Changing Threshold-Based Segmentation Has No Relevant Impact on Semi-Quantification in the Context of Structured Reporting for PSMA-PET/CT

The superior detection rate of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT compared to short axial field-of-view [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for early recurrent prostate cancer patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET imaging has been extensively utilized for the detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer. However, the detection rate declines to merely 10-40% when PSA levels are < 0.2 ng/mL employing short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET. Prior studies exhibited superior detection rates with total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET in BCR patients with PSA > 0.2 ng/mL. Nevertheless, the diagnostic utility of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET for BCR patients when PSA is < 0.2 ng/mL remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT could improve the detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL.

METHODS

Eighty BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL underwent total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. These patients were matched by baseline qualities to another 80 patients who received SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The detection rates of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were compared utilizing a chi-square test and stratified analysis. Image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was assessed based on subjective scoring and objective parameters. The objective parameters measured were SUVmax, SUVmean, standard deviation (SD) of SUV, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver and gluteus maximus.

RESULTS

The image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT was superior to that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in both early and delayed scans. The detection rate of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL was significantly higher than that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (73.75% vs. 43.75%, P < 0.001). Total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT resulted in noteworthy modifications to the treatment regimen when contrasted with SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

In BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL, total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT not only demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT but also led to significant alterations in treatment regimens.

CXCR4-directed PET/CT with [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor in solid tumors-a comprehensive analysis of imaging findings and comparison with histopathology

BACKGROUND

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is overexpressed in various solid cancers and can be targeted by CXCR4-directed molecular imaging. We aimed to characterize the in-vivo CXCR4 expression in patients affected with solid tumors, along with a comparison to ex-vivo findings.

METHODS

A total 142 patients with 23 different histologically proven solid tumors were imaged with CXCR4-directed PET/CT using [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor (total number of scans, 152). A semi-quantitative analysis of the CXCR4-positive tumor burden including maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratios (TBR) using blood pool was conducted. In addition, we performed histopathological staining to determine the immuno-reactive score (IRS) from patients' tumor tissue and investigated possible correlations with SUVmax (by providing Spearman's rho ρ). Based on imaging, we also assessed the eligibility for CXCR4-targeted radioligand therapy or non-radioactive CXCR4 inhibitory treatment (defined as more than five CXCR4-avid target lesions [TL] with SUVmax above 10).

RESULTS

One hundred three of 152 (67.8%) scans showed discernible uptake above blood pool (TBR > 1) in 462 lesions (52 primary tumors and 410 metastases). Median TBR was 4.4 (1.05-24.98), thereby indicating high image contrast. The highest SUVmax was observed in ovarian cancer, followed by small cell lung cancer, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, and adrenocortical carcinoma. When comparing radiotracer accumulation between primary tumors and metastases for the entire cohort, comparable SUVmax was recorded (P > 0.999), except for pulmonal findings (P = 0.013), indicative for uniform CXCR4 expression among TL. For higher IRS, a weak, but statistically significant correlation with increased SUVmax was observed (ρ = 0.328; P = 0.018). In 42/103 (40.8%) scans, more than five TL were recorded, with 12/42 (28.6%) exhibiting SUVmax above 10, suggesting eligibility for CXCR4-targeted treatment in this subcohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In a whole-body tumor read-out, a substantial portion of prevalent solid tumors demonstrated increased and uniform [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor uptake, along with high image contrast. We also observed a respective link between in- and ex-vivo CXCR4 expression, suggesting high specificity of the PET agent. Last, a fraction of patients with [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor-positive tumor burden were rendered potentially suitable for CXCR4-directed therapy.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System Version 2.0

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System (PSMA-RADS) was introduced for standardized reporting, and PSMA-RADS version 1.0 allows classification of lesions based on their likelihood of representing a site of prostate cancer on PSMA-targeted positron emission tomography (PET). In recent years, this system has extensively been investigated. Increasing evidence has accumulated that the different categories reflect their actual meanings, such as true positivity in PSMA-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. Interobserver agreement studies demonstrated high concordance among a broad spectrum of 68Ga- or 18F-labeled, PSMA-directed radiotracers, even for less experienced readers. Moreover, this system has also been applied to challenging clinical scenarios and to assist in clinical decision-making, for example, to avoid overtreatment in oligometastatic disease. Nonetheless, with an increasing use of PSMA-RADS 1.0, this framework has shown not only benefits, but also limitations, for example, for follow-up assessment of locally treated lesions. Thus, we aimed to update the PSMA-RADS framework to include a refined set of categories in order to optimize lesion-level characterization and best assist in clinical decision-making (PSMA-RADS version 2.0).

Development trends and knowledge framework in the application of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 1984 to 2022

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common tumor of the male genitourinary system. With the development of imaging technology, the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of PCa is increasing. The present study summarizes research on the application of MRI in the field of PCa using bibliometric analysis and predicts future research hotspots.

Methods

Articles regarding the application of MRI in PCa between January 1, 1984 and June 30, 2022 were selected from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on November 6, 2022. Microsoft Excel 2016 and the Bibliometrix Biblioshiny R-package software were used for data analysis and bibliometric indicator extraction. CiteSpace (version 6.1.R3) was used to visualize literature feature clustering, including co-occurrence analysis of countries, institutions, authors, references, and burst keywords analysis.

