|
1
|
Sathianathen NJ, Furrer MA, Mulholland CJ, Katsios A, Soliman C, Lawrentschuk N, Peters JS, Zargar H, Costello AJ, Hovens CM, Bishop C, Rao R, Tong R, Steiner D, Moon D, Thomas BC, Dundee P, Calero JAR, Thalmann GN, Corcoran NM. Lymphovascular Invasion at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy Adversely Impacts Oncological Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:123. [PMID: 38201549 PMCID: PMC10778356 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Lymphovascular invasion, whereby tumour cells or cell clusters are identified in the lumen of lymphatic or blood vessels, is thought to be an essential step in disease dissemination. It has been established as an independent negative prognostic indicator in a range of cancers. We therefore aimed to assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion at the time of prostatectomy on oncological outcomes. We performed a multicentre, retrospective cohort study of 3495 men who underwent radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. Only men with negative preoperative staging were included. We assessed the relationship between lymphovascular invasion and adverse pathological features using multivariable logistic regression models. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were created to evaluate the impact of lymphovascular invasion on oncological outcomes. Lymphovascular invasion was identified in 19% (n = 653) of men undergoing prostatectomy. There was an increased incidence of lymphovascular invasion-positive disease in men with high International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade and non-organ-confined disease (p < 0.01). The presence of lymphovascular invasion significantly increased the likelihood of pathological node-positive disease on multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR 15, 95%CI 9.7-23.6). The presence of lymphovascular invasion at radical prostatectomy significantly increased the risk of biochemical recurrence (HR 2.0, 95%CI 1.6-2.4). Furthermore, lymphovascular invasion significantly increased the risk of metastasis in the whole cohort (HR 2.2, 95%CI 1.6-3.0). The same relationship was seen across D'Amico risk groups. The presence of lymphovascular invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy is associated with aggressive prostate cancer disease features and is an indicator of poor oncological prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niranjan J. Sathianathen
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
| | - Marc A. Furrer
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (A.K.); (G.N.T.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Kantonsspital Olten, 4600 Olten, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Bürgerspital Solothurn, 4500 Solothurn, Switzerland
| | - Clancy J. Mulholland
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
| | - Andreas Katsios
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (A.K.); (G.N.T.)
| | - Christopher Soliman
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
| | - Justin S. Peters
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
| | - Homi Zargar
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
| | - Anthony J. Costello
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
- Australian Prostate Centre, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
| | - Christopher M. Hovens
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
- Australian Prostate Centre, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
| | - Conrad Bishop
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
- Department of Urology, Footscray Hospital Western Health, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia
| | - Ranjit Rao
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
| | - Raymond Tong
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
| | - Daniel Steiner
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
| | - Daniel Moon
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Genitourinary Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia
| | - Benjamin C. Thomas
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Bürgerspital Solothurn, 4500 Solothurn, Switzerland
| | - Philip Dundee
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia; (C.M.H.); (C.B.)
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Bürgerspital Solothurn, 4500 Solothurn, Switzerland
| | | | - George N. Thalmann
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (A.K.); (G.N.T.)
| | - Niall M. Corcoran
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia (C.J.M.); (C.S.); (N.L.); (J.S.P.); (H.Z.); (A.J.C.); (R.R.); (R.T.); (D.M.); (B.C.T.); (P.D.); (N.M.C.)
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Bürgerspital Solothurn, 4500 Solothurn, Switzerland
- Australian Prostate Centre, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Kiełb P, Kaczorowski M, Kowalczyk K, Piotrowska A, Nowak Ł, Krajewski W, Gurwin A, Dudek K, Dzięgiel P, Hałoń A, Szydełko T, Małkiewicz B. Comparative analysis of GOLPH3 expression in lymph node-positive prostate cancer: immunohistochemistry staining patterns and clinical significance. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1265788. [PMID: 37790749 PMCID: PMC10544905 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men worldwide. Lymph node metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for PCa. Previous studies have found that Golgi phosphoprotein 3 (GOLPH3) is overexpressed in various cancers, including PCa. We examined GOLPH3 expression in PCa cells from primary tumor and, as the first, also in metastatic lymph nodes to assess its potential as a new risk factor for PCa progression. Methods The study included 78 patients diagnosed with lymph node-positive PCa confirmed in the postoperative material. All the patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) with extended lymphadenectomy. The clinical data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed, and their histopathological specimens were selected for further analysis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed and the expression of GOLPH3 was assessed by an experienced uropathologist using an immunoreactive scale (IRS). A correlational analysis of the obtained data with the clinicopathological data of patients was performed. Results A positive IHC reaction for GOLPH3 was observed in all samples. IRS score for GOLPH3 expression was higher in the metastatic lymph nodes than in the prostate (not statistically significant; p=0.056). Several significant correlations were identified in connection with GOLPH3 expression levels in the prostate and metastatic lymph node tissues. No significant correlations were found between GOLPH3 expression and patient characteristics (e.g. BMI, EAU risk group, or preoperative PSA level), pathological features, or postoperative outcomes. However, we found that lymphovascular invasion (LVI) tended to be more common in patients with a higher percentage of GOLPH3-positive cells (p=0.02). We also found a positive association between the intensity of GOLPH3 staining in metastatic lymph nodes and the EAU classification. Finally, we found a significant negative correlation between the GOLPH3 expression and the efficacy of RP - the higher the expression of GOLPH3, the lower the efficacy of RP was (p<0.05). Conclusion GOLPH3 is expressed in both prostate and metastatic lymph nodes, with higher expression in metastatic lymph nodes. High GOLPH3 expression was associated with the occurrence of LVI, higher-risk group in the EAU classification, and lower efficacy of the RP, but there was no significant correlation with other pathological features or postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Kiełb
