagnosis. All but one received palliative chemotherapy before PIPAC, and 37 % received bidirectional treatment. More than 90 % of the LTS patients had response according to PRGS. The mOS from PIPAC 1 was 23.3, 12.4, and 28.5 months for GC, PC, and CRC LTS patients. Conclusions Patients with PM from GC, PC, and CRC treated with systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC can reach LTS and most show histological response. Causality must be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte G. Kryh-Jensen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Claus W. Fristrup
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Alan P. Ainsworth
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael B. Mortensen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Line S. Tarpgaard
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Graversen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Upper GI & HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN – Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van de Vlasakker VCJ, Lurvink RJ, Wassenaar EC, Rauwerdink P, Bakkers C, Rovers KP, Bonhof CS, Burger JWA, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Nienhuijs SW, Mols F, de Hingh IHJT. Comparing patient reported abdominal pain between patients treated with oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) and primary colorectal cancer surgery. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20458. [PMID: 37993560 PMCID: PMC10665337 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47510-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) is an emerging palliative treatment for patients with unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases. Previously, our study group reported that patients experienced abdominal pain for several weeks after PIPAC-OX. However, it is unknown how this compares to abdominal pain after regular colorectal cancer surgery. To provide some perspective, this study compared the presence of abdominal pain after PIPAC-OX to the presence of abdominal pain after primary tumor surgery. Patient reported abdominal pain scores (EORTC QLQ-CR-29), from two prospective, Dutch cohorts were used in this study. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, a higher score represents more abdominal pain. Abdominal pain at baseline and at four weeks after treatment were compared between the two groups. Twenty patients who underwent PIPAC-OX and 322 patients who underwent primary tumor surgery were included in the analysis. At baseline, there were no differences in abdominal pain between both groups (mean 20 vs. 18, respectively; p = 0.688). Four weeks after treatment, abdominal pain was significantly worse in the PIPAC group (39 vs 15, respectively; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.99). The differential effect over time for abdominal pain differed significantly between both groups (mean difference: 19 vs - 3, respectively; p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.88). PIPAC-OX resulted in significantly worse postoperative abdominal pain than primary tumor surgery. These results can be used for patient counseling and stress the need for adequate analgesia during and after PIPAC-OX. Further research is required to prevent or reduce abdominal pain after PIPAC-OX.Trial registration CRC-PIPAC: Clinicaltrails.gov NCT03246321 (01-10-2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent C J van de Vlasakker
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Cancer Registry, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emma C Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Paulien Rauwerdink
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Checca Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Cynthia S Bonhof
- Department of Research, Netherlands Cancer Registry, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Centre of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Floortje Mols
- Department of Research, Netherlands Cancer Registry, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Centre of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
- Department of Research, Netherlands Cancer Registry, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ezanno AC, Malgras B, Pocard M. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, reasons for interrupting treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Pleura Peritoneum 2023; 8:45-53. [PMID: 37304159 PMCID: PMC10249753 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) gives encouraging results in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM). The current recommendations require at least 3 sessions of PIPAC. However, some patients do not complete the full treatment course and stop after only 1 or 2 procedures, hence the limited benefit. A literature review was performed, with search terms including "PIPAC" and "pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy." Content Only articles describing the causes for premature termination of the PIPAC treatment were analysed. The systematic search identified 26 published clinical articles related to PIPAC and reporting causes for stopping PIPAC. Summary The series range from 11 to 144 patients, with a total of 1352 patients treated with PIPAC for various tumours. A total of 3088 PIPAC treatments were performed. The median number of PIPAC treatments per patient was 2.1, the median PCI score at the time of the first PIPAC was 19 and the number of patients who did not complete the recommended 3 sessions of PIPAC was 714 (52.8%). Disease progression was the main reason for early termination of the PIPAC treatment (49.1%). The other causes were death, patients' wishes, adverse events, conversion to curative cytoreductive surgery and other medical reasons (embolism, pulmonary infection, etc…). Outlook Further investigations are necessary to better understand the causes for interrupting PIPAC treatment and also improving the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from PIPAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Cecile Ezanno
- Department of digestive surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Brice Malgras
- Department of digestive surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
- French Military health Service Academy, Ecole du Val de Grâce, Paris, France
| | - Marc Pocard
- Department of digestive surgery, La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
- INSERM, U965 Cart unit, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1331-1341. [PMID: 36513815 PMCID: PMC9984350 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new, palliative approach for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). Its main goals are to control symptoms and ascites. For this experimental procedure, treatment efficacy and patient safety need to be closely monitored. METHODS We performed a prospective registry study for patients with PSMs. Cisplatin (C) (7.5 mg/m2 body surface) and doxorubicin (D) (1.5 mg/m2) were administered laparoscopically via PIPAC. RESULTS Between November 2015 and June 2020, we recorded data from 108 patients and 230 scheduled procedures. Tumor burden, patient fitness, quality of life, operating time and in-hospital stay remained stable over consecutive procedures. We recorded 21 non-access situations and 14 intraoperative complications (11 intestinal injuries, and three aspirations while inducing anesthesia). Three or more previous abdominal surgeries or cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (HIPEC) were risk factors for non-access and intestinal injuries (χ2, p ≤ 0.01). Five Grade IV and three Grade V postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) occurred. Median overall survival was 264 days (interquartile range 108-586). Therapies were primarily discontinued because of death (34%), progressive (26%), or regressive (16%) disease. CONCLUSION PIPAC is effective in stabilizing PSMs and retaining quality of life in selected patients. Earlier abdominal surgeries and CRS with HIPEC should be considered when determining the indication for PIPAC. Randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate PIPAC's therapeutic benefits compared to systemic chemotherapy (sCHT) alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03100708 (April 2017).
