1
|
Nguyen TTT, Greene LA, Mnatsakanyan H, Badr CE. Revolutionizing Brain Tumor Care: Emerging Technologies and Strategies. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1376. [PMID: 38927583 PMCID: PMC11202201 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12061376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Revised: 06/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive forms of brain tumor, characterized by a daunting prognosis with a life expectancy hovering around 12-16 months. Despite a century of relentless research, only a select few drugs have received approval for brain tumor treatment, largely due to the formidable barrier posed by the blood-brain barrier. The current standard of care involves a multifaceted approach combining surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy. However, recurrence often occurs within months despite these interventions. The formidable challenges of drug delivery to the brain and overcoming therapeutic resistance have become focal points in the treatment of brain tumors and are deemed essential to overcoming tumor recurrence. In recent years, a promising wave of advanced treatments has emerged, offering a glimpse of hope to overcome the limitations of existing therapies. This review aims to highlight cutting-edge technologies in the current and ongoing stages of development, providing patients with valuable insights to guide their choices in brain tumor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trang T. T. Nguyen
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Lloyd A. Greene
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | - Hayk Mnatsakanyan
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Neuroscience Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA; (H.M.); (C.E.B.)
| | - Christian E. Badr
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Neuroscience Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA; (H.M.); (C.E.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martinez JA, Yu VY, Tringale KR, Otazo R, Cohen O. Phase-sensitive deep reconstruction method for rapid multiparametric MR fingerprinting and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain. Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 109:147-157. [PMID: 38513790 PMCID: PMC11042874 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study explores the potential of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) with a novel Phase-Sensitivity Deep Reconstruction Network (PS-DRONE) for simultaneous quantification of T1, T2, Proton Density, B1+, phase and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). METHODS Data were acquired at 3 T in vitro and in vivo using an optimized EPI-based MRF sequence. Phantom experiments were conducted using a standardized phantom for T1 and T2 maps and a custom-made agar-based gadolinium phantom for B1 and QSM maps. In vivo experiments included five healthy volunteers and one patient diagnosed with brain metastasis. PSDRONE maps were compared to reference maps obtained through standard imaging sequences. RESULTS Total scan time was 2 min for 32 slices and a resolution of [1 mm, 1 mm, 4.5 mm]. The reconstruction of T1, T2, Proton Density, B1+ and phase maps were reconstructed within 1 s. In the phantoms, PS-DRONE analysis presented accurate and strongly correlated T1 and T2 maps (r = 0.99) compared to the reference maps. B1 maps from PS-DRONE showed slightly higher values, though still correlated (r = 0.6) with the reference. QSM values showed a small bias but were strongly correlated (r = 0.99) with reference data. In the in vivo analysis, PS-DRONE-derived T1 and T2 values for gray and white matter matched reference values in healthy volunteers. PS-DRONE B1 and QSM maps showed strong correlations with reference values. CONCLUSION The PS-DRONE network enables concurrent acquisition of T1, T2, PD, B1+, phase and QSM maps, within 2 min of acquisition time and 1 s of reconstruction time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Martinez
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York 10065, NY, USA.
