Evidence for in the appearance of mRNAs of nucleotide excision repair genes, in human ovarian cancer tissues

Nanoparticle-Mediated Gene Silencing for Sensitization of Lung Cancer to Cisplatin Therapy

Platinum-based chemotherapy remains a mainstay treatment for the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A key cellular factor that contributes to sensitivity to platinums is the 5'-3' structure-specific endonuclease excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1)/ xeroderma pigmentosum group F (XPF). ERCC1/XPF is critical for the repair of platinum-induced DNA damage and has been the subject of intense research efforts to identify small molecule inhibitors of its nuclease activity for the purpose of enhancing patient response to platinum-based chemotherapy. As an alternative to small molecule inhibitors, small interfering RNA (siRNA) has often been described to be more efficient in interrupting protein-protein interactions. The goal of this study was therefore to determine whether biocompatible nanoparticles consisting of an amphiphilic triblock copolymer (polyethylenimine-polycaprolactone-polyethylene glycol (PEI-PCL-PEG)) and carrying siRNA targeted to ERCC1 and XPF made by microfluidic assembly are capable of efficient gene silencing and able to sensitize lung cancer cells to cisplatin. First, we show that our PEI-PCL-PEG micelleplexes carrying ERCC1 and XPF siRNA efficiently knocked down ERCC1/XPF protein expression to the same extent as the standard siRNA transfection reagent, Lipofectamine. Second, we show that our siRNA-carrying nanoparticles enhanced platinum sensitivity in a p53 wildtype model of non-small cell lung cancer in vitro. Our results suggest that nanoparticle-mediated targeting of ERCC1/XPF is feasible and could represent a novel therapeutic strategy for targeting ERCC1/XPF in vivo.

Clinical research of individualized therapy in advanced esophageal cancer based on the ERCC1 C8092A genotype

The present study aimed to explore the role and clinical value of the detection of Excision repair cross-complementing 1(ERCC1) C8092A polymorphisms in individualized therapy of patients with advanced esophageal cancer. A total of 127 patients with advanced esophageal cancer were enrolled between January 2010 and January 2014 in Anhui Provincial Hospital. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to a standard treatment group or an individualized treatment group, respectively, prior to ERCC1 C8092A assessment. Patients in the standard treatment group were treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin. The DNA was obtained from the peripheral blood of individualized treatment patients, amplified by PCR and sequenced to determine the ERCC1 C8092A polymorphism prior to the administration of chemotherapies. Patients with the ERCC1 C8092A genotype of A/A or A/C received paclitaxel and cisplatin, and those with the genotype of C/C received paclitaxel and fluorouracil. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). The secondary endpoints included toxicity of chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times. Differences between the groups were evaluated by χ² test. Differences in survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The survival rate was analyzed by log-rank test. Follow-up data was obtained until December 2015. The RR was obtained for 15 patients (34.8%) in the standard treatment group and 45 patients (53.6%) in the individualized treatment group (χ²=3.095; P=0.046). For adverse events, nausea and vomiting and anemia were significantly decreased in the individualized treatment group compared with the standard treatment group (P=0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). The median progression free survival time was 4.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI)3.8-5.0 months] in the standard treatment group and 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.4 months) in the individualized treatment group (P=0.018). The median overall survival time was 11.4 months (95% CI, 10.1-12.7 months) in the standard treatment group and 14.2 months (95% CI, 13.2-15.2 months) in the individualized treatment group (P=0.008). The RR, toxicity of chemotherapy, PFS and OS were significantly improved in the individualized treatment group compared with the standard treatment group. Detection of ERCC1 gene polymorphisms maybe performed for patients with advanced esophageal cancer to improve individualized therapy, which requires additional study.

