Pushing the envelope: expanding fertility sparing treatment of endometrial cancer

Gynecologic oncology tumor board: the central role of the radiologist

This manuscript is a collaborative, multi-institutional effort by members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease Focus Panel and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Women Pelvic Imaging working group. The manuscript reviews the key role radiologists play at tumor board and highlights key imaging findings that guide management decisions in patients with the most common gynecologic malignancies including ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, and endometrial cancer.

Molecular Classification in Patients With Endometrial Cancer After Fertility-Preserving Treatment: Application of ProMisE Classifier and Combination of Prognostic Evidence

The Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) is a molecular classification system that identifies endometrial cancer (EC) into four prognostically distinct subtypes: POLE-mutated, mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D), p53 wild-type (p53wt), and p53 abnormal (p53abn). However, few reports have applied the ProMisE classifier to EC patients who underwent fertility-preserving treatment (FPT) so far. This study evaluated whether the ProMisE classifier predicted in early-stage EC patients after FPT. We first summarized the three reported outcomes of ProMisE applied to EC patients who received FPT. The hormone-treated patients with EC from 2010 to 2020 in our facility were then analyzed. By sequential immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing of POLE according to the ProMisE system, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of patients before treatment were collected and classified into POLE-mutated, MMR-D, p53wt, and p53abn subtypes. The primary outcome was a complete response rate after FPT. Thirteen patients were enrolled from our facility, with 3 (3/13) MMR-D, 0 (0/13) POLE, 8 (8/13) p53wt, 1 (1/13) p53abn, and 1 (1/13) failed with DNA amplification. Six (6/8) patients with p53wt, 2 (2/3) patients with MMR-D, and 1 (1/1) patient with p53abn achieved a complete response in 6 months after treatment. The results of our study and the reported outcomes were finally combined. A total of 106 patients who underwent FPT were included. Of these, 23 (21.7%) were classified as MMR-D, 3 (2.8%) as POLE-mutated, 3 (2.8%) as p53abn, and 77 (72.6%) as p53wt. There was no significant difference in the complete response rate (P = 0.152) and recurrence rate (P = 0.174) between MMR-D and p53wt subtypes after FPT. Based on current data, we observed no prognostic significance of the ProMisE classifier in EC patients who underwent FPT. Larger prospective studies are needed to elucidate the precise prognostic meaning of this molecular classifier in these cases.

Fertility-Sparing Approaches in Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fourth most common cancer in women in developed countries. Although it is usually diagnosed in postmenopausal women, its incidence has increased in young women, as well in recent decades, with an estimated rate of 4% in those under 40 years of age. Factors involved in this increase, particularly in resource-rich countries, include delayed childbearing and the rise in obesity. The new molecular classification of EC should help to personalize treatment, through appropriate candidate selection. With the currently available evidence, the use of oral progestin either alone or in combination with other drugs such as metformin, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and hysteroscopic resection, seems to be feasible and safe in women with early-stage EC limited to the endometrium. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence of the efficacy and safety of conservative management in EC. Randomized clinical trials in younger women and obese patients are currently underway.

Mismatch repair status influences response to fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients younger than 40 years usually present with early-stage endometrial cancer with favorable prognosis. However, such patients are usually in their childbearing age and may desire fertility-sparing options. The identification of biomarkers may improve the clinical outcomes in these patients and aid in fertility-sparing management; however, there has been no reports on biomarker analysis so far.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer in the fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 57 endometrial biopsy specimens obtained before hormone therapy were evaluated, and patients were classified according to the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer molecular subtypes (mismatch repair deficiency, DNA polymerase epsilon mutation, wild-type p53, and abnormal p53). The primary endpoint was the response rate after hormone therapy. The secondary endpoint was the recurrence rate after the complete response, hysterectomy rate owing to treatment failure, and upstaged diagnosis rate after hysterectomy.

RESULTS

Of 57 patients, 9 (15.8%) had mismatch repair deficiency, 2 (3.5%) had DNA polymerase epsilon mutation, 45 (78.9%) had wild-type p53, and 1 (1.8%) had abnormal p53. Overall, the complete response rate was 75.4% after hormone therapy. Patients with mismatch repair deficiency had a significantly lower complete response or partial response rate than those with wild-type p53 in terms of the best overall response (44.4% [95% confidence interval, 4.0-85.0] vs 82.2% [95% confidence interval, 71.0-94.0]; P=.018) and complete response rate at 6 months (11.1% [95% confidence interval, 0.2-37.0] vs 53.3% [95% confidence interval, 38.0-68.0]; P=.010). Among patients with mismatch repair deficiency, 4 underwent immediate hysterectomy because of treatment failure and 3 presented upstaged diagnosis after hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

The Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer molecular classification has prognostic significance in the fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer, thereby enabling early stratification and risk assignment to direct care. Mismatch repair status could be used as a predictive biomarker for selecting patients who could benefit from hormone therapy. These findings need to be validated in larger studies.