1
|
Bhatt N, Yang J, DeBaere L, Wang RS, Most A, Zhang Y, Dayanov E, Yang W, Santacatterina M, Kamberi M, Mojica J, Kamen E, Savitski J, Stein J, Jacobson A. Reducing Length of Stay in Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024. [PMID: 39118499 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether a new preoperative education and discharge planning protocol reduced unexpected discharge delays for patients undergoing reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer. METHODS A quality improvement (QI) intervention was implemented in January 2021 with several components to address historically prolonged observed lengths of stay (LOS) with head and neck cancer patients. The intervention added a preoperative educational visit with a head and neck cancer advanced practice provider, a standardized preoperative speech and swallow assessment, a personalized patient care plan document, discussion of inpatient hospital stay expectations, and early discharge planning. The intervention group included patients who underwent the preoperative education protocol from February to December 2021. For comparison, an age and sex-matched control group was constructed from inpatients who had been admitted for similar procedures in the 2 years prior to the QI intervention (2019-2020) and received standard of care counseling. RESULTS Our study demonstrated a significant reduction in observed to expected LOS ratio after implementation of the intervention (1.24 ± 0.74 control, 0.95 ± 0.52 intervention; P = .012). DISCUSSION We discuss a preoperative education QI intervention at our institution. Our findings demonstrate that our intervention was associated with decreased LOS for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This QI study shows the benefit of a new standardized preoperative education and discharge planning protocol for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nupur Bhatt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Jackie Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Lauren DeBaere
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Ronald Shen Wang
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Allison Most
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Elan Dayanov
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Wenqing Yang
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | | | - Maria Kamberi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Jacqueline Mojica
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Emily Kamen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Justin Savitski
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - John Stein
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Adam Jacobson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Löser A, Fabian A, Rühle A, Thieme A, Baehr A, Käsmann L, Zwaan I, Kahle B, Soror T, Kunte A, Seyedi N, Kebenko M, Seidel C, Dierks F, Krause L, Bruchhage KL, Rades D. Multidisciplinary survey on use of feeding tubes in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy in Germany-the SUFEETUBE project. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:583-594. [PMID: 38381142 PMCID: PMC11186953 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02206-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Data on enteral tube feeding in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy vary considerably between German institutions. This survey aims to investigate the management of feeding tubes in an interdisciplinary context across Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between December 2022 and May 2023, 70 participants (42 radiation oncologists, 12 medical oncologists, 14 head and neck surgeons, and 2 physicians covering several specialties) responded to our web-based survey. In addition to the type of institution (university hospital, private practice, etc.), their age, and professional experience (in years), participants were asked several questions on the indication and institutional policy for tube placement and management (prophylactic/reactive nasogastric or gastrostomy tube). All questions were mandatory single- or multiple-choice questions, while additional comments were possible by email. RESULTS Most participants were employed at a university hospital (n = 52; 74.3%) and came from a radiation oncology background (n = 42; 60%). Fifty-four contributors (77.1%) reported that no nutritional risk screening prior to chemoradiotherapy was routinely performed, and 71.4% (n = 50) stated that no standardized protocol was used at the institution to set the indication for tube placement. Generally, policies and methods of tube feeding vary considerably between the individual institutions and specialties. However, the majority (n = 56, 80%) recommended a prophylactic percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube to their patients before chemoradiotherapy. Still, there was no consistent trend regarding the approach for reactive tube feeding. CONCLUSION The policies and methods of tube feeding vary considerably between the individual institutions and specialties in Germany. In the era of individualized medicine, uniform protocols are difficult to establish. However, a baseline nutritional risk screening could simplify decision-making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastassia Löser
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein/Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander Thieme
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Baehr
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, LMU Clinic, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Inga Zwaan
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Birte Kahle
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tamer Soror
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ameya Kunte
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niloufar Seyedi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maxim Kebenko
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christoph Seidel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Friederike Dierks
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Linda Krause
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He Y, Liao WJ, Hu AQ, Li XY, Wang JG, Qian D. A nomogram based on clinical characteristics and nutritional indicators for relative and absolute weight loss during radiotherapy in initially inoperable patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nutrition 2024; 117:112227. [PMID: 38486479 DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radiation for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma often is accompanied by radiation esophagitis, which interferes with oral intake. We aimed to develop a nomogram model to identify initially inoperable patients with relative and absolute weight loss who need prophylactic nutritional supplementation. METHODS A total of 365 initially inoperable patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving radiotherapy between January 2018 and December 2022 were included in the study, which was divided into discovery and validation cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic and Kaplan-Meier curve analyses were performed to compare the areas under the curve and survival benefits. RESULTS A total of 42.2% (154 of 365) of the patients had been diagnosed with cancer cachexia. The malnourished group had a higher interruption rate of radiotherapy and number of complication diseases (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, patients with malnutrition had lower lymphocytes and prognostic nutritional index (P < 0.05). The combined index showed a higher area under the curve value (0.67; P < 0.001) than number of complication diseases (area under the curve = 0.52) and prognostic nutritional index (area under the curve = 0.49) for relative weight loss (≥ 5%). Similarly, the combined index had a higher area under the curve value (0.79; P < 0.001) than number of complication diseases (area under the curve = 0.56), treatment regimens (area under the curve = 0.56), subcutaneous fat thickness (area under the curve = 0.60), pretreatment body weight (area under the curve = 0.61), neutrophils (area under the curve = 0.56), and prognostic nutritional index (area under the curve = 0.50) for absolute weight loss (≥ 5 kg). Absolute and relative weight loss remained independent prognostic factors, with short overall survival rates compared with the normal group (P < 0.05). Patients with high nomogram scores supported by nutritional intervention had less weight loss, better nutrition scores, and increased plasma CD8+ T cells, and interferon gamma. CONCLUSIONS We developed a nomogram model that was intended to estimate relative and absolute weight loss in initially inoperable patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma during radiotherapy, which might help facilitate an objective decision on prophylactic nutritional supplementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Wen-Jun Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - An-Qi Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Xiao-Yang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Jian-Guo Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Dong Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ciolofan MS, Anghelina F, Mogoantă CA, Vlăescu AN, Mitroi MR, Căpitănescu AN, Florou C, Istrate-Ofiţeru AM, Iovănescu G. Kaposi's sarcoma of the larynx: case series. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY = REVUE ROUMAINE DE MORPHOLOGIE ET EMBRYOLOGIE 2023; 64:559-565. [PMID: 38184837 PMCID: PMC10863688 DOI: 10.47162/rjme.64.4.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) represents a type of cancer that usually arises on the skin and very rarely in other organs. KS-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), also known as human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8) commonly arises in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Laryngeal involvement of KS is very rare. Our study comprised of three cases with laryngeal KS. All cases were solved through surgical excision of the tumor. Histopathological and immunohistochemistry examinations revealed laryngeal KS. Laryngeal KS should be managed through surgical resection, followed by oncological treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mircea Sorin Ciolofan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania
| | - Florin Anghelina
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania
| | - Carmen Aurelia Mogoantă
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania
| | | | - Mihaela Roxana Mitroi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania
| | - Alina Nicoleta Căpitănescu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania
| | - Charoula Florou
- Department of Forensic Medicine, General University Hospital of Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Gheorghe Iovănescu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fong SC, Pandey R, Rajaretnam M, Delaibatiki M, Peel DN. Routine Prophylactic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Head and Neck Cancers with Bilateral Neck Irradiation: A Regional Cancer Experience in New Zealand. J Med Radiat Sci 2023; 70:292-300. [PMID: 37403761 PMCID: PMC10500120 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are particularly susceptible to dysphagia and malnutrition. Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is a method used to manage these issues, but practices vary among institutions. At Midcentral District Health Board, patients receiving radiotherapy to the primary and bilateral neck regions routinely undergo prophylactic PEG placement. This study aimed to review the nutritional and PEG-related outcomes of these patients. METHODS Records of 49 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Their demographics, tumour and treatment characteristics were recorded. We evaluated patient weight loss, non-elective hospitalisation, treatment interruption rates, PEG-related complications, usage, dependency rates and late dysphagia rates. RESULTS Oropharyngeal cancers were the most common primary site (61.2%), and 83.7% of patients received primary chemoradiotherapy. Mean weight loss at treatment completion was 5.6% ± 4.3 (4.6 kg ± 3.9). The rate of non-elective hospitalisations was 26.5%, and only 2% of patients had treatment interruptions. Peristomal infection was the most frequent PEG complication (20.4%). No PEG-related mortality was reported. Median duration of PEG dependency was 97 days (14-388 days). Two patients remained permanently dependent at 3 years due to grade 3 dysphagia, and six patients experienced grade ≥2 late dysphagia. CONCLUSION Our study showed that prophylactic PEG tube placement was relatively safe, with a high utilisation rate and low long-term dependence on PEG tubes after treatment completion. However, complications related to their use should be addressed through a multidisciplinary approach, with careful assessment by clinicians. The weight loss and hospitalisation rates observed were consistent with earlier studies that utilised prophylactic PEG tubes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Chen Fong
- Department of Radiation OncologyPalmerston North Hospital, Midcentral DHBPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
| | - Ramesh Pandey
- Department of Radiation OncologyPalmerston North Hospital, Midcentral DHBPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
- Department of Radiation OncologyAuckland HospitalAucklandNew Zealand
| | - Michelle Rajaretnam
- Department of Radiation OncologyPalmerston North Hospital, Midcentral DHBPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
| | - Miriama Delaibatiki
- Department of Radiation OncologyPalmerston North Hospital, Midcentral DHBPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
