Is apparent fixational drift in eye-tracking data due to filters or eyeball rotation?

Precise localization of corneal reflections in eye images using deep learning trained on synthetic data

We present a deep learning method for accurately localizing the center of a single corneal reflection (CR) in an eye image. Unlike previous approaches, we use a convolutional neural network (CNN) that was trained solely using synthetic data. Using only synthetic data has the benefit of completely sidestepping the time-consuming process of manual annotation that is required for supervised training on real eye images. To systematically evaluate the accuracy of our method, we first tested it on images with synthetic CRs placed on different backgrounds and embedded in varying levels of noise. Second, we tested the method on two datasets consisting of high-quality videos captured from real eyes. Our method outperformed state-of-the-art algorithmic methods on real eye images with a 3-41.5% reduction in terms of spatial precision across data sets, and performed on par with state-of-the-art on synthetic images in terms of spatial accuracy. We conclude that our method provides a precise method for CR center localization and provides a solution to the data availability problem, which is one of the important common roadblocks in the development of deep learning models for gaze estimation. Due to the superior CR center localization and ease of application, our method has the potential to improve the accuracy and precision of CR-based eye trackers.

GlassesValidator: A data quality tool for eye tracking glasses

According to the proposal for a minimum reporting guideline for an eye tracking study by Holmqvist et al. (2022), the accuracy (in degrees) of eye tracking data should be reported. Currently, there is no easy way to determine accuracy for wearable eye tracking recordings. To enable determining the accuracy quickly and easily, we have produced a simple validation procedure using a printable poster and accompanying Python software. We tested the poster and procedure with 61 participants using one wearable eye tracker. In addition, the software was tested with six different wearable eye trackers. We found that the validation procedure can be administered within a minute per participant and provides measures of accuracy and precision. Calculating the eye-tracking data quality measures can be done offline on a simple computer and requires no advanced computer skills.

Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section "An empirically based minimal reporting guideline").

Can Microsaccades Be Used for Biometrics?

Human eyes are in constant motion. Even when we fix our gaze on a certain point, our eyes continue to move. When looking at a point, scientists have distinguished three different fixational eye movements (FEM)-microsaccades, drift and tremor. The main goal of this paper is to investigate one of these FEMs-microsaccades-as a source of information for biometric analysis. The paper argues why microsaccades are preferred for biometric analysis over the other two fixational eye movements. The process of microsaccades' extraction is described. Thirteen parameters are defined for microsaccade analysis, and their derivation is given. A gradient algorithm was used to solve the biometric problem. An assessment of the weights of the different pairs of parameters in solving the biometric task was made.

Small head movements increase and colour noise in data from five video-based P-CR eye trackers

We empirically investigate the role of small, almost imperceptible balance and breathing movements of the head on the level and colour of noise in data from five commercial video-based P-CR eye trackers. By comparing noise from recordings with completely static artificial eyes to noise from recordings where the artificial eyes are worn by humans, we show that very small head movements increase levels and colouring of the noise in data recorded from all five eye trackers in this study. This increase of noise levels is seen not only in the gaze signal, but also in the P and CR signals of the eye trackers that provide these camera image features. The P and CR signals of the SMI eye trackers correlate strongly during small head movements, but less so or not at all when the head is completely still, indicating that head movements are registered by the P and CR images in the eye camera. By recording with artificial eyes, we can also show that the pupil size artefact has no major role in increasing and colouring noise. Our findings add to and replicate the observation by Niehorster et al., (2021) that lowpass filters in video-based P-CR eye trackers colour the data. Irrespective of source, filters or head movements, coloured noise can be confused for oculomotor drift. We also find that usage of the default head restriction in the EyeLink 1000+, the EyeLink II and the HiSpeed240 result in noisier data compared to less head restriction. Researchers investigating data quality in eye trackers should consider not using the Gen 2 artificial eye from SR Research / EyeLink. Data recorded with this artificial eye are much noisier than data recorded with other artificial eyes, on average 2.2-14.5 times worse for the five eye trackers.

A low-cost, high-performance video-based binocular eye tracker for psychophysical research

We describe a high-performance, pupil-based binocular eye tracker that approaches the performance of a well-established commercial system, but at a fraction of the cost. The eye tracker is built from standard hardware components, and its software (written in Visual C++) can be easily implemented. Because of its fast and simple linear calibration scheme, the eye tracker performs best in the central 10 degrees of the visual field. The eye tracker possesses a number of useful features: (1) automated calibration simultaneously in both eyes while subjects fixate four fixation points sequentially on a computer screen, (2) automated realtime continuous analysis of measurement noise, (3) automated blink detection, (4) and realtime analysis of pupil centration artifacts. This last feature is critical because it is known that pupil diameter changes can be erroneously registered by pupil-based trackers as a change in eye position. We evaluated the performance of our system against that of a wellestablished commercial system using simultaneous measurements in 10 participants. We propose our low-cost eye tracker as a promising resource for studies of binocular eye movements.

Characterizing gaze position signals and synthesizing noise during fixations in eye-tracking data

The magnitude of variation in the gaze position signals recorded by an eye tracker, also known as its precision, is an important aspect of an eye tracker’s data quality. However, data quality of eye-tracking signals is still poorly understood. In this paper, we therefore investigate the following: (1) How do the various available measures characterizing eye-tracking data during fixation relate to each other? (2) How are they influenced by signal type? (3) What type of noise should be used to augment eye-tracking data when evaluating eye-movement analysis methods? To support our analysis, this paper presents new measures to characterize signal type and signal magnitude based on RMS-S2S and STD, two established measures of precision. Simulations are performed to investigate how each of these measures depends on the number of gaze position samples over which they are calculated, and to reveal how RMS-S2S and STD relate to each other and to measures characterizing the temporal spectrum composition of the recorded gaze position signal. Further empirical investigations were performed using gaze position data recorded with five eye trackers from human and artificial eyes. We found that although the examined eye trackers produce gaze position signals with different characteristics, the relations between precision measures derived from simulations are borne out by the data. We furthermore conclude that data with a range of signal type values should be used to assess the robustness of eye-movement analysis methods. We present a method for generating artificial eye-tracker noise of any signal type and magnitude.