Prognostic significance of ERCC1 expression in postoperative patients with gastric cancer

AIM

This study explored the correlation between the expression of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) and the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2008, 605 patients who underwent radical surgery in The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled. We conducted the follow-up every 6 months and its contents included a comprehensive medical history, tumor markers and abdominal ultrasound or CT and other imaging findings. Deadline was April 30, 2013 and follow-up time between 51 to 91 months. Survival time is calculated from the date of diagnosis to death or last follow-up date. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to assess the expression of ERCC1 in resected samples. The relationship between ERCC1 expression and survival of patients was investigated. The comparison of count data were analyzed by Chi-square test. Median survival time (MST) and the 5-year survival rate were calculated by life table analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

ERCC1 expression was positive in 412 patients (68.1%). There is no significant difference between ERCC1-positive group and ERCC1-negative group in terms of the MST and 5-year survival rate (P=0.455). The MST and 5-year survival rate have no significant difference (P=0.162) between group with chemotherapy and group with no chemotherapy in patients with ERCC1-positive expression. However, the MST and 5-year survival rate in patients with ERCC1-negative expression benefited more from with chemotherapy (P=0.019). The ERCC1-positive patients survived longer than those ERCC1-negative patients (P=0.183) in subgroup with no adjuvant chemotherapy. In the subgroup analysis, ERCC1 expression had no significant relationship with overall survival in patients with stage II or III gastric cancer (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ERCC1 might be a good prognostic factor for the patients of gastric cancer after radical resection. Patients with ERCC1-negative expression could benefit more from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism predicts response and time to progression to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a Chinese Han population

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) genetic polymorphisms and the clinical efficacy of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 135 chemonaive patients with unresectable advanced NSCLC were treated with gemcitabine/platinum regimens. The polymorphisms of MTHFR C677T, ERCC1 C8092A, and ERCC1 C118T were genotyped using the TaqMan methods.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 28.9%. Patients with MTHFR CC genotype had a higher rate of objective response than patients with variant genotype (TT or CT) (41.2% versus 19.1%, P=0.01). Median time to progression (TTP) of patients with MTHFR CC genotype was longer than that of patients with variant genotype (7.6 months versus 5.0 months, P=0.003). No significant associations were obtained between ERCC1 C118T and C8092A polymorphisms and both response and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest the value of MTHFR C677T polymorphism as a possible predictive marker of response and TTP in advanced NSCLC patients treated with gemcitabine/platinum.

Nucleotide excision repair and anti-cancer chemotherapy

DNA repair is an important effector of anti-cancer drug resistance. In recent years, it has become apparent that DNA repair is an extremely complex process. Processes within DNA repair that may contribute to one or more drug resistance phenotypes include; O-6-alkyltransferase activity, base excision repair, mismatch repair, nucleotide excision repair, and gene specific repair. Clearly, several of these processes may show increased activity within any single cell, or tumor, at any one time. This review attempts to touch briefly upon the question of the distinctions between each of these specific pathways; and then seeks to expand on nucleotide excision repair as a possible effector of cellular and clinical resistance to platinum-based anticancer therapy.

Pre-treatment tumor expression of ERCC1 in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer is not predictive of clinical outcomes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is required for the repair of platinum-induced DNA damage. This study sought to assess the prognostic value of ERCC1 expression, measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a highly specific antibody, in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors were collected from two GOG phase III trials (GOG-172 and GOG-182) of patients with stage III/IV EOC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. ERCC1 was detected by (IHC) using FL297 polyclonal antibody and tumors were categorized as negative or positive, based on nuclear staining of tumor cells. ERCC1 genotyping was performed as previously reported. Associations between ERCC1 expression and clinical characteristics, platinum responsiveness, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 408 eligible patients, 27% had tumors that were ERCC1 positive. ERCC1 expression was not associated with clinical characteristics or platinum-responsiveness. Women with ERCC1-positive versus -negative tumors had similar median PFS (17.9 months versus 17.5 months, respectively, p=0.59), median OS (52.0 months versus 47.0 months, respectively, p=0.30), risk of disease progression (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-1.15, p=0.41), and risk of death (adjusted HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.61-1.07, p=0.14). ERCC1 expression, as measured by IHC, was not associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), in codon 118 and C8092A, of the ERCC1 gene.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCC1 expression, measured by IHC in pre-treatment tumor specimens, using a highly specific antibody, has limited clinical value in patients with advanced EOC treated with platinum and taxane based chemotherapy.

