Application and efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions to manage patients with knee osteoarthritis: An umbrella review 5-year update

Objective

This umbrella review aimed to summarize (and update) the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

The study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Manual and electronic databases were searched, to identify systematic reviews, following the P (knee osteoarthritis) I (non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments) C (pharmacological, surgical, placebo, no intervention, or other non-pharmacological/non-surgical conservative treatments) O (pain, function, quality of life, and other knee-specific measures) model. The quality of evidence was assessed using the R-AMSTAR checklist and GRADE principles.

Results

The search yielded 4086 records, of which 61 met the eligibility criteria. After evaluation with R-AMSTAR, four systematic reviews were excluded, resulting in 57 included systematic reviews, with an overall score of 29.6. The systematic reviews were published between 2018 and 2022 (29.8% in 2022), conducted in 19 countries (52.6% in China), and explored 24 distinct interventions. The systematic reviews encompassed 714 trials (mean of 13 ​± ​7.7 studies per systematic review), and 59,343 participants (mean 1041 ​± ​1002 per systematic review, and 82 ​± ​59.2 per study). The majority of participants were older obese women (61.6 ​± ​4.2 years, 30.2 ​± ​3.6 ​kg/m2, 70%, respectively).

Conclusions

Based on the systematic reviews findings, Diet Therapy, Patient Education, and Resistance Training are strongly supported as core interventions for managing patients with knee osteoarthritis. Aquatic Therapy, Balance Training, Balneology, Dietary Supplements, Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, and Tai Ji show moderate support. For other interventions, the evidence quality was low, results were mixed or inconclusive, or there was not sufficient efficacy to support their use.

The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee osteoarthritis : an umbrella review

BACKGROUND

An umbrella review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) versus non-ESWT in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three databases including PubMed, Embase and Web of science were searched up to September 2023. Literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction were performed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of outcome indicators was performed using Revman 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of eight meta-analysis were included in this umbrella review. All meta-analysis were graded against a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and scored between 8 and 11. Compared to the sham group, the ESWT group showed better results in WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) [mean difference (MD)=-2.94, 95% CI: -5.52, -0.37, P=0.03, I²=60%], Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (MD=-2.0, 95% CI: -2.5, -1.5, P<0.01, I²=0%), range of motion (ROM) (MD=17.55, 95% CI: 13.49, 21.61, P<0.00001, I²=0%), and Lequesne index (MD=-2.85, 95% CI: -3.64, -2.07, P<0.00001, I²=48%).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of our analysis, ESWT is now an effective therapy for improving pain and function in patients with KOA.

Relative Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Alone or in Combination with Noninjective Treatments on Pain and Physical Function in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been recommended for managing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The difference in therapeutic effects between radial shockwave characteristics (RaSW) and focused shockwave characteristics (FoSW) with different energy levels for KOA remains controversial. The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to identify the effects relative to the different ESWT regime and combination treatments on pain and functional outcomes in individuals with KOA. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which investigated the efficacy of RaSW, FoSW, and combination treatments in patients with KOA were identified by searches of electronic databases. The included RCTs were analyzed through NMA and risk-of-bias assessment. We analyzed 69 RCTs with a total of 21 treatment arms in the NMA. Medium-energy FoSW plus physical therapy, medium-energy acupoint RaSW plus Chinese medicine, and high-energy FoSW alone were the most effective treatments for reducing pain [standard mean difference (SMD) = -4.51], restoring function (SMD = 4.97), and decreasing joint inflammation (SMD = -5.01). Population area and study quality influenced the treatment outcomes, particularly pain. Our findings indicate that medium-energy ESWT combined with physical therapy or Chinese medicine is beneficial for treating pain and increasing function in adults with KOA.