- Department of Radiation OncologyKathleen Kilgour Centre, Tauranga HospitalTaurangaNew Zealand
| | - David N.Y. Peel
- Department of Radiation OncologyPalmerston North Hospital, Midcentral DHBPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim YC, Woo SH, Jeong WS, Oh TS, Choi JW. Impact of Dynamic Tongue Reconstruction on Sequential Changes of Swallowing Function in Patients Undergoing Total or Near-Total Glossectomy. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 91:257-264. [PMID: 37489967 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the effects of motor-innervated free flap on sequential changes of swallowing function in patients undergoing total or near-total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS The medical charts of 21 patients who underwent tongue reconstruction after total or near-total glossectomy between April 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into groups by reconstruction type: conventional, reconstruction using an anterolateral thigh free flap (n = 11), and dynamic, reconstruction using an anterolateral thigh with innervated vastus lateralis flap (n = 10). Demographics, surgical details, and survival outcomes were investigated. A videofluoroscopic penetration-aspiration scale and functional outcome swallowing scale were analyzed according to postoperative time courses, classified as within 6 months, 6 to 12 months, and after 12 months postoperative. A time-to-event analysis was performed for gastrostomy tube status. RESULTS The dynamic group showed improved swallowing outcomes at 6 to 12 months postoperative (dynamic vs conventional group, penetration-aspiration scale: 3 ± 1.51 vs 6 ± 1.63, P = 0.024; functional outcome swallowing scale: 1.89 ± 1.36 vs 4 ± 1.41, P = 0.009). In the multivariate analysis, the dynamic group showed a decreased probability of decompensated swallowing function at 6 to 12 months postoperative (odds ratio, 0.062; 95% confidence interval, 0.004-1.084; P = 0.057). A time-to-event analysis revealed no significant difference in gastrostomy tube status between the dynamic and the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS Considering higher mortality in patients subjected to total or near-total glossectomy, dynamic reconstruction with motor-innervated free flap is worth to perform in terms of enhancing the swallowing function within 1-year postoperative period, thereby improving the quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Chul Kim
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, SeoulAsan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Becker JN, Hermann R, Wichmann J, Sonnhoff M, Christiansen H, Bruns F. Low skeletal muscle mass is predictive of dose-limiting toxicities in head and neck cancer patients undergoing low-dose weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282015. [PMID: 36802403 PMCID: PMC9942991 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The dose-limiting effect of CT-assessed low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) measured at the level of the third cervical vertebra has been found in head and neck cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemoradiotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive factors for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) using low-dose weekly chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Head and neck cancer patients receiving definite chemoradiotherapy with weekly 40 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA) cisplatin or paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 BSA and carboplatin AUC2 were consecutively included and retrospectively analysed. Skeletal muscle mass was assessed using the muscle surface at the level of the third cervical vertebra in pretherapeutic CT scans. After stratification for LSMM DLT, acute toxicities and feeding status during the treatment were examined. RESULTS Dose-limiting toxicity was significantly higher in patients with LSMM receiving cisplatin weekly chemoradiotherapy. For paclitaxel/carboplatin, no significance regarding DLT and LSMM could be found. Patients with LSMM had significantly more dysphagia before treatment, although feeding tube placement before treatment was equal in patients with and without LSMM. CONCLUSIONS LSMM is a predictive factor for DLT in head and neck patients treated with low-dose weekly chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin. For paclitaxel/carboplatin, further research must be carried out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Niklas Becker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Robert Hermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Centre for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology Bremen and Westerstede, Westerstede, Germany
| | - Jörn Wichmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mathias Sonnhoff
- Centre for Radiotherapy and Radiooncology Bremen and Westerstede, Bremen, Germany
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Bruns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Din-Lovinescu C, Barinsky GL, Povolotskiy R, Grube JG, Park CW. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Timing in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery. Laryngoscope 2023; 133:109-115. [PMID: 35366010 PMCID: PMC10084390 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine outcomes and complications in patients receiving a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube on the same day of head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery versus later in hospitalization. METHODS The 2003-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for patients undergoing ablative HNC procedures who had a PEG tube placed. Cases were stratified by PEG tube timing into an early (on the same day as ablative procedure) and late (later in hospitalization) group. Demographics and outcomes were compared using univariate analysis and multivariate regression modeling. RESULTS A total of 4,068 cases were included, of which 2,206 (54.23%) underwent early PEG and 1,862 (45.77%) received a late PEG tube. Late PEG tube patients were more likely to have a diagnosis of malnutrition (18.0% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.018) or renal failure (4.7% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.006). On multivariate regression analysis, patients receiving late PEG tubes were more likely to experience aspiration pneumonia, acute pulmonary disease, infectious pneumonia, sepsis, hematoma, wound disruption, surgical site infection, and fistula formation (all p < 0.05). The mean length of stay and hospital charges in the late PEG group were significantly greater (17.1 vs. 12.6 days, p < 0.001) and ($159,993 vs. $125,705, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing HNC surgery who received a PEG tube on the day of ablative surgery had lower complication rates, shorter length of stay, and decreased hospital costs compared to those who had a PEG tube placed later during hospitalization. Further research is needed to determine the causal relationships behind these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 133:109-115, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina Din-Lovinescu
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Gregory L Barinsky
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Roman Povolotskiy
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Chan W Park
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dragan T, Van Gossum A, Duprez F, Lalami Y, Lefebvre Y, Mootassim-Billah S, Beauvois S, Gulyban A, Vandekerkhove C, Boegner P, Paesmans M, Ameye L, Digonnet A, Quiriny M, Dequanter D, Lipski S, Willemse E, Rodriguez A, Carlot S, Karaca Y, Lemort M, Emonts P, Al Wardi C, Van Gestel D. Patient-reported outcomes in terms of swallowing and quality of life after prophylactic versus reactive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in advanced oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with definitive chemo-radiotherapy: Swall PEG study. Trials 2022; 23:1036. [PMID: 36539781 PMCID: PMC9768988 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06991-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is often used to provide nutritional support in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients undergoing multimodality treatment. However, there is little published data on the impact of prophylactic versus reactive PEG. PEG placement may affect swallowing-related physiology, function, and quality of life. The Swall PEG study is a randomized controlled phase III trial testing the impact of prophylactic versus reactive PEG on patient-reported outcomes in terms of swallowing and quality of life in oropharyngeal cancer patients. METHODS Patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer receiving chemo-radiotherapy will be randomized to either the prophylactic or reactive PEG tube group. Randomization will be stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) status and unilateral versus bilateral positive neck lymph nodes. The primary objective of the study is the patient's reported outcome in terms of swallowing (MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)) at 6 months. Secondary objectives include health-related quality of life, dosimetric parameters associated with patient-reported outcomes, chemo-radiation toxicities, PEG tube placement complications, the impact of nutritional status on survival and toxicity outcomes, loco-regional control, overall survival, the impact of HPV and tobacco smoking on survival outcomes and toxicities, and the cost-effectiveness of each treatment strategy. DISCUSSION Findings from this study will enhance clinical evidence regarding nutritional management in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated by concurrent chemo-radiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04019548, study protocol version 2.0_08/08/2019. Registered on 15 July 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Dragan
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Radiation Oncology (Head and Neck Unit), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1 rue Héger Bordet, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - André Van Gossum
- grid.418119.40000 0001 0684 291XConsultant at the Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, Hopital Erasme and Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederic Duprez
- grid.410566.00000 0004 0626 3303Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Yassine Lalami
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yolene Lefebvre
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sofiana Mootassim-Billah
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Radiation Oncology, Speech Therapy, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sylvie Beauvois
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Radiation Oncology (Head and Neck Unit), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1 rue Héger Bordet, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Akos Gulyban
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Medical Physics Department, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christophe Vandekerkhove
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Medical Physics Department, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Petra Boegner
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Medical Oncology Clinic, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianne Paesmans
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lieveke Ameye
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antoine Digonnet
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marie Quiriny
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Didier Dequanter
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Samuel Lipski
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Esther Willemse
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alejandra Rodriguez
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sebastien Carlot
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yasemin Karaca
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Erasmus Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc Lemort
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick Emonts
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Clémence Al Wardi
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Radiation Oncology (Head and Neck Unit), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1 rue Héger Bordet, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Showunmi A, Ahluwalia M. A Case of Non-cutaneous Kaposi Sarcoma. Cureus 2022; 14:e32394. [PMID: 36636532 PMCID: PMC9830648 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Kaposi sarcoma is a malignancy common in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). It is a proliferative soft-tissue tumor commonly manifesting as pigmented papules and nodules on the skin. Lesions can also appear on the mucosal lining of the oropharynx and other parts of the body such as the lymph nodes. Head and neck involvement in Kaposi sarcoma is not unusual; however, laryngeal involvement is not commonly seen. We report the case of a 31-year-old gentleman, a former smoker with AIDS, who developed a mass in the throat with progressive hoarseness of voice without stridor. An elective tracheostomy was done to protect his airway before performing a direct laryngoscopy with biopsy. Histopathology examination showed neoplastic spindle cells positive for CD31, erythroblast transformation specific-related gene, and human herpesvirus 8, consistent with Kaposi sarcoma. The diagnosis of laryngeal Kaposi sarcoma in immunodeficient patients requires a high index of suspicion, especially when it occurs without classical dermatological manifestation, an interesting feature in this report.
