Evaluation of a Novel Polymeric Flocculant for Enhanced Water Recovery of Mature Fine Tailings

Estimating the bioaccessibility of flocculants in the presence of sediments in model wastewater

The cationic degradable polymer poly(lactic acid) choline iodide ester methacrylate, poly(PLA₄ChMA), can be used to flocculate particles and dewater sediments from tailings ponds and wastewater. A suitable bioaccessibility method is required to characterize the interactions of this novel flocculant in the human gastrointestinal system. To this end, a physiologically based extraction test (PBET) was modified to evaluate the bioaccessibility of flocculants. Bioaccessibility (bioaccessible fraction) is a measure of the solubility of a contaminant in gastrointestinal fluids and that may be available for systemic absorption. The flocculants poly(PLA₄ChMA), SNF C3276, and FLOPAM A3338 were tested at a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:200 in the absence and presence of kaolin clay, which is used as a model sediment compound. Bioaccessible fractions were characterized by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and estimated by gravimetry. The bioaccessibility of poly(PLA₄ChMA) in gastric and intestinal PBET solutions decreases from 78% to 100%, respectively, in the absence of kaolin to approximately 0% with kaolin, indicating that poly(PLA₄ChMA) remains adsorbed onto the clay surface throughout the PBET, a result confirmed by thermogravimetric analysis. The bioaccessibility of cationic SNF C3276 and anionic FLOPAM A3338 in gastric solution is approximately 76% and 26%, respectively, and is not affected by the presence of kaolin. However, in intestinal solutions, the bioaccessibility of SNF C3276 and FLOPAM A3338 (60-85% in the absence of kaolin) changes to 0% and 100%, respectively, in the presence of kaolin. These results, interpreted in terms of solution pH and surface charge, demonstrate that interactions with kaolin influence the solubility of flocculants and must be considered in the evaluation of bioaccessibility. In future works, such bioaccessibility methods can be applied to assess the human-health safety of using flocculants in wastewater treatments.

Toward sustainable remediation of oil sands fine Tailings-A review

Significant quantities of tailings are produced during the extraction of bitumen from oil sands. Tailings are stored in tailings ponds for several years before they can be appropriately managed. Current fine tailings management approaches include mechanical and/or chemical amendments of fine tailings (FT) to speed up tailings reclamation. However, complex structures of fine tailings, stringent tailings management regulations, failure in production of trafficable deposits with current FT reclamation technologies and biogenic gas (e.g., CH₄) generations have prompted the re-evaluation of current FT remediation technologies and exploration of alternative biological treatments (e.g., bioaugmentation and biostimulation). Biological treatments have proven to effectively remediate environmental pollutants by creating favourable environments for the desire microorganisms. Thus their effects on FT reclamation have been increasingly investigated in the last two decades. Many of these studies confirmed that biological treatments can improve FT dewatering and densification. However, other studies found that not all biological treatments can effectively suppress CH₄ generations or they may lead to the generation of other biogenic gases (e.g., H₂S, N₂O, NO). Therefore, it is critical to identify potential environmental risks associated with the biological treatments before their full-scale applications. This review revolved around two questions. First, whether bioaugmentation and biostimulation methods can improve FT reclamation. Secondly, what are the potential environmental issues that may arise from the applications of biological treatments. To address these questions, the existing peer-reviewed documents on fine tailings management were carefully reviewed to provide an introduction to the currently practiced FT reclamation technologies. Further discussions on biological treatments and their potentials and limitations were also presented. Finally, the review highlighted the knowledge gap in the area of biological treatments of FT and provided recommendations for future research.