Collapse
|
10
|
Di Giorgio A, Macrì A, Ferracci F, Robella M, Visaloco M, De Manzoni G, Sammartino P, Sommariva A, Biacchi D, Roviello F, Pastorino R, Pires Marafon D, Rotolo S, Casella F, Vaira M. 10 Years of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041125. [PMID: 36831468 PMCID: PMC9954579 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel intraperitoneal drug delivery method of low-dose chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol in patients affected by peritoneal cancer of primary or secondary origin. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of assessing the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PIPAC. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using Medline and Web of Science databases from 1 January 2011, to inception, to 31 December 2021. Data were independently extracted by two authors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality and risk of bias of studies. Meta-analysis was performed for pathological response, radiological response, PCI variation along treatment, and for patients undergoing three or more PIPAC. Pooled analyses were performed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, and 95% CIs were calculated using Clopper-Pearson exact CIs in all instances. RESULTS A total of 414 papers on PIPAC were identified, and 53 studies considering 4719 PIPAC procedure in 1990 patients were included for analysis. The non-access rate or inability to perform PIPAC pooled rate was 4% of the procedures performed. The overall proportion of patients who completed 3 or more cycles of PIPAC was 39%. Severe toxicities considering CTCAE 3-4 were 4% (0% to 38.5%). In total, 50 studies evaluated deaths within the first 30 postoperative days. In the included 1936 patients were registered 26 deaths (1.3%). The pooled analysis of all the studies reporting a pathological response was 68% (95% CI 0.61-0.73), with an acceptable heterogeneity (I2 28.41%, p = 0.09). In total, 10 papers reported data regarding the radiological response, with high heterogeneity and a weighted means of 15% (0% to 77.8%). PCI variation along PIPAC cycles were reported in 14 studies. PCI diminished, increased, or remained stable in eight, one and five studies, respectively, with high heterogeneity at pooled analysis. Regarding survival, there was high heterogeneity. The 12-month estimated survival from first PIPAC for colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, gynecological cancer and hepatobiliary/pancreatic cancer were, respectively, 53%, 25%, 59% and 37%. CONCLUSIONS PIPAC may be a useful treatment option for selected patients with PM, with acceptable grade 3 and 4 toxicity and promising survival benefit. Meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity of data among up-to-date available studies. In a subset analysis per primary tumor origin, pathological tumor regression was documented in 68% of the studies with acceptable heterogeneity. Pathological regression seems, therefore, a reliable outcome for PIPAC activity and a potential surrogate endpoint of treatment response. We recommend uniform selection criteria for patients entering a PIPAC program and highlight the urgent need to standardize items for PIPAC reports and datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Macrì
- U.O.C.—P.S.G. con O.B.I. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria “G. Martino”—Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Federica Ferracci
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +39-0630157255
| | - Manuela Robella
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO—IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy
| | - Mario Visaloco
- U.O.C.—P.S.G. con O.B.I. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria “G. Martino”—Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Sammartino
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Sommariva
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Daniele Biacchi
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Roma, Italy
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Roberta Pastorino
- Sezione di Igiene, Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health—Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Denise Pires Marafon
- Sezione di Igiene, Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Rotolo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences (Di.Chir.On.S.), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Casella
- Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Vaira
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO—IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Roensholdt S, Detlefsen S, Mortensen MB, Graversen M. Response Evaluation in Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis Treated with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041289. [PMID: 36835824 PMCID: PMC9963217 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) directed therapy emerged as a treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM) a decade ago. The response assessment of PIPAC is not uniform. This narrative review describes non-invasive and invasive methods for response evaluation of PIPAC and summarizes their current status. PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for eligible publications, and data were reported on an intention-to-treat basis. The peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) showed a response in 18-58% of patients after two PIPACs. Five studies showed a cytological response in ascites or peritoneal lavage fluid in 6-15% of the patients. The proportion of patients with malignant cytology decreased between the first and third PIPAC. A computed tomography showed stable or regressive disease following PIPAC in 15-78% of patients. The peritoneal cancer index was mainly used as a demographic variable, but prospective studies reported a response to treatment in 57-72% of patients. The role of serum biomarkers of cancer or inflammation in the selection of candidates for and responders to PIPAC is not fully evaluated. In conclusion, response evaluation after PIPAC in patients with PM remains difficult, but PRGS seems to be the most promising response evaluation modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Roensholdt
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 15, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael Bau Mortensen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Graversen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guchelaar NAD, Noordman BJ, Koolen SLW, Mostert B, Madsen EVE, Burger JWA, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Creemers GJ, de Hingh IHJT, Luyer M, Bins S, van Meerten E, Lagarde SM, Verhoef C, Wijnhoven BPL, Mathijssen RHJ. Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Unresectable Peritoneal Surface Malignancies. Drugs 2023; 83:159-180. [PMID: 36633826 PMCID: PMC9908703 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01828-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Malignancies of the peritoneal cavity are associated with a dismal prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is the gold standard for patients with unresectable peritoneal disease, but its intraperitoneal effect is hampered by the peritoneal-plasma barrier. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, which is administered repeatedly into the peritoneal cavity through a peritoneal implanted port, could provide a novel treatment modality for this patient population. This review provides a systematic overview of intraperitoneal used drugs, the performed clinical studies so far, and the complications of the peritoneal implemental ports. Several anticancer drugs have been studied for intraperitoneal application, with the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel as the most commonly used drug. Repeated intraperitoneal chemotherapy, mostly in combination with systemic chemotherapy, has shown promising results in Phase I and Phase II studies for several tumor types, such as gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Two Phase III studies for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer have been performed so far, but the results regarding the superiority over standard systemic chemotherapy alone, are contradictory. Pressurized intraperitoneal administration, known as PIPAC, is an alternative way of administering intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and the first prospective studies have shown a tolerable safety profile. Although intraperitoneal chemotherapy might be a standard treatment option for patients with unresectable peritoneal disease, more Phase II and Phase III studies focusing on tolerability profiles, survival rates, and quality of life are warranted in order to establish optimal treatment schedules and to establish a potential role for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the approach to unresectable peritoneal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels A D Guchelaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Bo J Noordman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca Mostert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Misha Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Bins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther van Meerten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lang N, Diciola A, Labidi-Galy I, Ris F, Di Marco M, Mach N, Petignat P, Toso C, Undurraga M, Hubner M. Nab-PIPAC: a phase IB study protocol of intraperitoneal cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel administered by pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the treatment of advanced malignancies confined to the peritoneal cavity. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067691. [PMID: 36604127 PMCID: PMC9827272 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intraperitoneal dissemination is a major problem resulting in very poor prognosis and a rapid marked deterioration in the quality of life of patients. Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an emergent laparoscopic procedure aiming to maximise local efficacy and to reduce systemic side effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Nab-PIPAC, a bicentre open-label phase IB, aims to evaluate safety of nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin association using in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of gastric, pancreatic or ovarian origin as ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy. Using a 3+3 design, sequential intraperitoneal laparoscopic application of nab-paclitaxel (7.5, 15, 25, 37.5, 52.5 and 70 mg/m2) and cisplatin (10.5 mg/m2) through a nebuliser to a high-pressure injector at ambient temperature with a maximal upstream pressure of 300 psi. Treatment maintained for 30 min at a pressure of 12 mm Hg and repeated4-6 weeks intervals for three courses total.A total of 6-36 patients are expected, accrual is ongoing. Results are expected in 2024.The primary objective of Nab-PIPAC trial is to assess tolerability and safety of nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin combination administered intraperitoneally by PIPAC in patients with PC of gastric, pancreatic or ovarian origin. This study will determine maximum tolerated dose and provide pharmacokinetic data. ETHIC AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committees of Geneva and Vaud (CCER-2018-01327). The study findings will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences and research meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04000906.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemie Lang
- Service d'oncologie, Département d'Oncologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Antonella Diciola
- Service d'oncologie, Département d'Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Intidhar Labidi-Galy
- Service d'oncologie, Département d'Oncologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Frédéric Ris
- Département de Chirurgie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Mariagrazia Di Marco
- Service d'oncologie, Département d'Oncologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Mach
- Service d'oncologie, Département d'Oncologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Petignat
- Département Gynécologie et Obstétrique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Christian Toso
- Département de Chirurgie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Undurraga
- Département Gynécologie et Obstétrique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Martin Hubner
- Département de chirurgie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Baggaley AE, Lafaurie GBRC, Tate SJ, Boshier PR, Case A, Prosser S, Torkington J, Jones SEF, Gwynne SH, Peters CJ. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): updated systematic review using the IDEAL framework. Br J Surg 2022; 110:10-18. [PMID: 36056893 PMCID: PMC10364525 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alice E Baggaley
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Sophia J Tate
- Department of Anaesthesia, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Piers R Boshier
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Amy Case
- Department of Cancer Services, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Susan Prosser
- Department of Library Services, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Jared Torkington
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sadie E F Jones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sarah H Gwynne
- Department of Cancer Services, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Christopher J Peters
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Case A, Prosser S, Peters CJ, Adams R, Gwynne S. Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosolised chemotherapy (PIPAC) for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases: A systematic review by the PIPAC UK collaborative. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 180:103846. [PMID: 36257535 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases (GCPM) carries a poor prognosis. Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosolised Chemotherapy (PIPAC) offers pharmacokinetic advantages over intravenous therapy, resulting in higher chemotherapy concentrations in peritoneal deposits, and potentially reduced systemic absorption/toxicity. This review evaluates efficacy, tolerability and impact on quality of life (QOL) of PIPAC for GCPM. METHODS Following registration with PROSPERO (CRD42021281500), MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched for PIPAC in patients with peritoneal metastases, in accordance with PRISMA standards RESULTS: Across 18 included reports representing 751 patients with GCPM (4 prospective, 11 retrospective, 3 abstracts, no phase III studies), median overall survival (mOS) was 8 - 19.1 months, 1-year OS 49.8-77.9%, complete response (PRGS1) 0-35% and partial response (PRGS2/3) 0-83.3%. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was 0.7-25% and 0-4.1% respectively. Three studies assessing QOL reported no significant difference. CONCLUSION PIPAC may offer promising survival benefits, toxicity, and QOL for GCPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Case
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Singleton Hospital, Sketty Lane, Swansea SA2 8QA, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Grove Building, Singleton Park, SA2 8PP, UK.