Collapse
|
11
|
Coke A, Gilbert M, Hill S, Siddiqui F. Nasogastric Feeding Tube/Dobhoff Placement: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Management of Malnutrition During Radiation Therapy in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. Cureus 2022; 14:e24905. [PMID: 35698672 PMCID: PMC9186100 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
12
|
Predicting the need for aggressive nutritional supplementation in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:129-138. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
13
|
Delays in Time to Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: A South Australian Perspective. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58020145. [PMID: 35208469 PMCID: PMC8877393 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58020145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In head and neck cancer, delays in time to treatment are associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Within Australia, it is recommended that primary treatment is initiated within 56 days of initial referral. The aim of this study was to assess whether head and neck cancer treatment was delivered within these timeframe guidelines at our institution and identify factors associated with treatment delays. Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer over a 24 months period (2018 to 2019) at Flinders Medical Centre, Australia. Time to treatment intervals were calculated for comparison to local timeframe guidelines. Results: A total of 72 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median time from specialist referral to treatment initiation was 45.5 days (IQR 29–61), with 72% meeting the 56 days guideline. On univariate logistic regression, patients undergoing primary radiotherapy treatment were less likely to meet this guideline than those undergoing primary surgery (OR 8.8, 95% CI 2.6–28.9, p < 0.001), as were those requiring prophylactic gastrostomy tube insertion (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–9.0, p < 0.05). Treatment initiation beyond 56 days had no significant impact on 12 months overall survival or disease-free survival. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that primary radiotherapy treatment is associated with delays in head and neck cancer treatment initiation, likely related to time consuming pre-treatment factors such as gastrostomy tube insertion.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kok A, van der Lugt C, Leermakers-Vermeer MJ, de Roos NM, Speksnijder CM, de Bree R. Nutritional interventions in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy: Current practice at the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology centres. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 31:e13518. [PMID: 34637563 PMCID: PMC9285387 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess variations in nutritional interventions during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) among the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology centres (HNOCs). Methods An online questionnaire about nutritional interventions and dietetic practices was sent to 14 oncology dietitians of the HNOCs. Results The response rate was 93%. The number of scheduled dietetic consultations varied from two to seven during CRT. Most centres (77%) reported using a gastrostomy for tube feeding in the majority of patients. Gastrostomies were placed prophylactically upon indication (39%) or in all patients (15%), reactive (15%), or both (31%). For calculating energy requirements, 54% of the dietitians used the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization and United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU) formula and 77% uses 1.2–1.5 g/kg body weight for calculating protein requirements. Almost half of the centres (46%) reported to remove the gastrostomy between 8 and 12 weeks after CR. Most centres (92%) reported to end dietary treatment within 6 months after CRT. Conclusion This study shows substantial variation in dietetic practice, especially in the use of a gastrostomy for tube feeding, between the HNOCs. There is a need for concise dietetic guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemieke Kok
- Department of Dietetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn van der Lugt
- Department of Dietetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marja J Leermakers-Vermeer
- Department of Dietetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole M de Roos
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline M Speksnijder
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gaito S, France A, Foden P, Abravan A, Burnet N, Garcez K, Kota VR, Lee LW, Price J, Sykes A, Thomson D, Smith E, Osorio EV, McPartlin A. A Predictive Model for Reactive Tube Feeding in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive (Chemo) Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e433-e441. [PMID: 34090753 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Careful management of a patient's nutritional status during and after treatment for head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) is crucial for optimal outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop a model for stratifying a patient's risk of requiring reactive enteral feeding through a nasogastric tube during radiotherapy for HNSCC, based on clinical and treatment-related factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cohort of consecutive patients treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy for HNSCC between January 2016 and January 2018 was identified in the institutional electronic database for retrospective analysis. Patients requiring enteral feeding pretreatment were excluded. Clinical and treatment data were obtained from prospectively recorded electronic clinical notes and planning software. RESULTS Baseline patient characteristics and tumour-related parameters were captured for 225 patients. Based on the results of the univariate analysis and using a stepwise backwards selection process, clinical and dosimetric variables were selected to optimise a clinically predictive multivariate model, fitted using logistic regression. The parameters found to affect the probability, P, of requiring a nasogastric feeding tube for >4 weeks in our clinical multivariate model were: tumour site, tumour stage (early T0/1/2 stage versus advanced T3/T4 stage), chemotherapy drug (none versus any drug) and mean dose to the contralateral parotid gland. A scoring model using the regression coefficients of the selected variables in the clinical multivariate model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745 (95% confidence interval 0.678-0.812), indicating good discriminative performance. Internal validation of the model involved splitting the dataset 80:20 into training and test datasets 10 times and assessing differences in AUC of the model fitted to these. CONCLUSIONS We developed an easy-to-use prediction model based on both clinical and dosimetric parameters, which, once externally validated, can lead to more personalised treatment planning and inform clinical decision-making on the appropriateness of prophylactic versus reactive enteral feeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gaito
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.
