Autoimmune encephalitis: A potentially reversible cause of status epilepticus, epilepsy, and cognitive decline

Predictors and prognoses of epilepsy after anti-neuronal antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and predictors of epilepsy after anti-neuronal antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis (AIE). The clinical outcomes of patients with epilepsy after AIE were also explored.

METHODS

A total of 111 AIE patients were retrospectively evaluated. Post-AIE epilepsy (PAEE) was defined as at least one unprovoked seizure occurring six or more months after discharge from hospital.

RESULTS

The incidence of acute symptomatic seizures was 80.2% (89/111) in our AIE patients. Furthermore, of the 89 AIE patients with seizures, 29 (32.6%) presented with seizures as the initial symptom. Overall, 44 out of 111 AIE patients (39.6%) had unprovoked seizures after six months, meeting our definition of PAEE. The independent risk factors for PAEE incidence included an initial presentation with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), delayed immunotherapy treatment, the complication of a lung infection during admission, the requirement for mechanical ventilation during hospitalization, parietal lesions observed in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and focal slow waves on electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Early initiation of immunotherapy and lung infection treatment may reduce the risk of conversion of symptomatic seizures to chronic epilepsy in the acute phase of AIE. In general, PAEE patients could have a good prognosis if treated properly and in a timely fashion.

Predisposing factors and prognosis of status epilepticus in patients with autoimmune encephalitis

The aim of this study was to study the predisposing factors and prognosis of status epilepticus (SE) in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE).A total of 227 cases of AE were collected from the inpatient department of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2010 to May 2018. All patients met the 2015 criteria for the diagnosis of AE. The binary logistic regression model was used to multivariate and retrospective chart analysis the predisposition factors for SE and its prognostic factors.Of the 227 patients with AE, 50 (22.03%) had SE during hospitalization, and 19 patients with SE had a poor prognosis (modified Rankin score MRS = 3-6), and 7 patients with no SE had a poor prognosis. In the logistic regression model, electroencephalograms (EEGs) abnormalities (P = .000) and head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities (P = .003) were associated with a predisposition to SE, while Glasgow scores <8 (P = .027), abnormal EEG (P = .046), delayed immunotherapy (P = .012), and SE duration at admission lasting >30 minutes (P = .023) were risk factors for a poor prognosis of SE.SE is a common complication in patients with AE. EEG and MRI abnormalities may be predisposing factors for SE. Glasgow scores <8 points, abnormal EEG, delayed immunotherapy, and SE duration lasting >30 minutes at admission are risk factors for a poor prognosis in patients with SE.

Antibody Negative Autoimmune Encephalitis- Does it Differ from Definite One?

Context

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is an emerging cause of non-infective encephalitis, presentations of which vary widely. Traditionally the diagnosis of AE is based on detection of antibodies in a patient with clinical picture suggestive of AE.

Aim

To evaluate the clinical characteristics and response to immunotherapy in patients with antibody negative autoimmune encephalitis and to compare them with definite cases.

Settings and Design

A prospective follow-up study was done in patients presenting with presumptive symptoms of AE from January 2017 to January 2019. The study was done in a tertiary care institute of Northern India.

Patients and Methods

Demographic and clinical parameters were noted and relevant investigations for management were done according to well-defined protocol. The patients were treated with immunomodulatory therapy in the form of steroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). They were followed up for treatment response and relapse at 2 monthly intervals.

Statistical Analysis Used

The data was expressed as either proportions or mean/median. Chi-square test/Independent T test was used to compare antibody positive and antibody negative group.

Results

Out of 31 patients with presumptive AE, 16 patients tested positive for autoimmune antibodies (definite AE). Incidences of seizure, behavioral abnormalities, dementia and altered sensorium were similar between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Complete or partial response was seen in all treated patients in both groups with no significant difference (p 0.716). CSF protein concentration and cellularity were higher in the definite group although only high protein concentration could reach statistical significance (p 0.002). Malignancy could be confirmed after extensive search in 2 out of 16 patients with definite AE and in 1 out of 15 antibody negative AE patients.

Conclusions

Clinical presentation of antibody negative cases does not differ significantly from definite ones. Since treatment response is also similar in both the groups, starting immunotherapy in a patient presenting with presumptive symptoms of AE, while ruling out other common mimickers, seems to be the need of the hour in the management of this evolving entity.

