Distal ulna hook plate fixation for unstable distal ulna fracture associated with distal radius fracture

Treatment of the Distal Forearm Fracture by Volar Dual Window Approach

BACKGROUND

Distal forearm fractures were defined as distal radius fractures with concomitant distal ulna fractures, except ulna styloid fractures. Distal forearm fractures are common among geriatric populations, particularly those with osteoporosis. Conventionally, distal forearm fractures are reduced by a double incision approach; however, malreduction and instability of the distal radioulnar joint were not uncommon. We introduced a modified volar dual window approach to treat the distal forearm fracture and evaluate the functional outcomes and complications.

METHODS

From January 2020 to June 2023, 13 patients with distal forearm fractures underwent open reduction by the modified dual window approach with locking plate fixation. After surgery, splints were applied for two weeks, and the patients underwent postoperative hand therapy for three months. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, range of motions, grip strength, postoperative radiographic parameters, and complications data were collected.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 12.1 months, and the mean age was 52.3 years. Average wrist flexion was 67°, extension 69°, pronation 81°, and supination 79°. Grip strength was 28.3 ± 11.5 kg, which was 88% of the uninjured opposite side. The Visual Analog Scale score during activities was recorded as 0.5 ± 0.9. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 14 ± 11.5. The postoperative radiographic parameters were as follows: radial height: 10.8 ± 1.7 mm, radial inclination: 22.6 ± 3.7°, volar tilting: 4.0 ± 3.9°, and ulnar variance: -0.4 ± 1.4 mm. All the patients achieved bone union at the final follow-up. Two patients underwent ulnar implant removal due to irritation symptoms. Neither infection, nor neurovascular injury, nor malreduction developed in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified volar dual window approach can achieve good wrist function and distal forearm fracture reduction without increasing neurovascular or wound healing complications. This method is an alternative approach for distal forearm fracture, especially in comminuted distal ulna fracture or distal radioulnar joint incongruity.

Comparative analysis of tension band wiring and hook plate fixation in ulnar styloid fractures: a focus on fracture type

INTRODUCTION

Various surgical techniques for ulnar styloid fractures (USFs) fixation have recently been developed, the actual clinical outcomes have not been discussed in detail. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of tension band wiring (TBW) and hook plate fixation in the treatment of USFs and to explore effective management strategies for these fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 109 patients with styloid process fractures from March 2016 to July 2020. Among them, patients aged 21-75 years who required surgical intervention for USFs with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability, with or without accompanying distal radius fracturs (DRFs), were included. The patients were treated with either TBW (group T) or hook plate fixation (group P). The fractures were classified into four types based on their location and complexity. Postoperative assessments were conducted using radiographic analysis to monitor fracture healing. Clinical evaluations, including range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and patient-reported outcomes using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores and the visual analog scale for pain, were performed, at multiple time points up to a year after surgery. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare outcomes across fracture types and treatment methods.

RESULTS

Osseous union was achieved in 96% of the patients. Specifically, the time to union in types 3 and 4 fractures was significantly shorter in group P than in group T. Functionally, ROM assessments showed similar flexion-extension in both groups but better pronation-supination in group T. Grip strength and patient-reported outcomes did not show significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TBW offers slight ROM benefits for type 2 USFs, whereas hook plate fixation provides superior stability for complex types 3 and 4 USFs. Despite the minimal differences in ROM, the enhanced advantages of the hook plate fixation make it the preferred choice for severe fractures, ensuring faster healing.

Management of Very Distal Ulna Fractures: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize all-cause complications and reoperations data, and secondary clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes after the management of very distal ulna fractures (VDUFs) either nonoperatively or operatively.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for English-language articles from inception to February 17, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting the nonoperative or operative management of VDUFs were eligible for inclusion. VDUFs were defined as either being Q2-Q5 distal ulna fractures using the OTA/AO Comprehensive Classification of Fractures for distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fractures or being amenable to characterization by the classification system for ulnar head, neck and metaphyseal fractures by Biyani et al.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted data from included studies. Study validity was assessed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Seventeen studies (512 VDUFs) were included for analysis. There were 209, 237, and 66 fractures in the nonoperative, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and distal ulna resection groups, respectively. Descriptive statistics including weighted mean values, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of VDUFs with nonoperative management, ORIF, or distal ulna resection may all be acceptable treatment options in specific patient populations. Nonoperative management of VDUFs is a promising treatment strategy even for complex fracture patterns in patients 65 years of age or older. Despite higher reoperation rates, ORIF may be considered for the younger, high-demand patient. Distal ulna resection presents with very favorable functional outcomes in patients 65 years of age or older presenting with a complex VDUF with the lowest reoperation rate across all groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture

Background

Distal ulna head or neck fracture is commonly associated with distal radius fracture. Treatment of these fractures remains controversial. Plate osteosynthesis is commonly performed. The purpose of this study was to observe clinical and radiological outcomes in ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for distal ulna fracture associated with distal radius fracture.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study between 2010 and 2018 included patients presenting combined displaced distal ulna fracture and distal radius fracture who were treated with ulna hook plate osteosynthesis. Patient evaluation included pain measurement with the visual analog scale, wrist range of motion, grip and pinch strengths, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and Mayo wrist score. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed to classify the distal ulna fracture according to Biyani. Bone union was evaluated on postoperative X-rays. At final follow-up, the usual radiographic parameters were measured and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) osteoarthritis was assessed.

Results

A total of 48 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years old and mean follow-up was 28 months. According to the Biyani classification, there were 12 type I, 4 type II, 8 type III, and 24 type IV distal ulna fractures. Wrist flexion was 60°, extension 57°, pronation 85°, and supination 80°. Grip strength was 21 kg (86% of the uninjured opposite side). Pinch strength was 6.6 kg (92% of the uninjured opposite side). Clinical scores were very good to excellent, with a mean Q-DASH of 12 and a Mayo wrist score of 90. Discomfort or pain due to the implant that required implant removal was reported in 29%, and was higher in younger patients. Nonunion was observed in two cases and secondary implant displacement in one case. These three cases required secondary intervention with ulna head resection, which was higher in Biyani type IV. DRUJ osteoarthritis was observed in 12 patients (31%) and was higher in older patients.

Conclusions

Ulna hook plate fixation gives good clinical results and a high rate of fracture union, but complications are common. Implant irritation is a frequent complication, especially in young patients, and often requires implant removal.

Level of evidence: IV

Outcomes of distal ulna locking plate in management of unstable distal ulna fractures: a prospective case series

INTRODUCTION

Given the absence of a satisfying plate system to deal with multifragmentary or subcapital distal ulnar fractures, the Distal Ulna Locking Plate (DUL, I.T.S. GmbH, Graz, Austria) could become a useful treatment option. This study aimed to evaluate the results of this anatomically pre-contoured plate regarding patients with unstable or displaced distal ulnar fractures.

METHODS

In a prospective clinical trial, 20 patients (18 female, two male; mean age 70 years (24-91 years)) with unstable or displaced distal ulna fractures between December 2010 and August 2015 were analyzed. All patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the DUL. They were evaluated at three follow-up appointments at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively regarding their bone healing, ulnar variance (UV), range of motion (ROM) and grip strength. Patient related outcomes were measured using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The results after one year were compared to the outcome of the healthy contralateral side.

RESULTS

All fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the Distal Ulna Locking Plate healed within 6 months and showed stable ulnar variances after surgery. ROM (rotational plane 81.1 ± 9.0°, sagittal plane 55.1 ± 14.6°, frontal plane 33.0 ± 9.4°) and grip strength (18.7 ± 7.1 N) at the follow-up after 12 month had similar values compared with the uninjured side. The mean DASH score (36.4 ± 29.0), the PRWE-score (14.5 ± 27.0), and the VAS (at rest 0.5 ± 1.1, during activity 1.2 ± 2.4) after one year had no significant difference to the uninjured side. The surgeon's overall satisfaction rate regarding plate handling reached 81.8%.

CONCLUSION

Stabilization of unstable distal ulna fractures using the DUL restores nearly normal anatomy and function. Its pre-countered design, volar placement, and enhanced stability present a satisfying plate system.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

 The trial was retrospectively Registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov on 16 December 2021 (Trial Registration Number: NCT05329012).

Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures are often found in conjunction with distal radius fractures. However, there is no consensus on optimal management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures would improve outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients treated for distal radial fractures over a 4-year period at our trauma center were identified, and their medical records were analyzed. Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. All radius fractures were fixed using a volar locking plate. Fourteen ulnar fractures were treated with surgical fixation, and nine were treated conservatively. Data were collected on patient demographics, mechanism of injury, whether it was a closed or open fracture, Gustilo classification, AO/OTA classification, immobilization period, follow-up period, and type of treatment. Physical findings comprising the active range of motion and grip strength and radiological findings, including the ulnar variance compared to the healthy side and bone union, were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, but the arc of dorsi-palmar flexion was more restricted in the operative group than in the conservative group. Other results were not significantly different between the two groups. Discussion: Fixation of distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be challenging, and several studies have shown the validity of conservative treatments. This supports the view that if the distal radius fracture is anatomically and rigidly fixed, distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be successfully managed conservatively. Conclusion: Our results did not show any merit in the simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures. Thus, needless surgery should be avoided.