| | - S Prosser
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Singleton Hospital, Sketty Lane, Swansea SA2 8QA, UK
| | - C J Peters
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Marys Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK
| | - R Adams
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Road, Whitchurch CF14 2TL, UK
| | - S Gwynne
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Singleton Hospital, Sketty Lane, Swansea SA2 8QA, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Grove Building, Singleton Park, SA2 8PP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hübner M, Somashekhar SP, Teixeira Farinha H, Abba J, Rao RG, Alyami M, Willaert W. Treatment Response After Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Originf. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2022; 3:e203. [PMID: 37600288 PMCID: PMC10406066 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study is to analyze oncological outcomes of patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) of colorectal origin treated with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). Background PIPAC has been demonstrated to be a feasible and safe novel treatment for patients with PM of various origins. Only small series reports on survival after PIPAC by disease entity. Methods International retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with PM of colorectal origin. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS), radiological response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), histological response (peritoneal regression grading score [PRGS]: complete response: 1-4: no response), change of peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and symptom control. Results Seventeen eligible centers compiled 256 non-selected patients (mean age 61 [50.6-69.2], 43% female) and 606 procedures. Sixty-three percent were treated after 2 lines of chemotherapy, median PCI at PIPAC1 was 18 (interquartile range [IQR] = 10-27). Median OS was 19.00 months (IQR = 12.9-29.8) from diagnosis and 9.4 months (IQR = 4.5-16.8) from PIPAC1. One hundred and four of 256 patients (40.6%) had ≥3 procedures (per protocol [pp]) with the following outcomes at PIPAC3: RECIST: 59.3% partial response/stable, 40.7% progression; mean PRGS: 2.1 ± 0.9. Median PCI was 21 (IQR = 15-29) at baseline and 20 (IQR = 12-27) at PIPAC3 (P = 0.02). Fifty-six (54%) and 48 (46%) patients were symptomatic at baseline and PIPAC3, respectively (P = 0.267). Median OS for the pp cohort was 11.9 months (IQR = 10.7-15.0) from PIPAC1. Independent predictors for survival were radiological response (HR = 3.0; 95% CI = 1.6-5.7) and no symptoms (HR = 4.5, 95% CI = 2.2-9.1) at PIPAC3. Conclusions Objective treatment response and encouraging survival were demonstrated after PIPAC for colorectal PM. Prospective registry data and comparative studies are now needed in to confirm these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hübner
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - S. P. Somashekhar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | - Hugo Teixeira Farinha
- From the Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Ramya G. Rao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wouter Willaert
- Department of human structure and repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fiorentini C, Sarti D, Guadagni S, Fiorentini G. Immune response and locoregional treatments for peritoneal carcinomatosis. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2022; 371:97-116. [PMID: 35965002 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC) is considered as a terminal disease with short survival. It is treated with palliative therapies, consisting of repeated drainages and sometimes instillation of chemotherapy. Since the nineties, surgery has been combined with more effective systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of PC. This combination therapy significantly increases the overall survival of selected PC patients. The understanding of how intraperitoneal chemotherapy and HIPEC can cure patients is still unclear. Experts hypothesized that the efficacy is obtained by the ability of high peritoneal drug exposure and hyperthermia to directly kill cancer cells. Several studies indicate that cancer cells death directly influences the response of the immune system. For this reason, the protective effect of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and HIPEC could be mediated by its ability to kill cancer cells in an immuno-genic way, causing an efficient anticancer immune response. In this review, we investigate the role of the innate peritoneal or locoregional therapy-induced immune response in PC therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Fiorentini
- Department of Prevention and Sport Medicine, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Donatella Sarti
- Oncology Department, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, ASUR1, Urbino, Italy
| | - Stefano Guadagni
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giammaria Fiorentini
- Department of Onco-Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera "Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord", Pesaro, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Robella M, Hubner M, Sgarbura O, Reymond M, Khomiakov V, di Giorgio A, Bhatt A, Bakrin N, Willaert W, Alyami M, Teixeira H, Kaprin A, Ferracci F, De Meeus G, Berchialla P, Vaira M, Villeneuve L, Cortés-Guiral D, Nowacki M, So J, Abba J, Afifi A, Mortensen MB, Brandl A, Ceelen W, Coget J, Courvoiser T, de Hingh IH, Delhorme JB, Dumont F, Escayola C, Eveno C, Ezanno AC, Gagnière J, Galindo J, Glatz T, Glehen O, Jäger T, Kepenekian V, Kothonidis K, Lehmann K, Lynch C, Mehta S, Moldovan B, Nissan A, Orry D, Pérez GO, Paquette B, Paskonis M, Piso P, Pocard M, Rau B, Singh S, Somashekhar S, Soravia C, Taibi A, Torkington J, Vizzielli G. Feasibility and safety of PIPAC combined with additional surgical procedures: PLUS study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:2212-2217. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
19
|
Sun BJ, Lee B. Review of Regional Therapies for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030570. [PMID: 35158837 PMCID: PMC8833629 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Gastric cancer is usually diagnosed at late stages and is associated with poor five-year survival rates. Metastasis to the peritoneal cavity is common and leads to even worse outcomes. Currently, the mainstay of treatment for metastatic gastric cancer is systemic chemotherapy or supportive care. These recommendations remain despite evidence that suggests systemic therapy has poor penetration into the abdominal cavity, limiting efficacy against peritoneal disease. Newer treatments have been developed to address this problem, specifically regional therapies aimed at delivering chemotherapy directly into the peritoneal cavity to eradicate tumor cells. These novel therapies include hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy. Regional therapies may also be combined with surgery to remove both macroscopic and microscopic disease. Although more clinical trials are needed to evaluate its efficacy, early studies have shown promising outcomes with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Abstract Gastric cancer carries a poor prognosis and is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Patients with gastric cancer who develop peritoneal metastases have an even more dismal prognosis, with median survival time measured in months. Since studies have demonstrated that systemic chemotherapy has poor penetration into the peritoneum, multimodal treatment with intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been proposed for the treatment of peritoneal metastases and has become the foundation for newer therapeutic techniques and clinical trials. These include heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), which involves the application of heated chemotherapy into the abdomen with or without tumor debulking surgery; normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC), in which non-heated chemotherapy can be delivered into the abdomen via a peritoneal port allowing for repeat dosing; and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC), a newer technique of pressurized and aerosolized chemotherapy delivered into the abdomen during laparoscopy. Early results with intraperitoneal chemotherapy have shown promise in increasing disease-free and overall survival in select patients. Additionally, there may be a palliative effect of these regional therapies. In this review, we explore and summarize these different intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment regimens for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases.
