Feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 consisting of a 4-week administration and a two-week rest period in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

Randomized phase II study of daily and alternate-day administration of S-1 for adjuvant chemotherapy in completely-resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer: results of the Setouchi Lung Cancer Group Study 1301

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicenter, randomized phase II study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of alternate-day S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected pathological stage I (tumor diameter > 2 cm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year comprising either alternate-day oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 4 days a week (Group A) or a 2-week oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) followed by 1 week of rest (Group B). The primary endpoint was feasibility, which was defined as the proportion of patients who completed the allocated intervention for 6 months with a relative dose intensity (RDI) of 70% or more.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were enrolled of whom 90 patients received S-1 treatment. Median follow-up was 66.9 months. The treatment completion rate based on an RDI of 70% or more for 6 months was 84.4% (95%CI; 70.5-93.5%) in group A and 64.4% (95%CI; 48.8-78.1%) in group B. There were no grade 4 adverse events in either group. Moderate or severe adverse events (grade 2 or grade 3) were significantly more frequent in group B (67%) compared with group A (29%, P = 0.001). The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 87.0 and 80.9% for group A and B, respectively (P = 0.451). The 5-year overall survival rate for all patients (n = 93) was 100 and 89.4% for group A and B, respectively (P = 0.136).

CONCLUSION

Alternate-day oral administration of S-1 for 1 year as adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be feasible with low toxicity in completely resected stage I (tumor diameter > 2 cm) NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number: UMIN000011994 . Date of registration: 10/8/2013.

Acceptability and feasibility of S-1 plus cisplatin adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, single arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial

Background

Although platinum-based chemotherapy is accepted as adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its completion rate is low due to severe adverse events. S-1 plus cisplatin is associated with relatively low toxicity and an unimpaired quality of life, and has been used for unresectable advanced lung cancer. We investigated the acceptability and feasibility of combination therapy with S-1 plus cisplatin as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following complete resection of pathological stage II-IIIA NSCLC.

Methods

Enrolled patients received oral S-1 at a dose depending on their body weight twice daily for 21 days with intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 8, with 1 cycle comprising 5 weeks and 4 cycles. Patients received standard precautions against adverse events and received standard treatment when adverse events occurred. The primary endpoint was completion rate; secondary endpoints included safety, status of drug administration, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 19 patients [14 men, 5 women; mean age, 59.1 years; mean body surface area, 1.688 m²; 17 with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0 and 2 with a PS of 1; 7 (36.8%) with stage II disease and 12 (63.2%) with stage IIIA disease] were enrolled. The rate of completion of 4 cycles was 68.4%. Grade 3 adverse events that occurred in ≥10% of patients included neutropenia (21.1%), nausea (21.1%), and anorexia (15.8%). No grade 4 adverse events, febrile neutropenia, or treatment-related deaths occurred. The mean relative dose intensity (RDI) was 79% for S-1 and 80% for cisplatin. The 2-year DFS rate was 42.1%, and 2-year OS rate was 83.3%.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the acceptability and feasibility of using S-1 plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Trial registration

This study was registered on the UMIN clinical study registration site (protocol ID: UMIN000016191) on December 1, 2015.

A phase 2 study of adjuvant carboplatin plus S-1 followed by maintenance S-1 therapy for patients with completely resected stage II/IIIA non-small cell lung cancer-Japanese Northern East Area Thoracic Surgery Study Group JNETS1302 study

Background

The standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for completely resected pathological stage II/IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is four courses of cisplatin plus vinorelbine. However, the continuity and toxicity of cisplatin-based regimens remain problematic. Conversely, carboplatin-based chemotherapy is a less toxic and more tolerable regimen for various stages of NSCLC. In particular, the efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin plus S-1 in advanced NSCLC were confirmed by previous pivotal studies such as the LETS trail. Therefore, this phase II study assessed the feasibility, safety, and usefulness of carboplatin plus S-1 followed by maintenance S-1 as an adjuvant treatment.

Methods

In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, 40 patients who previously underwent complete resection of NSCLC were enrolled from November 2013 to January 2015. The chemotherapy protocol was four cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1) and oral S-1 (80 mg/m² every other day from days 1 to 21) followed by oral S-1 (80 mg/m² every other day for 48 weeks). The primary endpoint was the treatment completion rate, and the secondary endpoints were adverse events and 2-year recurrence-free survival.

Results

The treatment completion rate of the planned schedule was as low as 30.0% (90% confidence interval: 40.3–63.0%). The reasons for adjuvant chemotherapy discontinuation were adverse events, refusal, tumor recurrence, and other reasons in 13, 6, 10, and 2 patients, respectively. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 66.7% among patients who completed maintenance chemotherapy. There were no treatment-related deaths, and most adverse events were less than grade 3.