| | - A France
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, Manchester, UK
| | - P Foden
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, Manchester, UK
| | - A Abravan
- The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, Manchester, UK
| | - N Burnet
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - K Garcez
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - V R Kota
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - L W Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - J Price
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - A Sykes
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - D Thomson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - E Smith
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - E V Osorio
- The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, Manchester, UK
| | - A McPartlin
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baijens LWJ, Walshe M, Aaltonen LM, Arens C, Cordier R, Cras P, Crevier-Buchman L, Curtis C, Golusinski W, Govender R, Eriksen JG, Hansen K, Heathcote K, Hess MM, Hosal S, Klussmann JP, Leemans CR, MacCarthy D, Manduchi B, Marie JP, Nouraei R, Parkes C, Pflug C, Pilz W, Regan J, Rommel N, Schindler A, Schols AMWJ, Speyer R, Succo G, Wessel I, Willemsen ACH, Yilmaz T, Clavé P. European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:577-616. [PMID: 33341909 PMCID: PMC7826315 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06507-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a European White Paper document on oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in head and neck cancer (HNC). There are wide variations in the management of OD associated with HNC across Europe. METHODS Experts in the management of specific aspects of OD in HNC across Europe were delegated by their professional medical and multidisciplinary societies to contribute to this document. Evidence is based on systematic reviews, consensus-based position statements, and expert opinion. RESULTS Twenty-four sections on HNC-specific OD topics. CONCLUSION This European White Paper summarizes current best practice on management of OD in HNC, providing recommendations to support patients and health professionals. The body of literature and its level of evidence on diagnostics and treatment for OD in HNC remain poor. This is in the context of an expected increase in the prevalence of OD due to HNC in the near future. Contributing factors to increased prevalence include aging of our European population (including HNC patients) and an increase in human papillomavirus (HPV) related cancer, despite the introduction of HPV vaccination in various countries. We recommend timely implementation of OD screening in HNC patients while emphasizing the need for robust scientific research on the treatment of OD in HNC. Meanwhile, its management remains a challenge for European professional associations and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura W J Baijens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Margaret Walshe
- Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Leena-Maija Aaltonen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Christoph Arens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Reinie Cordier
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Patrick Cras
- Department of Neurology, Born Bunge Institute, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lise Crevier-Buchman
- Voice, Speech, Swallowing Lab, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UVSQ and Research lab CNRS-UMR7018, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Chris Curtis
- Swallows Head and Neck Cancer Charity, Blackpool, UK
| | - Wojciech Golusinski
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Roganie Govender
- Head and Neck Cancer Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kevin Hansen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kate Heathcote
- Robert White Centre for Airway, Voice and Swallow, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset, UK
| | - Markus M Hess
- Deutsche Stimmklinik, Hamburg, Germany
- Departement of Voice, Speech and Hearing Disorders, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sefik Hosal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Atılım University, Medicana International Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jens Peter Klussmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C René Leemans
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise MacCarthy
- Division of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Beatrice Manduchi
- Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jean-Paul Marie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Reza Nouraei
- Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, The Robert White Centre for Airway Voice and Swallowing, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Claire Parkes
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christina Pflug
- Departement of Voice, Speech and Hearing Disorders, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Walmari Pilz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Regan
- Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nathalie Rommel
- Department Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Deglutology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonio Schindler
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Annemie M W J Schols
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renee Speyer
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, School of Health and Social Development, Victoria, Australia
| | - Giovanni Succo
- Head and Neck Oncology Service, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Irene Wessel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna C H Willemsen
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Taner Yilmaz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pere Clavé
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bojaxhiu B, Shrestha BK, Luterbacher P, Elicin O, Shelan M, Macpherson AJS, Heimgartner B, Giger R, Aebersold DM, Zaugg K. Unplanned hospitalizations in patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with (chemo)radiotherapy with and without prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:281. [PMID: 33317602 PMCID: PMC7737384 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01727-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current studies about percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement report equivalent patient outcomes with prophylactic PEG tubes (pPEGs) versus common nutritional support. Unreported was if omitting a pPEG is associated with an increased risk of complications leading to a treatment-related unplanned hospitalization (TRUH). METHODS TRUHs were retrospectively analyzed in patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (n = 310) undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy with (pPEG) or without PEG (nPEG). RESULTS In 88 patients (28%), TRUH was reported. One of the leading causes of TRUH in nPEG patients was inadequate oral intake (n = 16, 13%), and in pPEG patients, complications after PEG tube insertion (n = 12, 10%). Risk factors for TRUH were poor performance status, tobacco use, and surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS Omitting pPEG tube placement without increasing the risk of an unplanned hospitalization due to dysphagia, dehydration or malnutrition, is an option in patients being carefully monitored. Patients aged > 60 years with hypopharyngeal carcinoma, tobacco consumption, and poor performance status appear at risk of PEG tube-related complications leading to an unplanned hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beat Bojaxhiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Triemli, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, 8063, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Binaya K Shrestha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Luterbacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrew J S Macpherson
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Heimgartner
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kathrin Zaugg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Triemli, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, 8063, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dickstein DR, Egerman M, Monrose E, Varma A, Ozbek U, Sharma S, Liu JT, Gupta V, Posner MR, Misiukiewicz K, Miles BA, Genden E, Bakst RL. Treatment tolerability and outcomes in elderly patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2020; 43:858-873. [PMID: 33615611 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to grow. Management of this cohort remains poorly defined. We investigated treatment tolerability and clinical outcomes in this underrepresented population. METHODS We identified patients aged ≥70 with nonrecurrent, nonmetastatic HNSCC treated curatively from 2007-2018 and analyzed clinical covariates. RESULTS Two hundred and twenty patients with a median age of 75 (interquartile range:72-80) were identified. Age and comorbidities were not correlated with toxicity (P ≥ .05). Patients who experienced a treatment interruption had significantly greater weight loss (P = .042) and worse overall survival (OS) (P < .001), but not worse disease-specific survival (P = .45), or locoregional control (P = .21). CONCLUSIONS Treatment interruptions were associated with weight loss and worse OS, but not disease related outcomes, suggesting an interruption in the elderly may be a surrogate for another issue. In sum, our data should guide clinical trial design to benefit this growing, neglected cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marc Egerman
- Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Erica Monrose
- Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Achintya Varma
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Umut Ozbek
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jerry T Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vishal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marshall R Posner
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Krzysztof Misiukiewicz
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brett A Miles
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Genden
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard L Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jensen AD, Langer C. [Late toxicity following primary conservative treatment : Dysphagia and xerostomia]. HNO 2020; 69:263-277. [PMID: 33180145 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-020-00961-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Dysphagia and xerostomia are still among the most important acute and late side effects of radiotherapy. Technical developments over the past two decades have led to improved diagnostics and recognition as well as understanding of the causes of these side effects. Based on these findings and advances in both treatment planning and irradiation techniques, the incidence and severity of treatment-associated radiogenic late sequelae could be clearly reduced by the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), which could contribute to marked long-term improvements in the quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Highly conformal techniques, such as proton therapy have the potential to further reduce treatment-associated side effects in head and neck oncology and are currently being prospectively tested within clinical trial protocols at several centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Jensen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Klinikstr. 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. .,FB 20 (Medizin), Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
| | - C Langer
- Klinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf‑/Halschirurgie, Plastische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland.,Justus-Liebig Universität Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Prediction model for tube feeding dependency during chemoradiotherapy for at least four weeks in head and neck cancer patients: A tool for prophylactic gastrostomy decision making. Clin Nutr 2020; 39:2600-2608. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
21
|
Lang K, ElShafie RA, Akbaba S, Koschny R, Bougatf N, Bernhardt D, Welte SE, Adeberg S, Häfner M, Kargus S, Plinkert PK, Debus J, Rieken S. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:127-136. [PMID: 32021429 PMCID: PMC6955619 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s218432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aim The primary aim of our study was to evaluate percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement depending on body weight and body mass index in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). A secondary aim was to evaluate the course of weight change following PEG placement. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 186 patients with HNC undergoing radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) at our institution between January 2010 and August 2017. Initial weight and nutritional intake were analyzed prior to RT initiation and then followed throughout treatment until completion. Based on these data, the indication of PEG placement was determined. Medical records were also reviewed to analyze PEG-related acute toxicities. Results A total of 186 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were most commonly male (n=123, 66.1%) with squamous cell carcinoma (n=164, 88.2%). Patients who had dysphagia prior to treatment initiation as well as patients with a BMI <18.5 kg/m2 needed PEG placement earlier during the treatment course. Low-grade toxicities related to PEG insertion were observed in 10.7% patients, with peristomal pain and redness adjacent to the PEG tube insertion site being most common. High-grade toxicities, such as peritonitis and organ injury, were found in 4.9% of patients. Conclusion Underweight patients and those with preexisting dysphagia should be closely screened during RT for weight loss and decreased oral intake. For weight loss greater than 4.5% during the treatment of HNC, early PEG-tube placement should be considered. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings, and delineate a scoring system for timing of PEG use (prophylactic vs reactive) as well as assess the quality of life in patients with HNC who receive PEG placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rami A ElShafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ronald Koschny
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nina Bougatf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Stefan E Welte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Matthias Häfner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Peter K Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hausmann J, Kubesch A, Müller von der Grün J, Goettlich CM, Filmann N, Oliver Tal A, Vermehren J, Friedrich-Rust M, Wächtershäuser A, Bojunga J, Blumenstein I. Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer: Influence on nutritional status, utilisation rate and complications. Int J Clin Pract 2019; 73:e13405. [PMID: 31408231 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are at high risk for malnutrition because of tumour localisation and therapy. Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is common practice to prevent malnutrition. OBJECTIVE To investigate the benefits of prophylactic PEG tube placement for HNC patients in terms of the influence on patients' nutritional status, utilisation rate, complications and to identify the predictors of PEG tube utilisation. METHODS All consecutive HNC patients who underwent prophylactic PEG tube insertion between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2012 prior to therapy were enrolled. The PEG tube utilisation rate, complications, the patients' nutritional status and tumour therapy were evaluated with the help of electronic patient charts and telephone interviews. RESULTS A total of 181 patients (48 female, median 67.5 years) were included. The PEG utilisation rate in the entire cohort was 91.7%. One hundred and forty-nine patients (82.3%) used the PEG tube for total enteral nutrition, 17 patients (9.4%) for supplemental nutrition and 15 patients (8.3%) made no use of the PEG tube. Peristomal wound infections were the most common complications (40.3%) in this study. A high Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) score prior to tube insertion was found to be independently associated with PEG utilisation. No significant weight changes were observed across the three patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS The overall PEG tube utilisation rate was high in this study. However, given the high rate of infections, diligent patient selection is crucial in order to determine which patients benefit most from prophylactic PEG tube insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Hausmann
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alica Kubesch
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jens Müller von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Carmen M Goettlich
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Natalie Filmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andrea Oliver Tal
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Vermehren
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mireen Friedrich-Rust
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Astrid Wächtershäuser
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jörg Bojunga
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Irina Blumenstein
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer after prophylactic percutaneous-gastrostomy. Eur J Clin Nutr 2019; 74:565-572. [PMID: 31570758 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-019-0499-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HNC patients often experience weight loss during treatment. To date, there is only limited data on patient quality of life (QLQ) and subjective benefit of the PEG insertion. OBJECTIVE To investigate the nutritional status, QLQ, and overall benefit. METHODS 181 patients fitting our inclusion criteria (01/2012-12/2012) were enrolled. Utilization rate, nutritional status, QLQ, and subjective PEG assessment were determined with electronic charts and the Quality of life-questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30). RESULTS The utilization rate of the entire cohort was 91.7%. The PEG was used full-time by 149 patients. No statistical differences in QLQ were observed between the groups. Of the patients that used the PEG entirely (99.7%), partially (85.3%) or not all (55.3%) would 99.7%, 85.3 and 55.8% undergo the procedure in the future if necessary. CONCLUSIONS QLQ was not significantly reduced by insertion. Especially patients using the PEG full-time had an objective and subjective benefit from the inserted PEG tube.