Collapse
|
20
|
Lurvink RJ, Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Bakkers C, Burger JWA, Creemers GJM, Los M, Mols F, Wiezer MJ, Nienhuijs SW, Boerma D, de Hingh IHJT. Patient-reported outcomes during repetitive oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases in a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (CRC-PIPAC). Surg Endosc 2022; 36:4486-4498. [PMID: 34757489 PMCID: PMC9085665 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08802-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CRC-PIPAC prospectively assessed repetitive oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC-OX) as a palliative monotherapy (i.e., without concomitant systemic therapy in between subsequent procedures) for unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The present study explored patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during trial treatment. METHODS In this single-arm phase 2 trial in two tertiary centers, patients with isolated unresectable CPM received 6-weekly PIPAC-OX (92 mg/m2). PROs (calculated from EQ-5D-5L, and EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29) were compared between baseline and 1 and 4 weeks after the first three procedures using linear mixed modeling with determination of clinical relevance (Cohen's D ≥ 0.50) of statistically significant differences. RESULTS Twenty patients underwent 59 procedures (median 3 [range 1-6]). Several PROs solely worsened 1 week after the first procedure (index value - 0.10, p < 0.001; physical functioning - 20, p < 0.001; role functioning - 27, p < 0.001; social functioning - 18, p < 0.001; C30 summary score - 16, p < 0.001; appetite loss + 15, p = 0.007; diarrhea + 15, p = 0.002; urinary frequency + 13, p = 0.004; flatulence + 13, p = 0.001). These PROs returned to baseline at subsequent time points. Other PROs worsened 1 week after the first procedure (fatigue + 23, p < 0.001; pain + 29, p < 0.001; abdominal pain + 32, p < 0.001), second procedure (fatigue + 20, p < 0.001; pain + 21, p < 0.001; abdominal pain + 20, p = 0.002), and third procedure (pain + 22, p < 0.001; abdominal pain + 22, p = 0.002). Except for appetite loss, all changes were clinically relevant. All analyzed PROs returned to baseline 4 weeks after the third procedure. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving repetitive PIPAC-OX monotherapy for unresectable CPM had clinically relevant but reversible worsening of several PROs, mainly 1 week after the first procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03246321; Netherlands trial register: NL6426.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin J. Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands ,Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P. Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Emma C. E. Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Checca Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W. A. Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan M. Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Floortje Mols
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands ,Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Disorders, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J. Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W. Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands ,Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands ,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hübner M, Alyami M, Villeneuve L, Cortés-Guiral D, Nowacki M, So J, Sgarbura O. Consensus guidelines for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: Technical aspects and treatment protocols. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:789-794. [PMID: 34785087 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is increasingly used to treat patients with peritoneal cancer. A recent survey demonstrated considerable diversification of current practice of PIPAC raising issues of concern also regarding safety and efficacy. The study aim was to reach consensus on best practice of PIPAC treatment. METHODS Current practice was critically discussed during an expert meeting and the available evidence was scrutinized to elaborate a 33-item closed-ended questionnaire. All active PIPAC centers were then invited to participate in an online two-round Delphi process with 3 reminders at least. Consensus was defined a priori as >70% agreement for a minimal response rate of 70%. RESULTS Forty-nine out of 57 invited PIPAC centers participated in Delphi 1 and 2 (86%). Overall, there was agreement for 21/33 items. Consensus was reached for important aspects like advanced OR ventilation system (91.8%), remote monitoring (95.9%), use of the PRGS (85.7%) and use of a safety checklist (98%). The drug regimens oxaliplatin (87.8%) and cisplatin/doxorubicin (81.6%) were both confirmed by the expert panel. Important controversies included number and location of Biopsies during repeated PIPAC and the combination of PIPAC with additional surgical procedures. CONCLUSION This consensus statement aims to allow for safe and efficacious PIPAC treatment and to facilitate multi-center analyses of the results. Additional preclinical and clinical studies are needed to resolve the remaining controversies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland.
