Impact of donor age on liver regeneration and function following adult living donor liver transplantation

Evaluation of liver regeneration after hemi-hepatectomy by combining computed tomography and post-operative liver function

Background

Accurate evaluation of postoperative liver regeneration is essential to prevent postoperative liver failure.

Aims

To analyze the predictors that affect liver regeneration after hemi-hepatectomy.

Method

Patients who underwent hemi-hepatectomy in Hangzhou First People's Hospital and Hangzhou Shulan Hospital from January 2016 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. The regeneration index (RI) was calculated by the following equation: RI = [(postoperative total liver volume {TLVpost} - future liver remnant volume {FLRV}/FLRV] × 100 %. Hepatic dysfunction was defined according to the "TBilpeak>7" standard, which was interpreted as (peak) total bilirubin (TBil) >7.0 mg/dL. Good liver regeneration was defined solely when the RI surpassed the median with hepatic dysfunction. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate prognostic factors affecting liver regeneration.

Result

A total of 153 patients were enrolled, with 33 in the benign group and 120 patients in the malignant group. In the entire study population, FLRV% [OR 4.087 (1.405-11.889), P = 0.010], international normalized ratio (INR) [OR 2.763 (95%CI, 1.008-7.577), P = 0.048] and TBil [OR 2.592 (95%CI, 1.177-5.710), P = 0.018] were independent prognostic factors associated with liver regeneration. In the benign group, only the computed tomography (CT) parameter FLRV% [OR, 11.700 (95%CI, 1.265-108.200), P = 0.030] predicted regeneration. In the malignant group, parenchymal hepatic resection rate (PHRR%) [OR 0.141 (95%CI, 0.040-0.499), P = 0.002] and TBil [OR 3.384 (95%CI, 1.377-8.319), P = 0.008] were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

FLRV%, PHRR%, TBil and INR were predictive factors associated with liver regeneration.

Liver transplantation for NAFLD cirrhosis: Age and recent coronary angioplasty are major determinants of survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of end-stage non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD), that is decompensated cirrhosis and/or complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Few data on long-term outcome are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall patient and graft survivals and associated predictive factors.

METHOD

This retrospective multicentre study included adult transplant patients for NAFLD cirrhosis between 2000 and 2019 in participating French-speaking centres.

RESULTS

A total of 361 patients (69.8% of male) were included in 20 centres. The median age at LT was 62.3 years [57.4-65.9] and the median MELD score was 13.9 [9.1-21.3]; 51.8% of patients had HCC on liver explant. Between 2004 and 2018, the number of LT for NAFLD cirrhosis increased by 720%. A quarter of the patients had cardiovascular history before LT. Median follow-up after LT was 39.1 months [15.8-72.3]. Patient survival at 1, 5 and 10 years after LT was 89.3%, 79.8% and 68.1% respectively. The main causes of death were sepsis (37.5%), malignancies (29.2%) and cardiovascular events (22.2%). In multivariate analysis, three risk factors for overall mortality after LT were recipient pre-LT BMI < 32 kg/m² at LT time (OR: 2.272; p = .012), pre-LT angioplasty during CV check-up (OR: 2.916; p = .016), a combined donor and recipient age over 135 years (OR: 2.020; 95%CI: p = .035).

CONCLUSION

Survival after LT for NAFLD cirrhosis is good at 5 years. Donor and recipient age, and cardiovascular history, are major prognostic factors to consider.

Healthy Spouses can be Considered as Living Liver Donors

BACKGROUND

Spousal donors have gradually been accepted as an alternative living liver donors to alleviate the organ shortage and prevent donations from children. No information is available regarding the effects of spousal donation on donor safety and recipient outcomes. Our purpose in this study was to determine how spousal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) affect donor safety and recipient outcomes compared with those of LDLT from children.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 656 patients, including spouses and children, who underwent a right or extended right hepatectomy for living liver donation between January 2009 and December 2018.

RESULTS

Spouses represented 18.8% (n = 123) of living liver donors. Female donors comprised 78.9% (n = 97) of spousal donors, and the proportion of male donors in the children group was 72.6% (n = 387). The mean donor operation time of the spousal group was shorter than that of the children group (330 min vs. 358 min; P = 0.011), and the complication rate in the spousal group was lower than that in the children group (12.2% vs. 22.9%; P = 0.006). However, there were no differences in severe complication rates, hospitalization, or liver function tests between the 2 groups at 3 months after donor surgery. The overall survival of recipients in the spousal group was not reduced compared to that of recipients in the children group.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that, with careful selection, spousal donation is feasible and safe in LDLT.

Predictive utility of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in early allograft dysfunction in living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to determine the association between the ratio of C-reactive protein to albumin (CRP/ALB) and the risk of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 588 adult patients undergoing LDLT were retrospectively investigated, after 22 were excluded because of signs of overt infection or history of ALB infusion. The study population was classified into high and low CRP/ALB ratio groups according to EAD. All laboratory variables, including CRP and ALB, had been collected on the day before surgery. A percentage value for the CRP/ALB ratio (%) was calculated as CRP/ALB × 100.

RESULTS

After LDLT, 83 patients (14.1%) suffered EAD occurrence. A higher CRP/ALB ratio was independently associated with risk of EAD, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, fresh frozen plasma transfusion, and donor age. Based on a cutoff CRP/ALB ratio (i.e., > 20%), the probability of EAD was significantly (2-fold) higher in the high versus low CRP/ALB group. The predictive utility of CRP/ALB ratio for EAD was greater than those of other inflammatory markers. In addition, patients with a high CRP/ALB ratio had poorer survival than those with a low CRP/ALB ratio during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The easily calculated CRP/ALB ratio may allow estimation of the risk of EAD after LDLT and can provide additional information that may facilitate the estimation of a patient's overall condition.