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Maciej Kaczorowski
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kamil Kowalczyk
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Piotrowska
- Division of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Łukasz Nowak
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Adam Gurwin
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Dudek
- Center for Statistical Analysis, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Dzięgiel
- Division of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Hałoń
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Xiong ZZ, Xie MH, Li XZ, Jin LY, Zhang FX, Yin S, Chen HX, Lian L. Risk factors for postoperative recurrence in patients with stage II colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:658. [PMID: 37452325 PMCID: PMC10347847 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11093-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrences are the main reasons for unfavorable outcomes for patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). To obtain a clear understanding of the high-risk factors, further investigation is warranted. The present study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with postoperative recurrence in patients with stage II CRC. METHODS Eligible patients with pathologically confirmed stage II CRC were enrolled in the study retrospectively based on a prospectively maintained database from April 2008 to March 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method were used to calculate the overall survival (OS) rate and the cumulative recurrence rate. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS There were 2515 patients included, of whom 233 (9.3%) developed local or distant recurrence. Recurrence was associated with a significantly worse 5-year OS (45.4% vs. 95.5%, p < 0.0001). The 5-year cumulative recurrence rate was 13.0% in patients with stage II CRC. On multivariable Cox analysis, tumor size (Hazard Ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.79[1.38, 2.33]), preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 125 level (HR [95% CI] = 1.78[1.17, 2.70]), preoperative CA 199 level (HR [95% CI] = 1.56[1.09, 2.22]), and ulcerating tumor (HR [95% CI] = 1.61[1.19, 2.17]) were found to be associated with postoperative recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower cumulative recurrence rate in patients with these risk factors (p = 0.00096). CONCLUSION The tumor diameter, preoperative CA125 level, preoperative CA199 level, and an ulcerative tumor can predict postoperative recurrence in patients with stage II CRC, and postoperative chemotherapy could reduce the cumulative recurrence rate in patients with these high-risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Zhong Xiong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Er Heng Rd., Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Hao Xie
- Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xian-Zhe Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Er Heng Rd., Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Long-Yang Jin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Er Heng Rd., Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Feng-Xiang Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Er Heng Rd., Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shi Yin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Er Heng Rd., Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hua-Xian Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Er Heng Rd., Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei Lian
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Er Heng Rd., Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Rodrigues I, Ferreira C, Gonçalves J, Carvalho L, Oliveira J, Castro C, Oliveira Â. Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer - outcomes and optimization strategies. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26:535-544. [PMID: 34434569 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Salvage radiotherapy (sRT) is the main potentially curative treatment after biochemical failure/locoregional relapse post-radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of the study was to characterize the population who underwent sRT after RP at our Department, to understand the influence of several potential prognosis factors, and to determine possible optimization strategies. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing sRT at our department between 2012 and 2017, evaluating patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, restaging procedures and clinical outcomes - namely biochemical relapse-free survival (BC-RFS), clinical relapse-free survival (C-RFS), additional hormone therapy-free survival (HT-FS) and overall survival (OS). We assessed potential prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate models (MVA). Results We included 277 patients (median age 68 years). Median pre-sRT PSA was > 0.5ng/mL in 54.9%. All underwent prostate bed irradiation. Pelvic lymph nodes were included in 9.7%. Outcome analysis was performed for 264 patients (35.6 months median follow-up). At 3 years, BC-RFS was 61.4%, C-RFS was 81.3%, HT-FS was 79.9% and OS was 96.6%. Most relapses occurred in regional lymph nodes only (47.9% patients who relapsed). On MVA, lymphovascular invasion, advanced pT-stages and negative margins negatively influenced BC-RFS (p = 0.029, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) and HT-FS (p = 0.001, p = 0.029 and p = 0.002). C-RFS was worsened by lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.009) and negative margins (p = 0.015). These had no effect on OS. BC-RFS and HT-FS were improved when sRT started while PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL (p < 0.05). Conclusion Lymphovascular invasion, higher pT-stages and negative margins negatively affected prognosis. An early start of sRT (PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL) predicted better BC-RFS and HT-FS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Rodrigues
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Carolina Ferreira
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal.,Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| | - Joana Gonçalves
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal.,Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| | - Luísa Carvalho
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Jorge Oliveira
- Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| | - Carla Castro
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal.,Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| | - Ângelo Oliveira
