Vestibular Anatomic Localization of Pain Sensitivity in Women with Insertional Dyspareunia: A Different Approach to Address the Variability of Painful Intercourse

Does One Measure Fit All? The Role of Experimentally Induced Pain Tests in the Assessment of Women with Provoked Vestibular Pain

Purpose

A diagnostic algorithm was recently suggested to address the underlying mechanisms of provoked-vestibulodynia (PVD). It delineates four subgroups (Hormonal-associated, Augmented-anterior, Hymenal-associated and Hypertonicity-associated), each manifesting a distinctive vulvar pain-hypersensitivity regarding location (circumferential vs posterior-only vestibulodynia) and pain characteristics. We aimed to explore the significance of various experimentally induced vulvar pain measures in the manifestation of pain hypersensitivity in each subgroup.

Methods

Women with PVD (n = 113) and 43 controls reported pain intensity provoked during vaginal penetration and tampon insertion. Vestibular tenderness (anterior and posterior) was assessed by Q-tip test, and pressure stimulation delivered to the puborectalis assessed muscle tenderness. Pain thresholds were measured using a vulvar-algesiometer. These measures were compared between patients and controls and among the PVD subgroups. Correlations between the clinical and experimentally induced-pain measures were assessed. Finally, to address whether the association between experimentally induced-pain measures and dyspareunia severity is mediated by hypertonicity, the conditional indirect effect was analyzed in each subgroup.

Results

Compared to controls, augmented vulvar pain-hypersensitivity and hypertonicity were observed among patients (p < 0.001). ANOVA revealed no subgroup differences in dyspareunia severity. Nevertheless, some experimentally induced-pain measures were differently correlated with dyspareunia intensity in each subgroup, allowing discrimination of subgroups according to the unique findings of vulvar pain-hypersensitivity. The degree of pelvic floor muscle-hypertonicity mediated the association between vulvar pain-hypersensitivity and dyspareunia severity, emphasizing the key role of hypertonicity in distinguishing between subgroups.

Conclusion

The findings offer more evidence of variations among PVD subtypes, demonstrating that insertional dyspareunia may originate from dissimilar alterations in the mucosal and muscular tissues. The results also emphasize the significance of utilizing a wide battery of tests to capture different experimentally induced-pain measures, revealing the unique patterns of vulvar pain-hypersensitivity in each subgroup.

Are pelvic pain and increased pelvic floor muscle tone associated in women with persistent noncancer pelvic pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between pelvic pain and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) tone in women with persistent noncancer pelvic pain (PNCPP) is unclear.

AIM

To synthesize the evidence of the association between pelvic pain and PFM tone in women with PNCPP.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted via MEDLINE, Emcare, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus to identify relevant studies. Studies were eligible if pelvic pain and PFM tone outcome measures were reported among women aged >18 years. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies was used to assess study quality. Studies were pooled by assessment of PFM tone via a random effects model. Associations between the presence of pelvic pain and PFM tone were assessed with odds ratio (OR), while linear associations were assessed with Pearson or Spearman correlation.

OUTCOMES

Pelvic pain measures (intensity, threshold, and frequency) and resting PFM tone in women with PNCPP, as evaluated by any clinical assessment method or tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included in this review. The presence of pelvic pain was significantly associated with increased PFM tone as assessed by digital palpation (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.66-4.89). Pelvic pain intensity was inversely but weakly associated with PFM flexibility when evaluated through dynamometry (r = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.17). However, no significant associations were found between pelvic pain and PFM tone when measured with other objective assessment methods.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Pelvic pain and increased PFM tone may not be directly associated; alternatively, a nonlinear association may exist. A range of biopsychosocial factors may mediate or moderate the association, and clinicians may need to consider these factors when assessing women with PNCPP.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. All possible findings from relevant theses and conference abstracts were considered in our search. However, nonlinear associations between pelvic pain and increased PFM tone were not assessed as part of this review.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic pain may be linearly associated with increased PFM tone and decreased PFM flexibility when measured with digital palpation or dynamometry; however, this association was not observed when other aspects of PFM tone were assessed through objective methods. Future studies are required using robust assessment methods to measure PFM tone and analyses that account for other biopsychosocial factors that may influence the association.

Genito Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder (GPPPD) in Spanish Women-Clinical Approach in Primary Health Care: Review and Meta-Analysis

Sexuality is a component of great relevance in humans. Sexual disorders are a major public health problem representing a high prevalence in the general population. DSM-5 genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) includes dyspareunia and vaginismus (DSM-IV-TR). To assess the importance of research on these disorders in Spain, we evaluated the Spanish scientific publications of primary and community care. The objective was to quantify the magnitude of the publications of GPPPD in Spanish women in primary and community care. For this, we used the method of conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating GPPPD. As main results, of the 551 items found, we selected 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria. In primary care in Spain, one in nine women has these disorders; the percentage of women with GPPPD in this study (raw data) was 11.23% (95% CI: 0-29%) (vaginismus 5%; penetration pain 8.33%; dyspareunia 16.45%). These percentages can differ of those from other countries, and they are at the top of the data of the European countries (9-11.9%). There is much variability in the studies found in the world with respect to the prevalence of these health problems.

A systematic review of diagnostic tests to detect pelvic floor myofascial pain

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Myofascial pain arising from pelvic floor muscles occurs in women with vaginismus, interstitial cystitis and endometriosis but is often overlooked. The aim is to examine alternative diagnostic tests to detect pelvic floor myofascial pain compared with standardized vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscles as the reference test.

METHODS

A systematic review was prospectively conducted (PROSPERO-CRD42020183092) according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included Ovid Medline 1946-, Embase 1957-, Scopus 1960-, Cochrane Combined, Clinical trials, Google Scholar (top 200 articles), Web of Science, TRIP, BIOSIS, DARE, CINHAL, EmCare, PEDro, ProQuest and EBSCOhost up to July 2020. Articles were independently screened by two authors and assessed for bias using QUASDAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

A total of 26,778 articles were screened and 177 were selected for full text review, of which 5 were selected for final analysis. Five studies included 9694 participants of which 1628 had pelvic floor myofascial pain. Only one study reported data to calculate sensitivities and specificities of the index test, which utilized a score of > 40 on the Central Sensitization Inventory to detect women with pelvic floor myofascial pain and revealed a sensitivity of 34.8% and a specificity of 84.9% compared to the reference test.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review did not reveal any diagnostic test superior to the pre-defined reference test. There is a lack of consensus on the definition of pelvic floor myofascial pain and a lack of a validated diagnostic criteria which must be addressed to progress with meaningful research in this field.