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Service de Recherche et d'Epidémiologie Cliniques, Pierre-Bénite, F-69495, France; Université Lyon-1, EA 3738 CICLY, Oullins Cedex, F-69921, France
| | - Delia Cortés-Guiral
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maciej Nowacki
- Chair and Department of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun. Oncology Centre-Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital in Bydgoszcz. Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Jimmy So
- National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France; University of Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Akaishi EH, Vaz da Silva DG, Lima HVG, Grapperon-Mathis RLM, Arakaki MDS, Galindo IVA, Daia LA, Araruna GF, Oliveira ALT, Mancini CN, Hoff PMG. Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): The First Reported Case in Brazil Using Standardized Technique with the Capnopen® Nebulizer Device. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2021; 22:e933906. [PMID: 34725317 PMCID: PMC8574167 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.933906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal metastasis is a common progression of abdominal-pelvic cancers, and it is associated with poorer oncological prognosis when compared to other metastasis sites. Its treatment has limited results, mainly because of poor bioavailability of chemotherapy within the abdominal cavity after systemic administration. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been proposed as a novel method to deliver chemotherapy directly into the peritoneal surface; it combines the effectiveness and response of an intraperitoneal therapy with benefits of a minimally invasive approach. The laparoscopic capnoperitoneum is used to instill chemotherapy particles in a more efficient way for distribution and penetration when compared to peritoneal lavage. In the present study, we describe the first PIPAC performed in Brazil, according to the standard technique previously described with the Capnopen® nebulizer device, as well as technique details based on our literature review. CASE REPORT A 67-year-old man with pancreatic adenocarcinoma metastatic to the liver at first diagnosis underwent systemic treatment with the FOLFIRINOX protocol. After a major clinical response due to systemic treatment, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed with resection and radiofrequency ablation of hepatic nodules. After 7 months of follow-up, the patient's condition evolved with symptomatic relapse in the peritoneum. Aiming at better control of this site, multiple PIPAC procedures were performed, showing excellent control of the peritoneal cavity disease. The patient had a sustained response in the peritoneal cavity and showed systemic disease progression 6 months after the first PIPAC procedure, which deceased at 20 months after the first PIPAC procedure and 42 months after the primary diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS This report shows that the PIPAC procedure is reproducible elsewhere, with safety and good functional results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diego Greatti Vaz da Silva
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncologia D'Or, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Mário Covas State Hospital, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), Santo André, SP, Brazil
| | - Helber Vidal Gadelha Lima
- Department of Surgery, University of São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncologia D'Or, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Mariana de Souza Arakaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncologia D'Or, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Ivan Vinicius Andrade Galindo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncologia D'Or, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Lucas Afonso Daia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncologia D'Or, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Gustavo Ferreira Araruna
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncologia D'Or, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - André Luiz Torres Oliveira
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncologia D'Or, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Caio Nasser Mancini
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncologia D'Or, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Paulo Marcelo Gehm Hoff
- Department of Oncology, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Department of Radiology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute of The State of São Paulo (ICESP), University of São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mortensen MB, Glehen O, Horvath P, Hübner M, Hyung-Ho K, Königsrainer A, Pocard M, Reymond MA, So J, Fristrup CW. The ISSPP PIPAC database: design, process, access, and first interim analysis. Pleura Peritoneum 2021; 6:91-97. [PMID: 34676282 PMCID: PMC8482445 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2021-0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Several trials have documented the favorable safety profile, and promising clinical results of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) directed treatment in different types of peritoneal malignancies. However, until the results of randomized trials are available, the quality of documentation and acceptance by the users may be improved through a worldwide registry. The International Society for the Study of Pleura and Peritoneum (www.ISSPP.org) facilitated this process by creating a dedicated focus group and providing the funding needed for the creation and implementation of an international database. This article describes the design and the journey of establishing this international database and the first, preliminary results from the ISSPP PIPAC online database. Methods In 2019 the ISSPP PIPAC Registry Group started to create a database with a minimal dataset relevant to many diseases and applicable in different framework conditions. The task was divided into three phases including design, testing, implementation, protocol, handbook, legal requirements, as well as registry rules and bylaws for the registry group. Results The ISSPP PIPAC online database has six key elements (patient, consent, treatment, complications, response evaluation and follow-up). Following design, testing and implementation the database was successfully launched in June 2020. Ten institutions reported on 459 PIPAC procedures in 181 patients during the first 6 months, and the recorded data were comparable to the present literature. Conclusions A new international multicenter PIPAC database has been developed, tested and implemented under the auspices of ISSPP. The database is accessible through the ISSPP website (www.ISSPP.org), and PIPAC institutions worldwide are highly encouraged to participate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bau Mortensen
- Department of Surgery, Odense PIPAC Center and Odense Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard, DK-5000Odense C, Denmark
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Philipp Horvath
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kim Hyung-Ho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marc Pocard
- Department of Surgery, Pitie Salpêtriére University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marc Andre Reymond
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jimmy So
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Laparoscopic Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Carcinomatosis of Gastric Adenocarcinoma Origin. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10204757. [PMID: 34682880 PMCID: PMC8539356 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in conjunction with cytoreductive surgery has been gaining increasing traction in treating gastric adenocarcinoma with metastasis to the peritoneum in recent years. The addition of laparoscopic HIPEC (LS-HIPEC) to these treatment algorithms has increased the flexibility and adaptability of HIPEC integrating into treatment sequencing, allowing for iterative protocols of LS-HIPEC prior to cytoreduction as neoadjuvant treatment, as well as in the palliation of patients with unresectable disease and uncontrolled ascites. As the use of HIPEC in gastric adenocarcinoma continues to be refined, LS-HIPEC algorithms should continue to be considered and utilized both in curative treatment algorithms as well as in patients in the palliative setting. Given that LS-HIPEC remains a relatively nascent treatment modality, we advocate for its use in the setting of a clinical trial when feasible.