Pre-treatment tumor expression of ERCC1 in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer is not predictive of clinical outcomes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is required for the repair of platinum-induced DNA damage. This study sought to assess the prognostic value of ERCC1 expression, measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a highly specific antibody, in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors were collected from two GOG phase III trials (GOG-172 and GOG-182) of patients with stage III/IV EOC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. ERCC1 was detected by (IHC) using FL297 polyclonal antibody and tumors were categorized as negative or positive, based on nuclear staining of tumor cells. ERCC1 genotyping was performed as previously reported. Associations between ERCC1 expression and clinical characteristics, platinum responsiveness, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 408 eligible patients, 27% had tumors that were ERCC1 positive. ERCC1 expression was not associated with clinical characteristics or platinum-responsiveness. Women with ERCC1-positive versus -negative tumors had similar median PFS (17.9 months versus 17.5 months, respectively, p=0.59), median OS (52.0 months versus 47.0 months, respectively, p=0.30), risk of disease progression (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-1.15, p=0.41), and risk of death (adjusted HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.61-1.07, p=0.14). ERCC1 expression, as measured by IHC, was not associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), in codon 118 and C8092A, of the ERCC1 gene.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCC1 expression, measured by IHC in pre-treatment tumor specimens, using a highly specific antibody, has limited clinical value in patients with advanced EOC treated with platinum and taxane based chemotherapy.

Gene expression and effects of orally active derivatives of fluoropyrimidine on gastric and colorectal cancer

The effects of chemotherapy on gastrointestinal cancer are influenced by the chemotherapeutic sensitivity of the cancer cells. Determining the expression of genes related to chemotherapeutic sensitivity has been used as a molecular method. The aim of the study was to clarify the relationships between the expression of genes related to chemotherapeutic sensitivity and the effects of orally active derivatives of fluoropyrimidine on gastric and colorectal cancer. Forty-five patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy containing orally active derivatives of fluoropyrimidine after undergoing curative surgery for gastric or colorectal cancer were enrolled. Twenty-four patients had colorectal cancer and 21 patients had gastric cancer. Total RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of the resected tumors, and the expression of 11 genes was measured using the RT-PCR method. We then analyzed the relationships between the gene expression and the postoperative relapse rate as well as the relationships between clinicopathological factors and postoperative relapse rate. The median observation period of the subjects was 41 months. Twelve out of the 21 gastric cancer patients (57%) and 11 out of the 24 colorectal cancer patients (46%) relapsed. Although the results of a univariate analysis revealed that expression of none of the evaluated genes was related to relapse in the gastric cancer patients, excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) overexpression was related to the relapse rate in colorectal cancer patients (p=0.023). When 1.295 was set as the cut-off value for ERCC1 overexpression using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, 67% of patients with ERCC1 overexpression and 25% of patients without ERCC1 overexpression relapsed. The relapse-free survival rate was lower in the group with ERCC1 overexpression than in the group without ERCC1 overexpression (p=0.046). ERCC1 overexpression appears to be a useful predictor of relapse in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy with regimens including orally active derivatives of fluoropyrimidine.

