1
|
Tirca L, Savin C, Stroescu C, Balescu I, Petrea S, Diaconu C, Gaspar B, Pop L, Varlas V, Hasegan A, Martac C, Bolca C, Stoian M, Zgura A, Gorecki GP, Bacalbasa N. Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors in GBC. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4201. [PMID: 39064241 PMCID: PMC11278318 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare entity with a poor prognosis, usually discovered late due to nonspecific symptoms; therefore, over the last years, attention has been focused on identifying the risk factors for developing this malignancy in order to provide an early diagnosis, as well as new prognostic factors in order to modulate the long-term evolution of such cases. The aim of this review is to discuss both major risk factors and prognostic factors in GBC for a better understanding and integration of relevant and currently available information. Methods: A literature search was performed using Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, Elsevier, and Web of Science; studies published after the year of 2000, in English, were reviewed. Results: Over time, risk factors associated with the development of GBC have been identified, which outline the profile of patients with this disease. The most important prognostic factors in GBC remain TNM staging, safety margin, and R0 status, along with perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Both the technique and experience of the surgeons and a pathological examination that ensures final staging are particularly important and increase the chances of survival of the patients. Conclusions: improvements in surgical techniques and pathological analyses might provide better and more consistent guidance for medical staff in the management of patients with GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiza Tirca
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Catalin Savin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Cezar Stroescu
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, “Fundeni” Clinical Institute, 022336 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Balescu
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Sorin Petrea
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Surgery, “Ion Cantacuzino” Clinical Hospital, 020026 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Camelia Diaconu
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Floreasca” Clinical Emergency Hospital, 014453 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Bogdan Gaspar
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Floreasca” Clinical Emergency Hospital, 014453 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Lucian Pop
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.P.); (V.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Institute of Mother and Child Care Alessandrescu-Rusescu, 020395 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Valentin Varlas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.P.); (V.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filantropia” Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Adrian Hasegan
- Department of Urology, Sibiu Emergency Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sibiu, 550024 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Cristina Martac
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fundeni Clinical Hospital, 022336 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Ciprian Bolca
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, ‘Marius Nasta’ National Institute of Pneumology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, ‘Charles LeMoyne’ Hospital, Longueuil, QC J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Marilena Stoian
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Dr Ion Cantacuzino Hospital, 011438 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anca Zgura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncological Institute Prof.Dr.Al.Trestioreanu, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gabriel Petre Gorecki
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, CF 2 Clinical Hospital, 014256 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 021251 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolae Bacalbasa
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, “Fundeni” Clinical Institute, 022336 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang J, Li Z, Chen LL, Zhao JB, Wu JL, Leng ZW. Comparing robotic and open surgical techniques in gallbladder cancer management: a detailed systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:111. [PMID: 38441753 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01851-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and oncological outcomes of robotic surgery compared to open surgery in treating gallbladder cancer (GBC). In October 2023, we performed a literature search across major global databases such as PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. We employed a Review Manager for parameter comparisons. This study has been registered with PROSPERO under the identifier CRD42023476686. Our final meta-analysis incorporated 5 cohort studies, encompassing a total of 353 patients. Compared to the Open Group (OG), the Robotic Group (RG) had reduced intraoperative blood loss (WMD - 217.72 ml, 95% CI - 371.08 to - 64.35; p = 0.005), shorter hospital stay (WMD - 1.80 days, 95% CI - 2.66 to - 0.95; p < 0.0001), and fewer overall complications (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.97; p = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation duration, postoperative inpatient days, readmission rate, major complications, 1-year postoperative survival, 2-year postoperative survival, and mortality rates. In our study, we found that for patients with gallbladder cancer, robotic radical cholecystectomy offers certain potential advantages over open radical cholecystectomy. This suggests that robotic radical cholecystectomy might be the optimal choice for treating gallbladder cancer. However, further validation from high-quality randomized clinical trials is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Wang
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancrease II, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Zhao Li
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancrease II, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Lin-Lin Chen
- Department of Hemodialysis, Sixth People's Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Jing-Bing Zhao
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancrease II, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Jian-Lin Wu
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancrease II, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Zheng-Wei Leng
