1
|
Blachura T, Matusik PS, Kowal A, Radzikowska J, Jarczewski JD, Skiba Ł, Popiela TJ, Chrzan R. Diagnostic accuracy of the Clear Cell Likelihood Score and selected MRI parameters in the characterization of indeterminate renal masses - a single-institution study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04484-5. [PMID: 38980404 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04484-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) and value of other selected magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features in the characterization of indeterminate small renal masses (SRMs). METHODS Fifty patients with indeterminate SRMs discovered on MRI between 2012 and 2023 were included. The ccLS for the characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) was calculated and compared to the final diagnosis (ccRCC vs. 'all other' masses). RESULTS The ccLS = 5 had a satisfactory accuracy of 64.0% and a very high specificity of 96.3%; however, its sensitivity of 26.1% was relatively low. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis revealed that from the selected MRI features, only T1 ratio and arterial to delayed enhancement (ADER) were good discriminators between ccRCC and other types of renal masses (area under curve, AUC = 0.707, p = 0.01; AUC = 0.673, p = 0.03; respectively). The cut-off points determined in ROC analysis using the Youden index were 0.73 (p = 0.01) for T1 ratio and 0.99 for ADER (p = 0.03). The logistic regression model demonstrated that ccLS = 5 and T1 ratio (OR = 15.5 [1.1-218.72], p = 0.04; OR = 0.002 [0.00-0.81], p = 0.04) were significant predictors of ccRCC. CONCLUSIONS The ccLS algorithm offers an encouraging method for the standardization of imaging protocols to aid in the diagnosis and management of SRMs in daily clinical practice by enhancing detectability of ccRCC and reducing the number of unnecessary invasive procedures for benign or indolent lesions. However, its diagnostic performance needs multi-center large cohort studies to validate it before it can be incorporated as a diagnostic algorithm and will guide future iterations of clinical guidelines. The retrospective nature of our study and small patient population confined to a single clinical center may impact the generalizability of the results; thus, future studies are required to define whether employment of the T1 ratio or ADER parameter may strengthen the diagnostic accuracy of ccRCC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Blachura
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| | - Patrycja S Matusik
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital, Kraków, 30-688, Poland.
- Chair of Radiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland.
| | - Aleksander Kowal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Cancer Centre and Traumatology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Julia Radzikowska
- Student's Scientific Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| | | | - Łukasz Skiba
- Student's Scientific Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| | - Tadeusz J Popiela
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
- Chair of Radiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| | - Robert Chrzan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
- Chair of Radiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, 30-688, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Isgrò G, Rogers A, Veeratterapillay R, Rix D, Page T, Maestroni U, Bertolotti L, Pagnini F, Martini C, De Filippo M, Ziglioli F. Role of Renal Biopsy in the Management of Renal Cancer: Concordance between Ultrasound/CT-Guided Biopsy Results and Definitive Pathology, Adverse Events, and Complication Rate. J Clin Med 2023; 13:31. [PMID: 38202038 PMCID: PMC10779766 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: In the last decade, the number of detected renal cancer cases has increased, with the highest incidence in Western countries. Although renal biopsy is reported as a safe procedure, it is not adopted in all centres. As it is not possible to accurately distinguish benign tumours using imaging, this may lead to overtreatment. Most of the cancer detected on imaging is treated by surgery, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or cryotherapy. (2) Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study of 225 patients studied preoperatively with ultrasound (US)/CT-guided renal biopsy, with the aim of supporting clinical management. Decisions regarding the biopsy were based on either MDT indication or physician preference. US-guided renal biopsy was the first option for all patients; CT-guided biopsy was used when US-guided biopsy was not feasible. The efficacy of renal biopsy in terms of diagnostic performance and the concordance between biopsy results and definitive pathology were investigated. Additionally, adverse events related to the biopsy were recorded and analysed. Data collected throughout the study were analysed using binary logistic regression, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson's chi-square test to investigate possible correlations between post-procedural complications and the size of the lesion. (3) Results: Renal biopsy was not diagnostic in 23/225 (10.2%) patients. A CT-guided approach was necessary in 20/225 patients after failure of US-guided biopsy. The complication rate of renal biopsy was 4.8% overall-all Clavien grade I and without any serious sequelae. Interestingly, complications occurred in patients with very different sizes of renal cell carcinoma. No correlation between complications and anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs was found. No seeding was reported among the patients who underwent partial/radical nephrectomy. (4) Conclusions: Renal biopsy was shown to be safe and effective, with a high concordance between biopsy results and definitive pathology and a low rate of complications. The use of a CT-guided approach whenever the US-guided approach failed improved the diagnostic performance of renal biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianmarco Isgrò
- Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
| | - Alistair Rogers
- Department of Urology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK (R.V.)
| | - Rajan Veeratterapillay
- Department of Urology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK (R.V.)
| | - David Rix
- Department of Urology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK (R.V.)
| | - Toby Page
- Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
| | - Umberto Maestroni
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (F.Z.)
| | - Lorenzo Bertolotti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Radiology, University-Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (M.D.F.)