| | - Victoria Y Yu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York 10065, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn R Tringale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York 10065, NY, USA
| | - Ricardo Otazo
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York 10065, NY, USA
| | - Ouri Cohen
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York 10065, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Z, Wang X, Zhang H, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Zhuang Y, Yang Q, Gao E, Ren Y, Zhang Y, Cai S, Chen Z, Cai C, Dong Y, Bao J, Cheng J. Positive Progesterone Receptor Expression in Meningioma May Increase the Transverse Relaxation: First Prospective Clinical Trial Using Single-Shot Ultrafast T 2 Mapping. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:187-198. [PMID: 37316368 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES This project aims to investigate the diagnostic performance of multiple overlapping-echo detachment imaging (MOLED) technique-derived transverse relaxation time (T2) maps in predicting progesterone receptor (PR) and S100 expression in meningiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS 63 meningioma patients were enrolled from October 2021 to August 2022, who underwent a complete routine magnetic resonance imaging and T2 MOLED, which can characterize the whole brain transverse relaxation time within 32 seconds in a single scan. After the surgical resection of meningiomas, the expression levels of PR and S100 were determined by an experienced pathologist using immunohistochemistry techniques. Histogram analysis was performed in tumor parenchyma based on the parametric maps. Independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test were applied for the comparison of histogram parameters between different groups, with a significance level of P < .05. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with 95% confidence interval were conducted for the diagnostic efficiency evaluation. RESULTS PR-positive group had significantly elevated T2 histogram parameters (P = .001-.049) compared to the PR-negative group. The multivariate logistic regression model with T2 showed the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting PR expression (AUC=0.818). Additionally, the multivariate model also had the best diagnostic performance for predicting meningioma S100 expression (AUC=0.768). CONCLUSION The MOLED technique-derived T2 maps can distinguish PR and S100 status in meningiomas preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongye Li
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Hongyan Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China (H.Z.)
| | - Yijie Yang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Yuchuan Zhuang
- Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Y.Z.)
| | - Qinqin Yang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Eryuan Gao
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Yanan Ren
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Yong Zhang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Shuhui Cai
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Zhong Chen
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Congbo Cai
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Yanbo Dong
- Institute of Psychology, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, Saint Petersburg, Russia (Y.D.)
| | - Jianfeng Bao
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Jingliang Cheng
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.).
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guberina N, Padeberg F, Pöttgen C, Guberina M, Lazaridis L, Jabbarli R, Deuschl C, Herrmann K, Blau T, Wrede KH, Keyvani K, Scheffler B, Hense J, Layer JP, Glas M, Sure U, Stuschke M. Location of Recurrences after Trimodality Treatment for Glioblastoma with Respect to the Delivered Radiation Dose Distribution and Its Influence on Prognosis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112982. [PMID: 37296942 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While prognosis of glioblastoma after trimodality treatment is well examined, recurrence pattern with respect to the delivered dose distribution is less well described. Therefore, here we examine the gain of additional margins around the resection cavity and gross-residual-tumor. METHODS All recurrent glioblastomas initially treated with radiochemotherapy after neurosurgery were included. The percentage overlap of the recurrence with the gross tumor volume (GTV) expanded by varying margins (10 mm to 20 mm) and with the 95% and 90% isodose was measured. Competing-risks analysis was performed in dependence on recurrence pattern. RESULTS Expanding the margins from 10 mm to 15 mm, to 20 mm, to the 95%- and 90% isodose of the delivered dose distribution with a median margin of 27 mm did moderately increase the proportion of relative in-field recurrence volume from 64% to 68%, 70%, 88% and 88% (p < 0.0001). Overall survival of patients with in-and out-field recurrence was similar (p = 0.7053). The only prognostic factor significantly associated with out-field recurrence was multifocality of recurrence (p = 0.0037). Cumulative incidences of in-field recurrences at 24 months were 60%, 22% and 11% for recurrences located within a 10 mm margin, outside a 10 mm margin but within the 95% isodose, or outside the 95% isodose (p < 0.0001). Survival from recurrence was improved after complete resection (p = 0.0069). Integrating these data into a concurrent-risk model shows that extending margins beyond 10 mm has only small effects on survival hardly detectable by clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS Two-thirds of recurrences were observed within a 10 mm margin around the GTV. Smaller margins reduce normal brain radiation exposure allowing for more extensive salvage radiation therapy options in case of recurrence. Prospective trials using margins smaller than 20 mm around the GTV are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nika Guberina