Collapse
|
24
|
The patient experience of having a feeding tube during treatment for head and neck cancer: A systematic literature review. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2019; 33:66-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
25
|
Mroueh R, Haapaniemi A, Saarto T, Grönholm L, Grénman R, Salo T, Mäkitie AA. Non-curative treatment of patients with oral tongue squamous-cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276:2039-2045. [PMID: 31069467 PMCID: PMC6581924 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05456-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Late-stage OTSCC is associated with poor overall survival (OS). Non-curative treatment approach aims to improve quality of life and prolong survival of patients deemed incurable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the used non-curative treatment modalities for OTSSC and patient survival. Methods All patients diagnosed with OTSCC and treated with non-curative intent at the HUS Helsinki University Hospital (Helsinki, Finland) during the 12-year period of 2005–2016 were included. Survival analysis after the non-curative treatment decision was conducted using the Kaplan–Meier method in this population-based study. Results Eighty-two patients were identified. A non-curative treatment decision was made at presentation without any previous treatment in 26 patients (7% of all patients diagnosed with OTSCC during the study period). Palliative radiotherapy was administered to 24% of all patients. The average survival time after the non-curative treatment decision was 3.7 months (median 2 and range 0–26). Conclusions Due to the short mean survival time after decision for treatment with non-curative intent, and the notable symptom burden in this patient population, a prompt initiation of all non-curative measures is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Mroueh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and HUS Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 263, 00029 HUS, FI-00029, Finland
| | - A Haapaniemi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and HUS Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 263, 00029 HUS, FI-00029, Finland
| | - T Saarto
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki and HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - L Grönholm
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki and HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - R Grénman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - T Salo
- Cancer and Translational Medicine Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Medical Research Unit, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.,Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Haartman Institute, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and HUS Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 263, 00029 HUS, FI-00029, Finland. .,Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. .,Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The indications for surgical feeding tube (SFT) placement in trauma patients are poorly defined. Patient selection is critical as complications from SFTs have been reported in up to 70% of patients. A previous analysis by our group determined that 25% of the SFTs we placed were unnecessary and that older patients, patients with head and spinal cord injuries, and patients who needed a tracheostomy were more likely to require long-term SFTs. Following this study, we modified our institutional guidelines for SFT placement. We hypothesized that a more selective placement strategy would result in fewer unnecessary SFTs. METHODS A retrospective review of all adult patients from 2012 to 2016 with an intensive care unit length of stay longer than 4 days and an SFT placed during admission was conducted. This group was compared to data collected prior to our change in practice (2007-2010). Data from 2011 were excluded as a washout period. "Necessary" SFT use was defined per established guidelines as either daily use of the SFT through discharge or for 28 days or longer and "unnecessary" SFT use as all others. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-seven SFTs were placed from 2007 to 2010 and 244 from 2012 to 2016. Following implementation of our selective SFT placement strategy, unnecessary SFT placement decreased from 25% in 2007 to 2010 to 8% in 2012 to 2016 (p < 0.0001). Significant predictors of necessary SFT placement by univariate regression were as follows: increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03/year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.04), head injury (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.71-4.60), cervical spinal cord injury (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.34-14.50), and need for tracheostomy (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 2.21-7.67). The overall complication rate was 11% (9% in the selective group vs. 13% in the preselective group, p = 0.2574) and was highest following open SFT placement (22%). CONCLUSION A selective placement strategy for SFTs in our trauma population resulted in fewer unnecessary SFTs and a trend toward fewer complications. Surgical feeding tubes should be placed through a percutaneous approach whenever possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV.
Collapse
|
27
|
Hofto S, Abbott J, Jackson JE, Isenring E. Investigating adherence to Australian nutritional care guidelines in patients with head and neck cancer. CANCERS OF THE HEAD & NECK 2018; 3:6. [PMID: 31093359 PMCID: PMC6460524 DOI: 10.1186/s41199-018-0033-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant weight loss and malnutrition are common in patients with head and neck cancer, despite advances in treatment and development of evidenced-based guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to evidenced-based guidelines and investigate nutrition outcomes during and post radiation treatment in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS This was a two-year retrospective cohort study of 209 head and neck cancer patients (85% male) treated with ≥20 fractions of radiation (mean dose = 64.8 Gy delivered over 31.9 fractions) at an Australian tertiary hospital. RESULTS Regarding guideline adherences, 80% of patients were seen by a dietitian weekly during treatment and 62% of patients were seen bi-weekly for six-weeks post-treatment. Average weight loss was 6.7% during treatment and 10.3% three-months post treatment. At the end of treatment, oropharyngeal and oral cavity patients had lost the most weight (8.8, 10.9%), with skin cancer and laryngeal patients losing the least weight (4.8, 2.9%). Gastrostomy patients (n = 60) had their tube in-situ for an average of 150 days and lost an average of 7.7 kg (9.4%) during treatment and 11.5 kg (13.5%) from baseline to three-months post treatment. The number of malnourished patients increased from 15% at baseline to 56% at the end of treatment, decreasing to 30% three-months post treatment. CONCLUSIONS Despite high adherence to evidenced-based guidelines, large discrepancies in weight loss and nutritional status between tumor sites was seen. This highlights the opportunity for further investigation of the relationship between tumor site, nutritional status and nutrition interventions, which may then influence future evidenced-based guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Hofto
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, 2 Promethean Way, Robina, QLD 4226 Australia
| | - Jessica Abbott
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD Australia
| | - James E. Jackson
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, 2 Promethean Way, Robina, QLD 4226 Australia
- Radiation Oncology Centres, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD Australia
| | - Elisabeth Isenring
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, 2 Promethean Way, Robina, QLD 4226 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ishii R, Kato K, Ogawa T, Sato T, Nakanome A, Ohkoshi A, Kawamoto-Hirano A, Shirakura M, Hidaka H, Katori Y. Poor oral intake causes enteral nutrition dependency after concomitant chemoradiotherapy for pharyngeal cancers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275:1607-1611. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-4963-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
29
|
Wopken K, Bijl HP, Langendijk JA. Prognostic factors for tube feeding dependence after curative (chemo-) radiation in head and neck cancer: A systematic review of literature. Radiother Oncol 2018; 126:56-67. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Revised: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
30
|
Kono T, Sakamoto K, Shinden S, Ogawa K. Pre-therapeutic nutritional assessment for predicting severe adverse events in patients with head and neck cancer treated by radiotherapy. Clin Nutr 2017; 36:1681-1685. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Revised: 10/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
31
|
Verma V, Allen PK, Lin SH. Evaluating Factors for Prophylactic Feeding Tube Placement in Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol 2017; 7:235. [PMID: 29021972 PMCID: PMC5623934 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Though better studied in head/neck cancers, there are currently no studies on timing of feeding tube (FT) placement in patients with gastroesophageal cancer. This study sought to discern characteristics of patients who used versus did not use a prophylactic FT (pFT), and also analyzed factors associated with placement of FTs during chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS/MATERIALS From 1998 to 2013, 1,329 patients underwent neoadjuvant CRT, of which 323 received an FT. Patients for whom FTs were placed prior to treatment due to tumor occlusion or substantial weight loss (n = 130), and those with FTs placed following treatment (n = 43) were excluded. One hundred patients had pFTs placed, and 50 underwent placement during CRT. The following was collected for each patient: demographic/patient information, oncologic/treatment characteristics, and CRT tolerance. RESULTS No significant differences were found in any parameter between cohorts that used (n = 66) versus did not use a pFT (n = 34); on univariate and multivariate analyses, no pretreatment characteristic associated with using a pFT. When compared with patients who used a pFT (n = 66), those who required an FT during CRT (n = 50) had lower body mass index (p = 0.045), underwent higher-dose radiotherapy (p = 0.003), and received induction chemotherapy (p = 0.031). On multivariate analysis, receipt of induction chemotherapy and greater weight loss and esophagitis during treatment were associated with placement of FTs during CRT (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Of our cohort who received pFTs, there were no clinical factors that predicted for their use. Patients must be closely monitored for weight loss and esophagitis when receiving CRT in order to intervene prior to further worsening of toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Pamela K. Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Steven H. Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nesemeier R, Dunlap N, McClave SA, Tennant P. Evidence-Based Support for Nutrition Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer. CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS 2017; 5:18. [PMID: 32288971 PMCID: PMC7102400 DOI: 10.1007/s40137-017-0179-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients diagnosed with head and neck (H&N) cancer often present in a malnourished state for varied reasons; nutritional optimization is therefore critical to the success of treatment for these complex patients. This article aims to review the current nutrition literature pertaining to H&N cancer patients and to present evidence-based strategies for nutritional support specific to this population. RECENT FINDINGS Aggressive nutritional intervention is frequently required in the H&N cancer patient population. Rehabilitating nutrition during operative and nonoperative treatment improves compliance with treatment, quality of life, and clinical outcomes. When and whether to establishing alternative enteral access are points of controversy, although recent evidence suggests prophylactic enteral feeding tube placement should not be universally applied. Perioperative nutritional optimization including preoperative carbohydrate loading and provision of arginine-supplemented immunonutrition has been shown to benefit at-risk H&N cancer patients. SUMMARY With multidisciplinary collaboration, H&N cancer patients can receive individualized nutritional support to withstand difficult cancer treatment regimens and return to acceptable states of nutritional health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Nesemeier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Louisville, 529 S Jackson St., 3rd Floor, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
