Femoral imaging artifacts associated with dorsal recumbency craniocaudal radiographic positioning. Description of a modified bisecting angle technique

Intersurgeon agreement in determining 3 cm surgical margins of subcutaneous tumors in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate intersurgeon agreement in performing a 3 cm wide surgical excision for subcutaneous malignancies in dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, blinded, randomized, clinical study.

ANIMALS

Client-owned dogs with subcutaneous tumors undergoing curative-intent, wide surgical excision between April 2019 to March 2020.

METHODS

Four surgeons, instructed to perform a 3 cm wide excision, each sequentially indicated their proposed skin incision locations around subcutaneous tumors, without knowledge of the other surgeons' proposed incisions. A tripod-mounted camera and laser positioning system were used to photograph each surgeon's proposed margin length. A random-effects model was used to estimate the standard deviation of margin lengths that would be expected from a random sample of surgeons.

RESULTS

Each of the four surgeons provided 33 independent radial measurements from 11 tumors (six soft tissue sarcomas and five mast cell tumors), for a total of 132 radial measurements. No individual surgeon consistently proposed longer or shorter margin incision locations. The prediction interval for a future margin measurement was 6 mm, implying that the 95% confidence interval of an individual surgeon's margin length would be within ±6 mm of the mean margin length from a random sample of surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Ninety-five percent of surgeons would be expected to deliver a surgical dose between 2.4-3.6 cm, for a theoretically uniform surgical dose of 3 cm wide margins.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Surgical doses are likely to vary at clinically relevant levels among surgeons, complicating design and interpretation of studies attempting to identify an ideal surgical dose.

Variability associated with assessing changes in position of a canine uncemented femoral stem prosthesis

Objective: Evaluate variability associated with assessing changes in the position of uncemented femoral stems.

Methods: Stem level, canal fill, stem angle, and version angle were measured on craniocaudal horizontal beam (CCHB) and open leg lateral (OLL) radiographic projections of the femur of 20 dogs that had uncemented total hip replacement. Intraobserver and inter -observer repeatability were determined on immediate postoperative (PO) images. Differences in position were calculated between the first (3 months – R1) and second (6 months – R2) re-evaluation (R1-R2) time points, and between PO and R1.

Results: The measurement process was very repeatable. For R1-R2, the stem appeared to subside 0.8 ± 1.4 mm for measurements based on the greater trochanter on the CCHB images, but there was a wide range (-3.9 to 2 mm; positive values indicate proximad movement). Measurements based on the inter-trochanteric crest on the OLL images had the same mean, and also a wide range (-4.4 to 2.1 mm; negative values indicate proximad movement). For PO-R1, the stem appeared to subside 1.8 ± 2.0 mm (CCHB, based on the greater trochanter, range -7.7 to 2.2 mm), 1.6 ± 1.5 mm (CCHB, based on the intertrochanteric crest, range -0.7 to 4.3 mm); and 2.1 ± 2.1 mm (OLL, based on the intertrochanteric crest, range -1.6 to 6.8 mm).

Conclusion: The position of a stable stem can appear different on subsequent re-evaluations, but this may be due to variability associated with inconsistency of positioning of the patient and limb.

Clinical significance: Documenting subsidence in individual patients should not rely on calculations based on a single measurement.

Risk factors for loosening of cementless threaded femoral implants in canine total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and potential risk factors of femoral implant loosening in the canine Helica® total hip replacement (THR) system.

METHOD

Sixteen dogs with a Helica THR were included. Medical records were reviewed for signalment and size of implants. Stem angle, stem collar to lateral cortex distance, tip to cortex distance, stem collar to lateral cortex distance at a stem angle of 150°, lever arm distance, and the distance on the diaphysis measurements were calculated from the one year postoperative radiographs. Three ratios were determined from these measurements to take into account the size of the femur in relation to the size of the implant. Femoral implant loosening was identified by radiographic and clinical signs, and confirmed at the time of surgical explantation. Differences in the successful and femoral stem failure groups were compared using either a students t-test or a Mann Whitney test. Significance was set at p <0.003.

RESULTS

Six of the 16 dogs had loosening of the femoral prostheses within one year post-implantation. One dog had evidence of a septic cause for loosening. No significant risk factors could be identified in this group of dogs with Helica stem loosening.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Helica femoral stem loosening was a common complication within one year post-implantation in this group of dogs. No risk factors were identified to potentially decrease the incidence of loosening. Therefore, due to this unacceptably high complication rate, the authors do not recommend this model of the Helica THR.