- External Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E., Portugal.,Urology Clinic, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, E.P.E, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Kataoka M, Hirano Y, Ishii T, Kondo H, Asari M, Ishikawa S, Kataoka A, Fujii T, Shimamura S, Yamaguchi S. Impact of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Stage II Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-matched Study. In Vivo 2021; 35:525-531. [PMID: 33402505 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Whether lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a high-degree risk factor in stage II colorectal cancer has not been fully clarified, as different results have been reported in the literature. If LVI is a risk factor, postoperative chemotherapy may be recommended. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of lymphovascular invasion on disease recurrence and patient prognosis in conjunction with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 636 patients with stage II CRC, each undergoing radical resection between April 2007 and December 2015, were selected for the study. Subjects with or without venous or lymphatic invasion were assigned to positive and negative groups, respectively. We then compared overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using propensity score matching. RESULTS After matching (n=226, each group), OS and DFS were found to be significantly lower (OS: p=0.047; DFS: p=0.004) in patients positive (vs. negative) for venous invasion. However, the same was not true of lymphatic invasion. After matching, positive and negative groups (n=92, each) did not significantly differ in terms of OS (p=0.951) or DFS (p=0.258). CONCLUSION In patients with stage II CRC, venous invasion proved to be a significant high-degree risk factor that may warrant adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Kataoka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasumitsu Hirano
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Toshimasa Ishii
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroka Kondo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Asari
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shintaro Ishikawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Atsuko Kataoka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takatsugu Fujii
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Shimamura
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shigeki Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
68Ga-PSMA-PET screening and transponder-guided salvage radiotherapy to the prostate bed alone for biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy: interim outcomes of a phase II trial. World J Urol 2021; 39:4117-4125. [PMID: 34076753 PMCID: PMC8571130 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03735-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate outcomes for men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer who were selected for transponder-guided salvage radiotherapy (SRT) to the prostate bed alone by 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (68Ga-PSMA-PET). Methods This is a single-arm, prospective study of men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level rising to 0.1–2.5 ng/mL following radical prostatectomy. Patients were staged with 68Ga-PSMA-PET and those with a negative finding, or a positive finding localised to the prostate bed, continued to SRT only to the prostate bed alone with real-time target-tracking using electromagnetic transponders. The primary endpoint was freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR, PSA > 0.2 ng/mL from the post-radiotherapy nadir). Secondary endpoints were time to biochemical relapse, toxicity and patient-reported quality of life (QoL). Results Ninety-two patients (median PSA of 0.18 ng/ml, IQR 0.12–0.36), were screened with 68Ga-PSMA-PET and metastatic disease was found in 20 (21.7%) patients. Sixty-nine of 72 non-metastatic patients elected to proceed with SRT. At the interim (3-year) analysis, 32 (46.4%) patients (95% CI 34.3–58.8%) were FFBR. The median time to biochemical relapse was 16.1 months. The rate of FFBR was 82.4% for ISUP grade-group 2 patients. Rates of grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity were 0% and 15.2%, respectively. General health and disease-specific QoL remained stable. Conclusion Pre-SRT 68Ga-PSMA-PET scans detect metastatic disease in a proportion of patients at low PSA levels but fail to improve FFBR. Transponder-guided SRT to the prostate bed alone is associated with a favourable toxicity profile and preserved QoL. Trial registration number ACTRN12615001183572, 03/11/2015, retrospectively registered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03735-0.
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Dominguez DA, Aversa JG, Hagerty BL, Diggs LP, Raoof M, Davis JL, Hernandez JM, Blakely AM. Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in pT1-T3 gallbladder adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1401-1408. [PMID: 32783204 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most gallbladder cancers are diagnosed after cholecystectomy for presumed benign disease, and nodal staging to inform subsequent treatment is therefore often lacking. We evaluated the association of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) with regional lymph node involvement in gallbladder adenocarcinoma and its impact on survival. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma and with available staging and LVI status. Patients with pT4 and M1 disease were excluded. Univariable and multivariable regression identified factors associated with positive lymph nodes. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 1649 patients with available LVI status, 1142 (69.7%) had at least one positive lymph node and 765 (46.4%) had LVI. On multivariable regression, presence of LVI was the strongest predictor of positive lymph nodes (odds ratio, 3.69; P < .001). The positive predictive value of LVI for positive lymph nodes in pT2 and pT3 tumors was 80.1% and 90.5%, respectively. LVI was independently associated with decreased OS (hazard ratio, 1.21; P = .001), as were node-positive disease and increasing T stage. CONCLUSION In patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma, LVI is independently associated with regional lymph node metastases and abbreviated OS. LVI status may help risk-stratify patients following initial cholecystectomy and inform subsequent treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana A Dominguez
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.,Department of General Surgery, UCSF East Bay, Oakland, California
| | - John G Aversa
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Brendan L Hagerty
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Laurence P Diggs
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Jeremy L Davis
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jonathan M Hernandez
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Andrew M Blakely
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|