Conclusions

Carboplatin plus S-1 followed by S-1 maintenance for 1 year in the adjuvant treatment of NSCLC was not tolerable, although most adverse events were not severe. However, patients who can fully complete the regimen might experience clinical benefit.

Anlotinib Combined with S-1 in the Third-Line Treatment of Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Study Protocol for Phase II Clinical Trial

Background:

A proportion of patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is predicted to receive third-line treatment. However, currently no standard third-line treatment for NSCLC is available. Anlotinib is an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase (TK) receptor inhibitor, which was approved as a third-line treatment for stage IV NSCLC in China on May 9, 2018. Nevertheless, The objective response rate of patients treated with anlotinib was merely 9.2% and the overall survival was only 3 months compared with the patients treated with placebo. Previous studies have shown that cancer treatment with a combination of chemotherapy with TK receptor inhibitors is effective and safe well tolerated. Therefore, the combination of anlotinib with other chemotherapeutic agents may be an effective treatment strategy for patients with stage IV NSCLC. Oral S-1 is a third-generation fluorouracil derivative; it showed good efficacy and caused relatively low toxicity in patients with NSCLC.

Methods:

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with S-1 as the third-line treatment for patients with stage IV NSCLC. This is a prospective, phase II clinical trial. We will enroll29 patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with anlotinib plus S-1. Tumors will be assessed using computed tomography prior to treatment, after two, four, and six cycles of treatment, and during follow-up every 3 months until disease progression or death. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, duration of response, proportion of disease control, and safety.

Discussion:

The expected outcome of this study is that anlotinib combined with S-1 has tolerable toxicity and better ORR than anlotinibmonotherapy. The results may indicate additional treatment options for patients with stage IV NSCLC.

Oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: Propensity score-matched and instrumental variable analyses

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy with vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VNR/CDDP) is a standard regimen for treatment of postoperative stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, oral fluorouracil offers a feasible alternative adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen. We compared the prognoses of patients with NSCLC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with either VNR/CDDP or oral fluorouracil.

METHODS

We identified patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC who underwent lung surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with VNR/CDDP (n = 384) or oral fluorouracil (n = 268) between July 2010 and March 2015, using the national Japanese inpatient and outpatient Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We compared recurrence-free survival between the groups by multivariable Cox regression analysis for one-to-one propensity score-matched patients and by instrumental variable analysis.

RESULTS

Younger patients and patients with positive N2 nodes were more likely to receive VNR/CDDP, while older patients and those with T3N0 classification were more likely to receive oral fluorouracil. Among 172 pairs of propensity-matched patients, time to adjuvant chemotherapy was shorter for oral fluorouracil compared with VNR/CDDP. Oral fluorouracil was also significantly associated with improved recurrence-free survival compared with VNR/CDDP, according to multivariable Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.64). Instrumental variable analysis showed a similar relationship (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.038-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

On a large nationwide cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy with oral fluorouracil prolonged recurrence-free survival in patients with postoperative stage II-IIIA NSCLC, compared with VNR/CDDP. Oral fluorouracil may thus be a useful alternative to VNR/CDDP for the adjuvant treatment of these patients.

A feasibility study of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine S-1 in patients with stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil tegafur (UFT) improved survival among patients with completely resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma. S-1, an oral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-inhibitory 5-fluorouracil, is a more potent DPD inhibitor than UFT;therefore, we hypothesized that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 would be effective for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a feasibility study of S-1 as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with curatively resected pathological stage bold I back 10 bold I and bold I back 10 bold I back 20 bold I A NSCLC.

METHODS

Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 9 courses (4-week administration, 2-week withdrawal) of S-1 at 80-120 mg/body per day. Twenty-four patients with completely resected NSCLC were enrolled in this study from November 2007 through December 2010. The primary endpoint was the rate of completion of the scheduled adjuvant chemotherapy. The secondary endpoints were safety, overall survival, and relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

Five patients were censored because of disease recurrence. The planned 9 courses of S-1 were administered to completion in 8 patients. Twelve patients completed more than 70% of the planned courses. Grade 3 adverse reactions, such as elevated total bilirubin (4.2%) and pneumonitis (4.2%), were observed, but there were no Grade 4 adverse reactions. Patients who completed more than 70% of the 9 courses demonstrated better overall survival than those who completed less than 70%.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative administration of S-1 may be possible with few severe adverse events as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with curatively resected pathological stage bold I back 10 bold I -bold I back 10 bold I back 20 bold I A NSCLC. J. Med. Invest. 65:90-95, February, 2018.