Results

A total of 10,230 articles were included in the study. Turkbey was the most prolific author. The USA was the most productive country and had strong partnerships with other countries. The most productive institution was Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Radiology were the most productive and highest impact factor (IF) journals in the field, respectively. Timeline views showed that "#1 multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging", "#4 pi-rads", and "#8 psma" were currently the latest research hotspots. Keywords burst analysis showed that "machine learning", "psa density", "multi parametric mri", "deep learning", and "artificial intelligence" were the most frequently used keywords in the past 3 years.

Conclusions

MRI has a wide range of applications in PCa. The USA is the leading country in this field, with a concentration of highly productive and high-level institutions. Meanwhile, it can be projected that "deep learning", "radiomics", and "artificial intelligence" will be research hotspots in the future.

PI-RADS-Based Segmented Threshold of PSMA-PET SUVmax Is Better than Traditional Fixed Threshold for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Especially for PI-RADS 3 Lesions

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to compare the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET) traditional fixed threshold (FT) and newly established Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)-based segmented threshold (ST) for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

METHODS

The study retrospectively included 218 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and PSMA-PET examination for suspected prostate cancer (PCa) from January 2018 to November 2021. Lesions with Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 were diagnosed as csPCa. In PSMA-PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the FT for all the lesions and STs for lesions with different PI-RADS score for diagnosing csPCa were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and compared with Z test. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Among the 218 patients, there were 113 csPCa and 105 non-csPCa. The PSMA-PET FT was SUVmax > 5.3 (area under the curve, AUC = 0.842) and STs for PI-RADS 3/4/5 were SUVmax > 4.2/5.7/6.0 (AUCs = 0.870/0.867/0.882), respectively. The AUC of PSMA-PET ST was higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.872 vs. 0.842), especially for PI-RADS 3 (0.870 vs. 0.653). Multimodality diagnostic criteria combining PSMA-PET ST and PI-RADS scores of mpMRI was established and its AUC was higher than that of PSMA-PET ST (0.893 vs. 0.872) and significantly higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.893 vs. 0.842) with an improvement in sensitivity (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.05) without significantly sacrificing specificity (86% vs. 91%, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For diagnosing csPCa, PI-RADS-based PSMA-PET segmented threshold achieved better performance than traditional fixed threshold, especially for PI-RADS 3 lesions. Multimodality diagnostic criteria demonstrated higher diagnostic performance than segmented threshold and significantly better than PSMA-PET fixed threshold for detecting csPCa.

PET Criteria by Cancer Type from Imaging Interpretation to Treatment Response Assessment: Beyond FDG PET Score

Background: in recent years, the role of positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a reliable diagnostic tool in a wide variety of pathological conditions. This review aims to collect and review PET criteria developed for interpretation and treatment response assessment in cases of non-[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) imaging in oncology. Methods: A wide literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was made to find relevant published articles about non-[18F]FDG PET response criteria. Results: The comprehensive computer literature search revealed 183 articles. On reviewing the titles and abstracts, 149 articles were excluded because the reported data were not within the field of interest. Finally, 34 articles were selected and retrieved in full-text versions. Conclusions: available criteria are a promising tool for the interpretation of non-FDG PET scans, but also to assess the response to therapy and therefore to predict the prognosis. However, oriented clinical trials are needed to clearly evaluate their impact on patient management.

Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis: First-line imaging is afoot

Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) is an excellent molecular imaging technique for prostate cancer. Currently, PSMA PET for patients with primary prostate cancer is supplementary to conventional imaging techniques, according to guidelines. This supplementary function of PSMA PET is due to a lack of systematic review of its strengths, limitations, and potential development direction. Thus, we review PSMA ligands, detection, T, N, and M staging, treatment management, and false results of PSMA PET in clinical studies. We also discuss the strengths and challenges of PSMA PET. PSMA PET can greatly increase the detection rate of prostate cancer and accuracy of T/N/M staging, which facilitates more appropriate treatment for primary prostate cancer. Lastly, we propose that PSMA PET could become the first-line imaging modality for primary prostate cancer, and we describe its potential expanded application.

Baseline Imaging Derived Predictive Factors of Response Following [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Therapy in Salvage Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Lesion- and Patient-Based Analysis

Earlier studies have mostly identified pre-therapeutic clinical and laboratory parameters for the prediction of treatment response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC). The current study investigated whether imaging-derived factors on baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT can potentially predict the response after two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment, in a lesion- and patient-based analysis in men with mCRPC. Included patients had histologically proven mCRPC and a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before and after two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. The imaging-based response was evaluated on lesion-level (standardized uptake value (SUV) reduction) and patient-level (total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA) reduction). In the lesion-level analysis, a clear relationship was found between SUVpeak/max and the imaging-based response to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (most avid lesion SUVpeak/max ≥ 30% reduction) (p < 0.001), with no significant difference in cut-off values between different sites of metastases (i.e., lymph node, bone or visceral metastasis). In patient-level analysis, baseline PSA and SUVpeak values of most avid metastasis were significantly associated with imaging-based response (TL-PSMA ≥ 30% reduction) (p = 0.019 and p = 0.015). In pre-treatment with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, a clear accumulation-response relationship in lesion-level was found for SUVpeak/max in men with mCRPC receiving two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. The SUVpeak of the most avid lesion was the only image-derived factor predictive of the imaging-based response at the patient-level.