Sonographic evaluation of proximal gastric accommodation in patients with functional dyspepsia

Impaired gastric accommodation in patients with postprandial distress syndrome type of functional dyspepsia assessed by 2D ultrasonography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The pathophysiology of postprandial distress syndrome includes impaired gastric accommodation, hypersensitivity to gastric distension and delayed gastric emptying. 2D-ultrasonography is one of the methods to assess gastric accommodation by measuring proximal gastric area and we evaluated its role in calculating proximal gastric area and thus assessing gastric accommodation in Indian patients with postprandial distress syndrome.

METHODS

In a hospital-based comparative analysis, proximal gastric area was measured with 2D-ultrasonography of postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) patients and compared with healthy controls. Five readings were measured every five minutes till 25 minutes after 400 mL of vegetable soup. The Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL score) and diets aggravating PDS symptoms were studied through detailed questionnaires. Sample size was calculated at 80% study power and alpha error of 0.05 to be 30 subjects in each group.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients (18 males) vs. 30 healthy controls (25 males) was 40.8 ± 11.50 years vs. 36.37 ± 7.58, respectively, (p = 0.084). Proximal gastric area was significantly lower in patients versus healthy controls at five minutes (22.54 ± 2.77 vs. 30.66 ± 2.55 cm2), 10 minutes (23.03 ± 2.45 vs. 31.10 ± 2.06 cm2), 15 minutes (23.06 ± 2.27 vs. 30.31 ± 2.11 cm2), 20 minutes (22.21 ± 2.31 vs. 29.73 ± 1.71 cm2) and 25 minutes (22.02 ± 2.33 vs. 28.39 ± 1.55 cm2); p < 0.001 at all intervals of time, indicating impaired gastric accommodation. The QOL was poor in all patients with PDS with mean PAGI-QOL score of 31.30 ± 15.05, median of 30, minimum score of 12 and maximum score of 66.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of proximal gastric area with 2D-ultrasonography is simple and non-invasive. Proximal gastric area in patients was lower than controls, indicating impaired gastric accommodation. Poor quality of life was universal in patients with postprandial distress syndrome.

Indentation of a pressurized silicon stomach model - A non-invasive study of gastric wall stiffness and pressurized gastric content stiffness

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Evaluation of gastric wall stiffness and intragastric pressure is essential for detailed assessments of gastric accommodation. However, non-invasive assessments are needed for large scale clinical studies and none of the existing methods takes abdominal wall effect into the calculation. This study aimed to assess gastric wall stiffness and gastric content stiffness as a proxy for intragastric pressure using novel mechanical modeling and non-invasive indentation tests on a silicon stomach model.

METHODS

A silicon stomach model (scaling 1:1 with the human stomach) was indented using a pressure algometer at intragastric pressures from 0 to 0.8 kPa. Wall thicknesses and luminal cross-sectional areas along the stomach were measured with ultrasound images. The gastric wall stiffness was compared between measurements from tensile tests on strips cut from the silicon stomach and estimations from a shell indentation model. The pressurized gastric content stiffness was predicted from a bonded two-layer axisymmetric half-space indentation model.

RESULTS

The gastric wall stiffness estimated from the shell indentation model showed no difference to measurements from the mechanical tests on the cutting strips (p = 0.14). The predicted gastric content stiffness was strongly associated with the intragastric pressure (r > 0.83, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanical model developed in this study can simultaneously predict the gastric wall stiffness and the pressurized gastric content stiffness. In future studies, the method can be applied to reveal intragastric pressure conditions non-invasively via the pressurized gastric content stiffness during gastric accommodation and emptying such as with magnetic resonance imaging.

Ultrasound imaging for assessing functions of the GI tract

OBJECTIVE

In the following review we outline how ultrasound can be used to measure physiological processes in the gastrointestinal tract.

APPROACH

We have investigated the potential of ultrasound in assessing gastrointestinal physiology including original research regarding both basic methodology and clinical applications.

MAIN RESULTS

Our main findings show the use of ultrasound to study esophageal motility, measure volume and contractility of the stomach, assess motility, wall thickness, and perfusion of the small bowel, and evaluate wall vascularization and diameters of the large bowel.

SIGNIFICANCE

Ultrasound is a widely accessible technology that can be used for both scientific and clinical purposes. Being radiation-free and user friendly, the examination can be frequently repeated enabling longitudinal studies. Furthermore, it does not influence normal GI physiology, thus being useful to estimate motility and subtle changes in physiology. Accordingly, ultrasound scanning and physiological measurements may make a big difference for the scientist and the doctor; and for the patients who receive an efficient work-up.