A phase II randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus S-1 plus cisplatin for completely resected pathological stage II/IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is the standard postoperative adjuvant treatment for pathological stage II/III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oral S-1 therapy has good efficacy and relatively low toxicity for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. We investigated whether long-term S-1 monotherapy is also useful as an adjuvant therapy after surgery in patients with NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a phase II randomized open-label multi-institutional study in patients with pathological stage II/IIIA NSCLC (7^th TNM classification) who underwent complete resection from 2009 to 2013. The primary endpoint, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, was evaluated using the Bayesian method. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to two arms: oral S-1 monotherapy (S-1 arm) and S-1 plus cisplatin combination therapy followed by S-1 (S-1 plus cisplatin arm) both for a total of 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 70 and 71 patients were enrolled in S-1 arm and S-1 plus cisplatin arm, respectively. The 2-year DFS rates were 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.63) and 61% (95% CI, 0.48-0.70) for S-1 arm and S-1 plus cisplatin arm, respectively. Both arms met the primary endpoint. Neither DFS nor OS was significantly different between the arms (log-rank test: P =  0.1695 and P =  0.8684, respectively). The main G3/4 adverse events were loss of appetite and anemia (S-1 vs. S-1 plus cisplatin: 4.3% vs. 11.6% and 0% vs. 5.8%, respectively). The treatment completion rate did not differ between the two arms (S-1 vs. S-1 plus cisplatin: 45.7%, 95% CI, 41.9-66.3% vs. 43.5% 95% CI, 44.0-68.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 was a feasible and promising treatment for patients with completely resected NSCLC, regardless of cisplatin addition. S-1 monotherapy should be investigated further, based on its low toxicity and practical convenience.

The relationship between the expression of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, orotate phosphoribosyltransferase, excision repair cross-complementation group 1 and class III β-tubulin, and the therapeutic effect of S-1 or carboplatin plus paclitaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer

Previous studies have reported that the expressions of specific proteins may predict the efficacy of chemotherapy agents for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The present study evaluated the expression of proteins hypothesized to be associated with the effect of chemotherapeutic agents in 38 NSCLC patients with pathological stage II and IIIA. The subjects received carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) or S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy following complete resection. The protein expressions evaluated were those of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and orotate phsphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), which were suspected to be associated with the effect of S-1 agents, excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), which was suspected to be associated with the effect of platinum-based agents, and class III β-tubulin (TUBB3), which was suspected to be associated with the effect of taxane-based agents. The positive rate of TS was 55.3% (n=21/38), DPD was 57.9% (n=22/38), OPRT was 42.1% (n=16/38), ERCC1 was 47.4% (n=18/38) and TUBB3 was 44.7% (n=17/38). Among the patients who received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, TS-negative cases demonstrated a significantly better disease-free survival than positive cases. Thus, TS protein expression may have been a factor that predicted the effect of S-1 agent as adjuvant chemotherapy.

S-1 vs. paclitaxel plus carboplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected stage II/IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer

The majority of patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) require adjuvant chemotherapy to improve survival following surgery. In the present trial, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the feasibility and safety of S-1 as an adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer were evaluated. A total of 40 patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC were enrolled and randomized to receive postoperative chemotherapy with either up to 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (arm A) or with up to 1 year of S-1 (arm B). The primary endpoint was 2-year DFS. The secondary endpoints were feasibility and toxicity. A total of 40 patients were enrolled, but 3 were excluded in accordance with the exclusion criteria. The remaining 37 patients were analyzed. The 2-year DFS rate was 54.2% in arm A and 84.2% in arm B. Overall, 15/18 (83.3%) patients completed 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin and 13/19 (68.4%) completed 1-year of S-1adjuvant chemotherapy. Of the 18 (16.7%) patients in arm A, 3 experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events, while none in arm B experienced such events. Therefore, S-1 chemotherapy for patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC was a feasible and safe regimen, and it may therefore be considered as a potential adjuvant chemotherapy option for advanced NSCLC.

Adherence and feasibility of 2 treatment schedules of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with completely resected advanced lung cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We conducted a multicenter randomized study of adjuvant S-1 administration schedules for surgically treated pathological stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients receiving curative surgical resection were centrally randomized to arm A (4 weeks of oral S-1 and a 2-week rest over 12 months) or arm B (2 weeks of S-1 and a 1-week rest over 12 months). The primary endpoints were completion of the scheduled adjuvant chemotherapy over 12 months, and the secondary endpoints were relative total administration dose, toxicity, and 3-year disease-free survival.