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancrease II, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patkar S, Kunte A, Chaudhari V, Goel M. Outcomes of incidental versus non-incidental T2 gallbladder cancer: A single-institute experience of 425 cases. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:754-764. [PMID: 38088226 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 60% of incidentally detected gallbladder cancers (GBCs) have a primary stage of pathologic T2 stage (pT2), defined by invasion of the peri-adventitial tissue by the tumour, a plane breached during a simple cholecystectomy. This study assesses the impact of incidental detection of pT2 GBCs on survival outcomes. METHODS Retrospective analysis of pT2 GBCs undergoing a curative resection was performed. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before an upfront radical resection were excluded. Outcomes of patients undergoing upfront surgery (uGBC) and incidentally detected tumours (iGBC) were compared. RESULTS From a total of 1356 patients, 425 patients with pT2 GBCs were included. Of these, 118 (27.7%) and 307 (72.23%) patients were in the uGBC and iGBC groups, respectively. Patients with iGBC had significantly higher locoregional, (62 [19.8%] vs. 11 [9.3%]; p = 0.009), liver, (36 [11.5%] vs. 4 [3.4%]; p = 0.01), and abdominal wall recurrences (23 [7.4%] vs. 1 [0.8%]; p = 0.009). Five-year disease free survival rates were 68.7% and 49.2% in the uGBC and iGBC groups, respectively (p = 0.013). Five-year overall survival rates were 71.7% and 64.6% in the uGBC and iGBC groups, respectively (p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS Incidentally detected pT2 GBCs have significantly poorer outcomes compared to similarly staged patients undergoing an upfront radical cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shraddha Patkar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GI & HPB Services, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditya Kunte
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GI & HPB Services, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vikram Chaudhari
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GI & HPB Services, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GI & HPB Services, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kwon CH, Seo HI, Kim DU, Han SY, Kim S, Lee SJ, Jeon DY. HER2 status based on breast cancer guidelines as a useful prognostic marker of T2 gallbladder cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:392-398. [PMID: 36369228 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the only stage showing a survival benefit after complete surgical resection, but recurrence rates remain high. Although human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has emerged as a therapeutic target, its role in T2 GBC remains unclear. This study investigated the status and prognostic impact of HER2 expression on T2 GBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS HER2 expression and amplification were detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), respectively, in 90 patients with T2 GBC who underwent radical cholecystectomy. We evaluated HER2 status according to the breast and gastric cancer guidelines and analyzed the effect of relevant prognostic factors on survival. RESULTS HER2 positive status was observed in 11.11% (10/90) and 8.89% (8/90) of cases based on gastric and breast cancer guidelines, respectively. Poor differentiation and a higher level of perineural invasion were independent prognostic factors of disease-free survival (DFS). Old age, male sex, presence of lymph node metastasis, poor differentiation, high levels of perineural invasion, and HER2 positivity based on breast cancer guidelines were identified as independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). Patients with HER2-positive T2 GBC according to breast cancer guidelines had worse OS. CONCLUSIONS HER2 positivity based on breast- but not gastric-cancer guidelines was associated with poorer survival. These results provide a criterion for the evaluation of HER2 and a rationale for therapeutic strategies targeting HER2 in T2 GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chae Hwa Kwon
- Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| | - Hyung Il Seo
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
| | - Dong Uk Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| | - Sung Yong Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| | - Suk Kim
- Department of Radiology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
| | - So Jeong Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seegene Medical Foundation, Busan, South Korea
| | - Da Ye Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi JH, Kang CM, Park JY. EGFR-targeted fluorescent imaging using the da Vinci® Firefly™ camera for gallbladder cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:201. [PMID: 35701793 PMCID: PMC9199159 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02675-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fluorescent imaging may aid with the precise diagnosis and treatment of patients with gallbladder cancer. In this study, we sought to demonstrate whether the da Vinci® surgical system and Firefly™ camera could detect EGFR-targeted fluorescent images in orthotopic mouse models of gallbladder cancer. Methods An orthotopic mouse model of gallbladder cancer was created by injecting NOZ gallbladder cancer cells mixed with Matrigel into the gallbladder. In vivo imaging of subcutaneous and orthotopic gallbladder tumors was performed after the injection of DyLight 650- or 800-conjugated EGFR antibody. Results Western blotting, flow cytometry, and confocal microscopy showed the presence of EGFR in NOZ cells, but not in HEK293 cells. Subcutaneous NOZ cell tumors fluoresced after injection with fluorescent EGFR antibody, but subcutaneous HEK293 tumors did not. Fluorescent EGFR antibody made orthotopic NOZ tumors fluoresce, with an intensity stronger than that in the surrounding normal tissues. Histochemical examination confirmed the location of the tumors inside the gallbladder and adjacent liver parenchyma. Fluorescent signal was also detected in orthotopic gallbladder tumors with Firefly™ camera. Conclusion Our study showed that fluorescent EGFR antibodies and the Firefly camera in the da Vinci system can detect fluorescing gallbladder tumors, which demonstrates their potential use for molecular imaging-based prevision surgery in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Ha Choi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, and Yonsei Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong Youp Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. .,Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, and Yonsei Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|