- Department of Radiation Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Padeberg
- Department of Radiation Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Maja Guberina
- Department of Radiation Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Lazaros Lazaridis
- Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ramazan Jabbarli
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Cornelius Deuschl
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Tobias Blau
- Institute of Neuropathology, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Karsten H Wrede
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Kathy Keyvani
- Institute of Neuropathology, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Björn Scheffler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- DKFZ-Division Translational Neurooncology at the West German Cancer Center (WTZ), DKTK Partner Site, University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Jörg Hense
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Julian P Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Glas
- Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Sure
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiation Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martucci M, Russo R, Schimperna F, D’Apolito G, Panfili M, Grimaldi A, Perna A, Ferranti AM, Varcasia G, Giordano C, Gaudino S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Primary Adult Brain Tumors: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines 2023; 11:364. [PMID: 36830900 PMCID: PMC9953338 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
MRI is undoubtedly the cornerstone of brain tumor imaging, playing a key role in all phases of patient management, starting from diagnosis, through therapy planning, to treatment response and/or recurrence assessment. Currently, neuroimaging can describe morphologic and non-morphologic (functional, hemodynamic, metabolic, cellular, microstructural, and sometimes even genetic) characteristics of brain tumors, greatly contributing to diagnosis and follow-up. Knowing the technical aspects, strength and limits of each MR technique is crucial to correctly interpret MR brain studies and to address clinicians to the best treatment strategy. This article aimed to provide an overview of neuroimaging in the assessment of adult primary brain tumors. We started from the basilar role of conventional/morphological MR sequences, then analyzed, one by one, the non-morphological techniques, and finally highlighted future perspectives, such as radiomics and artificial intelligence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matia Martucci
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosellina Russo
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella D’Apolito
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Panfili
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Grimaldi
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Perna
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Varcasia
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Giordano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Gaudino
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Konar AS, Paudyal R, Shah AD, Fung M, Banerjee S, Dave A, Lee N, Hatzoglou V, Shukla-Dave A. Qualitative and Quantitative Performance of Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) Method: An Exploratory Analysis for Head and Neck Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153624. [PMID: 35892883 PMCID: PMC9331960 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The present exploratory study investigates the performance of a new, rapid, synthetic MRI method for diagnostic image quality assessment and measurement of relaxometry metric values in head and neck (HN) tumors and normal-appearing masseter muscle. The multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME) sequence was used for data acquisition, followed by synthetic image reconstruction on a 3T MRI scanner for 14 patients (3 untreated and 11 treated). The MDME enables absolute quantification of physical tissue properties, including T1 and T2, with a shorter scan time than the current state-of-the-art methods used for relaxation measurements. The vendor termed the combined package MAGnetic resonance imaging Compilation (MAGiC). In total, 48 regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed, drawn on normal-appearing masseter muscle and tumors in the HN region. Mean T1 and T2 values obtained from normal-appearing muscle were 880 ± 52 ms and 46 ± 3 ms, respectively. Mean T1 and T2 values obtained from tumors were 1930 ± 422 ms and 77 ± 13 ms, respectively, for the untreated group, 1745 ± 410 ms and 107 ± 61 ms, for the treated group. A total of 1552 images from both synthetic MRI and conventional clinical imaging were assessed by the radiologists to provide the rating for T1w and T2w image contrasts. The synthetically generated qualitative T2w images were acceptable and comparable to conventional diagnostic images (93% acceptability rating for both). The acceptability ratings for MAGiC-generated T1w, and conventional images were 64% and 100%, respectively. The benefit of MAGiC in HN imaging is twofold, providing relaxometry maps in a clinically feasible time and the ability to generate a different combination of contrast images in a single acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaresha Shridhar Konar
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.S.K.); (R.P.)
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.S.K.); (R.P.)
| | - Akash Deelip Shah
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.D.S.); (V.H.)
| | - Maggie Fung
- General Electric Health Care, New York, NY 10065, USA; (M.F.); (S.B.)
| | | | - Abhay Dave
- Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, NY 10027, USA;
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.D.S.); (V.H.)
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.S.K.); (R.P.)
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.D.S.); (V.H.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-212-639-3184
| |
Collapse
|