Cryoablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in AVNRT: Same Goal, Different Strategy

Cryoablation for the treatment of chronic rhinitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

ClariFix is a novel intranasal cryotherapy device developed for clinic-based cryosurgical ablation of the posterior nasal nerves region. As a relatively new technology, there is a paucity of studies within the literature assessing the efficacy and safety profile of ClariFix for chronic rhinitis.

METHODS

A systematic review was completed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included: Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Pubmed, Cochrane and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies investigating the use of ClariFix in chronic rhinitis (i.e., allergic and non-allergic rhinitis) in patients of all ages.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 1110 studies. Final analysis consisted of 8 articles, evaluating a total of 472 patients. The data showed a significant reduction in scores post-treatment across all studies based on validated outcome measures. In all studies, at all time intervals, there was a significant improvement in outcome scores from baseline. Minor adverse effects included post-procedural pain and discomfort, headache and palate numbness. No major adverse events were identified.

CONCLUSION

ClariFix is a novel intranasal cryotherapy device that was introduced in Canada in 2021. This is the first systematic review evaluating its efficacy and safety profile. Across all studies, there was a significant reduction in validated outcome scores at multiple time intervals. Further, the treatment is safe with only minor adverse effects reported by patients. Overall, the consensus from this study highlights an apparent benefit in using this intervention for chronic rhinitis that is refractory to medical management.

Remote magnetic navigation shows superior long-term outcomes in pediatric atrioventricular (nodal) tachycardia ablation compared to manual radiofrequency and cryoablation

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) is the first-choice treatment for tachyarrhythmia in children. Currently available CA techniques differ in mechanism of catheter navigation and energy sources. There are no large studies comparing long-term outcomes between available CA techniques in a pediatric population with atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) or atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) mechanisms.

Objective

This study aimed to compare procedural and long-term outcomes of remote magnetic navigation-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation (RMN), manual-guided RF ablation (MAN) and manual-guided cryoablation (CRYO).

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study included all first consecutive CA procedures for AVRT or AVNRT performed in children without structural heart disease from 2008 to 2019. Three study groups were defined by the ablation technique used: RMN, MAN or CRYO. Primary outcome was long-term recurrence of tachyarrhythmia.

Results

In total, we included 223 patients, aged 14 (IQR 12-16) years; weighting 56 (IQR 47-65) kilograms. In total, 108 procedures were performed using RMN, 76 using MAN and 39 using CRYO. RMN had significantly lower recurrence rates compared to MAN and CRYO at mean follow-up of 5.5 ± 2.9 years (AVRT: 4.3% versus 15.6% versus 54.5%, P < 0.001; AVNRT: 7.7% versus 8.3% versus 35.7%, P = 0.008; for RMN versus MAN versus CRYO respectively). In AVNRT ablation, RMN had significantly lower fluoroscopy doses compared to CRYO [30 (IQR 20-41) versus 45 (IQR 29-65) mGy, P = 0.040).

Conclusion

In pediatric patients without structural heart disease who underwent their first AV(N)RT ablation, RMN has superior long-term outcomes compared to MAN and CRYO, in addition to favorable fluoroscopy doses.

Recurrent single echo beats after cryoablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: The pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Cryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is effective and safe with a reported limitation of lower success and higher recurrence rates. We have observed cases in which slow pathway conduction was eliminated as demonstrated by atrial extra-stimulus testing within 1 min of cryo-energy delivery but returned following tissue rewarming. Frequently, slow pathway conduction persisted despite multiple acutely successful lesions over a broad anatomic region. We aimed to determine if return of slow pathway conduction after elimination during cryoablation represents a risk for recurrent AVNRT with the same intermediate term results as slow pathway ablation. We hypothesize that remnant single echo beats in the absence of sustained slow pathway conduction and inducible AVNRT is an acceptable end point after clear slow pathway elimination during cryoablation.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing attempted slow pathway ablation for AVNRT using solely cryoablation between January 2015-January 2018.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria with at-least 2 features of dual AVN physiology. 19 patients had return of slow pathway conduction shortly after clear elimination during cryoablation (Group A) while 25 did not (Group B). All in Group A had recurrent single echo beats but none had sustained slow pathway conduction at the end of the procedure nor AVNRT recurrence at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent single echo beats with absent sustained slow pathway conduction and non-inducible AVNRT may be an acceptable endpoint for slow pathway ablation of AVNRT using cryoablation when there is elimination of slow pathway demonstrated during energy delivery.