Chinese herbal medicine Xianling Gubao capsule for knee osteoarthritis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most prevalent degenerative joint disease among populations over 60 years old, and is the most common cause of musculoskeletal pain and disability worldwide. Xianling Gubao capsule (XLGBC), a Chinese patent medicine, is widely used for treatment of osteoporosis. Meanwhile, according to the theory of homotherapy for heteropathy, XLGBC is increasingly applied in the clinical practice of KOA. However, no systematic review has found that XLGBC is as effective in treatment of KOA as it is in treatment of osteoporosis. Therefore, we will conduct a systematic review of XLGBC in KOA treatments.

METHODS

All randomized controlled trials assessing the validity of XLGBC therapy for KOA will be retrieved from the following seven databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Database, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database. The primary outcome measures are the visual analogue scale pain score, and a comprehensive evaluation including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores, Lysholm scores, and Bristol scores. And the secondary outcome measures include cure rate and adverse events. The procedure such as retrieval and selection of literature, data extraction, evaluation of risk of bias, and assessment of reporting bias will be executed by 2 reviewers independently. The data synthesis for meta-analysis will be conducted by Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A high-quality evidence of XLGBC for the treatment of KOA will be generated from the aspects of safety and efficacy.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review will provide evidence to help us confirm the clinical efficacy of XLGBC in the treatment of KOA.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

Registration DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/QD5SY.

The efficacy and safety of bisphosphonate analogs for treatment of osteoporosis after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Bisphosphonates can inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, prevent bone loss, and reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Our meta-analysis of studies shows that early bisphosphonate administration after SCI was safe and beneficial to the BMD of the total hip and lumbar spine at 12 months.

INTRODUCTION

Rapid bone loss in the early stages of spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis after SCI.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases identified nine randomized controlled trials with 206 individuals. This meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was the percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the total hip, distal femur, and lumbar spine from baseline to 12 months. Bone turnover markers were secondary outcomes. The incidences of adverse events were assessed in order to evaluate safety.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in BMD of the total hip and lumbar spine or serum C-terminal telopeptide between the bisphosphonate and control groups but no difference in adverse events. The percent change in BMD of the distal femur and serum type 1 procollagen N-terminal peptide from baseline to 12 months was not superior in the treatment groups. Osteoclast-mediated bone resorption was inhibited by bisphosphonate administration. Subgroup analyses of participants treated with zoledronate at different sites revealed a beneficial effect on BMD of the total hip and lumbar spine but not the distal femur.

CONCLUSION

Early bisphosphonate administration after SCI was safe and beneficial to the BMD of the total hip and lumbar spine at 12 months.

Dose-related effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the dose-related effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain alleviation in knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

With the use of a 2?×?2 factorial randomized controlled design, 89 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups, which varied in terms of shock intensity (0.12 mJ/mm2, lower density, or 0.24 mJ/mm2, higher density) and shock number (2,000 impulses or 4,000 impulses), or to a placebo control. Each group received 4 sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, one week apart. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured on a visual analogue scale, and the secondary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Assessments were performed at baseline, after each session, and at 4-week follow-up.

RESULTS

Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant effect on the Pain score for intensity (p<0.001), with no effect for number (p=0.467) or the intensity?number interaction (p=0.536). Similar results were obtained for the WOMAC scores, except for an association between number and WOMAC score (p=0.036). At the 4-week follow-up, all treatment groups showed greater reductions in the Pain and WOMAC scores than the control group. In addition, scores decreased more at higher densities of shock intensity than at lower densities, while there was no significant difference between the 2,000- and 4,000-shock conditions.

CONCLUSION

Moderate-intensity radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was effective, and a higher density might be more efficacious in alleviating pain in knee osteoarthritis.