Admission diagnoses of patients later diagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis

BACKGROUND

Since the detection of autoantibodies against neuronal surface antigens, autoimmune encephalitis (AE) has been more frequently diagnosed, especially in patients with symptoms typical of limbic encephalitis, such as seizures, short-term memory deficits, or psychosis. However, the clinical spectrum of AE may be much wider, making correct clinical diagnosis difficult.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed symptoms and admission diagnoses at first clinical presentation in 50 AE patients. We included patients with a clinical diagnosis of AE for whom a FDG-PET imaging was available. Final diagnoses were re-evaluated by a blinded investigator according to the most recent consensus suggestions published in 2016 for AE diagnostic criteria. We additionally describe two patients with Morvan syndrome who showed CASPR2 antibodies.

RESULTS

In 40 patients (80.0%), the clinical presentation at first admission was typical for AE. Ten patients (20.0%) initially suffered from atypical symptoms; among these patients, isolated headache and cerebellar dysfunction were most frequent (three patients each). However, an initial diagnosis of suspected encephalitis was only reached in 16 patients (32.0%), nine (18.0) of which were suspected to have infectious encephalitis, and seven (14.0%) patients were suspected to have AE. In 34 patients (68.0%), a diagnosis other than encephalitis was considered, (e.g., epilepsy, psychiatric diseases, transient ischemic attack, dementia, meningitis, and cerebellitis).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show the broad spectrum of initial symptoms of AE; the correct initial diagnosis of AE is often missed or delayed. Hence, clinicians in neurological and psychiatric hospitals should consider AE in the differential diagnosis of cases with atypical clinical presentations.

Updates in Refractory Status Epilepticus

Refractory status epilepticus is defined as persistent seizures despite appropriate use of two intravenous medications, one of which is a benzodiazepine. It can be seen in up to 40% of cases of status epilepticus with an acute symptomatic etiology as the most likely cause. New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a recently coined term for refractory status epilepticus where no apparent cause is found after initial testing. A large proportion of NORSE cases are eventually found to have an autoimmune etiology needing immunomodulatory treatment. Management of refractory status epilepticus involves treatment of an underlying etiology in addition to intravenous anesthetics and antiepileptic drugs. Alternative treatment options including diet therapies, electroconvulsive therapy, and surgical resection in case of a focal lesion should be considered. Short-term and long-term outcomes tend to be poor with significant morbidity and mortality with only one-third of patients reaching baseline neurological status.

MicroRNA-129-5p inhibits the development of autoimmune encephalomyelitis-related epilepsy by targeting HMGB1 through the TLR4/NF-kB signaling pathway

The study aimed to explore the effects of microRNA-129-5p (miR-129-5p) on the development of autoimmune encephalomyelitis (AE)-related epilepsy by targeting HMGB1 through the TLR4/NF-kB signaling pathway in a rat model. AE-related epilepsy models were established. Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into control, model, miR-129-5p mimics, miR-129-5p inhibitor, HMGB1 shRNA, TLR4/NF-kB (TLR4/NF-kB signaling pathway was inhibited) and miR-129-5p mimics+HMGB1 shRNA groups respectively. Latency to a first epilepsy seizure attack was recorded. Neuronal injuries in the hippocampus regions were detected using HE, Nissl and FJB staining methods 24h following model establishment. Microglial cells were detected by OX-42 immunohistochemistry. Expressions of miR-129-5p, HMGB1 and TLR4/NF-kB signaling pathway-related proteins were detected by qRT-PCR. Protein expressions of HMGB1 and TLR4/NF-kB signaling pathway-related proteins were detected by Western blotting. Dual luciferase reporter gene assay showed that miR-129-5p was negatively targeting HMGB1. Neurons of hippocampal tissues in rats were heavily injured by an injection of lithium chloride. Compared with the model and control groups, neuronal injury of the hippocampus and AE-related epilepsy decreased and microglial cells increased in the miR-129-5p mimics, HMGB1 shRNA and TLR4/NF-kB groups; however, in the miR-129-5p inhibitor group, miR-129-5p expression decreased, HMGB1 expression increased, TLR4/NF-kB signaling pathway was activated, latency to a first epilepsy seizure attack was shortened, and neuronal injury increased. This study provides evidence that miR-129-5p inhibits the development of AE-related epilepsy by suppressing HMGB1 expression and inhibiting TLR4/NF-kB signaling pathway.