Collapse
|
25
|
Rodolfino E, Di Marco M, Ilot A, Iezzi R, Gui B, Avesani G, Panico C, Strippoli A, Di Giorgio A, Pacelli F, Manfredi R. Radiologist Checklist for Selecting Patients to Undergo PIPAC (Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy). Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11090941. [PMID: 34575093 PMCID: PMC8472130 DOI: 10.3390/life11090941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis frequently occurs in advanced gastrointestinal and gynecological cancers. As factors such as poor drug uptake and distribution cause chemotherapy to be less effective, alternative therapies have been explored. Introduced in 2013, PIPAC (pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy) uses aerosolized chemotherapeutics sprayed into the patient’s peritoneal cavity using a laparoscopic approach. Despite the literature showing encouraging data regarding the tolerability and efficacy of PIPAC, there is a lack of articles on the role that imaging plays in selecting patients suitable for PIPAC. The aim of this study is to combine literature-based evidence and clinical experience to provide information able to support training radiologists, as well as experienced radiologists interested in innovative therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Rodolfino
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.R.); (B.G.); (G.A.); (C.P.); (R.M.)
| | - Margo’ Di Marco
- Section of Radiology, Department of Radiological and Hematological Scienses, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.M.); (A.I.)
| | - Alessia Ilot
- Section of Radiology, Department of Radiological and Hematological Scienses, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.M.); (A.I.)
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.R.); (B.G.); (G.A.); (C.P.); (R.M.)
- Section of Radiology, Department of Radiological and Hematological Scienses, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.M.); (A.I.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Benedetta Gui
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.R.); (B.G.); (G.A.); (C.P.); (R.M.)
| | - Giacomo Avesani
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.R.); (B.G.); (G.A.); (C.P.); (R.M.)
| | - Camilla Panico
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.R.); (B.G.); (G.A.); (C.P.); (R.M.)
| | - Antonia Strippoli
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (F.P.)
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (F.P.)
| | - Riccardo Manfredi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.R.); (B.G.); (G.A.); (C.P.); (R.M.)
- Section of Radiology, Department of Radiological and Hematological Scienses, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.M.); (A.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Huang R, Zhou PK. DNA damage repair: historical perspectives, mechanistic pathways and clinical translation for targeted cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021; 6:254. [PMID: 34238917 PMCID: PMC8266832 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00648-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 273] [Impact Index Per Article: 91.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic instability is the hallmark of various cancers with the increasing accumulation of DNA damage. The application of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in cancer treatment is typically based on this property of cancers. However, the adverse effects including normal tissues injury are also accompanied by the radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Targeted cancer therapy has the potential to suppress cancer cells' DNA damage response through tailoring therapy to cancer patients lacking specific DNA damage response functions. Obviously, understanding the broader role of DNA damage repair in cancers has became a basic and attractive strategy for targeted cancer therapy, in particular, raising novel hypothesis or theory in this field on the basis of previous scientists' findings would be important for future promising druggable emerging targets. In this review, we first illustrate the timeline steps for the understanding the roles of DNA damage repair in the promotion of cancer and cancer therapy developed, then we summarize the mechanisms regarding DNA damage repair associated with targeted cancer therapy, highlighting the specific proteins behind targeting DNA damage repair that initiate functioning abnormally duo to extrinsic harm by environmental DNA damage factors, also, the DNA damage baseline drift leads to the harmful intrinsic targeted cancer therapy. In addition, clinical therapeutic drugs for DNA damage and repair including therapeutic effects, as well as the strategy and scheme of relative clinical trials were intensive discussed. Based on this background, we suggest two hypotheses, namely "environmental gear selection" to describe DNA damage repair pathway evolution, and "DNA damage baseline drift", which may play a magnified role in mediating repair during cancer treatment. This two new hypothesis would shed new light on targeted cancer therapy, provide a much better or more comprehensive holistic view and also promote the development of new research direction and new overcoming strategies for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruixue Huang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ping-Kun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, AMMS, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Robella M, Berchialla P, Borsano A, Cinquegrana A, Ilari Civit A, De Simone M, Vaira M. Study Protocol: Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin and Doxorubicin Applied as PIPAC in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18115656. [PMID: 34070561 PMCID: PMC8197803 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel laparoscopic intraperitoneal chemotherapy approach offered in selected patients affected by non-resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. Drugs doses currently established for nebulization are very low: oxaliplatin (OXA) 120 mg/sm, cisplatin (CDDP) 10.5 mg/sm and doxorubicin (DXR) 2.1 mg/sm. A model-based approach for dose-escalation design in a single PIPAC procedure and subsequent dose escalation steps is planned. The starting dose of oxaliplatin is 100 mg/sm with a maximum estimated dose of 300 mg/sm; an escalation with overdose and under-dose control (for probability of toxicity less than 16% in case of under-dosing and probability of toxicity greater than 33% in case of overdosing) will be further applied. Cisplatin is used in association with doxorubicin: A two-dimensional dose-finding design is applied on the basis of the estimated dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at all combinations. The starting doses are 15 mg/sm for cisplatin and 3 mg/sm for doxorubicin. Safety is assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03). Secondary endpoints include radiological response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (version 1.1) and pharmacokinetic analyses. This phase I study can provide the scientific basis to maximize the optimal dose of cisplatin, doxorubicin and oxaliplatin applied as PIPAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Robella
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia—IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (A.B.); (A.C.); (A.I.C.); (M.D.S.); (M.V.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Paola Berchialla
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy;
| | - Alice Borsano
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia—IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (A.B.); (A.C.); (A.I.C.); (M.D.S.); (M.V.)