RESULTS

From April 2005 to January 2012, 80 patients were enrolled, of whom 78 patients were eligible and assessable. The planned S-1 administration over 12 months was accomplished to 28 patients in 38 arm A patients (73.7%) and to 18 patients in 40 arm B patients (45.0%, p = 0.01). The average relative dose intensity was 77.2% for arm A and 58.4% for arm B (p = 0.01). Drug-related grade 3 adverse events were recorded for 11% of arm A and 5% of arm B (p = 0.43). Grade 1-3 elevation of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine transaminase were more frequently recorded in arm A than in arm B. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 79.0% for arm A and 79.3% for arm B (p = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The superiority of feasibility of the shorter schedule was not recognized in the present study. The conventional schedule showed higher completion rates over 12 months (p = 0.01) and relative dose intensity of S-1 (p = 0.01). Toxicity showed no significant difference among the shorter schedule and the conventional schedule, except for grade 1-3 elevation of bilirubin.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This randomized multicenter study was retrospectively registered with the UMIN-CTR (UMIN000016086, registration date December 30, 2014).

Adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy after complete surgical resection is currently the standard of care for patients with stage IB, II, or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the generalizability of this treatment to elderly patients is controversial. We investigated the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients aged over 75 years with stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 246 consecutive patients aged over 75 years with stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent standard lung cancer surgery between January 2001 and December 2015. They were divided into 102 who had adjuvant chemotherapy and 144 who had none (control group). The outcomes were compared between the two groups, and prognostic factors were evaluated.

Results

Relapse-free survival and overall survival were significantly shorter in the control group than the chemotherapy group ( p = 0.006 and p = 0.008, respectively). In multivariable analyses, adjuvant chemotherapy was found to be an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.594, 95% confidence interval: 0.396–0.893, p = 0.012; and hazard ratio = 0.616, 95% confidence interval: 0.397–0.957, p = 0.031, respectively). After inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting adjustment using the propensity score for baseline characteristics, chemotherapy almost improved relapse-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.652, 95% confidence interval: 0.433–0.981, p = 0.040; and hazard ratio = 0.657, 95% confidence interval: 0.429–1.004, p = 0.052, respectively).

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy improved the prognosis after standard lung cancer surgery in patients aged over 75 years with stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer.

Randomized feasibility study of S-1 for adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected Stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the Setouchi Lung Cancer Group Study 0701

The feasibility of the S-1 administration schedules (the 4-week versus the 2-week) showed no significant difference for adjuvant chemotherapy among pathological-Stage IA non–small-cell lung cancer patients.

Objective

The aim of this multicenter study was to determine the appropriate administration schedule for S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected pathological-Stage IA (tumor diameter, 2–3 cm) non–small-cell lung cancer.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of either the 4-week oral administration of S-1 (80–120 mg/body/day) followed by a 2-week rest (Group A), or the 2-week oral administration of S-1 (80–120 mg/body/day) followed by a 1-week rest (Group B). The duration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 1 year in both arms. The primary endpoint was compliance, namely drug discontinuation-free survival, which was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test.

Results

Eighty patients were enrolled in this study, and 76 patients actually received S-1 treatment. The drug discontinuation-free survival rates at 1 year were 49.1% in Group A and 52.7% in Group B (P = 0.373). The means of the relative dose intensities were 55.3% in Group A and 64.6% in Group B (P = 0.237). There were no treatment-related deaths. Patients with grade 3/4 toxicities were significantly more frequent in Group A (40.5%) than in Group B (15.4%, P = 0.021). The 2-year relapse-free survival rates were 97.5% in Group A and 92.5% in Group B, and the 2-year overall survival rates were 100% in both groups.

Conclusions

The feasibility showed no significant difference between the two groups among patients with completely resected Stage IA (tumor diameter, 2–3 cm) non–small-cell lung cancer.

Prognostic Impact of the ABCC11/MRP8 Polymorphism in Adjuvant Oral Chemotherapy with S-1 for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Postoperative 1-year administration of S-1, an oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), was shown to be feasible in lung cancer. The 5-year survival rates of postoperative patients treated with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy and the prognostic impact of clinicopathological factors were examined. Methods: The data of 50 patients with curatively resected pathological stage IB to IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, who were treated with S-1 postoperatively, were analyzed. The prognostic impacts of 22 clinicopathological factors including expressions of the 5-FU pathway enzymes were evaluated. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), i.e. 538G>A (rs17822931), of ABCC11/MRP8, which encodes a 5-FU excretion enzyme that is known as an earwax type determinant, was also evaluated. Results: The 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 72.5 and 67.5%, respectively. A performance status ≥1, lymphatic vessel invasion, blood vessel invasion, and the A/A type of SNP538, which is responsible for the dry earwax type, were significantly associated with shorter relapse-free survivals. In 34 patients who showed a relative performance of 70% or more for chemotherapy, multivariate survival analysis indicated significant hazard ratios only for the A/A type of SNP538 (p = 0.007). Conclusions: S-1 has sufficient power as adjuvant chemotherapy. However, its effect might be small in the dry earwax type patient group in an adjuvant setting.