| | - Neal Dunlap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY USA
| | - Stephen A. McClave
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Louisville School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY USA
| | - Paul Tennant
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Louisville, 529 S Jackson St., 3rd Floor, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Predictive Factors for Prophylactic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube Placement and Use in Head and Neck Patients Following Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Treatment: Concordance, Discrepancies, and the Role of Gabapentin. Dysphagia 2016; 31:206-13. [PMID: 26753929 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-015-9679-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The prophylactic placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube in the head and neck cancer (HNC) patient is controversial. We sought to identify factors associated with prophylactic PEG placement and actual PEG use. Since 2010, data regarding PEG placement and use were prospectively recorded in a departmental database from January 2010 to December 2012. HNC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were retrospectively evaluated from 2010 to 2012. Variables potentially associated with patient post-radiation dysphagia from previous literature, and our experience was evaluated. We performed multivariate logistic regression on these variables with PEG placement and PEG use, respectively, to compare the difference of association between the two arms. We identified 192 HNC patients treated with IMRT. Prophylactic PEG placement occurred in 121 (63.0 %) patients, with PEG use in 97 (80.2 %) patients. PEG placement was associated with male gender (p < .01), N stage ≥ N2 (p < .05), pretreatment swallowing difficulties (p < .01), concurrent chemotherapy (p < .01), pretreatment KPS ≥80 (p = .01), and previous surgery (p = .02). Concurrent chemotherapy (p = .03) was positively associated with the use of PEG feeding by the patient, whereas pretreatment KPS ≥80 (p = .03) and prophylactic gabapentin use (p < .01) were negatively associated with PEG use. The analysis suggests there were discrepancies between prophylactic PEG tube placement and actual use. Favorable pretreatment KPS, no pretreatment dysphagia, no concurrent chemotherapy, and the use of gabapentin were significantly associated with reduced PEG use. This analysis may help refine the indications for prophylactic PEG placement.
Collapse
|
34
|
Hoffmann M, Saleh-Ebrahimi L, Zwicker F, Haering P, Schwahofer A, Debus J, Huber PE, Roeder F. Long term results of postoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) located in the oropharynx or oral cavity. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:251. [PMID: 26637471 PMCID: PMC4670508 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0561-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Accepted: 11/27/2015] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To report our long-term results with postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients suffering from squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity or oropharynx. METHODS Seventy five patients were retrospectively analyzed. Median age was 58 years and 84 % were male. 76 % of the primaries were located in the oropharynx. Surgery resulted in negative margins (R0) in 64 % of the patients while 36 % suffered from positive margins (R1). Postoperative stages were as follows: stage 1:4 %, stage 2:9 %, stage 3:17 %, stage 4a:69 % with positive nodes in 84 %. Perineural invasion (Pn+) and extracapsular extension (ECE) were present in 7 % and 29 %, respectively. All patients received IMRT using the step-and-shoot approach with a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) in 84 %. Concurrent systemic therapy was applied to 53 patients, mainly cisplatin weekly. RESULTS Median follow-up was 55 months (5-150). 13 patients showed locoregional failures (4 isolated local, 4 isolated neck, 5 combined) transferring into 5-year-LRC rates of 85 %. Number of positive lymph nodes (n > 2) and presence of ECE were significantly associated with decreased LRC in univariate analysis, but only the number of nodes remained significant in multivariate analysis. Overall treatment failures occurred in 20 patients (9 locoregional only, 7 distant only, 4 combined), transferring into 3-and 5-year-FFTF rates of 77 % and 75 %, respectively. The 3-and 5-year-OS rates were 80 % and 72 %, respectively. High clinical stage, high N stage, number of positive nodes (n > 2), ECE and Pn1 were significantly associated with worse FFTF and OS in univariate analysis, but only number of nodes remained significant for FFTF in multivariate analysis. Maximum acute toxicity was grade 3 in 64 % and grade 4 in 1 %, mainly hematological or mucositis/dysphagia. Maximum late toxicity was grade 3 in 23 % of the patients, mainly long-term tube feeding dependency. CONCLUSION Postoperative IMRT achieved excellent LRC and good OS with acceptable acute and low late toxicity rates. The number of positive nodes (n > 2) was a strong prognostic factor for all endpoints in univariate and the only significant factor for LRC and FFTF in multivariate analysis. Patients with feeding tubes due to postoperative complications had an increased risk for long-term feeding tube dependency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hoffmann
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - L Saleh-Ebrahimi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - F Zwicker
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - P Haering
- Department of Radiation Physics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - A Schwahofer
- Department of Radiation Physics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - J Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - P E Huber
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - F Roeder
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bishop S, Reed WM. The provision of enteral nutritional support during definitive chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. J Med Radiat Sci 2015; 62:267-76. [PMID: 27512573 PMCID: PMC4968562 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2015] [Revised: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Combination chemoradiation is the gold standard of management for locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. One of the most significant advantages of this approach to treatment is organ preservation which may not be possible with radical surgery. Unfortunately, few treatments are without side-effects and the toxicity associated with combined modality treatment causes meaningful morbidity. Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) may have difficulties meeting their nutritional requirements as a consequence of tumour location or size or because of the acute toxicity associated with treatment. In particular, severe mucositis, xerostomia, dysgeusia and nausea and vomiting limit intake. In addition to this, dysphagia is often present at diagnosis, with many patients experiencing silent aspiration. As such, many patients will require enteral nutrition in order to complete chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Feeding occurs via catheters placed transnasally (nasogastric tubes) or directly into the stomach through the anterior abdominal wall (percutaneous gastrostomy tubes). In the absence of clear evidence concerning the superiority of one method over another, the choice of feeding tube tends to be dependent on clinician and patient preference. This review examines key issues associated with the provision of enteral nutritional support during definitive CRT in HNC patients, including feeding methods, patient outcomes and timing of tube insertion and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bishop
- Illawarra Cancer Care CentreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wollongong HospitalWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNelune Comprehensive Cancer CentrePrince of Wales HospitalRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Warren Michael Reed
- Medical Image Optimisation and Perception GroupDiscipline of Medical Radiation SciencesFaculty of Health SciencesThe University of SydneyLidcombeNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Khanh NT, Iyer NG. Management of post-operative fistula in head and neck surgery: Sweeping it under the carpet? World J Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 5:93-104. [DOI: 10.5319/wjo.v5.i4.93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Revised: 07/19/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The most dreaded complication in head and neck surgery is the development of fistula. Fistulas are common and devastating. The prevalence and the risk factors that contribute to fistula formation after head and neck procedures were discussed briefly. The main goal of this manuscript is to discuss current management of head and neck fistula. We believed that the best management strategy for head and neck fistulas is prevention. We recommend a holistic preventive approach during the perioperative period. The roles of different types of wound products and hyperbaric oxygen therapy were also discussed and highlighted. We also discussed the operative repair of fistulas, which relies on the tenet of providing well-vascularized tissue to an area of poor wound healing. Most often, the surgeon’s preference and range of operative skills dictate the timing and the type of repair. We highlighted the use of the pectoralis major, a well-known flap, as well as a novel technique in the surgical repair of complex, difficult-to-heal head and neck fistula.