Is Favorable Outcome Possible After Prolonged Refractory Status Epilepticus?

When status epilepticus (SE) remains refractory to appropriate therapy, it is associated with high mortality and with substantial morbidity in survivors. Many outcome predictors such as age, seizure type, level of consciousness before treatment, and mostly, etiology, are well-established. A longer duration of SE is often associated with worse outcome, but duration may lose its prognostic value after several hours. Several terms and definitions have been used to describe prolonged, refractory SE, including "malignant SE," "prolonged" SE, and more recently, "super refractory" SE, defined as "SE that has continued or recurred despite 24 hours of general anesthesia (or coma-inducing anticonvulsants)." There are few data available regarding the outcome of prolonged refractory SE, and even fewer for SE remaining refractory to anesthetic drugs. This article reviews reports of outcome after prolonged, refractory, and "super refractory" SE. Most information detailing the clinical outcome of patients surviving these severe illnesses, in which seizures can persist for days or weeks (and especially those concerning "super-refractory" SE) come from case reports and retrospective cohort studies. In many series, prolonged, refractory SE has a mortality of 30% to 50%, and several studies indicate that most survivors have a substantial decline in functional status. Nevertheless, several reports demonstrate that good functional outcome is possible even after several days of SE and coma induction. Treatment of refractory SE should not be withdrawn from younger patients without structural brain damage at presentation solely because of the duration of SE.

Evaluation of positive and negative predictors of seizure outcomes among patients with immune-mediated epilepsy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to analyze published literature on autoimmune epilepsy and assess predictors of seizure outcome.

METHODS

From PubMed and EMBASE databases, two reviewers independently identified publications reporting clinical presentations, management and outcomes of patients with autoimmune epilepsy. A meta-analysis of 46 selected studies was performed. Demographic/clinical variables (sex, age, clinical presentation, epilepsy focus, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] characteristics, time to diagnosis and initiation of immunomodulatory therapy, and type of immunomodulatory therapy) were compared between two outcome groups (responders and nonresponders). Clinical response was defined as >50% reduction in seizure frequency. Unstandardized effect sizes were collected for the studies for responder and nonresponder groups. Sample size was used as the weight in the meta-analysis. The random effects model was used to account for heterogeneity in the studies.

RESULTS

The 46 reports included 186 and 96 patients in responder and nonresponder groups respectively. Mean age of the responders and nonresponders was 43 and 31 years (p < 0.01). Responders were more likely to have cell-surface antibodies (68% versus 39%, p < 0.05), particularly voltage-gated potassium channel complex antibodies (p < 0.01). Mean duration from symptom onset to diagnosis, and symptom onset to initiation of immunomodulation was significantly lower among the responders (75 versus 431 days, p < 0.05, and 80 versus 554, p < 0.01, respectively). There was no outcome difference based on gender, MRI characteristics, seizure type, type of acute immunomodulatory therapy, or use of chronic immunomodulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Among published cases to date, older age, presence of cell-surface antibodies, early diagnosis and immunomodulatory treatment are associated with better seizure outcomes among patients with autoimmune epilepsy.

Limbic Encephalitis Associated With GAD65 Antibodies: Brief Review of the Relevant literature

Recently, many cases of autoimmune limbic encephalitis with positive GAD65 (glutamic acid decarboxylase) antibodies have been described in the scientific literature. However, it remains an understudied topic of great relevance to practicing neurologists. Thus, we report here a review of published cases, in English, of autoimmune limbic encephalitis with this type of antibodies, focusing on presenting symptoms and signs, associated conditions, and findings upon investigation. We also report treatment responses. We aim to offer a better description of the clinical spectrum of autoimmune limbic encephalitis associated with GAD65 antibodies as well as to expose its paraclinical features and outcome.