| | - Armando Cinquegrana
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia—IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (A.B.); (A.C.); (A.I.C.); (M.D.S.); (M.V.)
| | - Alba Ilari Civit
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia—IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (A.B.); (A.C.); (A.I.C.); (M.D.S.); (M.V.)
| | - Michele De Simone
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia—IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (A.B.); (A.C.); (A.I.C.); (M.D.S.); (M.V.)
| | - Marco Vaira
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia—IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (A.B.); (A.C.); (A.I.C.); (M.D.S.); (M.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lurvink RJ, Rovers KP, Nienhuijs SW, Creemers GJ, Burger JWA, de Hingh IHJ. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC-OX) in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases-a systematic review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:S242-S258. [PMID: 33968441 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC-OX) is increasingly used as a palliative treatment option for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The present study aimed to systematically review all clinical studies reporting safety and efficacy outcomes of PIPAC-OX in patients with CPM. PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were systematically searched to identify all clinical studies that included at least one patient with CPM treated with PIPAC-OX and reported one of the following outcomes: adverse events, tumor response, quality of life, secondary cytoreductive surgery, progression-free survival, overall survival, and environmental safety of PIPAC-OX. Results were narratively described. Of 28 included studies, only 14 non-comparative studies separately reported at least one outcome of PIPAC-OX for CPM, of which only two studies specifically focused on this group. These 14 studies reported adverse events (5 studies), tumor response (5 studies), secondary cytoreductive surgery (4 studies), progression-free survival (1 study), overall survival (5 studies), and environmental safety (2 studies). Except for 5 studies (describing 26 patients), none of the included studies stratified their results for PIPAC-OX monotherapy and PIPAC-OX with concomitant systemic therapy, and none of the studies reporting survival outcomes stratified results for line of palliative treatment, complicating interpretation. No PIPAC-OX related deaths were reported. No occupational platinum was detected during PIPAC-OX. The available evidence regarding PIPAC-OX for CPM is limited and difficult to interpret. Despite these limitations, PIPAC-OX appears safe in patients with CPM and safe for operating personnel. To increase insight in the role of PIPAC-OX in this setting, investigators of ongoing and future studies are encouraged to report separate outcomes of PIPAC-OX for CPM, to stratify their results for PIPAC-OX monotherapy and PIPAC-OX with concomitant systemic therapy, and to stratify survival results for line of palliative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ignace H J de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin and Doxorubicin Applied as PIPAC in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051060. [PMID: 33802269 PMCID: PMC7958944 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This study is one of the very few phase I trials on intraperitoneal chemotherapy applied as PIPAC. Cisplatin and doxorubicin may be safely used as PIPAC at a dose of 30 mg/m2 and 6 mg/m2, respectively; oxaliplatin can be used at an intraperitoneal dose of 135 mg/m2. No serious adverse event was reported. The dosages achieved to date are the highest ever used in PIPAC. The results of these investigations should be the starting point for further clinical phase II trials regarding repeated PIPAC, possibly associated with systemic chemotherapy. Abstract Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an innovative laparoscopic intraperitoneal chemotherapy approach with the advantage of a deeper tissue penetration. Thus far, oxaliplatin has been administered at an arbitrary dose of 92 mg/m2, cisplatin at 7.5 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2. This is a model-based approach phase I dose escalation study with the aim of identifying the maximum tolerable dose of the three different drugs. The starting dose of oxaliplatin was 100 mg/m2; cisplatin was used in association with doxorubicin: 15 mg/m2 and 3 mg/m2 were the respective starting doses. Safety was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03). Thirteen patients were submitted to one PIPAC procedure. Seven patients were treated with cisplatin and doxorubicin and 6 patients with oxaliplatin; no dose limiting toxicities and major side effects were found. Common adverse events included postoperative abdominal pain and nausea. The maximum tolerable dose was not reached. The highest dose treated cohort (oxaliplatin 135 mg/m2; cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 6 mg/m2) tolerated PIPAC well. Serological analyses revealed no trace of doxorubicin at any dose level. Serum levels of cis- and oxaliplatin reached a peak at 60–120 min after PIPAC and were still measurable in the circulation 24 h after the procedure. Cisplatin and doxorubicin may be safely used as PIPAC at a dose of 30 mg/m2 and 6 mg/m2, respectively; oxaliplatin can be used at an intraperitoneal dose of 135 mg/m2. The dosages achieved to date are the highest ever used in PIPAC.
Collapse
|