Duration from Wound Occurrence to Referral to a Vascular Center in Japanese Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia

Injury Precipitating Tissue Loss and Time to Referral to a Vascular Center in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

AIM

This study aimed to report injury precipitating tissue loss and to provide updated information on the time from tissue loss occurrence to referral to a vascular center for patients who developed chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in Japan.

METHODS

We examined 450 patients who developed CLTI with tissue loss and were registered in a multicenter prospective study between October 2017 and June 2020. They were referred to the participating vascular centers for revascularization. Information on the injury precipitating tissue loss and time to referral was collected at registration. The severity of tissue loss was evaluated using the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification.

RESULTS

Injury precipitating tissue loss was absent in 52.0% (95% confidence interval, 47.3%-56.6%) of the patients. The absence was associated with lower albumin levels and preserved pressure sensation. Although the time to referral was significantly shorter in cases without a history of prereferral revascularization, 16.8% (12.8%-20.7%) of the patients were referred to the vascular centers more than 3 months after tissue loss occurrence. Time to referral, but not the lack of a clear precipitant for tissue loss, was significantly associated with the severity of tissue loss.

CONCLUSION

A clear precipitant for tissue loss was often lacking, particularly in patients with low albumin levels and preserved pressure sensation. Delayed referral to a vascular center is still common.

Evidence-Experience Gap and Future Perspective on the Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a systemic disease associated with impaired limb function, poor quality of life, and increased cardiovascular morbidity. Its incidence has been dramatically increasing over years because of the emergence of an aging society and the increase in the number of patients with atherosclerotic risk factors. The clustering of these risk factors promotes disease development, reportedly leading to the differential location of atherosclerotic lesions in lower extremity arteries. The clinical presentations of PAD include intermittent claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). PAD is associated with a high risk of mortality and morbidity from both cardiovascular and limb events. The therapeutic goals for patients with PAD include 1) relief from PAD-related limb symptoms, 2) the prevention of new-onset and the development and recurrence of PAD, and 3) the prevention of concomitant adverse events due to coronary artery disease (CAD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD). There are several types of antithrombotic agents, and their main role in patients with PAD is to reduce systemic events mainly including cardiovascular and lower extremity-related events. Currently, the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is also suggested by recent clinical trials. Although endovascular therapy (EVT) has been a first-line revascularization strategy for symptomatic PAD, whether clinical outcomes after EVT are comparable to those after surgical bypass therapy remains inconclusive.

Diabetes Mellitus and Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease, or often simply called peripheral artery disease (PAD), is a common cardiovascular disease, as coronary artery disease is. Atherosclerotic disease of the arteries of the lower extremity, or arteriosclerosis obliterans, accounts for the vast majority of PAD today. Rest pain, nonhealing ulcers, and gangrenes associated with chronic ischemia (i.e., Fontaine stage III and IV or Rutherford category 4 to 6) are referred to as chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), formally called critical limb ischemia (CLI). This narrative review focuses on atherosclerotic PAD, especially CLTI, mainly highlighting its link with diabetes mellitus (DM). This article will first overview the clinical impact of DM in patients with symptomatic PAD and that of symptomatic PAD in patients with DM, followed by the clinical features of CLTI, which will be discussed from a viewpoint of its prognosis, patient profile, onset, and seasonality. DM poses a great clinical impact on CLTI, and vice versa. Patient profile appears different between DM patients complicated with CLTI and the general population with DM. Furthermore, although CLTI is pathologically rooted in atherosclerosis as is acute coronary syndrome (ACS), CLTI has considerably different clinical features compared with ACS. CLTI has an extremely poor prognosis even after revascularization, and there is ample room for improvement in terms of its prognosis. Some measures might be needed in healthcare and clinical settings before revascularization: e.g., DM control and regular ischemia risk evaluation before CLTI onset, proper diagnosis at CLTI onset, and prompt referral to a vascular specialist after CLTI onset, although its evidence is still scanty. Piling up evidence of patients with CLTI, by patients with CLTI, and for patients with CLTI is needed.