Collapse
|
37
|
Usefulness of Prophylactic Percutaneous Gastrostomy Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy. Dysphagia 2015; 31:84-9. [PMID: 26487063 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-015-9661-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has evolved as the preferred organ preservation strategy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). This approach increases malnutrition, and thus, establishing a direct enteral feeding route is essential. To evaluate the usefulness of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in HNC patients receiving definitive CRT, we performed a prospective evaluation of HNC patients over a 6-month period. Patients and tumor characteristics, nutritional status 30 days after PEG insertion and technique complications were evaluated. We also assessed the long-term PEG usage. Forty-seven PEGs were placed and only 2 patients did not use it. The mean time of PEG use was 131 days (4-255) and mean duration of exclusive utilization was 71 days (4-180). On 30th day after procedure, 34/45 (76 %) patients had lost weight, but only 10/45 (22 %) patients had lost more than 10 % of their initial weight. The most frequent complications were minor peristomal infections, which were correlated with proton-pump inhibitor use before PEG placement (OR 3.91, 95 % CI 1.01-15.2, and p = 0.049). One year later, 19 % of patients in remission continue needing PEG. Enteric nutritional support is essential during and after CRT in HNC patients. Most patients lost weight even with PEG. One-fifth of patients in remission required long-term PEG utilization.
Collapse
|
38
|
Lango MN, Galloway TJ, Mehra R, Ebersole B, Liu JCJ, Moran K, Ridge JA. Impact of baseline patient-reported dysphagia on acute gastrostomy placement in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing definitive radiation. Head Neck 2015; 38 Suppl 1:E1318-24. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.24220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2014] [Revised: 06/04/2015] [Accepted: 07/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam N. Lango
- Department of Surgical Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Head and Neck Institute, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas J. Galloway
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Ranee Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Barbara Ebersole
- Department of Speech Pathology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Head and Neck Institute, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia PA
| | - Jeffrey Chang-Jen Liu
- Department of Surgical Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Head and Neck Institute, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Kathleen Moran
- Department of Speech Pathology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Head and Neck Institute, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia PA
| | - John A. Ridge
- Department of Surgical Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Head and Neck Institute, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bernstein OA, Campbell J, Rajan DK, Kachura JR, Simons ME, Beecroft JR, Jaskolka JD, Ringash J, Ho CS, Tan KT. Randomized Trial Comparing Radiologic Pigtail Gastrostomy and Peroral Image-Guided Gastrostomy: Intra- and Postprocedural Pain, Radiation Exposure, Complications, and Quality of Life. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26:1680-6; quiz 1686. [PMID: 26316137 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To prospectively compare radiologically created pigtail gastrostomy (PG), in which the tube is inserted directly through the abdominal wall, versus peroral image-guided gastrostomy (POG), in which the tube is inserted through the mouth. Pain profiles (primary outcome measure), fluoroscopy times, total room times, technical success, complications, and quality of life (QOL) were measured. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty patients were prospectively randomized to receive 14-F PG or 20-F POG tubes. All patients received prophylactically created gastrostomies before radiation therapy for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma. Patients receiving palliative treatment were excluded, as were those with established pharyngeal obstruction. Pain was measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for 6 weeks after the procedure and by intraprocedural fentanyl and midazolam doses and postprocedural 24-h morphine doses. Fluoroscopy times, total room times, technical success, complications up to 6 months, and gastrostomy-related QOL (using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Enteral Feeding questionnaire) were determined. RESULTS Fifty-six patients underwent the randomized procedure. The POG group required significantly higher intraprocedural midazolam and fentanyl doses (mean, 1.2 mg and 67 μg, respectively, for PG vs 1.9 mg and 105 μg for POG; P < .001) and had significantly longer fluoroscopy times (mean, 1.3 min for PG vs 4.8 min for POG; P < .0001). NRS scores, morphine doses, total room times, technical success, complication rates, and QOL did not differ significantly between groups. The one major complication, a misplaced PG in the peritoneal cavity, followed a technical failure of POG creation. CONCLUSIONS Despite the differences in insertion technique and tube caliber, the measured outcomes of POG and PG are comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondina A Bernstein
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jennifer Campbell
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dheeraj K Rajan
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John R Kachura
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin E Simons
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Robert Beecroft
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey D Jaskolka
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jolie Ringash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia S Ho
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kong Teng Tan
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Swallowing outcomes and PEG dependence in head and neck cancer patients receiving definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy +/− chemotherapy with a proactive PEG: A prospective study with long term follow up. Oral Oncol 2015; 51:622-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2014] [Revised: 03/14/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
41
|
Gorenc M, Kozjek NR, Strojan P. Malnutrition and cachexia in patients with head and neck cancer treated with (chemo)radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2015; 20:249-58. [PMID: 26109912 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Revised: 12/26/2014] [Accepted: 03/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To highlight the problems associated with nutrition that occur in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). BACKGROUND SCCHN is associated with weight loss before, during and after radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Because of serious consequences of malnutrition and cachexia on treatment outcome, mortality, morbidity, and quality of life, it is important to identify SCCHN patients with increased risk for the development of malnutrition and cachexia. MATERIALS AND METHODS Critical review of the literature. RESULTS This review describes pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of malnutrition and cancer cachexia. Treatment of malnutrition and cancer cachexia includes nutritional interventions and pharmacological therapy. Advantages and disadvantages of different nutritional interventions and their effect on the nutritional status, quality of life and specific oncological treatment are presented. CONCLUSIONS Nutritional management is an essential part of care of these patients, including early screening, assessment of nutritional status and appropriate intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojca Gorenc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nada Rotovnik Kozjek
- Clinical Nutrition Unit, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shaw SM, Flowers H, O'Sullivan B, Hope A, Liu LWC, Martino R. The effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement on swallowing and swallow-related outcomes in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Dysphagia 2015; 30:152-75. [PMID: 25737196 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-014-9592-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2014] [Accepted: 08/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) often experience malnutrition and dehydration during treatment. As a result, some centres place PEG tubes prophylactically (pPEG) to prevent these negative consequences. However, recent research has suggested that pPEG use may negatively affect swallowing physiology, function and/or quality of life, especially in the long term. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on pPEG use in HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy and to determine its impact on swallowing-related outcomes. The following electronic databases were searched for all relevant primary research published through February 24, 2014: AMED, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Healthstar, Medline, and PsycINFO. Main search terms included HNC, radiotherapy, deglutition disorders, feeding tube(s), and prophylactic or elective. References for all accepted papers were hand searched to identify additional relevant research. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias. At all levels, two blinded raters provided judgments. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The search retrieved 181 unique citations. Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria. Quality assessment revealed that all studies were at risk for bias due to non-randomized sampling and unreported or inadequate blinding. Ten studies demonstrated selection bias with significant baseline differences between pPEG patients and controls. Results regarding the frequency and severity of dysphagia and swallowing-related outcomes were varied and inconclusive. The impact of pPEG use on swallowing and swallowing-related outcomes remains unclear. Well-controlled, randomized trials are needed to determine if pPEG places patients at greater risk for developing long-term dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Shaw
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave., Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Verma V, Liu J, Eschen L, Danieley J, Spencer C, Lewis JS, Diaz J, Piccirillo JF, Adkins DR, Nussenbaum B, Thorstad WL, Gay HA. Pre-radiotherapy feeding tube identifies a poor prognostic subset of postoperative p16 positive oropharyngeal carcinoma patients. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:8. [PMID: 25572866 PMCID: PMC4333178 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-014-0314-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study explores variables associated with poor prognosis in postoperative p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Specifically, analysis was done related to timing of feeding tube insertion relative to radiotherapy. Methods From 1997–2009, of 376 consecutive patients with OPSCC, 220 received adjuvant IMRT, and 97 were p16 positive and eligible. Of these, 23 had feeding tube placement before IMRT (B-FT), 32 during/after IMRT (DA-FT), and 42 had no feeding tube (NO-FT). Feeding tubes were not placed prophylactically. These three groups were analyzed for differential tumor, patient, treatment, and feeding tube characteristics, as well as differences in overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). Results Pre-RT FT insertion was associated with higher tumor size and depth, T (but not N) and overall stage, comorbidities, presence of chemotherapy, and less use of transoral laser microsurgery/transoral bovie. Additionally, time from surgery to IMRT completion was also statistically longer in the B-FT group. The feeding tube was permanent in 52% of patients in the B-FT group versus 16% in the DA-FT group (p = 0.0075). The 5-year OS for the NO-FT, DA-FT, and B-FT groups was 90%, 86%, and 50%, respectively. The 5-year DFS for the NO-FT, DA-FT, and B-FT groups was 87.6%, 83.6%, and 42.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that for OS and DFS, feeding tube placement timing and smoking history were statistically significant. Conclusion Due to the poor prognosis of early FT insertion, the presence of FTs at time of radiotherapy consultation can be used as an alternate marker to identify a subset of p16 positive OPSCC patients that have a poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
| | - Jingxia Liu
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Laura Eschen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Place, Campus Box 8224, St. Louis, 63110-6311, Missouri, USA.
| | - Jonathan Danieley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Place, Campus Box 8224, St. Louis, 63110-6311, Missouri, USA.