The potential role of pharmacogenomic and genomic in the adjuvant treatment of early stage non small cell lung cancer

Although notable progress has been made in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, this disease is still associated with a poor prognosis. Despite early-stage NSCLC is considered a potentially curable disease following complete resection, the majority of patients relapse and eventually die after surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival, altough the absolute improvement in 5-year overall survival is only approximately 5%.Trying to understand the role of genes which could affect drug activity and response to treatment is a major challenge for establishing an individualised chemotherapy according to the specific genetic profile of each patient. Among genes involved in the DNA repair system, the excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) is a useful markers of clinical resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. In the International Lung Cancer Trial (IALT) adjuvant chemotherapy significantly prolonged survival among patients with ERCC1 negative tumors but not among ERCC1-positive patients. BRCA1 and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1), two other key enzymes in DNA synthesis and repair, appear to be modulators of drug sensitivity and may provide additional information for customizing adjuvant chemotherapy.Several clinical trials suggest that overexpression of class III beta-tubulin is an adverse prognostic factor in cancer since it could be responsible for resistance to anti-tubulin agents. A retrospective analysis of NCIC JBR.10 trial showed that high tubulin III expression is associated with a higher risk of relapse following surgery alone but also with a higher probability of benefit from adjuvant cisplatin plus vinorelbine chemotherapy.Finally, the use of gene expression patterns such as the lung metagene model could provide a potential mechanism to refine the estimation of a patient's risk of disease recurrence and could affect treatment decision in the management of early stage of NSCLC.In this review we will discuss the potential role of pharmacogenomic approaches to guide the medical treatment of early stage NSCLC.

Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 Enzyme as a Molecular Determinant of Responsiveness to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for non Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Although platinum-based chemotherapy remains the “standard” in advanced non small-cell lung cancer, not all patients derive clinical benefit from such a treatment. Hence, the development of predictive biomarkers able to identify lung cancer patients who are most likely to benefit from cisplatin-based chemotherapy has become a scientific priority. Among the molecular pathways involved in DNA damage control after chemotherapy, the nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a critical process for the repair of DNA damage caused by cisplatin-induced DNA adducts. Many reports have explored the role of the excision repair cross-complementation group 1 enzyme (ERCC1) expression in the repair mechanism of cisplatin-induced DNA adducts in cancer cells.

Using immunohistochemistry in resected tumors from patients included in the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial, the study of important biomarkers showed that high ERCC1 protein expression was associated with improved survival in chemo-naïve patients. On the contrary, the benefit of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy was more profound in patients with low ERCC1 expression. In a prospective cohort studying mRNA expression in tumor biopsies from patients receiving customized therapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine depending on the molecular profile of the tumour, results showed that patients with low ERCC1 mRNA expression had a longer median survival compared to those with high expression. These data suggest the potent use of ERCC1 as a molecular predictor of clinical resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting of NSCLC. Nevertheless, optimization of methodology, including standardization of technical procedures, as well as validation of ERCC1 protein expression in large prospective cohorts, seem necessary before any routine immunohistochemical validation of ERCC1 can be implemented in daily practice.

Excision Repair Cross Complementation Group 1 Immunohistochemical Expression Predicts Objective Response and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients Treated by Cisplatin-Based Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the correlation of excision repair cross complementation group 1 (ERCC1) immunohistochemical expression with objective tumor response and cancer-specific survival in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The initial cohort was composed of 107 patients who were treated from 1992 to 1996 by an induction chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. p53 mutations had previously been studied. Pretherapeutic biopsy samples from 96 patients with a known tumor response were available. Two independent observers blinded to clinical annotations evaluated ERCC1 immunohistochemical expression.

RESULTS

Of 96 patients, 68 (71%; 95% confidence interval, 61-79%) had tumors that expressed ERCC1 intensively and diffusely. Using the logistic regression method, the 28 (29%) patients with tumors expressing ERCC1 at lower levels had a 4-fold greater odds of benefiting from an objective response to chemotherapy (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-13.4; P = 0.01) compared with the group of 68 patients with high ERCC1 expression. ERCC1 and p53 status, but not their interaction, were independent predictors of tumor response. In a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted on age, TNM stage, tumor differentiation, and tumor localization, ERCC1 low expression was associated with a lower risk of cancer death (risk ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.90; P = 0.04) whereas p53 status had no prognostic value.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that those patients characterized by low ERCC1 expression are more likely to benefit from cisplatin induction chemotherapy compared with patients with high ERCC1 expression.