Finite element analysis of different locking plate fixation methods for the treatment of ulnar head fracture

Background

Ulnar head fractures are increasingly higher with the growing proportion of the elderly people. Failure to achieve a stable anatomic reduction of ulna head fracture may lead to a distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dysfunction and nonunion of the distal radius. Due to the lack of the postoperative reporting outcomes and the biomechanical studies, it has not been well established about the optimal management of the comminuted distal ulna head fracture. Hence, the purpose of this study is to use finite element analysis to explain the advantages and disadvantages of ulnar-side locking plate fixation compared with dorsal-side locking plate fixation and its screw arrangement in the treatment of ulnar head fractures.

Methods

FE models of the ulnar head fracture and the models of ulnar-side locking plate and dorsal-side plate with two or three distal screws was constructed. In order to simulate forces acting on the ulnar and the osteosynthesis material during daily-life activity in subjects who underwent reconstructive surgery, we applied three loading conditions to each model, viz. 20 N axial compression, 50 N axial compression, 1 N∙m torsion moment, 1 N∙m lateral bending moments, and 1 N∙m extension bending moments. Under these conditions, values of the von Mises stress (VMS) distribution of the implant, peak VMS, the relative displacement of the head and shaft fragments between the fracture ends and the displacement and its direction of the models were investigated.

Results

The stress values of ulnar-side plates were lower than those of dorsal-side plates. And the ulnar-plate fixation system also has smaller maximum displacement and relative displacement. When adding a screw in the middle hole of the ulnar head, the values of model displacement and the peak stress in fixation system are lower, but it may evidently concentrate the stress on the middle screw.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study indicated that ulnar-side locking plates resulted in a lower stress distribution in the plate and better stability than dorsal-side locking plates for ulnar head fracture fixation. Adding an additional screw to the ulnar head could increase the stability of the fixation system and provide an anti-torsion function. This study requires clinical confirmation of its practicality in the treatment of ulnar head fractures. This study requires clinical confirmation as to its practicality in the treatment of ulnar head fracture.

Comparative Study of Internal Fixation of the Ulna and Distal Ulna Resection in Patients Older Than 70 Years With Distal Radius and Distal Metaphyseal Ulna Fractures

Background: Acute management of fractures of the distal ulna that are associated with fractures of the distal radius remains difficult, particularly in the elderly. Methods: In this study, we investigated whether internal fixation of the distal ulna is associated with a higher rate of complications than resection of the distal ulna in patients older than 70 years. Twenty-four consecutive patients were included in this study, 12 of whom had undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the distal ulna, and 12 who had undergone distal ulna resection. Patients were retrospectively assessed for range of motion, grip strength, pain, and radiographic appearance. The functional outcome was evaluated by the Mayo Wrist Score. Complications were classified according to the Classification of Surgical Complications. Results: There were no differences in patient demographics between the 2 groups, except patient age. Clinical evaluation showed no difference at follow-up; however, there were significantly more complications associated with ORIF compared with resection. Conclusions: The results from our study show that women older than 70 years with fracture of the distal radius and distal ulna have a higher rate of complications if ORIF of the distal ulna is performed. Patients should be warned, by surgeons, of this in cases where ORIF of the distal ulna is suggested.

LCP distal ulna plate fixation of irreducible or unstable distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fracture

PURPOSE

The advent of locking compression plate (LCP) has provided convenient and secure fixation of distal ulna fractures. This study was performed to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes following LCP distal ulna plate fixation of irreducible or unstable distal ulna fractures with concomitant distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 17 patients who had been treated with LCP distal ulna plates for distal ulna fractures was performed. The average age of the patients was 58.9 years (range 21-87 years), and the mean follow-up period was 15 months (range 12-20 months). This study consisted of eleven fractures involving metaphysis and six ulna styloid base fractures. Fracture union, radiologic parameters, stability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), and functional outcomes, including ROM, grip strength, and functional scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients showed bony union, the average radial height was 10.5 mm, and the ulnar variance was 0.8 mm on final radiographs. None of the patients had instability of the DRUJ compared with the opposite wrist, and the subluxation ratio was within normal range on the follow-up CT scan. There were 6 excellent and 11 good cases according to Sarmiento's modified wrist score at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Locking compression plate distal ulna plate fixation of irreducible or unstable distal ulna fractures after stabilization of concomitant distal radius fractures showed favorable results in union, alignment, and functional outcomes and therefore could be one of the recommendable implant options for distal ulna fractures.