1
|
Arakawa T, Kamio S. Control Efficacy of UAV-Based Ultra-Low-Volume Application of Pesticide in Chestnut Orchards. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 12:2597. [PMID: 37514212 PMCID: PMC10384239 DOI: 10.3390/plants12142597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Pesticide spraying using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has been utilized in many crops, including fruit tree crops, because of its merits in terms of labor-saving and the low risk to the operator. However, its relevance to chestnut, one of the commercially significant fruit trees grown throughout Europe and Asia, has not been studied. In this work, we assessed the effectiveness of UAV-based ultra-low-volume pesticide application in chestnuts. We demonstrated the efficiency of three insecticides applied by a UAV on young chestnut trees. Interestingly, using a reduced amount of one of the pesticides, UAV-based spraying had greater control efficacy than conventional methods. The efficacy of ultra-low-volume pesticide application to adult trees was equivalent to using an air-blast sprayer. The spray coverage was compared in terms of spray volume (20 L vs. 40 L ha-1), flight method (straight flight vs. rotating flight for each tree), the size of the UAVs (8 L vs. 30 L in payload capacity), flow rate (3.8 L vs. 6.0 L min-1), and tree age in order to characterize the droplet deposition of UAV-based spraying. Overall, we showed that spraying pesticides using a UAV could effectively protect chestnut trees. It was debated how tree training, or tree height, affected pest control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takumi Arakawa
- Gifu Prefectural Research Institute for Agricultural Technology in Hilly and Mountainous Areas, Nakatsugawa 508-0203, Japan
| | - Shinji Kamio
- Gifu Prefectural Research Institute for Agricultural Technology in Hilly and Mountainous Areas, Nakatsugawa 508-0203, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sousa JJ, Toscano P, Matese A, Di Gennaro SF, Berton A, Gatti M, Poni S, Pádua L, Hruška J, Morais R, Peres E. UAV-Based Hyperspectral Monitoring Using Push-Broom and Snapshot Sensors: A Multisite Assessment for Precision Viticulture Applications. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:6574. [PMID: 36081033 PMCID: PMC9460142 DOI: 10.3390/s22176574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Hyperspectral aerial imagery is becoming increasingly available due to both technology evolution and a somewhat affordable price tag. However, selecting a proper UAV + hyperspectral sensor combo to use in specific contexts is still challenging and lacks proper documental support. While selecting an UAV is more straightforward as it mostly relates with sensor compatibility, autonomy, reliability and cost, a hyperspectral sensor has much more to be considered. This note provides an assessment of two hyperspectral sensors (push-broom and snapshot) regarding practicality and suitability, within a precision viticulture context. The aim is to provide researchers, agronomists, winegrowers and UAV pilots with dependable data collection protocols and methods, enabling them to achieve faster processing techniques and helping to integrate multiple data sources. Furthermore, both the benefits and drawbacks of using each technology within a precision viticulture context are also highlighted. Hyperspectral sensors, UAVs, flight operations, and the processing methodology for each imaging type' datasets are presented through a qualitative and quantitative analysis. For this purpose, four vineyards in two countries were selected as case studies. This supports the extrapolation of both advantages and issues related with the two types of hyperspectral sensors used, in different contexts. Sensors' performance was compared through the evaluation of field operations complexity, processing time and qualitative accuracy of the results, namely the quality of the generated hyperspectral mosaics. The results shown an overall excellent geometrical quality, with no distortions or overlapping faults for both technologies, using the proposed mosaicking process and reconstruction. By resorting to the multi-site assessment, the qualitative and quantitative exchange of information throughout the UAV hyperspectral community is facilitated. In addition, all the major benefits and drawbacks of each hyperspectral sensor regarding its operation and data features are identified. Lastly, the operational complexity in the context of precision agriculture is also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquim J. Sousa
- Engineering Department, School of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Centre for Robotics in Industry and Intelligent Systems (CRIIS), INESC Technology and Science (INESCTEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
| | - Piero Toscano
- Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council (CNR-IBE), Via G. Caproni, 8, 50145 Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Matese
- Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council (CNR-IBE), Via G. Caproni, 8, 50145 Florence, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Berton
- Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources, National Research Council (CNR-IGG), Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Gatti
- Department of Sustainable Crop Production (DI.PRO.VE.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via E. Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Stefano Poni
- Department of Sustainable Crop Production (DI.PRO.VE.S.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via E. Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Luís Pádua
- Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Jonáš Hruška
- Engineering Department, School of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Raul Morais
- Engineering Department, School of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Emanuel Peres
- Engineering Department, School of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
In recent years, technological advances have led to the increasing use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for forestry applications. One emerging field for drone application is forest health monitoring (FHM). Common approaches for FHM involve small-scale resource-extensive fieldwork combined with traditional remote sensing platforms. However, the highly dynamic nature of forests requires timely and repetitive data acquisition, often at very high spatial resolution, where conventional remote sensing techniques reach the limits of feasibility. UAVs have shown that they can meet the demands of flexible operation and high spatial resolution. This is also reflected in a rapidly growing number of publications using drones to study forest health. Only a few reviews exist which do not cover the whole research history of UAV-based FHM. Since a comprehensive review is becoming critical to identify research gaps, trends, and drawbacks, we offer a systematic analysis of 99 papers covering the last ten years of research related to UAV-based monitoring of forests threatened by biotic and abiotic stressors. Advances in drone technology are being rapidly adopted and put into practice, further improving the economical use of UAVs. Despite the many advantages of UAVs, such as their flexibility, relatively low costs, and the possibility to fly below cloud cover, we also identified some shortcomings: (1) multitemporal and long-term monitoring of forests is clearly underrepresented; (2) the rare use of hyperspectral and LiDAR sensors must drastically increase; (3) complementary data from other RS sources are not sufficiently being exploited; (4) a lack of standardized workflows poses a problem to ensure data uniformity; (5) complex machine learning algorithms and workflows obscure interpretability and hinders widespread adoption; (6) the data pipeline from acquisition to final analysis often relies on commercial software at the expense of open-source tools.
Collapse
|
4
|
Recent Advances in Forest Insect Pests and Diseases Monitoring Using UAV-Based Data: A Systematic Review. FORESTS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/f13060911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are platforms that have been increasingly used over the last decade to collect data for forest insect pest and disease (FIPD) monitoring. These machines provide flexibility, cost efficiency, and a high temporal and spatial resolution of remotely sensed data. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent contributions and to identify knowledge gaps in UAV remote sensing for FIPD monitoring. A systematic review was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol. We reviewed the full text of 49 studies published between 2015 and 2021. The parameters examined were the taxonomic characteristics, the type of UAV and sensor, data collection and pre-processing, processing and analytical methods, and software used. We found that the number of papers on this topic has increased in recent years, with most being studies located in China and Europe. The main FIPDs studied were pine wilt disease (PWD) and bark beetles (BB) using UAV multirotor architectures. Among the sensor types, multispectral and red–green–blue (RGB) bands were preferred for the monitoring tasks. Regarding the analytical methods, random forest (RF) and deep learning (DL) classifiers were the most frequently applied in UAV imagery processing. This paper discusses the advantages and limitations associated with the use of UAVs and the processing methods for FIPDs, and research gaps and challenges are presented.
Collapse
|