Differences in epileptic symptoms depending on the type of autoimmune-mediated limbic encephalitis

Limbic encephalitis (LE) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that is characterized by the selective involvement of limbic structures. The clinical manifestations of LE include the acute or sub-acute onset of recent memory disorders, mental disorders and seizures. Autoimmune-mediated LE is a major type of non-infectious LE; seizure is a hallmark of this type of LE. The treatment of epilepsy, which is a key factor that affects the prognosis of LE patients, warrants special attention. Understanding the characteristics of epilepsy caused by autoimmune-mediated LE and providing the appropriate treatment will help to improve patients' outcomes. In this article, we extensively review the literature related to autoimmune-mediated LE epidemiology, mechanisms, characteristics and seizure frequency and onset, and we discuss the possible diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Super-refractory status epilepticus in West China

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the general frequency, mortality, and risk factors of super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) versus non-refractory status epilepticus (NRSE) and refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

This work is a retrospective study. Clinical data of patients who were diagnosed with status epilepticus (SE) in the neurological ward and neuro-intensive care unit of West China Hospital from January 2009 to December 2012 were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were included in the study. The percentages of NRSE, RSE, and SRSE were 67.3%, 20.4%, and 12.2%, respectively. Convulsive SE was the main seizure type among the three groups. The most common cause of NRSE was related to epilepsy (EP). However, 67.7% of SRSE cases were caused by acute encephalitis. Moreover, 47% of SE and 40% of RSE cases had a history of EP, whereas only 8.3% of SRSE cases had such history (P < 0.01). The percentage of patients with STESS ≤2 was lowest in the SRSE group without statistical significance (P > 0.05). The general mortality of SE was 7.1%, whereas that of SRSE was 50%. During follow-up, most SRSE patients who survived have developed symptomatic EP.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first to use the statistical percentage of SRSE. Approximately 12.2% of SE cases will result in SRSE, which is a challenging medical situation for doctors. Patients with first episodes and acute encephalitis were also prone to develop SRSE.

Neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis

In the past few years, many autoimmune encephalitides have been identified, with specific clinical syndromes and associated antibodies against neuronal surface antigens. There is compelling evidence that many of these antibodies are pathogenic and most of these encephalitides are highly responsive to immunotherapies. The clinical spectra of some of these antibody-mediated syndromes, especially those reported in only a few patients, are evolving. Others, such as anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis, are well characterized. Diagnosis involves recognizing the specific syndromes and identifying the antibody in a patient's cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or serum. These syndromes are associated with variable abnormalities in CSF, magnetic resonance imaging, and electroencephalography. Treatment is often multidisciplinary and should be focused upon neutralizing the effects of antibodies and eliminating their source. Overlapping disorders have been noted, with some patients having more than one neurologic autoimmune disease. In other patients, viral infections such as herpes simplex virus encephalitis trigger robust antineuronal autoimmune responses.

Limbic encephalitis: Clinical spectrum and long-term outcome from a developing country perspective

INTRODUCTION

Limbic encephalitis (LE) is characterized by rapidly progressive short-term memory loss, psychiatric symptoms and seizures. We describe the clinical spectrum, underlying etiology and long-term follow-up of patients with LE from India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included patients during the period of January 2009 and December 2011 with the clinical features consistent with LE with one or more of the following: (1) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of temporal lobe involvement; (2) cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory abnormalities, or (3) detection of antineuronal antibodies. Patients with metastasis, infection, metabolic and nutritional deficits, stroke, were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 16 patients (9 females), mean age of presentation was 36.6 years (range 15-69 years). The mean duration of symptoms before presentation was 11 months (range 5 days-2 years). The most common symptom at presentation was short-term memory impairment in 7 patients followed by seizures in 5 and behavioral changes in three. Nine patients had seizures, 11 had change in behavior, language involvement in eight, cerebellar features in 3 and autonomic dysfunction in two. Four patients had associated malignancy, 3 of four presented with neurological symptoms and on investigations found to be have malignancy. Antineuronal antibody testing was done in 6 of 12 non paraneoplastic and two paraneoplastic patients, one positive for N-methyl-D-aspartate and one for anti-Hu antibody. MRI brain showed typical fluid attenuated inversion recovery or T2 bilateral temporal lobe hyperintensities in 50% of patients. At a mean follow-up of 21 months (3-36 months), 10 patients improved, 4 patients remained same and two patients expired.

CONCLUSION

Early recognition of LE is important based upon clinical, MRI data in the absence of antineuronal surface antibody screen in developing nations. Early institution of immunotherapy will help in improvement in outcome of these patients in long-term.