Ergosterol limits osteoarthritis development and progression through activation of Nrf2 signaling

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disorder characterized by progressive articular cartilage degeneration and destruction and results in gradual disability among middle-aged and elderly patients. Our previous study demonstrated that depletion of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) exacerbated cartilage erosion in an OA model and that activation of the Nrf2 pathway could counter this process. As a downstream target of Nrf2, heme oxygenase (HO) degrades heme to free iron, biliverdin and carbon monoxide (CO), which protects against oxidative stress. Ergosterol (ER), which is extracted from fungi, is a newly discovered Nrf2 activator and displayed efficacy against myocardial injury. The present study aimed to investigate the potential protective effects of ER against cartilage damage during OA. Primary mouse chondrocytes were treated with ER for in vitro assays. Furthermore, mice that underwent destabilization of the medial meniscus surgery were orally administered with ER. Western blotting suggested that ER increased protein expression of Nrf2 and HO-1 in primary chondrocytes and articular cartilage from knee joints. Cartilage damage in knee joints was significantly reduced by ER treatment. Western blotting and PCR analysis confirmed that ER could also suppress the expression of MMP-9 and MMP-13 in vivo and in vitro. The present findings suggested that ER effectively alleviated cartilage degradation and that activation of the Nrf2-heme oxygenase 1 pathway may play a role in ER-mediated cartilage protection against OA.

Retrospective Study of Rehabilitation Exercise Combined with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rehabilitation exercise combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Material/Methods

The clinical data of 217 patients with KOA who underwent ESWT in our hospital from December 2017 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a rehabilitation exercise (RE) group and a non-rehabilitation exercise (NRE) group according to whether they were given RE. The treatment course of the 2 groups was 5 weeks. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VSA), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities knee osteoarthritis index visualized scale (WOMAC), Lequesne index scores, Range of motion (ROM) score, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to evaluate the treatment effect of the 2 groups of patients.

Results

After 5 weeks of treatment, the VSA scores (p<0.001), WOMAC scores (P<0.001) and Lequesne index scores (P<0.001) of the RE group and NRE group were significantly lower than those before treatment, while ROM score (P<0.001) and JOA score (p=0.006) were significantly increased. Compared with the NRE group, the VAS score (3.14±0.64 vs. 4.78±0.85, P=0.002), WOMAC score (20.37±4.06 vs. 27.82±4.57, P<0.001) and Lequesne index score (6.13±1.83 vs. 7.35±2.21, P=0.019) in the RE group were significantly lower than those in the NHE group; however, the ROM score (89.13±9.83 vs. 79.15±6.25, P=0.021) and JOA score (79.53±7.59 vs. 67.85±8.27, P=0.016) were significantly higher than those in the NRE group.

Conclusions

RE combined with ESWT has a positive effect on KOA, which may more significantly relieve the patient’s clinical symptoms and improve joint function and quality of life.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Osteoarthritis is the most common musculoskeletal disease. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy had shown an effect on osteoarthritis in both some animal experiments and clinical studies, but there was no systematic review to confirm the value of shockwave therapy in the treatment of all types of osteoarthritis and compare it with other traditional therapies (especially traditional Chinese medicine).

Method

PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG database, and VIP database were searched up to December 10, 2019, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing shockwave therapy and other treatments for osteoarthritis. Visual analogue scale and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were extracted and analyzed by RevMan and STATA software as outcomes of pain reduction and functional improvement. Adverse reactions were recorded to evaluate the safety of shockwave therapy.

Results

Shockwave therapy had significant improvement in both pain reduction and functional improvement compared with placebo, corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, medication, and ultrasound (P < 0.05). In functional improvement, shockwave therapy showed statistical improvement compared with kinesiotherapy and moxibustion (P < 0.05) but not with acupotomy surgery (P = 0.24). A significant difference between shockwave therapy and platelet-rich plasma was observed in pain reduction (P < 0.05) but not in functional improvement (P = 0.89). Meanwhile, a statistical difference was found between shockwave therapy and fumigation in functional improvement (P < 0.05) but not in pain reduction (P = 0.26). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between shockwave therapy and manipulation in both pain reduction (P = 0.21) and functional improvement (P = 0.45). No serious adverse reaction occurred in all of studies.

Conclusions

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy could be recommended in the treatment of osteoarthritis as a noninvasive therapy with safety and effectiveness, but the grade of recommendations needs to be discussed in a further study.