| | - Christopher Spencer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Place, Campus Box 8224, St. Louis, 63110-6311, Missouri, USA.
| | - James S Lewis
- Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. .,Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Jason Diaz
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Jay F Piccirillo
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Douglas R Adkins
- Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Brian Nussenbaum
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Wade L Thorstad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Place, Campus Box 8224, St. Louis, 63110-6311, Missouri, USA.
| | - Hiram A Gay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Place, Campus Box 8224, St. Louis, 63110-6311, Missouri, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wopken K, Bijl HP, van der Schaaf A, van der Laan HP, Chouvalova O, Steenbakkers RJHM, Doornaert P, Slotman BJ, Oosting SF, Christianen MEMC, van der Laan BFAM, Roodenburg JLN, Leemans CR, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Langendijk JA. Development of a multivariable normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for tube feeding dependence after curative radiotherapy/chemo-radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2014; 113:95-101. [PMID: 25443500 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2014] [Revised: 07/16/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Curative radiotherapy/chemo-radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may result in severe acute and late side effects, including tube feeding dependence. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to develop a multivariable normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for tube feeding dependence 6 months (TUBEM6) after definitive radiotherapy, radiotherapy plus cetuximab or concurrent chemoradiation based on pre-treatment and treatment characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 355 patients with HNC. TUBEM6 was scored prospectively in a standard follow-up program. To design the prediction model, the penalized learning method LASSO was used, with TUBEM6 as the endpoint. RESULTS The prevalence of TUBEM6 was 10.7%. The multivariable model with the best performance consisted of the variables: advanced T-stage, moderate to severe weight loss at baseline, accelerated radiotherapy, chemoradiation, radiotherapy plus cetuximab, the mean dose to the superior and inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle, to the contralateral parotid gland and to the cricopharyngeal muscle. CONCLUSIONS We developed a multivariable NTCP model for TUBEM6 to identify patients at risk for tube feeding dependence. The dosimetric variables can be used to optimize radiotherapy treatment planning aiming at prevention of tube feeding dependence and to estimate the benefit of new radiation technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Wopken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hendrik P Bijl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen van der Schaaf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Paul van der Laan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Chouvalova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel J H M Steenbakkers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Doornaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda E M C Christianen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bernard F A M van der Laan
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan L N Roodenburg
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - C René Leemans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Habib SF, Ahmed S, Skelly R, Bhatt K, Patel B, Lowe D, Tuson J, Rogers SN. Developing a protocol for gastrostomy tube insertion in patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014; 117:551-559. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.12.412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2013] [Revised: 12/01/2013] [Accepted: 12/30/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
46
|
Zhang L, Dean SA, Furth EE, Weinstein GS, LiVolsi VA, Montone KT. Metastatic carcinoma to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube sites. A report of five cases. Am J Clin Pathol 2014; 141:510-4. [PMID: 24619751 DOI: 10.1309/ajcpyl2zba7ogzgp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the clinicopathologic features of metastatic carcinomas at percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube sites. METHODS We reviewed the metastatic malignancies at PEG tube sites (2002-2011). RESULTS Five patients were identified, each with primary head and neck keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma. The metastases had a mean size of 6.08 cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.75-8.41). The time from PEG tube placement to metastasis diagnosis was 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.59-13.01). The survival times from PEG tube placement and from metastasis diagnosis were 23.5 (95% CI, 7.65-39.35) and 13.7 (95% CI, 0-31.08) months, respectively. Compared with a meta-analysis of the largest case series, our male patients were significantly older (mean, 73 years; 95% CI, 62.2-83.9 vs mean 59 years, 95% CI, 56.0-62.0) but had similar survival times. CONCLUSIONS Despite their older ages, our male patients had similar survival times to those reported previously. Larger series are needed to confirm our findings and explore the causes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lanjing Zhang
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicineand Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center of Princeton at Plainsboro, Plainsboro, NJ
| | - Stephanie A. Dean
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicineand Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Emma E. Furth
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicineand Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Gregory S. Weinstein
- Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Virginia A. LiVolsi
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicineand Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Kathleen T. Montone
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicineand Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gumaste VV, Bhamidimarri KR, Bansal R, Sidhu L, Baum J, Walfish A. Factors predicting early discharge and mortality in post-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy patients. Ann Gastroenterol 2014; 27:42-47. [PMID: 24714451 PMCID: PMC3959526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2013] [Accepted: 10/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to ascertain factors that favor early discharge and predict mortality in post-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) patients. METHODS Successive patients who underwent successful PEG placement during a 10-year period in a single New York City hospital were included in the study. Data was retrospectively extracted from hospital electronic medical records. RESULTS Two hundred and eighty-four patients underwent successful PEG placement. Forty-six patients (16%) were discharged within 3 days of PEG placement (early discharge). Two hundred and thirty six patients (84%) remained in hospital from 4 to 244 days (median 13.5) after PEG insertion (late discharge). Twenty-six (9%) patients died in-house after PEG placement. A serum albumin level <2.2 g/dL (P=0.007) and presence of 2 or more co-morbidities (P=0.019) were predictors of late discharge. A dementia indication was twice as likely to result in an early discharge compared to a stroke indication (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.07-5.36; P=0.033). Female sex, positive urine cultures and low serum albumin levels were independent predictors of in-house mortality. CONCLUSION Clinical and laboratory markers may predict post-PEG mortality as well as early patient discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek V. Gumaste
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Services, City Hospital Center at Elmhurst, New York and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, USA,
Correspondence to: Vivek V. Gumaste, MD, MRCP (I), SM (Harvard), Division of GI, Elmhurst General Hospital, 79-01 Broadway, NY NY11373, USA. Tel.: +71 833 42290, Fax: +71 833 41738, e-mail:
| | - Kalyan R. Bhamidimarri
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Services, City Hospital Center at Elmhurst, New York and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, USA
| | - Raghav Bansal
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Services, City Hospital Center at Elmhurst, New York and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, USA
| | - Lovleen Sidhu
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Services, City Hospital Center at Elmhurst, New York and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, USA
| | - Joel Baum
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Services, City Hospital Center at Elmhurst, New York and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, USA
| | - Aaron Walfish
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Services, City Hospital Center at Elmhurst, New York and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kramer S, Newcomb M, Hessler J, Siddiqui F. Prophylactic versus reactive PEG tube placement in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 150:407-12. [PMID: 24381015 DOI: 10.1177/0194599813517081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand the impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement timing on tube duration, weight loss, and disease control in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). SETTING A tertiary academic center. STUDY DESIGN Historical cohort study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Seventy-four patients with HNC were reviewed. Patients underwent cisplatinum-based chemoradiation therapy with or without surgical resection. They received a PEG tube either before radiation therapy began (prophylactic) or after (reactive). Patients were matched on the basis of age, gender, TNM stage, tumor subsite, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, and chemoradiation dose. RESULTS Patients receiving reactive PEG tubes had them in place for fewer days than those placed prophylactically (227 vs 139 days, P < .01). There was no difference in percentage weight loss at 2, 6, or 12 months. There was no difference in survival or disease control between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Reactive PEG tube placement may afford patients a shorter duration of usage without incurring greater weight loss or poorer oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Kramer
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Harréus U. Surgical errors and risks - the head and neck cancer patient. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2013; 12:Doc04. [PMID: 24403972 PMCID: PMC3884539 DOI: 10.3205/cto000096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck surgery is one of the basic principles of head and neck cancer therapy. Surgical errors and malpractice can have fatal consequences for the treated patients. It can lead to functional impairment and has impact in future chances for disease related survival. There are many risks for head and neck surgeons that can cause errors and malpractice. To avoid surgical mistakes, thorough preoperative management of patients is mandatory. As there are ensuring operability, cautious evaluation of preoperative diagnostics and operative planning. Moreover knowledge of anatomical structures of the head and neck, of the medical studies and data as well as qualification in modern surgical techniques and the surgeons ability for critical self assessment are basic and important prerequisites for head and neck surgeons in order to make out risks and to prevent from mistakes. Additionally it is important to have profound knowledge in nutrition management of cancer patients, wound healing and to realize and to be able to deal with complications, when they occur. Despite all precaution and surgical care, errors and mistakes cannot always be avoided. For that it is important to be able to deal with mistakes and to establish an appropriate and clear communication and management for such events. The manuscript comments on recognition and prevention of risks and mistakes in the preoperative, operative and postoperative phase of head and neck cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Harréus
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lescut N, Personeni E, Desmarets M, Puyraveau M, Hamlaoui R, Servagi-Vernat S, Bosset JF, Nguyen F. Évaluation d’un score prédictif de dénutrition chez les patients pris en charge par irradiation pour un cancer des voies aérodigestives supérieures : étude rétrospective chez 127 patients. Cancer Radiother 2013; 17:649-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2013.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2012] [Revised: 02/18/2013] [Accepted: 03/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|