| | - Francesco Pagnini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Radiology, University-Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (M.D.F.)
| | - Chiara Martini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University-Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy
| | - Massimo De Filippo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Radiology, University-Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (M.D.F.)
| | - Francesco Ziglioli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (F.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bertolotti L, Segato F, Pagnini F, Buti S, Casarin A, Celia A, Ziglioli F, Maestroni U, Pedrazzi G, Ascenti V, Martini C, Cicero C, De Filippo M. Percutaneous Ablation of T1 Renal Masses: Comparative Local Control and Complications after Radiofrequency and Cryoablation. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3059. [PMID: 37835802 PMCID: PMC10572527 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The efficacy and complication rates of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CA) in the treatment of T1 renal masses in two Northern Italy hospitals were retrospectively investigated. Eighty-two patients with 80 T1a tumors and 10 T1b tumors treated with thermal ablation from 2015 through 2020 were included. A total of 43 tumors in 38 patients were treated with RFA (2.3 ± 0.9 cm), and 47 tumors in 44 patients were treated with CA (2.1 ± 0.8 cm). The mean follow-up observation period was 26 ± 19 months. The major complications and efficacy, as measured using the technical success and local tumor recurrence rates, were recorded. There were three (6.9%) technical failures with RFA and one (2.1%) with cryoablation (p = 0.30). Among the 40 tumors that were successfully treated with RFA, 1 tumor (2.5%) developed local tumor recurrence; 5/46 tumors that were treated with cryoablation (10.8%) developed local tumor recurrence (p = 0.17). T1b lesions (4.0 ± 0.7 cm) resulted in 1/6 technically unsuccessful cases with RFA and 0/4 with CA. No recurrent disease was detected in the T1b lesions. Major complications occurred after 2.3% (1/43) of RFAs and 0/47 of cryoablation procedures. RFA and cryoablation are both effective in the treatment of renal masses. Major complications with either procedure are uncommon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Bertolotti
- Section of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (L.B.); (F.P.); (M.D.F.)
| | - Federica Segato
- G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, VR, Italy;
| | - Francesco Pagnini
- Section of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (L.B.); (F.P.); (M.D.F.)
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma–Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy;
| | - Andrea Casarin
- Department of Radiology, San Bassiano Hospital, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, VI, Italy; (A.C.); (C.C.)
| | - Antonio Celia
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, VI, Italy;
| | - Francesco Ziglioli
- Department of Urology, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (F.Z.); (U.M.)
| | - Umberto Maestroni
- Department of Urology, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (F.Z.); (U.M.)
| | - Giuseppe Pedrazzi
- Centre of Statistic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy;
| | - Velio Ascenti
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, Policlinico Universitario, University of Milan, 20133 Milano, MI, Italy;
| | - Chiara Martini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy
| | - Calogero Cicero
- Department of Radiology, San Bassiano Hospital, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, VI, Italy; (A.C.); (C.C.)
| | - Massimo De Filippo
- Section of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy; (L.B.); (F.P.); (M.D.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bucolo GM, Ascenti V, Barbera S, Fontana F, Aricò FM, Piacentino F, Coppola A, Cicero G, Marino MA, Booz C, Vogl TJ, D'Angelo T, Venturini M, Ascenti G. Virtual Non-Contrast Spectral CT in Renal Masses: Is It Time to Discard Conventional Unenhanced Phase? J Clin Med 2023; 12:4718. [PMID: 37510833 PMCID: PMC10380803 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Dual-layer Dual-Energy CT (dl-DECT) allows one to create virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions from contrast-enhanced CT scans, with a consequent decrease of the radiation dose. This study aims to assess the reliability of VNC for the diagnostic evaluation of renal masses in comparison with true non-contrast (TNC) images. The study cohort included 100 renal masses in 40 patients who underwent dl-DECT between June and December 2021. Attenuation values and standard deviations were assessed through the drawing of regions of interest on TNC and VNC images reconstructed from corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed in order to assess equivalence of data and Spearman's Rho correlation coefficient to evaluate correlations between each parameter. The diagnostic accuracy of VNC was estimated through the performance of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Differences between attenuation values were, respectively, 74%, 18%, 5% and 3% (TNC-VNCcort), and 74%, 15%, 9% and 2% (TNC-VNCneph). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated the equivalence of attenuation values between the TNC and VNC images. The diagnostic performance of VNC images in the depiction of kidney simple cysts remains high compared to TNC (VNCcort-AUC: 0.896; VNCneph-AUC: 0.901, TNC-AUC: 0.903). In conclusion, quantitative analysis of attenuation values showed a strong agreement between VNC and TNC images in the evaluation of renal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe M Bucolo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Velio Ascenti
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Barbera
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Federico Fontana
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco M Aricò
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Filippo Piacentino
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Andrea Coppola
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cicero
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Maria Adele Marino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Christian Booz
- Division of Experimental Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thomas J Vogl
- Division of Experimental Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Tommaso D'Angelo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo Venturini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ascenti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|