Biomarker Value in the Diagnosis of Community-Acquired Pneumonia with Concomitant Chronic Heart Failure

Biomarkers: Are They Useful in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia?

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a prevalent infectious disease often requiring hospitalization, although its diagnosis remains challenging as there is no gold standard test. In severe CAP, clinical and radiologic criteria have poor sensitivity and specificity, and microbiologic documentation is usually delayed and obtained in less than half of sCAP patients. Biomarkers could be an alternative for diagnosis, treatment monitoring and establish resolution. Beyond the existing evidence about biomarkers as an adjunct diagnostic tool, most evidence comes from studies including CAP patients in primary care or emergency departments, and not only sCAP patients. Ideally, biomarkers used in combination with signs, symptoms, and radiological findings can improve clinical judgment to confirm or rule out CAP diagnosis, and may be valuable adjunctive tools for risk stratification, differentiate viral pneumonia and monitoring the course of CAP. While no single biomarker has emerged as an ideal one, CRP and PCT have gathered the most evidence. Overall, biomarkers offer valuable information and can enhance clinical decision-making in the management of CAP, but further research and validation are needed to establish their optimal use and clinical utility.

Malnutrition and infection lead to poor prognosis and heavy financial burden of patients with chronic heart failure

Background

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a major public health concern, as it is associated with poor prognosis and heavy financial burden. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in medications for CHF in China, but few studies pay attention to the effects of nutrition and infection.

Methods and results

This was a retrospective study collected patients with CHF admitted to the Department of Cardiology of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2017 to May 2018. Patients were classified according to the prognosis and the financial burden. Through comparison and regression analysis, we found that the factor associated with worse prognosis were decreased heart rate, albumin and prealbumin; β-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism (MRA) were the factor improved the prognosis of patients with CHF; the factor overburdening financial condition were infection, decreased prealbumin, high Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), usage of recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide (rhBNP) and Levosimendan; aspirin and Sacubitril/Valsartan were the factor releasing financial burden of patients with CHF. Then, we grouped by Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, which enabled evaluation of the patient's protein reserve and immune defenses. Patients in the malnutrition group had higher infection ratios, longer hospital stays, and greater hospital expenses than the normal group. The improvement ratios of therapeutic outcomes in the moderate or severe malnutrition group were lower than in the normal and mild malnutrition group.

Conclusion

Malnutrition and infection caused poor prognosis and increased financial burden of patients with CHF. The high CONUT score indicated the CHF patient's unfavorable prognosis and heavy financial burden.

Use of infection biomarkers in the emergency department

The use of infection biomarkers in the emergency department is discussed in terms of their possible contributions to diagnostic-prognostic uncertainties, appropriate antibiotic treatments, and triage and follow-up planning. Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), proadrenomedullin (proADM), and presepsin are among the most discussed infection biomarkers for use in the emergency department. Due to the variable sensitivity results and cutoff values, there are insufficient data to recommend the widespread use of CRP and procalcitonin (PCT) for the diagnosis and prognosis of infection in the emergency department. However, these biomarkers can be used for appropriate antibiotic use in selected infection groups, such as community-acquired pneumonia, especially to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. With its prognostic superiority over other biomarkers and its contribution to prognostic score systems in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), proADM can be used to predict hospitalization, preferably within the scope of clinical studies. Although presepsin has been shown to have some advantages over other biomarkers to rule out sepsis, there are insufficient data for its clinical use in the emergency department.