Mexican consensus on dyspepsia

Since the publication of the 2007 dyspepsia guidelines of the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología, there have been significant advances in the knowledge of this disease. A systematic search of the literature in PubMed (01/2007 to 06/2016) was carried out to review and update the 2007 guidelines and to provide new evidence-based recommendations. All high-quality articles in Spanish and English were included. Statements were formulated and voted upon using the Delphi method. The level of evidence and strength of recommendation of each statement were established according to the GRADE system. Thirty-one statements were formulated, voted upon, and graded. New definition, classification, epidemiology, and pathophysiology data were provided and include the following information: Endoscopy should be carried out in cases of uninvestigated dyspepsia when there are alarm symptoms or no response to treatment. Gastric and duodenal biopsies can confirm Helicobacter pylori infection and rule out celiac disease, respectively. Establishing a strong doctor-patient relationship, as well as dietary and lifestyle changes, are useful initial measures. H2-blockers, proton-pump inhibitors, prokinetics, and antidepressants are effective pharmacologic therapies. H.pylori eradication may be effective in a subgroup of patients. There is no evidence that complementary and alternative therapies are beneficial, with the exception of Iberogast and rikkunshito, nor is there evidence on the usefulness of prebiotics, probiotics, or psychologic therapies. The new consensus statements on dyspepsia provide guidelines based on up-to-date evidence. A discussion, level of evidence, and strength of recommendation are presented for each statement.

Effects of humanistic intervention in patients with functional dyspepsia with depression

AIM: To evaluate the effects of humanistic intervention in patients with functional dyspepsia with depression.

METHODS: One hundred patients with functional dyspepsia with depression treated at our hospital were randomly divided into a control group and a study group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing care, and the study group received humanistic nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing. Depression and anxiety levels, adherence to treatment, common digestion symptoms and patients' satisfaction with nursing care were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: The depression and anxiety levels and the incidence of dyspeptic symptoms were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The adherence to treatment and patients' satisfaction with nursing care were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (58.0% vs 30.0%, 92.0% vs 58.0%, P < 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSION: Humanistic nursing intervention can significantly reduce the depression and anxiety levels and the incidence of the dyspeptic symptoms, and improve the adherence to treatment and the patients' satisfaction with nursing care in patients with functional dyspepsia with depression.

Effects of L-tryptophan on gastric emptying evaluated by breath test in relation to gastric accommodation evaluated by Barostat in rats

Gastric emptying has been known to correlate the pyloric sphincter contractile function and distention-induced gastric relaxation (gastric accommodation). In the present study, the effects of L-tryptophan on the gastric emptying and accommodation were evaluated by breath test using [1-(13)C]acetic acid and Barostat study, respectively, in rats. L-Tryptophan significantly decreased Cmax and AUC120min and delayed Tmax, indicating the inhibition of gastric emptying. L-Tryptophan significantly enhanced the gastric accommodation. These findings show that L-tryptophan may inhibit the gastric emptying through the enhanced gastric accommodation. Therefore, L-tryptophan may be useful for the therapy of postprandial dyspepsia, especially for early satiety.

Assessment of proximal gastric accommodation in patients with functional dyspepsia

Impaired gastric accommodation is one of the most important etiologic factors in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia. Ultrasound is a potential alternative method to study changes in gastric volume as a reflection of gastric accommodation. Ultrasound is suitable for patients because it is a non-invasive, easily repeated and non-radioactive procedure, and a previous study has demonstrated the feasibility of 3-dimensional ultrasound in examining functional dyspepsia. The brief article by Fan et al demonstrated that both the proximal gastric area and volume, measured by 2- and 3-dimensional ultrasound respectively, were significantly smaller in patients with functional dyspepsia than in healthy controls. These results are very interesting, but we raise the relevant point that it should have been mandatory to study both changes in gastric volume and their relationship with upper gastrointestinal symptoms in functional dyspepsia. In fact, the relationship between cardinal symptoms and several pathophysiologic mechanisms in functional dyspepsia remains a matter of debate. Moreover, further evaluation of distal gastric volume that has been previously implicated in the origin of functional dyspeptic symptoms is advisable. Therefore, impaired gastric accommodation does not serve as a clear marker of the cardinal symptoms experienced by patients with functional dyspepsia in daily life.